Something went wrong. Try again later
    Follow

    Fallout: New Vegas

    Game » consists of 25 releases. Released Oct 19, 2010

    The post-apocalyptic Fallout universe expands into Nevada in this new title in the franchise. As a courier once left for dead by a mysterious man in a striped suit, the player must now set out to find their assailant and uncover the secrets of the enigmatic ruler of New Vegas.

    Predict the Review Score

    • 161 results
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    Avatar image for wintersnowblind
    WinterSnowblind

    7599

    Forum Posts

    41

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 4

    #51  Edited By WinterSnowblind

    2 stars.
    Boring, filled with glitches, barley working and essentially a modded version of a 2 year old game. 
     
    That's what I expect it to be, anyway.  But who am I kidding, it'll still get 10/10 from most reviewers who are willing to overlook bad plots and blatent game breaking glitches and bugs because it happens to be a popular game.

    Avatar image for deactivated-5a46aa62043d1
    deactivated-5a46aa62043d1

    2739

    Forum Posts

    496

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    3/5 on Giant Bomb
     
    79 on Metacritic.

    Avatar image for nekusakuraba
    NekuSakuraba

    7810

    Forum Posts

    1670

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #53  Edited By NekuSakuraba
    @forestofdeath said:
    " @trophyhunter said:
    " @forestofdeath said:

    " @NekuSakuraba said:

    " Giantbomb will give it a 4, I think it will be for me personally a 6/5. Yeah, a fucking 6 out of 5. "
    could you explain your enthusiasm to me? keep in mind, i spent well over a hundred hours with fallout 3--loved every second of it. however: this just seems like a retreading of old material. "
    Well it's not retreading of old material, because your not in DC anymore. "
    well, i guess that's fair. but from what i've seen of previews, nuked DC looks hella similar to nuked las vegas.  the only thing that would possibly draw me towards buying this game would be quests that felt as exciting and original as fallout 3's offerings. "
    More guns, new area to explore, new quests, hardcore mode (basically you must survive by eating, sleeping etc like a real wasteland), companion wheel and just everything! I loved Fallout 3 and this is that but better.
    Avatar image for trophyhunter
    trophyhunter

    6038

    Forum Posts

    -1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 4

    User Lists: 5

    #54  Edited By trophyhunter
    @forestofdeath said:
    " @trophyhunter said:
    " @forestofdeath said:

    " @NekuSakuraba said:

    " Giantbomb will give it a 4, I think it will be for me personally a 6/5. Yeah, a fucking 6 out of 5. "
    could you explain your enthusiasm to me? keep in mind, i spent well over a hundred hours with fallout 3--loved every second of it. however: this just seems like a retreading of old material. "
    Well it's not retreading of old material, because your not in DC anymore. "
    well, i guess that's fair. but from what i've seen of previews, nuked DC looks hella similar to nuked las vegas.  the only thing that would possibly draw me towards buying this game would be quests that felt as exciting and original as fallout 3's offerings. "
    sorry you can't enjoy life, life is much better when your not so cynical.
    Avatar image for lukeweizer
    Lukeweizer

    3304

    Forum Posts

    24753

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 2

    #55  Edited By Lukeweizer

    3 stars.

    Avatar image for meierthered
    MeierTheRed

    6084

    Forum Posts

    1701

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #56  Edited By MeierTheRed

    Condom filled with rock, out of six ducks and a gopher masked man.

    Avatar image for odinsthunder
    OdinsThunder

    162

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #57  Edited By OdinsThunder

    3 stars

    Avatar image for deactivated-5fb7c57ae2335
    deactivated-5fb7c57ae2335

    3308

    Forum Posts

    1558

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    @pornstorestiffi said:
    " Condom filled with rock, out of six ducks and a gopher masked man. "
    I like you.
    Avatar image for ryanwho
    ryanwho

    12011

    Forum Posts

    -1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #59  Edited By ryanwho

    Vapid thread.

