Something went wrong. Try again later

Giant Bomb Review

208 Comments

Blackwater Review

1
  • X360

This game is practically a war crime.

While I am sure there are some out there who view the idea of private military corporations as a necessary evil in America's war on terror, I doubt too many of them even have particularly fond feelings toward the company formerly known as Blackwater. The company, which has made hundreds of millions of dollars in government contracts working for the US Army in Iraq, has changed its name not just once (to Xe Services) but twice (it's now known as Academi) in the last few years to try and counteract its own bad PR. Not that you can blame them. After years of accusations regarding illegal weapons trafficking, the alleged killings of civilians and subsequent cover-ups, and recruiting practices that saw them employing former members of Augusto Pinochet's death squads, you can hardly be surprised that they'd do just about anything they could to make the public forget about all of that.

Apparently
Apparently "beard technology" is not something Zombie Studios has quite grasped yet.

Thus enters Blackwater, a video game with a curiously outdated title and a message to the public that lets you know that, hey, these guys aren't so bad after all! When they aren't smuggling guns to the King of Jordan or getting sued by dozens of Iraqi families for "random killings," they're helping out the U.N., rescuing formerly deposed peaceful leaders of fictional North African countries, taking down brutal military dictatorships, rescuing hostages and killing the same five recycled models of generic terrorists for about 90 minutes at a time.

Blackwater feels, for all intents and purposes, like a public relations blast. It's less a video game than an attempt to try and sway the public opinion (at least insofar as the public opinion relates to gamers) back to their side, presenting them as a bunch of selfless, good-natured totally-not-mercenaries who save hostages and deliver food and totally don't kill civilians. How could they, when there are literally no civilians anywhere in this game? It's like they took a one way ticket straight to terrorist town.

As a PR tool, Blackwater is rather vile, not to mention woefully ineffective. It stages life as a Blackwater contractor as something akin to being in the fucking A-Team, minus any of the dramatic flair or clever wit. All these chuckleheads do is crack the same jokes to each other--literally, it's the same jokes recycled dozens and dozens of times throughout the game--while periodically dropping an "Oscar Mike" or other piece of equally ubiquitous military terminology to let you know how legit these guys really are. The dialogue is so stiff and tone-deaf that it makes Richard Marcinko sound like Ernest Hemingway, and that's before it even gets around to actually making cracks about the company's own miserable reputation. Yes, that's right: this game actually makes fun of the fact that people think Blackwater is awful and made up of mercenary killers. There are no words...

Do you like this enemy model? I hope so, because you're going to shoot it about six thousand times.
Do you like this enemy model? I hope so, because you're going to shoot it about six thousand times.

Whatever you may have heard about Blackwater being the first real attempt at bringing a "real first-person shooter" to Kinect, go ahead and disregard any such nonsense now. This is an on-rails light gun game without the light gun. Light gun games are not "real first-person shooters," at least as I understand the definition. They're target shoots where the targets shoot back. This game has more in common with Time Crisis or Hogan's Alley than it does Modern Warfare or Battlefield, and it's not even as good as Hogan's Alley.

For one thing, the aiming is terrible whether you're using Kinect or not. With Kinect, you're theoretically supposed to aim your hand like it's a gun, and effectively live out a way more boring version of this. Except that's really tiring after a while, and also patently unnecessary. You can just lift your hand up a bit so it recognizes that your arms are there, and then you're fine. It's like you're shooting bullets out of your palms, but whatever. The bigger issue is that the aiming reticle is jittery and also slow as hell. It takes seconds (as in plural) to move the reticle from one side of the screen to the other. It's even worse if you play with a controller, though maybe that should be of no surprise. No light gun game translates well to dual-analog sticks, but the fact that it still sucks with Kinect is pretty astounding.

