Something went wrong. Try again later

Giant Bomb Review

236 Comments

God of War III Review

4
  • PS3

Sony delivers a fittingly epic and savage PlayStation 3 debut for God of War, even if it does little to evolve the formula established by its predecessors.


 Kratos. Son of Zeus. Ghost of Sparta. God of War. Pisces.
 Kratos. Son of Zeus. Ghost of Sparta. God of War. Pisces.

Kratos is a man with serious anger-management issues--issues that he's been violently working out on the entire pantheon of Olympic gods over the course of the last two God of War games, dismembering, disfiguring, and disembowling every god, demi-god, and beast of myth that crosses his path. This hands-on approach to primal scream therapy continues with God of War III, the first in the series designed specifically for the PlayStation 3. God of War has always been a big graphical showcase for Sony, and to this end God of War III doesn't disappoint, using that extra horsepower to bring a phenomenal level of both detail and scale to the game's presentation. While the technology has advanced, the relative shortage of meaningful changes and refinements to God of War's vivisecting gameplay formula means that it's not quite as thrilling as the first (or second) go 'round. Some of these last-gen holdovers make the experience feel less cutting-edge than it might otherwise, though it's still plenty brutal enough to earn the God of War name.  

 

Still playing fast and loose with Greek mythology, God of War III sees Kratos continue on his quest for vengeance against the gods of Olympus, now with his sights set squarely on dear old dad, Zeus. Of course, Kratos can't just walk right up to Zeus, gut him like a trout, and roll credits, so you'll spend most of the ten-or-so hours of God of War III trying to collect the mythical objects that Kratos believes he needs to finish the job. Of course, on the way, Kratos will face off with, and usually murder, whatever significant figures of Greek mythology he didn't already turn into a red smear in the first two games, all in the most unflinchingly graphic, Verhoeven-esque way possible.  

    
 It's called God of War, not God of Friendly Handshakes.
 It's called God of War, not God of Friendly Handshakes.

If God of War III is your introduction to the series, there's a brief video that will basically catch you up to speed, though at this point, all you really need to know is that Kratos is an angry jerk, and pretty much everyone else he encounters is a vindictive, condescending, double-dealing jerk. His bottomless anger seemed justified in the beginning, but his continued insistence to pursue his vengeance at the cost of, basically, the entire known world makes it hard to conjure up much compassion, and makes him seem more like a petulant child than an unrelenting instrument of righteousness. The line between anti-hero and villain can be razor thin, and I occasionally found myself feeling more like I was the antagonist in someone else's story. Kratos is a consistently sadistic son of a bitch, and it's been his sole character trait for so long that certain turns in the story feel unearned. It's hard to tell exactly where the series will go from here--not to say that the ending is anticlimactic, but its gestures towards closure seem... tentative.  

  

The gameplay experience that wraps around this revenge tour doesn't venture too far from the rhythms of the previous God of War games, focusing primarily on contained group fights, mixing it up with some traversal sequences, some lever-pulling and box-pushing puzzles, and some really huge boss fights, with plenty of quick time events to highlight the game's penchant for cinematic flair. The combat is agreeably fast-paced and intense, and I found the default difficulty level to be the almost perfect, providing a hearty challenge while rarely becoming teeth-gnashingly frustrating.

 
 Say
 Say "AAAHRGH!"

In addition to the standard-issue chain blades, you'll unlock a series of weapons and abilities as you progress through God of War III, all of which can be upgraded using the red orbs found inside both treasure chests, and your enemies' chests. I found it kind of odd that two of the alternate weapons you pick up are variations on the basic chain blade motif, which compelled me to pretty much ignore them in favor of the more distinctive Nemean Cestus, a massive pair of lion-headed gauntlets that favor impact over range. Regardless of your weapons of choice, success in battle in God of War III ultimately comes down to diligent use of Kratos' dodge and counter abilities, as well as knowing which of Kratos' plentiful attacks to use on specific enemies or in specific situations, with a certain eye towards crowd control.  

  

Save for a handful of eye-catching sequences that make unique use of the Icarus wings, I found most of the traversal stuff not necessarily bad, but something to fill the downtime in between the administration of savage beatings. For as terrific as God of War III looks--and it is easily one of the best-looking PlayStation 3 games out there right now--there's something vaguely mechanical about the way Kratos shimmies along ledges and swings from his chains.  

