beatlebrainiac

I hope this isn't considered youtube spam, but yo: this kid looks amazingly similar to how I imagine Jeff looked when he was 11. Not only that, but he's busting out wack-ass rhymes, something else I can imagine a young Jeff doing. Anyone else have the same oh-shit reaction?
 
 

This...is...THE GREATEST!

" @JeffGoldblum said:

" @MrKlorox said:

" @JeffGoldblum said:

" @ColumnBreaker said:

" @cancerdancer said:

" Quality control over the reviews. They send out review copies to the companies they trust. "

Read: Pay. "

Rockstar doesn't have to pay for good scores. "

Nor do they have to make games that deserve them in order to receive them. "

No matter how you personally feel about Rockstar's games, you can't deny that they make quality products. "

Idiots prefer planes and rocket launchers to good story, you can't change it no matter how much you try, "

Had the video not gone down, wouldn't this have been considered youtube spam?

" @The_Laughing_Man said:

I think Edge rated RDR higher then MG2  "

Haven't seen Edge reviewing RDR yet "

" @ThePhantomnaut said:

Those print reviews are not reflective towards each publication's overall view because it's all of the reviewers' own opinion and they might have been astonished by it, not for money; notice the bold on print. In order for magazines to get the reviews on time for release, Rockstar has to send them early copies. They have stricter deadlines due to the actual print and distribution process of making a magazine. Print is not the fucking internet. 

 Here here. Nice to see someone gets it. The whole idea that R* is paying for reviews is just absurd. Sure it might happen with some companies (Kane & Lynch), but I seriously doubt R* would bother wasting the money. Why? Because despite how some of you might feel about GTA IV, the majority of purchasers loved the game and thought it was great. It sold fantastically and was highly regarded as one of the best games of the year. R* didn't need to pay anyone for that, it happened fully on the game's own merits. In fact, I can't think of a single R* game since at least GTA 3 that R* would have bothered to waste money on as far as paying for reviews. The games have all done phenomenally well and been highly regarded by all kinds of publications and people as fantastic. Why would they be paying for something they're getting anyway? That's just throwing money away, and last I checked, businesses aren't too keen on that. "

Just wondering, the mighty powers of google/wikipedia seem to have failed me in my pursuit at finding when the beta is supposed to end.

Oh man, I hope that "crash" fix is what I think it is. It's such a pain in the ass to have to ctrl+alt+delete anytime I want to close the program. 
 
Edit: it is indeed. Happy days! Also, the new Thor is still pretty substantial in size. It's quite humorous to see it being transported by a medivac.