That's the least of Blackwater's gameplay sins. More atrocious are the enemies and level designs, which dart violently between stump-stupid and frustratingly harrowing. Roughly half the enemies in the game will dart out from cover and then just kind of stand there while blurting out lines that sound about a step away from South Park's "Durka Durka!" terrorist dialogue. Forever. They will never move. Only after you shoot every other enemy on screen will they bother to shoot, but they still won't move. As for the ones who do demonstrate cognitive ability, they're still usually pretty easy to blow away, except for a random few who are such crack shots that they can basically pick you off entirely in three shots. This is where cover presumably comes into play, except that the cover mechanics are largely broken. If you're standing right next to a perfectly placed wall, then great, you can just hide behind it until your health regenerates. If you have to crouch, or bend in any sort of awkward way, most times the game has no idea what the hell you're trying to do, and just makes you stand there, soaking up bullets like they were glorious, life-giving sunlight.

If you buy Blackwater, the terrorists don't win. However, the next step below terrorists (mercenaries) do.
If you buy Blackwater, the terrorists don't win. However, the next step below terrorists (mercenaries) do.

Once you do die, you have to replay the entire level over again. All of it. Granted, most levels last between 5-7 minutes, but that's still a decent chunk of content you're going to be repeating again and again, until you either figure out which enemy is randomly really good at shooting you, or you quit in pure frustration. I'm not sure if it's an accidental bonus or something close to tragic, but ultimately you'll only be doing any of this for maybe 90 minutes total. The campaign is ludicrously short, which gives one the impression that this game may have been intended for arcades at one point in its development cycle. What to do when you finish that 90 minute campaign? You could replay the same godawful levels you just played for better scores, or you could try out the barely-stitched-on multiplayer component, though that would entail subjecting friends to this game's various unpleasantries. With friends like you, who needs private military contractors?

All of this misery for $50 a pop. An hour and a half of busted-ass light gun shooting that barely masks the deplorable PR message underneath. In effect, buyers of Blackwater are paying for propaganda. They're handing over money to a shady group of alleged killers for the privilege of being told that these guys aren't shady or killers or anything to that effect. The only good news is that the message is altogether lost in a sea of half-baked gameplay, barely-functioning graphics, and horrible one-liners. I don't know if the folks at publisher 505 Games actually sympathize with these dirtbags, or just figured they could make a quick, easy buck with this thing, but that they, and developer Zombie Studios have even failed to make the compelling propaganda tool they were tasked with is, in a way, kind of perfect. Shame on everyone involved.

Alex Navarro on Google+

208 Comments

Avatar image for jewers
jewers

10

Forum Posts

4

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By jewers

After reading this review I'm convinced the review is 20 times more entertaining than the actual game.

Avatar image for pandashake
pandashake

762

Forum Posts

14

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By pandashake

@plaintomato: You're being sarcastic right? I hope so since it's a really good remark, but if not then its really ironic. The 'credibility' issues you so say should be on the official magazine since all other reviews are giving this game negative scores as seen on metacritic except, unsurprisingly, xbox magazines.

Avatar image for jackijinx
JackiJinx

3255

Forum Posts

23588

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 34

Edited By JackiJinx

I can absolutely see this game being used for university study on propaganda. Not even joking. As an effort to demonstrate use of propaganda in different mediums, both effective and effective, with discussions on how things could've been executed differently in order to obtain the intended goals of the developers.

Avatar image for cornbredx
cornbredx

7484

Forum Posts

2699

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 15

Edited By cornbredx

I thought developers knew you couldn't make shit games anymore... and that reviews actually hold a lot of sway in todays society due to the interconnectedness of everything.

Oh wait, Kinect. That's why. This must be it's first piece of shovel ware?

Ok, maybe I am being generous.

Avatar image for bigchief
bigchief

513

Forum Posts

784

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 7

Edited By bigchief

How does this game even exist? Why? How did anyone think this was a good idea? How did Blackwater think that attaching their name to a shitty video game would generate good PR? How did a video game company think that latching onto a bunch of scumbags and potential murderers would be a good way to sell games? Is this real life?

Avatar image for dukest3
DukesT3

2114

Forum Posts

773

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By DukesT3

Im holding out for the Treadstone game.

Avatar image for paul
Paul

181

Forum Posts

138

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Paul

The fact that this game exists is disgusting. Honestly, revolting. This deserves 0 stars. Negative stars. 
 Big Rigs was bad, sure, and broken... but it didn't just straight up endorse known murders. 
Really, it seems like any game other then this is better just due to the subject matter.

