Bgrngod

Score, this should be fun.  I've never heard of a commentary for a video game before like this.  It seems to frickin' obvious now that I read about it.
 
I'm a sucker for Super-Special-Uber Editions and can't wait to pick up this 10 ton monstrosity next week.  (next week right?)

It cracks me up that all this discussion about Free-To-Pay games is taking off, and several companies are taking there chances with it, while at the same time other companies are attempting to charge for the online portion of a retail purchased game.
 
The hell is going here?

@mordecaix7 said:

" @Skillface said:

" Is it possible to buy this deal, and use all 4 years yourself? "

This is the first thing that came to mind. "

I never play these crap games to begin with so this is only a good thing in my eyes.  Less sports titles in the used section to wade through because the resell shops surely won't be buying back nearly as many.
 
Now if they start doing this for ALL of their games.. that's a different story.  I'm already pretty bitter about Mass Effect 2's shenanigans even though I bought it new.  If they are going to punish the used buyers they should reward the new game buyers just as much.  Make ALL DLC free to the original purchasers.

Crap.  You mean to tell me we are getting this series INSTEAD of a new Freedom Fighters game?
 
Lamesauce with an extra side of shitballs.
 
Hoping this one ends up good.  I'm still a little bitter about the $15 I spent on the last one.

I'm looking forward to watching my computer choke on this one too.

Sooo... to those of us that already beat Portal back when it came out.. we just get to be confused by not knowing about the "new" "canonical" ending that they patched in unless we watch it online?  They can't just make a fancy intro move in said sequel that clears it all up?
 
sigh
 
Taking advantage of patching to go just a tad bit in the wrong direction me thinks.  Features, maps, new chapters, bug fixes.  That all makes sense for a patch.  Flat out changing the story is lame sauce.
 
Not that it's a huge big deal or anything, it just seems kind of lame.

They should have never married the original Xbox Live service to the 360.  But NOOOO... all you lazy bastards cried and cried about having your friends lists carried over so they got tied together forever.  As a result the old xbox is being burned off the service.
 
Gotta get my game updates installed while I still can.  It could take awhile to cycle through all my old games and connect all of them.

I am really digging the potential here, but I think the execution might end up going wrong.
 
These old school Arcade games are NOT games that should be sold for 400 points each.  At the most, individual games should go for maybe, MAYBE 80 points each.  This would make it a lot more likely that users would buy $10 of product if they were getting 10 games out of it instead of just two.  There are so many arcade games to choose from that this really needs to be structured as a "dollars per customer" model instead of a "dollars per game" model.  There is going to be a certain range of money that people are going to be willing to spend for this experience as a whole.
 
This should be looked at the same way that Netflix is structured.  Dollars per customer, not dollars per item.

MW2 for best multiplayer?  I was hoping that steaming hunk of crap would go awardless this season.  Too bad.
 
Fix all the bugs/glitches/cheats/lazy design and it might be worth including in the discussion.  As it stands right now the game is simply the Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen for the gaming world.