  

Similarly, the quick time events are implemented in such a way that I sometimes felt they were drawing my attention away from the flashy camera moves and gruesome acts they were intended to highlight. It's all the stuff that you expect from a God of War game, which I suspect is the very reason why parts of the game feel kind of perfunctory. It's like the developers had a mechanical understanding of the beats they were expected to hit, and focused more on nailing that stuff than pushing the experience somewhere new. 

      Fighting a Titan is like fighting a mountain that hates you.
      Fighting a Titan is like fighting a mountain that hates you.

These issues, however, hardly define the experience of God of War III. No, God of War, as always, is all about vividly grotesque ways in which Kratos fells his enemies, and an incredible sense of scale as you take down one impossibly leviathanic enemy after another. Aside from the flight sequences I mentioned earlier, the most amazing moments in God of War III for me revolved around the Titans, the huge, primitive elder gods that preceded the Olympians. Acting as both enemy and environment, the Titans are the best example of God of War III's capacity to make you feel simultaneously powerful and insignificant, as the camera zooms out from a standard third-person view of Kratos to a perspective that makes him look like a flea on the Titan's back, all in real-time, and all of it looking incredibly sharp. Kratos himself features an impressive level of detail, both during gameplay but particularly in cutscenes, to the point that the other characters can look a little crude by comparison--which, really, says more about how good Kratos looks than anything else. 

 

The beautiful rendering of Kratos' ugliness is what made God of War III a compelling experience for me, despite of the bits that felt unnecessarily slavish to the God of War formula. Even if it's not the best God of War game, it's unequivocally the best-looking God of War to date, and it makes for a wicked showpiece for the PlayStation 3.

236 Comments

Avatar image for homeslice
Homeslice

1003

Forum Posts

103932

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Homeslice

Also, if you've followed these guys for a while, you know that freshness is what turns these guys on. That's why MK vs. DC got 5 stars, and Twilight Princess got an 8.8.

Avatar image for chavafx
chavafx

47

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By chavafx

good to know that not everyone is review ing the grahpics of games   ...  cuz gow 3  as a game is average at best
Avatar image for blair
blair

2265

Forum Posts

3572

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

Edited By blair

Thanks for the review Ryan, much appreciated.
 
People complaining about the score can go suck it.

Avatar image for agentofchaos
AgentofChaos

1575

Forum Posts

436

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By AgentofChaos

Easy people, its not like any of you who are arguing it should be 5/5 aren't going to buy the game now. Also, 4/5 is a perfectly respectable score. God of War III is a GOOD game. 4/5 stars is a GOOD score.

Avatar image for bonbolapti
bonbolapti

1752

Forum Posts

4208

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 2

Edited By bonbolapti

Geez some of you guys should just write your own reviews then :P

Avatar image for box3ru13
Box3ru13

814

Forum Posts

83

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By Box3ru13

I don't get the innovation complaint or the formula complaint when, DI came out and was GoW to the T from last gen. Everything about this game is bigger and better. I'd much rather take the awesome refinements they made with this one than some totally changed formula that would've most likely been hated. Everything else I agree with but damn after giving U2 the GOTY last year. And praising titles like darksiders despite their lack or originality or innovation some consistency or explanation would be helpful because I'm not getting it. 

Avatar image for cube
Cube

4410

Forum Posts

1677

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 5

Edited By Cube

Fuck that.
 
Guarantee Brad would 5/5 it.

Avatar image for iachilles
iAchilles

74

Forum Posts

3188

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By iAchilles
@Box3ru13 said:
" I don't get the innovation complaint or the formula complaint when, DI came out and was GoW to the T from last gen. Everything about this game is bigger and better. I'd much rather take the awesome refinements they made with this one than some totally changed formula that would've most likely been hated. Everything else I agree with but damn after giving U2 the GOTY last year. And praising titles like darksiders despite their lack or originality or innovation some consistency or explanation would be helpful because I'm not getting it.  "
Damn Straight
Avatar image for deactivated-60339640361ae
deactivated-60339640361ae

977

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 1

...goddamn fanboys...

