While the original tweet was an hyperbolic comparison probably due to the freshness of the experience, the replies are proof of lack of reading comprehension that would be put to shame by 10 years olds.
The issue is not about the theme, but the tone, and it is not about comparing Schindler's List to Last of Us 2, but that the focus on narrative and emotional impact between Last of Us 2 and most modern members of the medium (like Fortnite or Call of Duty Warzone) is comparable to the gap between John Wick and Schindler's List; which, haven't played it, but yeah... is probably right (after all, the gap in care and quality of the narrative between Last of Us 1 and other 2013 games, like DOTA, Call of Duty Ghosts or Beyond, was pretty noticeable). He could have used any other example, like The Raid and The Godfather, or Avengers and Parasite, or Avatar and The Pianist, and his point would not have changed one bit.
At this point, it is hard to say if Alexander and Schreier have a beef with TLOU2 because their recent research on the poor work conditions of Naughty Dogs colors their opinions, if they are jumping to the stereotypical "everyone is snarky and offended about everything" stance on twitter at the first thing they saw, or they just didn't like the game all that much, but they come out as bullies that don't even tried or cared to read and interpret what other people have to say before being all high and mighty.
After digesting this mess for 2 days. I think this is where I stand too. Mocking someone rather critically engaging in their discourse just seems petty. Further writing off the game's ability to be considered meaningful by the community a week before it even comes out, that seems like an intentional act of provocation; rebuking those actually excited for this game (which in reality is a lot of freaking people).
Log in to comment