Something went wrong. Try again later

falserelic

This user has not updated recently.

5767 0 56 56
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

What's your thoughts on interracial relationships?

(Just curious on peoples feedback)

Me personally I think finding love with anyone is a beautiful thing. Some people might have a problem with other people dating outside there race. I think those types of people can be simple minded, and hold some type of resentment. My cousin has found herself in that type of situation before.

She's black and her boyfriend is white. Now she gets along with her boyfriend's family just fine, but as for his friends not at all. Apparently they like to make sexual and racial jokes about her. When her boyfriend brings them around her she gets very uncomfortable.

She discuss the issue with her boyfriend and he noticed. He believes they're more jealous if anything. One time she ended up calling the police on one of his friends, because he touched her in inappropriate way. After that incident her boyfriend decided to not talk to his friends anymore. They've also came across people that didn't like there interracial relationship.

For me its just abunch of drama. Everybody was raised to view peoples nationality in different ways, it could either be for the good or worse...

238 Comments

241 Comments

Avatar image for jasonr86
JasonR86

10468

Forum Posts

449

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 5

Edited By JasonR86

@aetheldod:

I don't mean to undermind your experience but you're generalizing your experience as a child from an interracial couple to every child of an interracial couple. Also, I'd imagine anyone who is in a minority group dislikes themselves at some point. For example, I imagine and have heard that many LGBT people don't like themselves. But that doesn't mean they are wrong for being who they are. I would argue that minorities often feel bad about themselves because societies often do very little to accept them often kicking and screaming when they do. Everyone has the right to exist and to be whomever they want to be. And I do mean EVERYONE.

Avatar image for mariachimacabre
MariachiMacabre

7097

Forum Posts

106

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

@darji said:

@colourful_hippie said:
@mariachimacabre said:

@endurancefun said:

@mariachimacabre said:

@endurancefun said:

I appreciate the responses, I totally disagree with the science. The idea that keeping to your own race = inbreeding is disgusting. I suppose all of Africa, mostly homogeneous Africans who are innately likelier to be less diverse than Europeans, are massively in-breeding? And China too? If that was true, Europe would've died out entirely long ago, but it was flourishing up until a recent push for multiculturalism from the top-down. And yes, we're all blind to race until it comes time to take reparations for the past. There's no race except the human race! [spoilerblock]Unless you're that one color.[/spoilerblock]

Disagree with the science all you want. Luckily, science isn't a matter of opinion. I'll trust the science before I trust your David Duke-style nonsense. Animals are meant to breed and share their genes. It's how they evolve. Keeping the gene pools seperate does no one any good.

Races developed for a reason, some are better than others most of the time at certain tasks and playing God with genetics because of "love," a truly scientific term, is stupid. I'd rather have white, hispanic, black, asian, indian, etc etc., true diversity, than end up with one race whose strongest bonds are to the life-giving state, not their nation or family who are out for themselves.

Races developed based on the regions they settled after they left Africa. Skin color was a result of their exposure to the sun. Any physical differences was developed in response to their environment. It's not some divine nonsense. It's evolution. We interbred with Homo sapiens sapiens, Homo neanderthalensis, and our other cousins too before we or other forces wiped them out. I used this earlier but if one group of people was genetically immune to HIV/AIDS, they absolutely should be interbreeding because it serves the species as a whole. Race doesn't matter once the species as a whole is in danger of extinction. Sharing genes is not playing God (I happen to not believe in God but that's not part of this discussion at all). It's what our entire genetic construction was BUILT FOR. Humanity as a whole is now more resistant to the Plague because Europeans spread around the world breeding. If I had to choose between isolating my race in order to cling to my "culture" (Which goes away regardless. Things that were part of our culture 400 years ago [slavery, alchemy, extreme superstition] are either dead or dying rapidly) and help humanity as a whole survive and stengthen, the choice seems obvious.

