Something went wrong. Try again later
    Follow

    Gettysburg: Armored Warfare

    Game » consists of 1 releases. Released Mar 27, 2012

    Gettysburg: Armored Warfare is a real time strategy and third person shooter hybrid set in an alternate history depiction of the American Civil War.

    mikelemmer's Gettysburg: Armored Warfare (PC) review

    Avatar image for mikelemmer

    A Grand Idea, Horribly Wasted

    Download Size: 4.5 GB

    Time Played: 90 min.

    Players Online (Sunday evening after release): 8

    What I'd Pay: $5

    Steam Price (4/1/12): $10

    I'd like a wargame set in a alternate steampunk Civil War, but not one this half-baked. Between the janky online play, the stiff (sometimes unworkable) controls, and the vague instructions, it's a struggle to find the fun in this game.

    Battlefield: The Prequel
    Battlefield: The Prequel

    The game has a Battlefield setup: first side to run out of tickets loses. You can drain tickets from the enemy by holding control points, but you lose tickets if your men die. Instead of each player controlling just 1 infantry, they can choose between infantry, cavalry, cannons, tanks, and ships, jumping from one to another as they wish. They control like a simplified FPS: WASD to move, left-click to fire, right-click to aim. There's no jumping (except to clamor over fences) and no weapon switching (yet). The meat of the game is in the Army Skirmish mode, where you build your own army and send it out onto the battlefield, controlling it like an RTS.

    Unfortunately, both modes feel broken. The FPS controls feel clunky (the wooden animation doesn't help), while the RTS controls are unexplained and sometimes don't work for vague reasons. While I was trying to play Army Skirmish online, most of my units refused to Target Ground or enter Aggressive Stance. It was a crap shoot to get them to attack a unit. Was it working as intended, or was it a bug? I couldn't tell.

    Tanks: Natural enemy of airships
    Tanks: Natural enemy of airships

    Some of the unit mechanics also feel wrong or imbalanced. Take the airship, for example: the most expensive unit in the game, yet easily taken down by tanks, artillery, and machine guns from anywhere on the map. That's because most of those units have their shells fly in a straight line, gravity be damned. The 2060 artillery is actually better at taking down airships than other ground units; its shells fly in a straight line, and it can't aim low enough to hit the ground on flat land. The RTS fog of war deserves special notice: you can actually see much farther in FPS mode than you see in RTS view, and the RTS view doesn't clearly mark enemy troops; your men can walk right past their men and you'd never know.

    The maps aren't much to write home about, either. I'm not sure if the real-life battlefields they're based on were actually this sparse and barren, but most of the fighting happens in slightly hilly fields split up by stone walls, wooden fences, and some trees. There's few buildings, no roads, and aside from the map's weather, they look too similar for my tastes.

    This feels like an unfinished game, and perhaps with enough patches, it would be interesting & fun. Unfortunately, I don't think its community will last that long: it's barely been a week and already the number of people online during a Sunday evening are in the single-digits.

    Other reviews for Gettysburg: Armored Warfare (PC)

      Causality of War 0

      Remember all the time you spent daydreaming on the idea of going back in time to give the Confederates better technology to fight the Union during the American Civil War? Me neither, but that is the off-kilter premise of developer Radioactive Software’s off-kilter RTS-TPS hybrid, Gettysburg: Armored Warfare.Mixing the ability to take direct control of a single soldier or vehicle in a real-time strategy game is nothing new to the world of gaming, and Gettysburg: Armored Warfare has not set any ge...

      0 out of 0 found this review helpful.

    This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:

    Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

    Comment and Save

    Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.