@Tennmuerti said:So basically...if I respond to people who are making unnecessary jabs at me for making a topic...I'm being "butt hurt"? So I'm not allowed to defend myself, eh?@PixelPrinny said:OP has nothing to sayOne day in Internet Land, I came across a poorly written article that I didn't agree with so I decided to make a forum post telling people to go read it and give the poorly written article more traffic. Thinking back, I'm not sure why I did it, but it seemed like a good idea at the time.@Superman64 said:@PixelPrinny: And then you came into that topic to a make post that you thought was clever...but wasn't.Hmmmm, you know, I think it was rather clever.Especially when the OP acts butt-hurt about it.
Superman64's forum posts
Xentax? What is that - some sort of anti-anxiety pill?Perhaps it's a pill to make you like DNF more?
@Superman64 said:Well that wasn't my intention, but what I said is true. The only reason I said Jeff is because that's the one that caught my eye since I'm a Giant Bomb member.@ZeForgotten: Ummmm how do you know he stole that image exactly? And yes...by listing Jeff under the header of "Crap Reviewer"....that's pretty safe to say he's calling him a crap reviewer.Your title made people think he was calling Jeff out alone.
It's not my website. I don't even have a website. And I already said how I found the link. I haven't even played Duke Nukem Forever yet. And I don't have a problem with Jeff.
@Superman64: Is that your website?
Would be lying if that thought didn't cross my mind. But yeah, articl is bullshit. Whether or not a review is good or bad depends entirely on what side of the score the author deems the "appropriate" score falls on.
...at least that's what Xentax.com says:
And as you can see Jeff isn't the only one he thinks is "crap".
All of this over Duke Nukem Forever reviews.
This guy must really like Duke.