Avatar image for cuntdracula
CuntDracula

7

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By CuntDracula

Okay, dudes demanding that Alex shouldn't talk about politics when reviewing this game seem to have forgotten that it wasn't Alex who brought politics on the table, but "Blackwater - The Game". How can someone not talk about politics when a game takes such an offensive political stance.

Nice read, thanks Alex. Too bad you had to kinda waste your time on this game.

Avatar image for scottygrayskull
scottygrayskull

606

Forum Posts

26

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By scottygrayskull

But it will still sell better than Tony Hawk Shred.

... I wonder if it supports the Ride board come to think of it.

Avatar image for vaportra1l
vaportra1l

287

Forum Posts

206

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

Edited By vaportra1l

Well I've seen Blackwater sponsor a NASCAR race car so I guess this is the next logical step.

Avatar image for tebbit
tebbit

4659

Forum Posts

861

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 6

Edited By tebbit

@HyperionX3 said:

Alex Navarro's Opinion: It's a thing now... so, that happened.

Notably, he did't use either of those chestnuts in this review. What is the world coming to!?

Avatar image for superfluousmoniker
SuperfluousMoniker

2929

Forum Posts

5086

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 4

Where's the quick look?

Avatar image for rsistnce
RsistncE

4498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By RsistncE

This review is a pile of shit. Why? Alex somehow felt that launching into a diatribe against a company which he believes stands on shaky moral ground was appropriate. Guess what Alex? So does the US Army. Half of those accusations you talked about have also been levelled against the US Army (along with most others in the world). With this in mind: why didn't the reviewer of Call of Duty, or Battlefield, or one of the other million games that portray US soldiers in a positive light, launch into an off-topic rant about how immoral the US Army is etc.?

Stick to reviewing the product and keep non-game related stuff out. If you feel that you can't, then it should be expected that the same treatment should be given to all game reviews.

Avatar image for bybeach
bybeach

6754

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By bybeach

I really like Alex, I really dislike Blackwatwer/Xe/A new name I didn't know about. But...I would be a bit more limited to the gaming failures. You could say some side stuff, with the strong qualification that it was your opinion. Alex kinda goes to town. Well I think that can be done to some extant, but in a more circumspect and less arbitrary manner..it's arbitrary after all what I fear of Blackwater and the darkness of it's world around it.

Yes Blackwater fucked up bigtime, embarrassed the US and thwarted the positive goals of the US after the US started to grasp the monster was/had become itself, at least in the war for minds. Blackwater mercs. are the worst thing that could occur, and top of that making so much more big money than the Army or marine soldier who is/was in more danger of being grievously wounded or dieing. And I absolutely cringe at the thought of them anywhere near something the US should do for itself, or not do at all.

But I do not believe my views or views like this should necc. be a main focus in a video game review. Just let the facts speak for themselves, and reserve for yourself the reviewers thoughts on the matter. It could be limited to a few sentences and left at that.

EDIT- oh yeah, I'm a bit twisted and also want a QL. I'll never see this game otherwise..although I'm not sure about Kinnect, that would be bizarre.

Avatar image for spaceyoghurt
Spaceyoghurt

166

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

Edited By Spaceyoghurt

At least it doesn't have boobies in it, because that would be harmful to children.

Avatar image for mcshank
McShank

1700

Forum Posts

920

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By McShank

@RsistncE said:

This review is a pile of shit. Why? Alex somehow felt that launching into a diatribe against a company which he believes stands on shaky moral ground was appropriate. Guess what Alex? So does the US Army. Half of those accusations you talked about have also been levelled against the US Army (along with most others in the world). With this in mind: why didn't the reviewer of Call of Duty, or Battlefield, or one of the other million games that portray US soldiers in a positive light, launch into an off-topic rant about how immoral the US Army is etc.?

Stick to reviewing the product and keep non-game related stuff out. If you feel that you can't, then it should be expected that the same treatment should be given to all game reviews.

I agree with this.