Even if the guy's batshit logic actually worked, you would also have to completely disregard all of the human technological advances that have helped us to overcome our own shortcomings. This isn't cave man days where every single thing was dictated by the laws of evolution. Biodiversity my ass, that guy just doesn't know how to probably spell "bigot".

HE is right. African people for example are immune against most malaria viruses for example. Each race has certain advantages against the other one and they had to adopt it in order to survive in these regions. But also it is more effective to actually try to invent a cure for this kind of stuff. But that will most likely take longer than his breeding idea. Also through the huge uses of medicament these viruses become immune after a while this is not the case if you gens already have it in you sicne your are not in need to build antibodies (?) in your system.

He is wrong. Your second sentence proves my point. If certain races are genetically less susceptible to certain disease, then it's in the best interest of Human kind to interbreed with other races and spread the gene that gives them immunity. Racial "Purity" does far more harm than good in the long term.

Avatar image for colourful_hippie
colourful_hippie

6335

Forum Posts

8

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By colourful_hippie

@darji: @mariachimacabre He's right about the "advantages" part, not so much the doom and gloom scenario he's picturing once the world becomes "one color" which will never happen for numerous reasons.

Avatar image for rollingzeppelin
rollingzeppelin

2429

Forum Posts

8

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@darji said:

@superkenon said:

@darji said:

And the don't be a dick thing: Dont get offended so easily and if you get offended you wont die because of it. Political correctness is the dead of our society because everyone is becoming more and more affraid to speak their mind.

My post was essentially just a boring "don't bully people". If that's too much in the realm of political correctness for you, then I guess... I'm sorry?

Jokes about people who are not even there to witness them is not bullying. Jokes about a certain type of groups though stand up comedians is not bullying its called comedy. And In Comedy everything should be fair game.

Loading Video...

The difference is, and the reason why that's funny, is that he's pointing out the ridiculousness of the situation, and makes a point to say that there's nothing funny about rape. He isn't making light of that terrible act, he's pointing out how absurd it is.

Avatar image for mariachimacabre
MariachiMacabre

7097

Forum Posts

106

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

@animasta said:

@mariachimacabre: it sucks that the KKK are the ones that have head guys named wizard.

I would love to be in a non racist organization that had a grand wizard D:

I would be all for forming an Anti-KKK tolerance group that just uses all of their dumb D&D ranks. Just to make them mad.

Avatar image for artelinarose
artelinarose

1999

Forum Posts

470

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@artemesia said:

@mariachimacabre said:

I know I keep mentioning him but all of this "racial and cultural diversity" bullshit is exactly what former KKK Grand Wizard David Duke would spout when he ran for President (and was a Rep. for Louisiana.) It's a thinly veiled way of saying "Aryan Purity."

which is actually really funny because blue eyes are a genetic mutation

It's true. Every blue eyed individual has been traced to a single person who lived between 6,000 and 10,000 years ago.

I just always appreciated the irony in the fight for "Aryan Purity" and "keeping the race pure" and all that hooey when one of their defining traits is unnatural and the result of an impurity.

Avatar image for animasta
Animasta

14948

Forum Posts

3563

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 5

Edited By Animasta

@animasta said:

@mariachimacabre: it sucks that the KKK are the ones that have head guys named wizard.

I would love to be in a non racist organization that had a grand wizard D:

I would be all for forming an Anti-KKK tolerance group that just uses all of their dumb D&D ranks. Just to make them mad.

praise be to you, grand cleric!

Avatar image for darji
Darji

5412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Darji

@mariachimacabre: As far as I understand him he wants to build some kind of super race which is ethically questionable for sure but he is also right to think that. When we actually could decode your genetic code people would exactly try that to accomplish. How many people dream of not being sick anymore or about to a very very long life or certain traits like being a genius etc. If we actually knew how to do that we would certainly try that. ANd one way for certain point would be the breeding thing.

