xrayzwei

But comments aren't moderated like the wiki.  While I could put factual information in the comments, there really isn't a way to vet that information, and it could be wrong.  Anybody with an account could add something, I would lke it better if it were moderated. 

I hear what the three of you are saying, I'm just trying to provide something I think would be an improvement for later. 

I figured as much, but that's why I added the "wouldn't it be nice part".  Maybe in the future we could get something more than just the download from the other services.  Also, if it's not part of the wiki, and isn't going to be, can we get the edit button removed?  Just some thoughts.

Is there a restriction on editing the achievment pages?  Wouldn't it be nice to add information beyond what the basic xbox achievement  description is listed as?  For instance in Lego Batman,The Richest Man in Gotham award is described as "max out the stud counter" but the page doesn't allow a place to add what that amount might factually be outside of the comments.  I think the body of the page should allow an edit to enter the fact information.  That's merely one example, and it shouldn't be for recommended guides or anything, but the facts specifically.

Thanks

Yes, they don't seem to be fleecing anybody with those prices. 

I have tried to download this unsuccessfully on XBLM.  I have the trial, from my download history, and try to download the full game, but it doesn't work.  Anyone else tried it lately?  Also I'm wanting to try to download it from a game recommendation, so if you do have the full version, send a game rec to Aberfoyle on XBL.  Thanks.

what was the word again?  retrofaux? fauxtoro? retfauxto?

I don't believe in pennies, do you have change for a nickel?  Either way I'm looking forward to getting this game on XBLA

For search purposes, a main information might not help you find say a list of games that are BC.  The concept is confusing because there are games listed, but when you see the list it shows all platforms the game exists on, when it may not be BC on all of those platforms.  Rock Band , for example, is not an Xbox game, but is included I guess because of it's ability to play tracks from Rock Band.  Yet all of it's platforms, including PS2 are listed. 

when editing an original Xbox title and under a PS or PS2 game that reads something like (20/60 gig only, software, none)

"Note the internal controls are the same as on the current PSP, since both systems need to be able to run the same games. That means no second analog control, as previously rumored."

What I can't figure out is why everyone says that it won't have a second analog stick BECAUSE the original iterations didn't.  It's not like if one is added that the original games have to use it, and nobody would take advantage of one going forward.  I don't think that it would lead to PSP GO! specific titles.  I could see a lot of the current games being iterated to take advantage of such an addition, I mean how hard is it to convert some camera control, and would welcome more PS2 ports since I spend more of my time in a day away from my home entertainment.