Avatar image for yummylee
Yummylee

24646

Forum Posts

193025

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 88

User Lists: 24

Edited By Yummylee

Goddamn it, Alex. Yet again you manage to one-up yourself and continue to be the best and most entertaining writer of all WM. <3

Avatar image for hobosunday
Hobosunday

61

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Hobosunday

*sigh* Can we let the man review the game? Is everyone gonna go up in arms about this review? Guess what? Alex is a critic. He gives opinions. That's what he's paid to do. This game didn't get one star because it's Blackwater, it got one star because it's a terrible game.

That being said, why can't we state our feelings on an incident? Why if it involves the government at all it becomes political and therefore a no-no? If a game was made by nazis where you play as a nazi fighting non-jews would you as a critic bring up the fact that the game was made by well, nazis? Would you argue that the game attempts to glorify Hitler's regime even though they did some pretty messed up shit? What about a serial killer game where you control a man rapes and murders 10 girls and gets away with it? Would you not mention your distaste towards the idea, even if it was well made?

If you said you wouldn't mention these things in your review, you either have incredible self-control or you are a horrible liar. Yes, I'm going to extremes to prove my point, but think about it. We as human beings have opinions towards things, and some of those opinions are not pretty. Alex wants us to know where his distaste around this group comes from, why his review might seem very angry. Any of you that have a real problem with this, don't read it. That's the beauty of the internet.

Final note: Kinect reccomended, lol.

Avatar image for luthorcrow
luthorcrow

195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By luthorcrow

First off great review Alex. Second to the girls in the room whining about Alex ranting a bit about politics, how the fuck could you review or talk about this game and NOT talk about politics? I am sorry but it just would be silly to ignore the 800 pound gorilla jerking off in the corner. It's one thing to go off on a tangent on a feminist diatribe during a Zelda game review and whole another thing to talk to address the crimes of mercs guilty of war crimes.

Avatar image for homelessbird
Homelessbird

1681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Homelessbird

@RsistncE: I disagree with you, and here's why: a game review is an opinion. Certainly, applying an absolutely complete rubrick to judge all games by the same merits would be ideal for a product review (as in, reviewing a washing machine), but asking for that is unrealistic even of the context of something that utilitarian, because it's invariably colored by the user's specific experience with it.

Not to mention, we're talking about a videogame here, something that is intended to be enjoyed as an experience. Maybe you could play Blackwater without ever making the connections Alex did, but the fact is, he obviously wasn't able to. A large part of his experience with the game seems to have been his association with the real-life brand, which was probably especially true due to the fact that the game's like an hour and a half and terrible (from all accounts, not just his).

I guess what I'm saying is this: maybe if Alex though the US army was that reprehensible too, he would say that when he reviews games that depict the US army, too. But that's really not the issue - fact is, he could just say "I didn't like Blackwater because it was about Blackwater," and that would be just as legitimate a review. Reductive, yes, shitty, perhaps, but legitimate, because it's just an opinion about an experience.

Now if you don't wanna listen to Alex or GB because of how he/they review things, well... go ahead. That's fine. That's just like, your opinion, man.

Avatar image for deactivated-61abb009b221e
deactivated-61abb009b221e

398

Forum Posts

522

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

Oh, Alex. 4 years after your last job as an editor and you still review shitty games.

Avatar image for milkham
milkham

26

Forum Posts

5

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By milkham

Blackwater, starring Gary Whitta

Avatar image for brackynews
Brackynews

4385

Forum Posts

27681

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 48

Edited By Brackynews

And just like real PMCs, you can't punish this game in court.

Unless it's the court... of PUBLIC OPINION. Judge Navarro presiding.

@LooseChange said:

Im holding out for the Treadstone game.

Well they did the Bou.... oh, yeah I see what you're saying. I'm with ya.

Avatar image for fattony12000
fattony12000

8491

Forum Posts

22398

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

Edited By fattony12000

@InfamousBIG said:

METAL...GEAR?!

PM...C's?!!

NANOMACHINES?!!!!!

OCELOT!?????????????????????