@ RollingZeppelin If I say in a very certain way to my friend that I will rape him in his sleep for example" it would be also ridiculous because he knows that I will not do that at all. I would for example never laugh at someone who has been raped and say "HAHA" but again comedy should be otherwise fair game if you make fun of groups and not certain people.

Avatar image for mariachimacabre
MariachiMacabre

7097

Forum Posts

106

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

@mariachimacabre said:

@artemesia said:

@mariachimacabre said:

I know I keep mentioning him but all of this "racial and cultural diversity" bullshit is exactly what former KKK Grand Wizard David Duke would spout when he ran for President (and was a Rep. for Louisiana.) It's a thinly veiled way of saying "Aryan Purity."

which is actually really funny because blue eyes are a genetic mutation

It's true. Every blue eyed individual has been traced to a single person who lived between 6,000 and 10,000 years ago.

I just always appreciated the irony in the fight for "Aryan Purity" and "keeping the race pure" and all that hooey when one of their defining traits is unnatural and the result of an impurity.

Yeah. But, sadly, Neo-Nazis will never see the irony. They think they were made by Thor or some shit.

Avatar image for mikkaq
MikkaQ

10296

Forum Posts

52

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By MikkaQ

@darji I specifically avoided using a Star Trek alien race as an example cause I feel they're so close to human that it barely counts. Too easy!

Well there was that one episode of... Deep Space Nine or TNG that implied that all the major humanoid race of Star Trek are all descended from one ancient alien species. And then I guess the implications were too deep to even try to incorporate that into the universe so it was quickly forgotten about. But it explains why every alien the love-boat Enterprise runs into is compatible for boning. Still doesn't explain why federation officers are so damn horny though.

So really it's not even interspecies. They're just really far-off cousins.

Avatar image for mariachimacabre
MariachiMacabre

7097

Forum Posts

106

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

@darji said:

@mariachimacabre: As far as I understand him he wants to build some kind of super race which is ethically questionable for sure but he is also right to think that. When we actually could decode your genetic code people would exactly try that to accomplish.

But you don't make a "super race" by keeping all of the races seperate. All that does is recycle the genetics. It's a literal stagnant genetic cesspool. No new genes pop up in a stagnant gene pool. You need interbreeding for that to happen.

Avatar image for darji
Darji

5412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Darji

@mariachimacabre said:

@darji said:

@mariachimacabre: As far as I understand him he wants to build some kind of super race which is ethically questionable for sure but he is also right to think that. When we actually could decode your genetic code people would exactly try that to accomplish.

But you don't make a "super race" by keeping all of the races seperate. All that does is recycle the genetics. It's a literal stagnant genetic cesspool. No new genes pop up in a stagnant gene pool. You need interbreeding for that to happen.

You need interbreeding with certain races and types. Not anyone with everyone. again it is ethically very very questionable .

Avatar image for mariachimacabre
MariachiMacabre

7097

Forum Posts

106

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

@darji said:

@mariachimacabre said:

@darji said:

@mariachimacabre: As far as I understand him he wants to build some kind of super race which is ethically questionable for sure but he is also right to think that. When we actually could decode your genetic code people would exactly try that to accomplish.

But you don't make a "super race" by keeping all of the races seperate. All that does is recycle the genetics. It's a literal stagnant genetic cesspool. No new genes pop up in a stagnant gene pool. You need interbreeding for that to happen.

You need interbreeding with certain races and types. not everyone with everyone. again it is ethically very very questionable .

Ethically questionable to include everyone regardless of race? Wut?

Avatar image for darji
Darji

5412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Darji

@mariachimacabre said:

@darji said:

@mariachimacabre said:

@darji said:

@mariachimacabre: As far as I understand him he wants to build some kind of super race which is ethically questionable for sure but he is also right to think that. When we actually could decode your genetic code people would exactly try that to accomplish.

