I disagree with some of your points on film. Calling Paranormal Activity a little 15,000 dollar film, and ignoring the massive marketing push behind it, is missing a huge point.
You harp on the idea that all films cost the same to see, but they don't. Do you see real low rent independent films at the same price as new big studio competitors? While film doesn't usually have the unmitigated gall to charge at 60 dollars most of the time, sometimes they do.
The idea that the big fish megamovies like an Avengers are sustaining the other movies that come out is 100% backwords. Avengers making money does not mean that there will be more smaller movies out there bolstered by the huge success of this hyperbudget beast. It means we only make hyperbudget beasts cause they are what is making us money. When they suceed we are rich yay! If they fail, oh god no, we go under. In my opinion its a scary fucking model, but its the system now.
None of this had anything to do with content and perceived value though. I think if I am looking to buy a book and I see a 1200 page tome that I can just see wants to waste my time I look at it much the same as a jrpg, maybe there is value there but I could see myself being way more tolerable of that bullshit at 13 years old rather than today. I also value a short dramatically less than a feature length film. Length is a factor. It is ok to discriminate on entertainment. Hell thinking about why you like or dislike something is part of engaging with it. It is a good thing. We should all relax and not rant so much on the internet. Apologies.
Log in to comment