Avatar image for kovski
Kovski

173

Forum Posts

12

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Kovski

Oh lawd, I laugh at all of you thinks slanting Blackwater as "political". Silly 'mericans. Great written piece of an awful awful pr tool mr navarro!

Avatar image for metal_mills
metal_mills

3604

Forum Posts

4049

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 3

Edited By metal_mills
@RsistncE said:

This review is a pile of shit. Why? Alex somehow felt that launching into a diatribe against a company which he believes stands on shaky moral ground was appropriate. Guess what Alex? So does the US Army. Half of those accusations you talked about have also been levelled against the US Army (along with most others in the world). With this in mind: why didn't the reviewer of Call of Duty, or Battlefield, or one of the other million games that portray US soldiers in a positive light, launch into an off-topic rant about how immoral the US Army is etc.?

Stick to reviewing the product and keep non-game related stuff out. If you feel that you can't, then it should be expected that the same treatment should be given to all game reviews.

The US army can do bad things but the men and women in it try and do good. Blackwater is run by an arsehole warmonger who couldn't give a shit how many die as long as he gets a pay check.
Avatar image for jmrwacko
jmrwacko

2537

Forum Posts

50

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By jmrwacko

This game is practically a war crime.

Avatar image for ghostnpc
ghostNPC

803

Forum Posts

23

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Edited By ghostNPC

@RsistncE: I think you should go out and buy this game right now and play it to completion.

Avatar image for bsw
BSw

391

Forum Posts

80

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By BSw

@WindFall259 said:

Oh, Alex. 4 years after your last job as an editor and you still review shitty games.

Seems to me that the whole point of this review was to review an ethically questionable and downright crap game. I doubt this was given to him to make a review because it had to be done, especially given the small amount of reviews done on GB.

What scares me is that if Blackwater would've been a good game, Academi's credibility would actually have gone up after millions of people played it and 'experienced' that Academi isn't all that bad at all (wouldn't work for everyone, of course, but it would for a part, which is more than enough). Good propaganda is so extremely powerful.

Avatar image for falling_fast
falling_fast

2905

Forum Posts

189

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 6

Edited By falling_fast

kinect: the future of gaming.

I think Blackwater or whatever they call themselves now are piece of shit scum war criminals, so I'm not too bothered if Alex agrees.

more importantly, in the context of gaming anyway, it's shameful that something like this was released with a 50 dollar price tag attached to it. Like, what the fuck.

Avatar image for tsuchikage
tsuchikage

506

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By tsuchikage

This had to be an arcade lightgun game at some point, right? I mean, the name of the PMC is outdated, so this game was probably finished ages ago for the arcade. I bet no one wanted to pay thousands of dollars to put a machine in their arcade that featured a bunch of murderers, so the game was retooled for Kinect and sold for the bargain-basement price of only $50.

Avatar image for cptbedlam
CptBedlam

4612

Forum Posts

7

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By CptBedlam

@WindFall259 said:

Oh, Alex. 4 years after your last job as an editor and you still review shitty games.

I'm pretty sure he reviews the games he wants to review. Recently he did the Rayman Origins review, for example.

@CuntDracula said:

Okay, dudes demanding that Alex shouldn't talk about politics when reviewing this game seem to have forgotten that it wasn't Alex who brought politics on the table, but "Blackwater - The Game". How can someone not talk about politics when a game takes such an offensive political stance.

Exactly!

@Foxtrot0245: I call bullshit on you and your "contract work" claims, that's all.

Avatar image for gunslingerpanda
GunslingerPanda

5263

Forum Posts

40

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By GunslingerPanda

Was hoping this would be good, 505 Games are renowned for only publishing the highest quality videogames.

Avatar image for mcghee
McGhee

6128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By McGhee

I want to change my vote and nominate this for Game Review of the Year. Excellent work, Alex.

Avatar image for fuga
Fuga

207

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Fuga

@RsistncE said:

This review is a pile of shit. Why? Alex somehow felt that launching into a diatribe against a company which he believes stands on shaky moral ground was appropriate. Guess what Alex? So does the US Army. Half of those accusations you talked about have also been levelled against the US Army (along with most others in the world). With this in mind: why didn't the reviewer of Call of Duty, or Battlefield, or one of the other million games that portray US soldiers in a positive light, launch into an off-topic rant about how immoral the US Army is etc.?

