With the inclusion of 3V3 battles in Black and White, an RTS game isn't far off, right?
I mean, that crazy-ass rock-paper-scissors-ice-electric-whatever-else in an RTS setting would be really fun.
And I would suck at it, like all other RTS games.
Pokémon
The Pokémon franchise has spawned numerous titles and spin-offs, spanning several generations of games and has an animated series that spans many seasons.
Pokemon RTS?
I've thought of this before. It sounds like something that could be really fun. Of course you would have to throw out the limit of 6 pokemon, but then again a 6v6 RTS could work.
Nintendo seems pretty adamant about not changing the basic formula of the game, but this could at least bring a nice refreshing change to the franchise.
Oh well, yet another pokemon game that would be awesome to have, but like the MMO will probably not happen.
We can always hope though!
I can't really see how different aspects that befit RTS games would be done. What would be the resources? What would actually be the buildings where different pokémon are produced? What do you have to destroy to win the game? I think it's an established franchise that doesn't really fit into the genre (Pokémon, I mean).
" @FinalDasa: But it's not Pokémon. Do you actually envision a horde of pikachu going to invade your enemy's base or something? "
They have mini-game collections but they can't make an RTS?
Maybe not give me all your bases but you don't think Nintendo can't put some of their designers behind reinventing this franchise and satisfy both the kids who are keeping it alive and the now adults who started it way back when.
@zonerover:
Pokemon's system is iconic not only because of its simpliciity to get into, but also because of its hidden onion-like layers of depth. Trying to radically change this would not only alienate the Pokemon fan base (and let's be honest, there's a lot of kids amongst that crowd) but it would also throw out all of the subtle complexity which makes the series what it is today.
Subtle innovation is a good thing that keeps the system fresh and provides incentive to play the new game rather than keep the old ones. I don't even really play Pokemon, but I would have to say that its battle system is one of the best in the RPG world due to the fact that the core of it has remained unchanged for all these years, and the reason its remained like that is because people like it. I don't think a radical revolutionary revamp of the core gameplay is what either Nintendo or fans want or expect out of a new Pokemon game.
" @FinalDasa: Yeah, they'd probably figure something out if they actually wanted to make an RTS. But I really don't think that it would please both adults who grew up with the franchise and kids entering it. Pokémon games have a slow start and are quite simple to comprehend, which is appealing to kids. If they made an RTS that was too complex, kids could possibly get frustrated with it and if it was too simple, older people would have no fun playing it. "I agree. But I think they could balance the simplicity and childish nature of pokemon games to at least make them enjoyable and not embarrassing for adults.
They do it with Mario and other IPs but banish pokemon to games like Pokemon Ranch.
But it's Nintendo, so they'd probably hit that balance anyways. Unless, of course, they were only aiming for a specific audience and not universal appeal.
Please Log In to post.
This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:
Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.Comment and Save
Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.
Log in to comment