But you don't make a "super race" by keeping all of the races seperate. All that does is recycle the genetics. It's a literal stagnant genetic cesspool. No new genes pop up in a stagnant gene pool. You need interbreeding for that to happen.

You need interbreeding with certain races and types. not everyone with everyone. again it is ethically very very questionable .

Ethically questionable to include everyone regardless of race? Wut?

No to only be allowed to breed with certain types and races despite you love the person or not. Which we by the way are doing with dogs or horses^^

Avatar image for mikkaq
MikkaQ

10296

Forum Posts

52

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Also no one caught this, but in the first post the dude implied interracial relationships led to pedophilia and in the next post he made he implied they led to statism.

What's next, do interracial relationships lead to pacts with the devil? Excessive masturbation? No wait, I got it. Interracial relationships will lead to same sex relationships! OH NO!

Avatar image for rollingzeppelin
rollingzeppelin

2429

Forum Posts

8

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@darji said:

@ RollingZeppelin If I say in a very certain way to my friend that I will rape him in his sleep for example" it would be also ridiculous because he knows that I will not do that at all. I would for example never laugh at someone who has been raped and say "HAHA" but again comedy should be otherwise fair game if you make fun of groups and not certain people.

Your example is fine because it's clear that you are just being overtly offensive. But making fun of groups is still wrong unless you make it clear that your joke is about how ridiculous it is that people think that way, or your underlying or implied point is how wrong it is. This is how comedians like Louis CK and Daniel Tosh (I do believe that rape joke Tosh made was poorly executed, the woman was not familiar with his style and didn't understand that he's playing a persona of a terrible person on stage, if you are genuinely laughing at his bigotry-based jokes, you are a terrible person) do it. Otherwise it is not cool.

Avatar image for audiosnow
audiosnow

3926

Forum Posts

729

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By audiosnow

The same as any other?

The only, and I do mean the only, people I've ever met who had a problem with interracial relationships were meatheads assembling a pipeline in Nevada who were brought in from the dark South.

Avatar image for aiurflux
AiurFlux

956

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Who you fall in love with is your business. Anybody that is opposed to a relationship because it's homosexual or interracial is scum in my eyes.

That fact that this is still an issue just proves that, as a society, we're still brain dead retards. If tomorrow we developed interstellar flight and found alien life that was more advanced technologically and culturally than we are they'd think we still lived in caves.

Avatar image for darji
Darji

5412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@darji said:

@ RollingZeppelin If I say in a very certain way to my friend that I will rape him in his sleep for example" it would be also ridiculous because he knows that I will not do that at all. I would for example never laugh at someone who has been raped and say "HAHA" but again comedy should be otherwise fair game if you make fun of groups and not certain people.

Your example is fine because it's clear that you are just being overtly offensive. But making fun of groups is still wrong unless you make it clear that your joke is about how ridiculous it is that people think that way, or your underlying or implied point is how wrong it is. This is how comedians like Louis CK and Daniel Tosh (I do believe that rape joke Tosh made was poorly executed, the woman was not familiar with his style and didn't understand that he's playing a persona of a terrible person on stage, if you are genuinely laughing at his bigotry-based jokes, you are a terrible person) do it. Otherwise it is not cool.

I do not laugh at many shit I am just not offended by it. I will probably say that was dumb or lame but I would not laugh at most of this stuff.

Avatar image for hatking
hatking

7673

Forum Posts

82

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

This is 2013, right? Not 1913?

You're off a few decades, sadly. Interracial marriage was restricted in parts of the US until 1967 (Loving v. Virginia). And it was considered a big problem much, much later than that. In fact, it probably still is by most people, unfortunately. The good news is that those people get to have far less options for who'll have sex with them (nobody outside their race, and nobody with an ounce of intelligence or compassion), and they'll eventually all die out. In the long run, we win.

