planetfunksquad

@icemael: Yes, it is. And yes, that type of music should be playing throughout :)

Its not hip hop, but it's a great track. That whole album is fire.

The best hip hop track of all time is Halftime by Nas. Protect Ya Neck by Wu-Tang is a close second.

I hope this happens and I hope they get some decent help with promotion and stuff. If Devolver can publish Hatoful Boyfriend they can publish this.

Thats exactly what I am doing: disagreeing. Again, I am not forcing anything. He can say what he wants and I can respond in kind. Thats how this works.

@namoo: Firstly when someone is criticised for saying a thing the immediate response should not be to double down and insist that you're just joking and the people who feel that they're the butt of that joke are just over reacting. We can stop treating people who make mistakes as the devil and start treating them as people who had a moment of piss-poor judgement (and the people who sent death threats to Troy over this, if that happened, or who defend that harassment, would fall into the group of dick heads I was talking about earlier. I'll address that below). And we can stop defending shitty behaviour on the grounds of "free speech". I understand the need to defend a man from harassment, but you can do that while also acknowledging he fucked up and that he should have responded better. Finally, people like me can stop letting their emotions get the better of them and dehumanising the opposition. I have a habit of just saying fuck you to people, when I shouldn't, and I'm not alone in that.

That'd be a start.

@namoo: I can be against any and all death threats and harassment, and still think he did something shitty. I'm not defending harassment, I'm saying the people saying they "respect him more" for not apologising are dumb.

@babychoochoo: The original tweet was one thing. We all fuck up. But when people are telling you that you fucked up and you retreat into a state of "WELL YOU JUST DON'T LIKE FUN MAN" thats a problem. That has nothing to do with defending the right to free speech, you're only defending the right to intentional ignorance and I fail to understand the importance of that.

@namoo: Saying that I think you need to reevaluate your position (admittedly I said it aggressively) is not the same as saying you shouldn't be allowed to say a thing. Like I said above, it's nothing to do with defending free speech, you're just defending intentional ignorance.

@namoo: No one can deny someone the right to be a dick head, it's impossible. Dick heads gonna be dick heads. But if you're defending the right to act like a dick head, it might be because you're a dick head.

@namoo: yes, that is what I said. Thank you for your accurate translation. You are smart.

Jesus, I don't know what I expected from this thread. People will defend any-fucking-thing. If you're defending the right to be a dickhead you need to sort your fucking ideas out.