Something went wrong. Try again later

TheVatican

This user has not updated recently.

19 0 1 2
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

TheVatican's forum posts

Avatar image for thevatican
TheVatican

19

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Avatar image for thevatican
TheVatican

19

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Avatar image for thevatican
TheVatican

19

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By TheVatican

Thanks for all who have commented on my previous posts, hope you still do.

Now, onto my next topic.

Presentation.

Right out of IGN's (hope i can mention that here) grading scale is presentation. Its doesn't affect gameplay, but I thought of it as I played LOTR:Conquest and World of Goo over the weekend.

Now, Conquest is a bad game. I didn't like it. But the menu's are just some text boxes on clips from the movies basically, and launching multiplayre matches (locally, haven't played online yet) seem clunky and boring to me.

World of Goo on the other hand is amazing, as in a previous post of mine. The vibrant colors and menus are perfect in that game. The overall art is just amazing.

Presentation often gives me an overall feeling of a game. Brawl for instance disappointed me, since it seems too similar to melee (please don't attack me for that; post forthcoming). The Halo and Gears of War series also impressed me with their overall design.

Lock's Quest on the DS also is designed really well, and if anybody hasn't picked up that game I heartily recommend it.

What games have stood out to you for their presentation, art design, or just overall design? Comments appreciated!

Avatar image for thevatican
TheVatican

19

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By TheVatican

So recently I tried to convince a friend to play Half-Life 2. If anyone's played the demo on Xbox Live, its pretty lame.

I told him it was considered one of the greatest FPS's of our time. He wanted to know more. I said it had a Gravity Gun. He asked if there was multiplayer. And on and on and on....

I've been experiencing this lately, and after reading that Section 8 preview it was really brought to my attention. FPS's and games in general need to have a gimmick.

Take Timeshift for instance. If anyone remembers that game, it was a pretty generic sci-fi FPS but the thing was, you could control time. If you pitched that game to anyone it'd sound like this: 'its a shooter, but you can control time!'.

No longer can I just say to my friends "its a really good game." Games need something else to draw them in.

Dark Void is the perfect example of a game thats coming up with a gimmick. Jetpacks, hi-jacking alien ships, vertical cover, perfect gimmick.

Gears of War: Chainsaws+Guns. 'Nuff said. (and broken multiplayer, but thats a different post)

My point is: I think some good games are getting passed by people who haven't played any in that series before simply because they don't have good enough or any gimmick. I'm the only person I know who has played Uncharted, and I wish that weren't true. Other people just aren't draw in, a gimmick is needed there.

Gimmicks are necessarily a bad thing. The first Gears of War drew lots of people in just cause of its gore and chainsaws, and it turned out to be a really good game. Resistance 1, also actually was played by my not-in-the-loop friends (not checking IGN every day). Thanks to its awesome weaponry and graphics, it became a highly played game by us.

What are your thoughts on "gimmicks"? Beneficial? Harmful? Comments appreciated!

Avatar image for thevatican
TheVatican

19

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5  Edited By TheVatican

This could be a whole separate post of me talking about how awesome Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask is, but that'll come later.

The one single thing that really stands out to me about that game is the sidequests.

With tons of characters who's models were recycled from Ocarina of Time, on the surface it may just seem like a cheap cash in. But this time, they're real people. The sidequest where you drive into town with a woman that works on her farm with her little sister, the dialogue during that sidequest is truly awesome.

And these aren't your normal "I dropped an item in a forest/dungeon. Could you get it for me?" or, "My pet/child is lost in a forest/dungeon. Could you get it/them for me?" these are full on character driven sidequests.

Though Fallout 3 did have some major flaws in it, some of the quests in that game (don't worry no spoilers ahead) were really original and fun. Also, I really like Mass Effect, not for the types of quests you do, but for the way they are presented in the universe.

If you really think about it, what really is a sidequest? Something that doesn't relate to the main journey, but contains the main gameplay core as well? Majora's Mask, in my opinion, is the best example of something like that.

What are some of the favorite "sidequests" you've ever been on or what game do you think had the best "sidequests?" Comments appreciated!

Avatar image for thevatican
TheVatican

19

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6  Edited By TheVatican

I've been pondering this for a while, and a commentor on my last post really brought this up to the front of my mind (Thanks Icemael). And what it is is this:

2D Graphics are beautiful.

Take Super Metroid for instance. The mood and atmosphere that game creates is simply incredible, and all for a SuperNES game. Megaman games also look really good to me, along with almost every single 2D Mario game.

New games can also recapture this look as well. Take Street Fighter IV, which, in my opinion, looks like one of the best games this generation. Its look, while 2D, looks simply astounding and breathtaking. New Super Mario Bros. is another good example, as its 3D graphics on a 2D plane really advance that genre.

I think there is still a place for 2D games in today's market. The PSN Store and Xbox Live Arcade has really opened up a space for developers to take advantage of somewhat simplified graphics. Bionic Commando Rearmed is also a great example of how a 2D game should look.

How do you guys feel about 2D games? comments appreciated!

Avatar image for thevatican
TheVatican

19

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7  Edited By TheVatican
I recently downloaded Street Fighter II (Virtual Console) on my Wii and found that it was a great game. The graphics really look great to me.

Let me describe that. Some games, like Killzone 2 or Crysis, just look amazing and almost real to me. Other games, like World of Goo, Mario 64, Halo, or SFII, just look good to me. Like they did what they were trying to accomplish with the graphics they have, and nothing else is really needed.

Also, I recently went back to play Majora's Mask on my 64 (which is the best Zelda game, post forthcoming). That also had awesome graphics to me, because I didn't really feel like it needed any more. The characters, stories, and art design really make a game look good to me.

Metroid Prime is another game. That game looks pretty good just graphically, but the art style, the whole feel of the game, and the enemies and presentation just make that game look simply amazing to me.

What games "hold up" like this to you? Or, what games do you think their graphics are just fine as they are, and aren't very glaring in today's world of 360's and PS3s?

Comments appreciated!
Avatar image for thevatican
TheVatican

19

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By TheVatican

Thanks to everybody who commented on last post, your comments were greatly appreciated.

To clarify my current situation, I have a Wii but am only buying good games, not crappy kids ones, but the problems kinda moot now since my sister and her husband and my nephew are moving (just found out) so without her pressuring me to entertain him and myself, I'm saving money. (i will get a PS3 in the future, when i can afford it)

So I want to get Street Fighter. I only have a Wii. which game should I get?

The one's listed in the VC are SF2: World Warrior, SF2 Turbo Hyper Fighting, and Super SF2: The New Challengers.

More substantial post in the works, but this'll do it for now. Help and Comments appreciated!

Avatar image for thevatican
TheVatican

19

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By TheVatican

So, here's my first Giant Bomb Blog post. I dunno how often blogs and stuff is read on Giant Bomb, but here goes.

So, I've been trying to get into the whole Street Fightere hoopla recently. I've playe SFIITHDR recently because I'm trying to get good at it. Mainly because I would like to play Street Fighter 4 when it comes out cause that game looks awesome when two good people are playing it. I won't be good at it but I'll at least try.

Also, I've been deciding whether to get a PS3 or not. I'm not sure about the amount of E-rated games on it though, since it would have to have lots of those. My nephew comes over pretty regularly and my sister would be very disappointed If i had him start playing Resistance or something. And I'm low on cash right now, so I'd pretty much be just playing the E-rated games on it (no questions, thats just how its gonna happen).

So, you think its worth it?

Yeah....