    Avatar image for hailinel
    Hailinel

    25785

    Forum Posts

    219681

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 10

    User Lists: 28

    #60  Edited By Hailinel
    @InfamousBIG said:
    " @MooseyMcMan: I assume it's probably possible for them to do so (Screened has done it), but, you're right, I've never seen them do that even with the worst games.   "
    Screened and Giant Bomb rate on different scales.  You'll never see a game rated below one star on Giant Bomb.
    Avatar image for shivermetimbers
    shivermetimbers

    1740

    Forum Posts

    102

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 5

    User Lists: 2

    #61  Edited By shivermetimbers
    @InfamousBIG said:
    " @shivermetimbers:  That...is pretty damn extreme. "
    Maybe, but if Kerby's Epic Yarn can get 5 stars (I'm sure you couldn't have predicted that), anything is possible. 4 stars would seem obvious due to the material. However, I'm willing to believe that the game will have improved combat, RPG elements, and story to justify 5 stars. 
    Avatar image for scarace360
    scarace360

    4813

    Forum Posts

    41

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #62  Edited By scarace360

    10 STARS!

    Avatar image for powerbombyo
    PowerBombYo

    203

    Forum Posts

    9

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #63  Edited By PowerBombYo

    Hmmm, Jeff gave Fallout 3 four stars.
     
     If he reviews this one I bet it's 3 stars.

    Avatar image for deactivated-5fb7c57ae2335
    deactivated-5fb7c57ae2335

    3308

    Forum Posts

    1558

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    @shivermetimbers said:
    " @InfamousBIG said:
    " @shivermetimbers:  That...is pretty damn extreme. "
    Maybe, but if Kerby's Epic Yarn can get 5 stars (I'm sure you couldn't have predicted that), anything is possible. 4 stars would seem obvious due to the material. However, I'm willing to believe that the game will have improved combat, RPG elements, and story to justify 5 stars.  "
    I hope you're right. 
    Avatar image for meierthered
    MeierTheRed

    6084

    Forum Posts

    1701

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #65  Edited By MeierTheRed
    @InfamousBIG said:
    " @pornstorestiffi said:
    " Condom filled with rock, out of six ducks and a gopher masked man. "
    I like you. "
    You just got your self a follower young man.
    Avatar image for gamer_152
    gamer_152

    15036

    Forum Posts

    74588

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 71

    User Lists: 6

    #66  Edited By gamer_152  Moderator

    F-f-f-f-four stars.

    Avatar image for deactivated-5fb7c57ae2335
    deactivated-5fb7c57ae2335

    3308

    Forum Posts

    1558

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    @pornstorestiffi said:
    " @InfamousBIG said:
    " @pornstorestiffi said:
    " Condom filled with rock, out of six ducks and a gopher masked man. "
    I like you. "
    You just got your self a follower young man. "
    Gee whiz, for real?  I've always wanted one!  My very own!
    Avatar image for scooper
    Scooper

    7920

    Forum Posts

    1107

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #69  Edited By Scooper
    @DOUBLESHOCK said:
    " 3 stars "
    Avatar image for w0lfbl1tzers
    W0lfbl1tzers

    1791

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 4

    #70  Edited By W0lfbl1tzers

    1 Gabriel Anwar.

    Avatar image for guiseppe
    guiseppe

    2843

    Forum Posts

    18

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 6

    #71  Edited By guiseppe

    3-4 stars, but I'm hoping for 5. In the sense that I hope I'll love it, I don't really care what score it gets as long as I like it.

    Avatar image for hailinel
    Hailinel

    25785

    Forum Posts

    219681

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 10

    User Lists: 28

    #72  Edited By Hailinel
    @OtakuGamer said:

    " @Blair said:

    " @OtakuGamer said:
    " 4 stars I really hope they change the rating system somepoint. "
    That would be incredibly stupid. "
    Why? You tell me a reason why having a 10 point system would be incredibly stupid.    "
    What purpose would a ten-point rating serve?  The ten point rating systems commonly employed by other review sources are badly skewed to the point where anything below a 7.0 is considered utter trash.  And don't even get me started on the fanboy arguments over goddamn decimal points.
    Avatar image for freakache
    FreakAche

    3102

    Forum Posts

    114

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 8

    #73  Edited By FreakAche

    Probably three stars. The Giant Bomb guys don't seem to really appreciate Elder Scrolls style RPGs. This was painfully apparent on that one Bombcast where they were spewing all sorts of nonsense, saying that it was a good thing that Obsidian was giving this game a definite ending.