Avatar image for ez123
ez123

2166

Forum Posts

170

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 12

Edited By ez123
@Cube said:
"Guarantee Brad would 5/5 it. "
I guarantee that he would have given it a 3.
 
Hooray for comments that mean nothing!
Avatar image for cube
Cube

4410

Forum Posts

1677

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 5

Edited By Cube
@ez123 said:
" @Cube said:
"Guarantee Brad would 5/5 it. "
I guarantee that he would have given it a 3.  Hooray for comments that mean nothing! "
Hooray! You're awesome! GO YOU!
Avatar image for ez123
ez123

2166

Forum Posts

170

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 12

Edited By ez123
@Cube said:
" @ez123 said:
" @Cube said:
"Guarantee Brad would 5/5 it. "
I guarantee that he would have given it a 3.  Hooray for comments that mean nothing! "
Hooray! You're awesome! GO YOU! "
Hey, thanks. Appreciate it.
Avatar image for agentxricky
agentxricky

35

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By agentxricky
A@RsistncE said:
" @agentxricky:  Do, YOU know what a review is? Reviews aren't defined by subjectivity or objectivity. Maybe some people want to know what some other dick wad thinks of the game but many also use reviews as an evaluative tool to see how good a game is and if it merits a purchase.
 
You seem to have the misconception that objectivity = bad writing. Get the fuck outta here. I suggest you do a quick search of academic databases like JSTOR for a quick look at objective writing. It is far from bad and yet very objective at the same time.
 
Admittedly, I can't say I wasn't expecting some GB crew dick sucking fuck head like yourself to come out and start defending their honor to the last breath. 
No. You're just a brain dead moron who feels that anything less than your opinion = bad writing. Why don't you check your over sized ego at the door and realize that REVIEWS are fucking OPINION pieces. They are not quantitative assessments of the title they are QUALITATIVE. And seeing as how games are used for entertainment and not utilities like cars or computers, you're going to get OPINION.
 
You need to go make your own dumbshit blog, where you post the reviews you want to see, read them, and then suck your own dick afterwards, because you are literally too dumb to be given free reign over the internet.
 
Proof being: If you find yourself wanting to quit coming to this website. WHY THE FUCK ARE YOU READING AND THEN BASHING THESE REVIEWS. If you haven't been agreeing with their opinions for some time, why would continue to value what they have to say? Are you that much of a shit for brains that if somebody recommended you a restaurant that you hate. You would continue to take recommendations from them on places to eat?
 
Wait. Seeing as how you're a 12 year old dumbshit idiot. I guess you would.
Avatar image for gunslingernz
gunslingerNZ

2010

Forum Posts

300

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By gunslingerNZ
@Nasar7 said:
" @agentxricky said:
" @gunslingerNZ said:
" @EgoCheck616 said:
" ...and yet Modern Warfare 2 walks away with a 5/5. Awesome. "
Ha that is a little funny considering his complaints here apply almost exactly to MW2. Releasing a highly polished, best in genre experience but not evolving on your previous efforts. Check and check. "
Are you guys just brainless or is their really something in your minds that makes you completely oblivous to the fact that Jeff review MW2. Ryan and Jeff are NOT the same person. Morons. "
No need for your rudeness, they are entitled to their view, namely that the site should have some sort of standard. Innovation should either matter or not matter across the board, no matter who reviews what. "
Cheers Nasar, exactly what I was about to reply with. Reviewers are entitled to a modicum of subjectivity but you have to be able to rely on certain key points having equal weighting between reviews.
 
That and the fact that nothing in my original comment suggests I considered them the same person...
Avatar image for agentxricky
agentxricky

35

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By agentxricky
@Nasar7 said:
No need for your rudeness, they are entitled to their view, namely that the site should have some sort of standard. Innovation should either matter or not matter across the board, no matter who reviews what. 
Nobody is entitled to a view that is stupid or just plain wrong. If that was the case, the world would be a desolate wasteland already.
 