Avatar image for mariachimacabre
MariachiMacabre

7097

Forum Posts

106

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

@darji said:

@mariachimacabre said:

@darji said:

@mariachimacabre said:

@darji said:

@mariachimacabre: As far as I understand him he wants to build some kind of super race which is ethically questionable for sure but he is also right to think that. When we actually could decode your genetic code people would exactly try that to accomplish.

But you don't make a "super race" by keeping all of the races seperate. All that does is recycle the genetics. It's a literal stagnant genetic cesspool. No new genes pop up in a stagnant gene pool. You need interbreeding for that to happen.

You need interbreeding with certain races and types. not everyone with everyone. again it is ethically very very questionable .

Ethically questionable to include everyone regardless of race? Wut?

No to only be allowed to breed with certain types and races despite you love the person or not.

You're right. It is. That's why EnduranceFun is wrong. Humans chose to divide themselves by race. We're all the same species and the species matters more than the race. @endurancefun can argue against my interracial relationship all he wants with his pseudoscience but I DO NOT GIVE A SHIT ABOUT RACE. No one should. We are Homo sapiens first. Race doesn't factor into my daily life. I'm a Norwegian, Russian and German-American man who's dating a woman of Chinese and Czech anscestry. The last thought in my mind is "Boy I sure hope I'm not polluting my race." And that thought doesn't even deserve to see the light of day. Humans will not survive if we isolate ourselves by race and inbreed. Nothing good can come from that. Genetic diversity is what will help us move forward as a species.

Avatar image for gokaired
gokaired

581

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By gokaired
@darji said:

@mariachimacabre said:

@darji said:

@mariachimacabre said:

@darji said:

@mariachimacabre: As far as I understand him he wants to build some kind of super race which is ethically questionable for sure but he is also right to think that. When we actually could decode your genetic code people would exactly try that to accomplish.

But you don't make a "super race" by keeping all of the races seperate. All that does is recycle the genetics. It's a literal stagnant genetic cesspool. No new genes pop up in a stagnant gene pool. You need interbreeding for that to happen.

You need interbreeding with certain races and types. not everyone with everyone. again it is ethically very very questionable .

Ethically questionable to include everyone regardless of race? Wut?

No to only be allowed to breed with certain types and races despite you love the person or not. Which we by the way are doing with dogs or horses^^

Just for the argument for breeding within a race/breed in regards to animals

It's already shown animals we use or house through generations of genetic engineering (breeding) are and have been developing large defects and physical problems, Horses are prone to heart attacks and Bulldogs heads are so large now there are birthing difficulties and arthritis.

Interbreeding wins in the long run.

Avatar image for gokaired
gokaired

581

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@mikkaq said:

Also no one caught this, but in the first post the dude implied interracial relationships led to pedophilia and in the next post he made he implied they led to statism.

What's next, do interracial relationships lead to pacts with the devil? Excessive masturbation? No wait, I got it. Interracial relationships will lead to same sex relationships! OH NO!

You know i heard a while back some politician claimed exercise can repress or erase homosexual feels, same difference i say.

Avatar image for mariachimacabre
MariachiMacabre

7097

Forum Posts

106

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Edited By MariachiMacabre

@gokaired said:
@darji said:

@mariachimacabre said:

@darji said:

@mariachimacabre said:

@darji said:

@mariachimacabre: As far as I understand him he wants to build some kind of super race which is ethically questionable for sure but he is also right to think that. When we actually could decode your genetic code people would exactly try that to accomplish.

But you don't make a "super race" by keeping all of the races seperate. All that does is recycle the genetics. It's a literal stagnant genetic cesspool. No new genes pop up in a stagnant gene pool. You need interbreeding for that to happen.

You need interbreeding with certain races and types. not everyone with everyone. again it is ethically very very questionable .

Ethically questionable to include everyone regardless of race? Wut?

