EquitasInvictus

This user has not updated recently.

1591 321 58 40
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

EquitasInvictus's forum posts

#1 Posted by EquitasInvictus (1591 posts) - 6 days, 15 hours ago

@darji said:

@morbid_coffee said:

@darji said:

@equitasinvictus said:

@morbid_coffee said:

@carousel said:

@animasta: Do not sit here and play the victim.

Chloe is a liar, a cheat, and a would-be criminal. Her "condition" is no excuse to prey upon people's good will.

And quite frankly, I'm sure she would have gotten much more support if she were honest in her intentions.

So how is any of this reason for somebody to kill themselves?

Seriously, internet. Cut the fucking shit. What happened in the past doesn't really matter when somebody whose clearly suffering from severe depression tried to fucking kill themselves live in front of hundreds of viewers.

I didn't care about the indiegogo controversy before. I still don't. I went on not giving a flying fuck about it. But people are being dicks to somebody who clearly isn't in a mental state to deal with it and all of them need to fuck right off.

I agree; I don't think any of us has right to judge. No matter where anyone stands on the moral compass, I think it compromises values to force a judgment upon others without fully understanding the perspective of the people involved. How are we going to bring up that they might've cost other people money in the past when they're attempting to throw their life away in the present?

I've known someone in particular who has made some terrible life decisions and in spite of finally having the desire to come clean, he ended up committing suicide anyway and left behind a family that was supposed to rely on him. People would never stop judging him for his past mistakes in spite of his desire to clean up his life. No one looked out for him. In spite of how passionately he sounded like he wanted to clean up his life, I guess the pain was too much for him; there were so much more people judging him than actively helping him.

I can't accept the assumption that "she would have gotten much more support if she were honest" because my personal experience above exemplifies the case of someone who was seeking help and by not getting it ultimately committed suicide; it's the most crushing thing in the world to find out something like that when the last time I saw him he seemed so optimistic about cleaning up.

All I'm trying to say is that instead of judging others, people really need to look out for each other more. A lot of the discussion in this thread really shouldn't be happening at all.

The problem here is also that she did not hurt herself with these lies but mostly also people who actually have true intentions for such a campaign maybe not get funded or it will taken down because of this. Just to think about the person instead of the consequences other may experience because of this is not really the right think to do in my opinion.

I'm going to make this really simple for this thread and the rest of the internet. I want you guys to tell me which has more importance over the other:

  • The loss of potential sales/trust on a crowd funding website
  • The loss of one's life

I'll give everybody a moment to think about it.

I give you another thing to think about. These crowd funding things are often the last chance these people have. So yeah I go with the lives of more people than only one. These people also have troubles and problems they face. They maybe different or maybe even the same but they need as much help as other people. They are also desperate or fear for their future and life.

Even then, Chloe's case is a very isolated case relative to all of crowdfunding. I feel like there are many worse offenders that discredit crowdfunding as a whole. I highly doubt that Chloe's actions on IGG will have a large enough impact to have consequences for crowdfunding as whole.

Also, even if people are at the end of their rope financially, crowdfunding is definitely not their last option. Actually, I really don't think they should put all their stakes on crowdfunding, either -- there are many other outlets in place for them to make a living and even if they absolutely went broke there's still places out there that can support them financially.

But I digress, my point is that the discussion regarding her past with crowdfunding shouldn't even brought up right now. There's a time and place for this type of discussion and I don't think it should be right now when someone just attempted suicide.

That being said, this is definitely not the time to try and argue genetics and biology as reaction to someone's suicide attempt. That's as tactful as going to military funeral and arguing politics. Not the time and place.

#2 Edited by EquitasInvictus (1591 posts) - 6 days, 15 hours ago

EDIT: I've redacted my original post since the post I was responding to got deleted. I just hope everyone continues to exercise tact and respect in this thread.

#3 Posted by EquitasInvictus (1591 posts) - 6 days, 15 hours ago

@darji: Consequences others may experience? I really doubt the scale of finances involved were irreparable -- wasn't it even mentioned refunds were given out?

On the other hand, she was about to lose her life! How are we going to "think about consequences" that can be reversed in face of the irreversible consequence of taking one's own life! The fact that we're trying to compare the consequences of a monetary value to the consequence of suicide based on very deep personal problems I doubt anyone here knows the full story behind does not sit well with me at all.

#4 Edited by EquitasInvictus (1591 posts) - 6 days, 16 hours ago

@carousel said:

@animasta: Do not sit here and play the victim.

Chloe is a liar, a cheat, and a would-be criminal. Her "condition" is no excuse to prey upon people's good will.

And quite frankly, I'm sure she would have gotten much more support if she were honest in her intentions.

So how is any of this reason for somebody to kill themselves?

Seriously, internet. Cut the fucking shit. What happened in the past doesn't really matter when somebody whose clearly suffering from severe depression tried to fucking kill themselves live in front of hundreds of viewers.