The fact is that the Giant Bomb crew decide their standards for reviews. If they don't want any, then it's up to them. They aren't forcing their opinions on anyone. People choose to come here and read them, and with that comes the implications that you're getting GB opinions on GB terms. There are plenty... literally thousands, of other places people can find reviews that fit their standards, so it's idiotic, and just plain wrong for people to voluntarily consume the opinion of someone else in their own house, and then decide that their whole way of going about it is wrong.
Avatar image for agentxricky
agentxricky

35

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By agentxricky
@gunslingerNZ said:
Cheers Nasar, exactly what I was about to reply with. Reviewers are entitled to a modicum of subjectivity but you have to be able to rely on certain key points having equal weighting between reviews.  That and the fact that nothing in my original comment suggests I considered them the same person... "
The fact that you're comparing one review to the other, when they were written by two completely different people implies that you either thought they were the same person, or that you just don't understand the concept of an opinion.
 
 Which is also furthered by the fact you state that reviewers are entitled to a modicum of subjectivity. What exactly is objective about videogames?  You can speak of resolution, framerate, game length, and such, but any other qualitative assessment of a video game is going to be purely subjective.
 
Whether or not you like a character and his or her motivations for continuing the story. Whether or not you like a fighting system's flow. Whether or not you consider the puzzles to be too easy or too hard, whether or not an art style meshes with the tone of the game.
 
All of these things are purely subjective and this is the sole reason we have so many sources of reviews. Because everyone has a different view on things.
 
I feel like I'm babbling to babies right now.
Avatar image for theht
TheHT

15998

Forum Posts

1562

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 9

Edited By TheHT

I reckon this review could have used one more read over. Nevertheless I'm glad it's pretty much what I expected. More God of War but insanely prettier. :D

Avatar image for gunslingernz
gunslingerNZ

2010

Forum Posts

300

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By gunslingerNZ
@agentxricky: 
 
Woah tone down the hatred little man. Nobody is saying Ryan isn't entitled to say what he wants in a review because clearly he is. All we're saying is that within one site reviews should have parity otherwise you might as well be writing a blog.
 
If somebody can't make a reasoned comparison between reviews then what purpose do they serve at all?
 
In fact I don't know why I even bothered asking that question. Everyone knows at this stage that reviews from the games media are little more than fan service. I guarantee that 80% of people who looked at this review only did so to validate their own opinions they had already formed and of those a large percentage probably looked at the score and didn't even bother to read the text.
 
This is why Giant Bomb has been successful as a videogame site. It relies more on entertaining than informing.
Avatar image for agentxricky
agentxricky

35

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By agentxricky
@gunslingerNZ said:
" @agentxricky:   Woah tone down the hatred little man. Nobody is saying Ryan isn't entitled to say what he wants in a review because clearly he is. All we're saying is that within one site reviews should have parity otherwise you might as well be writing a blog.  If somebody can't make a reasoned comparison between reviews then what purpose do they serve at all?  In fact I don't know why I even bothered asking that question. Everyone knows at this stage that reviews from the games media are little more than fan service. I guarantee that 80% of people who looked at this review only did so to validate their own opinions they had already formed and of those a large percentage probably looked at the score and didn't even bother to read the text.  This is why Giant Bomb has been successful as a videogame site. It relies more on entertaining than informing. "
Sorry. I thought we were having an epic internet battle. You know. Like the Neogaf revolution.
 
Anyways... I feel that Giant Bomb isn't institutionalized like IGN and Gamespot and Gametrailers are and as such, don't need the formalities that those other sites use, such as review standards and scales and so forth. The fact is, most of us do come to this website to take in the personalities of these guys and hear what they have to say. You aren't too incorrect in that this should be treated like it's a blog-type format. I equate Giant Bomb to having 4 (or 5 or 6 sometimes) friends that are really knowledgeable about videogames, I've been following these guys for a while, and I respect, and more often than not, agree with their opinions. This is why I come to this site. 
 
Now when a friend gives me his opinion, I'm not going to call him out on consistency and bias. I'm just going to hear what he has to say, and if he likes it, he likes it. If he doesn't, he doesn't. It's just stupid to me, that someone would voluntarily subject themselves to someones opinion, and then get mad at them for having a different view than themselves. If you don't agree with someone's perspective, then you don't subject yourself to their opinion, you go somewhere else, somewhere that has similar tastes as yourself.
 
But that's what a sane person would do. The majority of these people are bags of potatoes with fingers attached.
Avatar image for gunslingernz
gunslingerNZ

2010

Forum Posts

300

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By gunslingerNZ
@agentxricky: 
 
I totally agree with you about the purpose this site serves to its fanbase but I also feel that if it's truly going to do that then why don't they simply drop review scores entirely?
 
