@ADTR_ZERO: No, I speak to scientists who have and are completing research on this very topic and actually believe that the media doesn't go far enough.
"Because big stories like this bring in big money. I suppose you belive the Earth will end in 2012 because the scientists say that too? What if the scientists said Earth doesn't exist and it's all an illusion and that you can wake up now? Would you believe it because the big bad scientists said so? What if a scientist said the Earth would end in 2000, or 1999, or th-oh wait, I'm pretty sure the super smart scientists DID say that...hmmmmm. "
SCIENCE DOES NOT WORK THAT WAY! "
But mainstream media will say it does to make people believe. "
Then start listening to scientists and not the media. In which case you'll believe in anthropogenic climate change even more.
" The earth does go through cycles but currently we are detecting temperature change that is not accounted for by the earth's cycles. However these changes are miniscule (something like 0.006 degrees Celsius per year), so yes, global warming is still BS. "
Please please please find me a single scientist who believes this and has evidence. "
I don't think I need to. If you can't find one for yourself then well, do you ever leave the house? Or watch the news? "
I need to find a scientific paper saying that the world won't end in 2012?! Surely the null hypothesis is that it won't, as such you need to prove the hypothesis that it will. It's your call.
And as a scientist myself, yes I do read the news and leave the house.
" @ADTR_ZERO: Before you say that we're going through a natural warm cycle, you may be surprised to know that we have been in a warm season for the past 10,000 years. The typical cycle is 10,000 warm, 100,000 cold, 10,000 warm, etc. (that is a generalisation before anyone jumps on the specific numbers, but the point still stands), so we should be going back to cold (and global temperatures were beginning to decline prior to the industrial revolution). "
Yeh pretty much. The time is irrelevent, it's the point of it happening, whether after 5 years or 5,000. "
The timing isn't that irrelevant. But the biggest factor is the temperature range, we were already in a warm period! A further addition of warmth and rate of this extent is unprecedented.
" @ADTR_ZERO: And what about all the scientific evidence and journals, I guess this is all a conspiracy too. Ignorance on anthropogenic climate change is mind-boggling at times. "
And what about the evidence that says otherwise? We have no solid foundation as to whether GW is real, but past climate changes says it's fake. "
I would expect for every piece of evidence which shows that it is not occurring I can find ten times as many backing anthropogenic climate change. But to be honest, I don't wish to get into an argument over this, you are obviously set in your belief that it is a load of rubbish, and any scientific evidence would not alter your thinking. "
I suppose you belive the Earth will end in 2012 because the scientists say that too?
Please please please find me a single scientist who believes this and has evidence.
@ADTR_ZERO: Before you say that we're going through a natural warm cycle, you may be surprised to know that we have been in a warm season for the past 10,000 years. The typical cycle is 10,000 warm, 100,000 cold, 10,000 warm, etc. (that is a generalisation before anyone jumps on the specific numbers, but the point still stands), so we should be going back to cold (and global temperatures were beginning to decline prior to the industrial revolution).
" @ADTR_ZERO: And what about all the scientific evidence and journals, I guess this is all a conspiracy too. Ignorance on anthropogenic climate change is mind-boggling at times. "
And what about the evidence that says otherwise? We have no solid foundation as to whether GW is real, but past climate changes says it's fake. "
I would expect for every piece of evidence which shows that it is not occurring I can find ten times as many backing anthropogenic climate change.
But to be honest, I don't wish to get into an argument over this, you are obviously set in your belief that it is a load of rubbish, and any scientific evidence would not alter your thinking.
" I hate metal too. I just hate the whole attitude and I honestly don't consider most of it to be music (it's all screaming and going as fast as possible on a guitar with little to no rhythm). The fact that the game doesn't even come close to taking it seriously though, makes it really awesome. "
The screaming is genre specific, there are countless metal bands who do not scream. Also to say that they have no rhythm is absolute ignorance. Just because they do not follow a simple 4:4 time scale they have rhythm.
Log in to comment