I didn't care about the indiegogo controversy before. I still don't. I went on not giving a flying fuck about it. But people are being dicks to somebody who clearly isn't in a mental state to deal with it and all of them need to fuck right off.

I agree; I don't think any of us has right to judge. No matter where anyone stands on the moral compass, I think it compromises values to force a judgment upon others without fully understanding the perspective of the people involved. How are we going to bring up that they might've cost other people money in the past when they're attempting to throw their life away in the present?

I've known someone in particular who has made some terrible life decisions and in spite of finally having the desire to come clean, he ended up committing suicide anyway and left behind a family that was supposed to rely on him. People would never stop judging him for his past mistakes in spite of his desire to clean up his life. No one looked out for him. In spite of how passionately he sounded like he wanted to clean up his life, I guess the pain was too much for him; there were so much more people judging him than actively helping him.

I can't accept the assumption that "she would have gotten much more support if she were honest" because my personal experience above exemplifies the case of someone who was seeking help and by not getting it ultimately committed suicide; it's the most crushing thing in the world to find out something like that when the last time I saw him he seemed so optimistic about cleaning up.

All I'm trying to say is that instead of judging others, people really need to look out for each other more. A lot of the discussion in this thread really shouldn't be happening at all.

#5 Edited by EquitasInvictus (1591 posts) - 6 days, 18 hours ago

Old Gods being around the corner for Crusader Kings II reminded me on how much I need to catch up on that game! I haven't played the last expansion allowing for the merchant factions to be playable, either.

So let's multiplayer, since I never played Crusader Kings II multiplayer before! Neither has @animasta, apparently. This would probably be the best possible way to enjoy new content!

Who would be in and when would be the best time to get this going?

#6 Edited by EquitasInvictus (1591 posts) - 7 days, 20 hours ago

@themangalist: thats why there are mods like Roma Surrectum 2. but CA isnt f**ing making their games mod friendly anymore

Really? Damn, that's not cool at all. The mod community for Total War did so much for the franchise, especially back during the original R:TW days with the realism mods and more historical conversions for the campaign. It's really upsetting that CA is turning their backs on the modding community like that.

#7 Edited by EquitasInvictus (1591 posts) - 8 days, 16 hours ago

@gelatinabomination: I didn't think Groose would win that last match, that was a great comeback!

#8 Edited by EquitasInvictus (1591 posts) - 8 days, 19 hours ago

... nor are we playing Arma to prep for war. only used training device? I don't have a particularly unique or impressive career, but I've been around the block

I'll (hopefully) be commissioning into in USAF within a year, but I've actually seen Virtual Battle Simulator 2 in the Camp Shelby Joint Forces Training Center and it's basically ArmA; it's even developed by a subdivision of Bohemia! I was really surprised to see it when I was down there for training last year.

Near by where I live there's a Joint Base that basically has a simulator similar to the one you mentioned, though, with simulated scenarios that throw dilemma's at you. The version I saw was for Security Forces, so it was a little less extreme. It was extreme in a sense that if you picked a choice that got you, your people, or someone actually innocent killed you would get shocked. Really interesting to see that Pavolovian conditioning twist added to that simulator!

You also mentioned pilots; because of the sequester causing USAF to stand down 1/3rd of our combat Air Forces, they're actually going to be doing a lot more ground training via virtual simulators to make up for the hours they won't be able to get anymore because of the cuts. I can definitely see this not being good for the pilots, but I guess it's unlikely for us to be getting into a full-scale air war anytime soon. Nevertheless, it's a bummer a bunch of pilots will be grounded as a result.

I definitely agree that there's a place for some of the virtual training that exists, but in some of the scenarios you mentioned regarding weapons training and from what I know about what's going on with pilots now I can see how we're spending too much money on systems that are not refined enough to provide an accurate experience for some situations. Hopefully this improves as technology and support for technologies become more refined and readily available.

#9 Posted by EquitasInvictus (1591 posts) - 9 days, 38 minutes ago

Anyone have an idea if the Japanese version of Persona 4 is a little more explicit about anything or does it play out pretty much the same way as the English translation down to the non-alcoholic drinks and them really getting drunk off the atmosphere?

#10 Posted by EquitasInvictus (1591 posts) - 9 days, 42 minutes ago

I think most of my summer will end up being JRPGs, particularly me catching up on Shin Megami Tensei since I now have a 3DS and Vita and have been long removed from the Persona games since I finished FES and P4. Of course there'll be the occasional shooter and Crusader Kings 2, though!

  • Ni No Kuni
  • SMT: Devil Summoner: Soul Hackers
  • SMT: Devil Survivor Overclocked & 2
  • SMT IV when that comes out
  • Persona 2: Innocent Sin & Eternal Punishment
  • Crusader Kings 2: The Republic & Old Gods
  • Black Ops 2, because somehow I never played it yet

Use your keyboard!

  • ESC