For me the reviews are the least interesting part of this site and for the most part I don't pay any attention to them at all. The bombcast and quick looks are far more my thing. They're also a far better evaluative tool than a review like this could ever be.
 
Also sorry but I have no idea what the Neogaf revolution is.
Avatar image for agentxricky
agentxricky

35

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By agentxricky
@gunslingerNZ said:
" @agentxricky: 
 
I totally agree with you about the purpose this site serves to its fanbase but I also feel that if it's truly going to do that then why don't they simply drop review scores entirely?
 
For me the reviews are the least interesting part of this site and for the most part I don't pay any attention to them at all. The bombcast and quick looks are far more my thing. They're also a far better evaluative tool than a review like this could ever be.  Also sorry but I have no idea what the Neogaf revolution is. "
I wouldn't mind if they dropped the stars. I'm pretty sure they only have them because the readers kinda need them. People always freak out when you take away a scoring system.
 
You're also completely correct about reviews in general. The Bombcast and the quicklooks combined kind of cover that role. I'm pretty sure they're doing it for the clicks more than anything else.
Avatar image for ghostiet
Ghostiet

5832

Forum Posts

160

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 3

Edited By Ghostiet

God, this is the Twilight Princess dispute ALL OVER AGAIN.


 
 
Avatar image for nathhaw
NathHaw

2874

Forum Posts

1877

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 1

Edited By NathHaw
@Ghostiet: Dude, not even close.
 
BTW, I'm not surprised.  From what I've seen of the game, it's GoW.  It's soon to arrive in the mail, and it will probably once again be a game in the franchise that I play through and not quite get the fanfare.  I'll still enjoy it and be glad when it's over.
Avatar image for therealdj
TheRealDJ

172

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By TheRealDJ

To counter the argument about this game deserving a 4/5 because its using the same game mechanics and whatnot: Punchout on Wii got a 5/5 and that's basically the exact same game as the NES version with updated graphics. And that was also rated by Ryan. Love the site but have to disagree with this review.

Avatar image for general_d23
General_D23

1210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By General_D23
@Bloviator said:
" @Ghostiet: Dude, not even close."
Indeed. It has a very, very long way to go before it reaches that much Critical Mass Stupidity. 
 
Anyway, yeah....God of War. Don't know what everyone was expecting from the game itself as well as the critical reaction to it, but it seems to be within line of expectations. I've still got some catch-up to play with other (and earlier) releases, but I liked the other two games, and I'm sure I'll like this one when I end up getting to it.
Avatar image for kibblez
Kibblez

774

Forum Posts

119

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 1

Edited By Kibblez

Good review and well justified, I think. I picked up the game yesterday and am loving it so far. The production levels in this game are off the charts. As a semi-newbie to God of War, I'm really enjoying it.

Avatar image for death_burnout
Death_Burnout

3847

Forum Posts

1617

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 6

Edited By Death_Burnout

It's moments like these that make me feel like a better user.
 
To chip in: I dont think i could ever give a game that is essentially the same as its predecessors, a 5 outright.

Avatar image for twardybidon
twardybidon

16

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By twardybidon
@Homeslice said:
It's a late review, possibly held back until the weekend because everyone knew something under a 5 would make some people upset. So....cut it out.
I don't think so. It's late because Sony probably didn't allow to publish other than "perfect" reviews early. That's why Giant Bomb had to wait until launch day.
Avatar image for globox82
Globox82

201

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By Globox82

i hate to say but i told you so. I called it a couple of days ago. 4 stars was max FROM Ruan. First Ryan is not that in GOW or Kratos as character. Based on quick look he was that into it and from short comments he game on bombcast i knew 4 stars is max. It's okey i know he tends to be hard on scores, and that's his thing. I just hope he finished the game and not stopped at half of it.

Avatar image for deadly_polo
deadly_polo

503

Forum Posts

790

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 6

Edited By deadly_polo

Good review, I really find it hard to believe people are saying 4 stars is a bad score - read the part of the FAQ about review scores: 4 stars =   "Still very good and easy to recommend, though it doesn't quite live up to its full potential."
 