Stick to reviewing the product and keep non-game related stuff out. If you feel that you can't, then it should be expected that the same treatment should be given to all game reviews.

nope

Avatar image for dharmasaurus
Dharmasaurus

11

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Dharmasaurus

I didn't expect more than this.

Avatar image for tober
Tober

186

Forum Posts

37

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

Edited By Tober

Quick Look please!

Avatar image for ghostiet
Ghostiet

5832

Forum Posts

160

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 3

Edited By Ghostiet

Worst Game of the Year 2011 confirmed, I guess!

Avatar image for mrwolf710
mrwolf710

57

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Edited By mrwolf710

I guess they left the name Blackwater so that grandma's would get confused when kids asked for Black Ops for Christmas. Yet another scummy thing.

Avatar image for darkjester74
darkjester74

1743

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By darkjester74

One star Alex reviews are the best reviews.

Avatar image for kingx
KingX

246

Forum Posts

37

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 7

Edited By KingX

haha. This reminds me of some of the glorius reviews over at gamespot back in the good old day :D

When do you do the video review dear Alex? =)

Avatar image for dohers
Dohers

33

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Dohers

@RsistncE said:

This review is a pile of shit. Why? Alex somehow felt that launching into a diatribe against a company which he believes stands on shaky moral ground was appropriate. Guess what Alex? So does the US Army. Half of those accusations you talked about have also been levelled against the US Army (along with most others in the world). With this in mind: why didn't the reviewer of Call of Duty, or Battlefield, or one of the other million games that portray US soldiers in a positive light, launch into an off-topic rant about how immoral the US Army is etc.?

Stick to reviewing the product and keep non-game related stuff out. If you feel that you can't, then it should be expected that the same treatment should be given to all game reviews.

Just Wow. So, so wrong. Could you imagine someone telling a film critic they should not discuss issues they had with the message the film was trying to convey? Insane.

Great read, Alex.

Avatar image for superzamrod
SuperZamrod

280

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By SuperZamrod

Fantastic review Alex!

Avatar image for cretaceous_bob
Cretaceous_Bob

552

Forum Posts

3

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Cretaceous_Bob

@RsistncE said:

This review is a pile of shit. Why? Alex somehow felt that launching into a diatribe against a company which he believes stands on shaky moral ground was appropriate. Guess what Alex? So does the US Army. Half of those accusations you talked about have also been levelled against the US Army (along with most others in the world). With this in mind: why didn't the reviewer of Call of Duty, or Battlefield, or one of the other million games that portray US soldiers in a positive light, launch into an off-topic rant about how immoral the US Army is etc.?

Stick to reviewing the product and keep non-game related stuff out. If you feel that you can't, then it should be expected that the same treatment should be given to all game reviews.

Oh man, Alex thought that talking about the entire subject matter of the game was appropriate in a review of the game. What a fucking idiot he is. What relevance does that have?!

Avatar image for jonnyflash80
Jonnyflash80

531

Forum Posts

576

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

Edited By Jonnyflash80

Reviews of god awful games like this are nothing if not entertaining.

Avatar image for lind_l_taylor
Lind_L_Taylor

4125

Forum Posts

6

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

Edited By Lind_L_Taylor

If this game was $20, I'd think it was on par with
Deadly Premonition.  Bad games should be released
at $20, so we don't feel ripped off & play them on purpose.
I'd love to try Blackwater. 
 
You know what would be an even better game?  One that
parodies the Blackwater company, except it allows you to
do all of those seedy, black ops things. Such as hiring 
Death Squad members (or Ex-Cons, active gang members,etc).
And then run around breaking the laws in the name of 
military covert ops.  And then covering it up. That would be
a game I'd love to play.  Strangling civilians in foreign countries
using a garrote?  Doing drive-bys in Arabs lands?  Sign me
up!

Avatar image for eastboundspider
EastboundSpider

106

Forum Posts

36

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By EastboundSpider

Good review 5/5