Cherrypopp1ns

Crysis is not optimized and looks shitty on almost everyones PC, and doom 3 is just fucking old. And there is no need to envy me. There is nothing real to play. I pretty much washed my money down the drain.

Look at Halo wars, looks like a great console RTS, and end war with the voice commands. The industry is changing its PC powerhouses to fit the console. GOW and halo 3 are great FPS. But i do agree with your FPS view on Pcs. The experience is always better on the PC. Other then TF2. What games for the PC are there really a huge fan base, that is not on the 360 as well. 

There are huge hardware strides for the PC every year, but are they justified with there high price point. The $2000 gaming pc i am talking about is the highest end you can go without getting stupid lol. But the point i am making is, there are not really any huge games coming out for the PC that are not also coming out on the consoles. So where are the competitive FPS games that will blow your mind on the PC? with kickass graphics, and amazing AI? That us optimized and runs smoothly. 

The reason console games are more optimized is the fact thay the developers have a set hardware to work with, and they get many programmers to get their software to run on that hardware at 60 FPS. I want to see a game with that level of polish for the PC, that is competive and fun. 

As of right now i do not see that.

I have been getting upset recently with all the talk of the PC being dead. Now I don't give a **** if someone already posted something much like my post. So don't bother commenting if that is your comment, cause I have something to say.

I watched E3 with my fingers crossed, hoping to see the next big PC game. But I was thrown a loop by the amount of console games vs pc games. Also the fact that games like Killzone 2 blows every other game out of the water in terms of graphics, even Pc games. Now I purpose a question to all of you thinking of "staying true" to the PC. Where is the PC's killzone, or GoW2, or halo, or any game that really stands out. You might say "what about wow, or spore, or crysis". To which I will reply, they are fun but they aren't competitive like their console brothers. Wow is an mmo, yes they have arenas, but it isnt like a GOW where you and your friends can jump in and have fun for a few hours without half of the time you spend ingame is getting to the arena. Spore, is not multiplayer, and Crysis is NOT optimized, idc what anyone says it is not. Then you can look at games like far cry2, left for dead, ect. But those games are also coming out on consoles, and will be limited in graphical power.

When is a developer going to go "balls to the wall" with a title for the PC. I see a lot of European developers going that route, but i am sorry, they dont have the proper resources or knowedge to really optimize a game (crytek, funcom vs an american blizzard).

The thing that gets me, is when i spend $2000+ on a computer (one that i built myself) and where my GPU is the same price as the PS3, and games are looking much better on the PS3 then on the PC. Where is the justice in purchasing something that expensive(a PC) and not being rewarded with any software that makes it look or play better then any console AAA title on the market now.

When the **** are PC developers, NO, PC gamers going to wake the **** up and try and do something about this problem? When?

I have been getting upset recently with all the talk of the PC being dead. Now I don't give a **** if someone already posted something much like my post. So don't bother commenting if that is your comment, cause I have something to say.

I watched E3 with my fingers crossed, hoping to see the next big PC game. But I was thrown a loop by the amount of console games vs pc games. Also the fact that games like Killzone 2 blows every other game out of the water in terms of graphics, even Pc games. Now I purpose a question to all of you thinking of "staying true" to the PC. Where is the PC's killzone, or GoW2, or halo, or any game that really stands out. You might say "what about wow, or spore, or crysis". To which I will reply, they are fun but they aren't competitive like their console brothers. Wow is an mmo, yes they have arenas, but it isnt like a GOW where you and your friends can jump in and have fun for a few hours without half of the time you spend ingame is getting to the arena. Spore, is not multiplayer, and Crysis is NOT optimized, idc what anyone says it is not. Then you can look at games like far cry2, left for dead, ect. But those games are also coming out on consoles, and will be limited in graphical power.

When is a developer going to go "balls to the wall" with a title for the PC. I see a lot of European developers going that route, but i am sorry, they dont have the proper resources or knowedge to really optimize a game like Western developers (crytek, funcom vs an american blizzard).

The thing that gets me, is when i spend $2000+ on a computer (one that i built myself) and where my GPU is the same price as the PS3, and games are looking much better on the PS3 then on the PC. Where is the justice in purchasing something that expensive(a PC) and not being rewarded with any software that makes it look or play better then any console AAA title on the market now.

When the **** are PC developers, NO, PC gamers going to wake the **** up and try and do something about this problem? When?