Haters just calm down, this is not an 8/10, it is 4 stars, and although some people disagree and think this has no problems and lives up to its full potential, then post your own review. 
 
As always, thanks for the review Ryan.

Avatar image for mildmolasses
MildMolasses

3200

Forum Posts

386

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 16

Edited By MildMolasses
@Snipes424:
I'll try and help out with an analagy to auditing, as I took an auditor training course and this will probably be the only time that I ever use anything I learned from it: 
 
An auditor (reviewer) is there to evaluate a system (product). If there are problems or potential for problems, it is the auditor's (reviewers) job to point them out but it is not their job to offer solutions. 
 
So I understand why you think it's nitpicky, but Ryan is reviewing from the player perspective. He's not a game designer. If he felt that things are too much the same, then that's where it ends. He doesn't need to create a design doc to explain how he felt things should be
Avatar image for eastside49er
eastside49er

4

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By eastside49er

Good review and I pretty much agree with all of it.

Avatar image for metalr
MetalR

425

Forum Posts

40

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By MetalR

How could you give this lower than 5/5?
 
Whine whine whine!

Avatar image for rhaknar
Rhaknar

6300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 12

Edited By Rhaknar

people still dont get that 4/5 here is not a 8/10 in most sites? I called this happening days ago like some others did too, maybe becase we listen to the bombcasts so much, or the video content, so many of us can pretty much predict what scores each guy will give to a game by now.
 
That being said, I do wish they never used a 5/5 scale to beging with. Hell I wish it had no score at all, but if it must have one then a 10scale is much better in my opinion. Not the .something scale mind you, I hate the whole 9.3 thing, but 7/10, 9/10 etc feels more representative of a game's worth IF you have to score it.
 
 Its too late to change now of course, but with a 5 scale "outrages" like this will always happen

Avatar image for ecinsiefil
Ecinsiefil

87

Forum Posts

161

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 2

Edited By Ecinsiefil

Wow, really thought this would be getting five stars. Well, it's higher than the Dante's Inferno score, at least.

Avatar image for get2sammyb
get2sammyb

6686

Forum Posts

1993

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 4

Edited By get2sammyb

I don't think the game is as familiar as people say it is. Yes it draws on the same style, art, look, themes and gameplay -- but the combat is WAY more tuned, the setpieces are a step above anything, the controls are much better, the QTEs are much more thoughtful, and overall it balances the God Of War "experience" into a much more cohesive package.
 
It's a 5 for me, but 4's a great score all the same.

Avatar image for rhaknar
Rhaknar

6300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 12

Edited By Rhaknar
@get2sammyb said:
" I don't think the game is as familiar as people say it is. Yes it draws on the same style, art, look, themes and gameplay -- but the combat is WAY more tuned, the setpieces are a step above anything, the controls are much better, the QTEs are much more thoughtful, and overall it balances the God Of War "experience" into a much more cohesive package.  It's a 5 for me, but 4's a great score all the same. "
i am about 3 and half hours in (after Helios) and dude, im loving the game, but besides the initial 45min with gaea and poseidon...its a god of war game, just prettier...or a lot prettier.
Avatar image for gunslingernz
gunslingerNZ

2010

Forum Posts

300

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By gunslingerNZ
@Globox82 said:

" i hate to say but i told you so. I called it a couple of days ago. 4 stars was max FROM Ruan. First Ryan is not that in GOW or Kratos as character. Based on quick look he was that into it and from short comments he game on bombcast i knew 4 stars is max. It's okey i know he tends to be hard on scores, and that's his thing. I just hope he finished the game and not stopped at half of it. "

Lol considering he got that stuck in Dante's Inferno I could easily see him getting held up during God of War. Then again he probably didn't jump straight into Titan mode, it's been damn hard in parts...
 
@Bloviator: Why the heck are you playing a game if you'll be glad when it's over??
Avatar image for daryl
Daryl

1776

Forum Posts

178

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Daryl

There is more to a review than a pointless star rating. xox

Avatar image for deathbyyeti
deathbyyeti

790

Forum Posts

56

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

Edited By deathbyyeti

people care about review scores?

Avatar image for smokepants
smokepants

286

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By smokepants

Weakest of the trilogy, for sure. God of War 2 was the pinnacle of the series -- a series which has served its purpose and shot its wad.