No to only be allowed to breed with certain types and races despite you love the person or not. Which we by the way are doing with dogs or horses^^

Just for the argument for breeding within a race/breed in regards to animals

It's already shown animals we use or house through generations of genetic engineering (breeding) are and have been developing large defects and physical problems, Horses are prone to heart attacks and Bulldogs heads are so large now there are birthing difficulties and authorities.

Interbreeding wins in the long run.

Yep. Look at Retrievers. All that inbreeding makes hip dysplasia almost a certainty for them.

Avatar image for rollingzeppelin
rollingzeppelin

2429

Forum Posts

8

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By rollingzeppelin

@endurancefun: The fact that people, in this day and age, share your opinion depresses the fuck out of me. My only solace is that you are in the vast minority. Also, it may help you to understand that science is based on demonstrable evidence and your statement that you don't believe in it is in-and-of-itself completely illogical.

Avatar image for darji
Darji

5412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Darji

@mariachimacabre: I would think so as well. If you love someone the last thing that should matter is what race or color this person has. But he is not going the emotional route he is trying to be as scientific as it is possible for him towards the whole topic..

If you want to create a super race you have to be very specific about what races and types breed with whom but if you are in love with someone you just do not care^^

@gokaired Yeah because they did not know the genetic code. If they would know this and know how to maniipulate it it would "benefit" these dogs in the way we want them to be.

Avatar image for rollingzeppelin
rollingzeppelin

2429

Forum Posts

8

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@darji said:

@rollingzeppelin said:

@darji said:

@ RollingZeppelin If I say in a very certain way to my friend that I will rape him in his sleep for example" it would be also ridiculous because he knows that I will not do that at all. I would for example never laugh at someone who has been raped and say "HAHA" but again comedy should be otherwise fair game if you make fun of groups and not certain people.

Your example is fine because it's clear that you are just being overtly offensive. But making fun of groups is still wrong unless you make it clear that your joke is about how ridiculous it is that people think that way, or your underlying or implied point is how wrong it is. This is how comedians like Louis CK and Daniel Tosh (I do believe that rape joke Tosh made was poorly executed, the woman was not familiar with his style and didn't understand that he's playing a persona of a terrible person on stage, if you are genuinely laughing at his bigotry-based jokes, you are a terrible person) do it. Otherwise it is not cool.

I do not laugh at many shit I am just not offended by it. I will probably say that was dumb or lame but I would not laugh at most of this stuff.

Oh I wasn't implying *you* in the bit about Tosh I was using it in the impersonal sense.

Avatar image for darji
Darji

5412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Darji

@rollingzeppelin: Oh thought you meant if I find this funny I am a terrible person. Sorry my English is not that good so I can misunderstand some stuff XD

Avatar image for rollingzeppelin
rollingzeppelin

2429

Forum Posts

8

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@darji: That's cool I was wondering as I was typing it if I should rephrase that sentence.

Avatar image for mariachimacabre
MariachiMacabre

7097

Forum Posts

106

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

@darji said:

@mariachimacabre: I would think so as well. If you love someone the last thing that should matter is what race or color this person has. But he is not going the emotional route he is trying to be as scientific as it is possible for him towards the whole topic..

If you want to create a super race you have to be very specific about what races and types breed with whom but if you are in love with someone you just do not care^^

@gokaired Yeah because they did not know the genetic code. If they would know this and know how to maniipulate it it would "benefit" these dogs in the way we want them to be.

No he isn't. His goal isn't to create a super race. His goal is to keep the races seperate to preserve their "culture". This is exactly what the KKK says whenever they show their dumb selves in a large city or a town they know they're not welcome in. It's softer language in order to convince people but it's just standard racism and bigotry.

Avatar image for darji
Darji

5412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@darji said:

@mariachimacabre: I would think so as well. If you love someone the last thing that should matter is what race or color this person has. But he is not going the emotional route he is trying to be as scientific as it is possible for him towards the whole topic..

If you want to create a super race you have to be very specific about what races and types breed with whom but if you are in love with someone you just do not care^^

@gokaired Yeah because they did not know the genetic code. If they would know this and know how to maniipulate it it would "benefit" these dogs in the way we want them to be.