Avatar image for ramyun
Ramyun

695

Forum Posts

211

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By Ramyun

I can see where Ryan is coming from in this review, but I guess fans of the series (which includes me) don't really need too much of a change because it felt so right for us. It just needed to be huge and epic and satisfying with which I can go back to again and again.

Avatar image for dbz1995
dbz1995

4962

Forum Posts

3989

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 2

Edited By dbz1995

MASSIVE WARNING

 
This entire comments section has been overcome by a great variety of GOW fanboys raging about how this game deserves 5 stars. As a result, I have given a template of how these complaints work, so you don't have to look for them as such.
 
OMGOMGOMG WTF IS GOW DOING WITH 4 STARS? GOW ISN'T SHIT! THIS IS A LOAD OF BULLSHIT! RYAN IS A CRAPPY REVIEWER AND SHOULD BE SACKED FROM GIANTBOMB. LONG LIVE KRATOS!
 
If you want to see a more extended approach towards how Ryan is wrong, please proceed. If you have something better to do with yourself other than watching them haters hate, please leave this comments section and never come back.
Avatar image for vitor
vitor

3088

Forum Posts

51

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By vitor
@pbhawks45 said:
" @Vitor said:
" There were sections in this that literally had me playing with my jaw open throughout their duration. However, I really feel that there seem to be some discrepancies in the quality level throughout the game (the titan fights have clearly been lavished with a lot more polish than some of the game, in particular a few of the rather dull corridor run battle sections).  It's a great showpiece for what the PS3 can do but, as a game, it's just God of War. The combat has been refined (the grappling in particular stands out, as does the new L1 circle combo which I feel demonstrates that the developers really knew what worked and what didn't in prior games) and it's definitely a step above the last games in the series but the design philosophy and gameplay those were built upon is starting to show its age. Damn it can look good though (a couple of the boss fights look better than the CG from the first 2 games - both in scale and execution).  Also: Kratos is a real dick. This and Heavy Rain are one of few games that make me whince and feel genuinely uncomfortable at points but for slightly different reasons. "
The entire Chronos battle......  Holy fucking donkey shit man. I mean, JESUS. "
Dude - YES. So annoyed I overwrote the save I had just before that point, I would play it again and again (and to show it off to people). Frankly, nearly all the boss fights (minus one giant rather clichéd insect)  have been staggeringly awesome.  
 
It's just a shame the rest of the game is plagued by invisible walls, contrived methods of having Kratos stand still while a camera pans to show you a puzzle with a time limit thus giving you less time to complete it and a rather weak last third (giant box temple is no Pandora's Temple and is filled with the kind of annoying forced battle segments that plagued the end of  Chains of Olympus). I also get that this is the dark third act, but I was kinda hoping for more lush, gorgeous GoW 2 style vistas. 
 
Definitely a 4/5 over all for me (one that reaches 3/5 levels of quality but starts off with and hits 6/5 in places).
Avatar image for machofantastico
MachoFantastico

6762

Forum Posts

24

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 73

User Lists: 4

Edited By MachoFantastico

Seems a fair score, doesn't exactly reinvent the wheel but stylish and a blast nonetheless. Great review Ryan. 

Avatar image for zerocast
ZeroCast

1882

Forum Posts

285

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By ZeroCast

 And yet again, Ryan's "I only give games 5 Stars if they are good enough" ideology prevents him from giving this game the right score.

Avatar image for metalgearsunny
MetalGearSunny

7466

Forum Posts

13349

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 3

Edited By MetalGearSunny

OH GOD NERD RAGE

Avatar image for termite
Termite

2428

Forum Posts

409

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

Edited By Termite

I'm sure it's been mentioned already, but it's "Pisces," not "Pices."

Avatar image for griefersstolemykeyboard
griefersstolemykeyboard

403

Forum Posts

418

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 1

Appropriate score according to the review. 

Avatar image for quacktastic
Quacktastic

1065

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Quacktastic

Most highly detailed video game characters ever:
1) Kratos
2) Aphrodite's left and right.
 
I felt like the game started insanely strong, but after Tartarus the best moments were never topped.
Still, really awesome and I haven't touched the challenge modes or Very Hard yet - or played around with any of the cheat items.