No he isn't. His goal isn't to create a super race. His goal is to keep the races seperate to preserve their "culture". This is exactly what the KKK says whenever they show their dumb selves in a large city or a town they know they're not welcome in. It's softer language in order to convince people but it's just standard racism and bigotry.

Didn't he say to prevent diseases and other harmful stuff? Culture has nothing really to do with that. if he means culture is is certainly wrong.

Avatar image for starvinggamer
StarvingGamer

11533

Forum Posts

36428

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 25

Oh my god this thread is just as bad as that other thread.

Well, I didn't need to follow that many people anyways.

Avatar image for mariachimacabre
MariachiMacabre

7097

Forum Posts

106

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

@darji said:

@mariachimacabre said:

@darji said:

@mariachimacabre: I would think so as well. If you love someone the last thing that should matter is what race or color this person has. But he is not going the emotional route he is trying to be as scientific as it is possible for him towards the whole topic..

If you want to create a super race you have to be very specific about what races and types breed with whom but if you are in love with someone you just do not care^^

@gokaired Yeah because they did not know the genetic code. If they would know this and know how to maniipulate it it would "benefit" these dogs in the way we want them to be.

No he isn't. His goal isn't to create a super race. His goal is to keep the races seperate to preserve their "culture". This is exactly what the KKK says whenever they show their dumb selves in a large city or a town they know they're not welcome in. It's softer language in order to convince people but it's just standard racism and bigotry.

Didn't he say to prevent diseases and other harmful stuff? Culture has nothing really to do with that. if he means culture is is certainly wrong.

No. I mentioned preventing disease. The more we share, genetically, the more likely we are to build up genetic immunity to disease.

Avatar image for gaminghooligan
gaminghooligan

1831

Forum Posts

30

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 1

Had to stop by to see the train wreck.... and here it is.

Avatar image for metalgearsunny
MetalGearSunny

7466

Forum Posts

13349

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 3

Fucking really, guys? Jesus.

Avatar image for dallas_raines
Dallas_Raines

2269

Forum Posts

45

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Dallas_Raines

Well, I'm the byproduct of a 25 year old interracial relationship, so my opinion on the matter should be pretty obvious. Also, why hasn't EnduranceFun been banned yet?

Avatar image for metalgearsunny
MetalGearSunny

7466

Forum Posts

13349

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 3

I totally disagree with the science.

I'm fucking done

Avatar image for dagbiker
Dagbiker

7057

Forum Posts

1019

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 16

@dagbiker said:

The thing is, belief never caused wars. Its the fact that people cant stand other people who are not like them.

Ironic, then that this thread, about accepting people who are different, can not accept people who think differently.

One person thinking differently, across the country, or the world, will definitely never hurt you. The problem comes when people force others to think, or do what they want. I don't agree with endurancefun, but I'm not going to change his mind, he is factually wrong, true, but half of what he said is opinion.

Really? Belief is defined by closing one's mind to any alternatives to a given situation.

If not for bigots believing that interracial relationships are morally wrong (or coming to that conclusion by way of some bogus 'scientific' explanation) then this wouldn't be the issue that it is.

As for your comments about 'force' being the tipping point, I think that anything one does to create an atmosphere of discomfort or disrespect pertaining to racial issues is very uncool. That doesn't preclude force, but it is still immensely damaging and regressive. That's why I think making racist jokes is highly distasteful, even if it's not directly 'bullying.'

But are you not making those same "Bigots" feel uncomfortable too? How is it any different? I don't believe in God, but I respect that others do, and know it is not my place to convince other people so.

You can spend your whole life being convinced that someone somewhere in the world thinks some other way then you. But what will it change if he thought like you?

Time and energy wasted, fighting wars, posting on forums because some person, who will likely never ever change his mind. Thinks differently.

If you want to use that energy for something good, then do something great.

Avatar image for mariachimacabre
MariachiMacabre

7097

Forum Posts

106

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Edited By MariachiMacabre

@dagbiker said:

@darkstorn said:

@dagbiker said:

The thing is, belief never caused wars. Its the fact that people cant stand other people who are not like them.

Ironic, then that this thread, about accepting people who are different, can not accept people who think differently.

One person thinking differently, across the country, or the world, will definitely never hurt you. The problem comes when people force others to think, or do what they want. I don't agree with endurancefun, but I'm not going to change his mind, he is factually wrong, true, but half of what he said is opinion.

Really? Belief is defined by closing one's mind to any alternatives to a given situation.

If not for bigots believing that interracial relationships are morally wrong (or coming to that conclusion by way of some bogus 'scientific' explanation) then this wouldn't be the issue that it is.

As for your comments about 'force' being the tipping point, I think that anything one does to create an atmosphere of discomfort or disrespect pertaining to racial issues is very uncool. That doesn't preclude force, but it is still immensely damaging and regressive. That's why I think making racist jokes is highly distasteful, even if it's not directly 'bullying.'

But are you not making those same "Bigots" feel uncomfortable too? How is it any different? I don't believe in God, but I respect that others do, and know it is not my place to convince other people so.

You can spend your whole life being convinced that someone somewhere in the world thinks some other way then you. But what will it change if he thought like you?

Time and energy wasted, fighting wars, posting on forums because some person, who will likely never ever change his mind. Thinks differently.

If you want to use that energy for something good, then do something great.

Because there's a difference between not believing in a religion and believing that one group is inferior to another based on traits that they have no control over. Those kinds of people do real harm. And they should be challenged for it. Racism, homophobia, transphobia, sexism etc. They're all antiquated lines of thinking that have no place in modern society and they need to be challenged as the hate that they are.

Avatar image for fattony12000
fattony12000

8491

Forum Posts

22398

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

I wish something would stop the endurancefun.

Avatar image for rick_fingers
Rick_Fingers

525

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@dagbiker: sitting back and saying nothing never solved a problem.

Indeed, sitting back and saying nothing is what allows narrow-minded idiots to spread their poison further.

Avatar image for alexw00d
AlexW00d

7604

Forum Posts

3686

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Lol at the guy who said some african people are immune to malaria 'cause they're black, and not 'cause they, and their ancestors, have lived in malarial zones for years and year.

Avatar image for ekami
Ekami

285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I wish something would stop the endurancefun.

tee hee

Avatar image for mariachimacabre
MariachiMacabre

7097

Forum Posts

106

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

I wish something would stop the endurancefun.

Me too.

Avatar image for techhits
TechHits

1483

Forum Posts

18649

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 12

It's really to bad that this even needs to be asked. I'm not saying you're bad for asking, I just wish I lived in a world where no one would even need to think twice about it.

Avatar image for artelinarose
artelinarose

1999

Forum Posts

470

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Oh my god this thread is just as bad as that other thread.

Well, I didn't need to follow that many people anyways.

sorry .w.

Avatar image for jimmyfenix
jimmyfenix

3941

Forum Posts

20

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

god dang it endurancefun

Avatar image for ekami
Ekami

285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Ekami

i'm actually pretty excited to be on a board where someone is bravely considering that me and my wife will produce a race of sewer mutants. I'm all "go forth my blob children!!! the kingdom of man shall soon be yours!!! hiissssssss!!!"

Avatar image for ekami
Ekami

285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

HISSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!

Avatar image for darji
Darji

5412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Darji

@alexw00d said:

Lol at the guy who said some african people are immune to malaria 'cause they're black, and not 'cause they, and their ancestors, have lived in malarial zones for years and year.

I said they are immune because they live in Africa. I said they are more immune to heat strokes etc because they are black which again is a result of living in this area to be able to survive.