    Avatar image for animasta
    Animasta

    14948

    Forum Posts

    3563

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 4

    User Lists: 5

    #74  Edited By Animasta
    @FreakAche said:
    " Probably three stars. The Giant Bomb guys don't seem to really appreciate Elder Scrolls style RPGs. This was painfully apparent on that one Bombcast where they were spewing all sorts of nonsense, saying that it was a good thing that Obsidian was giving this game a definite ending. "
    a definite ending that let's you know that if you do this, it's going to end the game for you. that's what I thought they were saying
    Avatar image for metzo_paino
    Metzo_Paino

    358

    Forum Posts

    261

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 5

    #75  Edited By Metzo_Paino

    I predict 4 stars unless: 
     
    It has a ton of bugs, in which case 3. I know some people say that's what Fallout 3 had but my personal experiences with it were great so I doubt this will happen.
     
    or 
     
    It somehow has an amazing story, in which case 5. I also doubt this, though not being tied to being from the vault gives Obsidian some interesting options.

    Avatar image for jimbo
    Jimbo

    10472

    Forum Posts

    2

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #76  Edited By Jimbo

    3 from Jeff, 4 from Ryan, GOTY from Vinny.

    Avatar image for hailinel
    Hailinel

    25785

    Forum Posts

    219681

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 10

    User Lists: 28

    #77  Edited By Hailinel
    @FreakAche said:
    " Probably three stars. The Giant Bomb guys don't seem to really appreciate Elder Scrolls style RPGs. This was painfully apparent on that one Bombcast where they were spewing all sorts of nonsense, saying that it was a good thing that Obsidian was giving this game a definite ending. "
    But the non-ending ending doesn't really work.  Sure, you can keep running around and finish any sidequests you didn't bother with before the endgame, but why not just do those before the endgame and let the narrative run its course?
     
    Fallout 3's ending was poorly done for a few reasons:
     
    1.  The original, pre-DLC ending forced you to sacrifice yourself despite being in the same room as Fawkes, who could do what needed to be done and not get killed in the process.
    2.  When the ending was changed via DLC, you can ask Fawkes to handle the situation for you, and the game treats you like a coward even though this ending path is what is supposed to allow you to survive to see the DLC you just bought.
    3.  Even after the change to the ending, it's still the same series of static flash cards telling you how the world changed through your actions.
     
    If Obsidian can put together a more definitive, worthwhile ending for New Vegas, more power to them, because Bethesda dropped the ball when it came to capping Fallout 3.
    Avatar image for forestofdeath
    forestofdeath

    259

    Forum Posts

    90

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #78  Edited By forestofdeath
    @trophyhunter:  huh? preeeetty sure that skepticism is completely different than being a cynic. 
     
    @NekuSakuraba: this was more of the answer i was looking for. :P i hope it'll surprise me, honestly.
    Avatar image for jammyjesus
    JammyJesus

    779

    Forum Posts

    28

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #79  Edited By JammyJesus

    4/5. Marks down for old engine and no continue option after the last mission. 

    Avatar image for lordandrew
    LordAndrew

    14609

    Forum Posts

    98305

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 36

    #80  Edited By LordAndrew

    6.8

    Avatar image for azteck
    Azteck

    7415

    Forum Posts

    5

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #81  Edited By Azteck
    @InfamousBIG said:
    " @MooseyMcMan: I assume it's probably possible for them to do so (Screened has done it), but, you're right, I've never seen them do that even with the worst games.   "
    No. They said somewhere that it gets 1 star by default just from landing on shelves.
     
    And I'll guess 4 as well.
    Avatar image for rongaryen
    Rongaryen

    316

    Forum Posts

    124

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 4

    User Lists: 5

    #82  Edited By Rongaryen

    3 stars because there will probably be at least 1 or 2 glitches that could be game breakers unless Obsidian did something crazy like optimized the fallout 3 engine then I'd say 4 stars.  If it's too similar to fallout 3 to the point that it's lacking originality then I could see Jeff giving it 3 stars for that reason.  I seriously doubt that it will get 5 stars or 1 star.
     
    Still, what made a some of Obsidian games and Bethesda games great were the weird glitches and bugs that would sometimes happen that sometimes made the game better like flying horses or people exploding for no discernible reason.

    Avatar image for mistasparkle
    MistaSparkle

    2293

    Forum Posts

    999

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 7

    #83  Edited By MistaSparkle

    I would give it 5 stars and so would Jeff because the game is now absolutely perfected and even refined!

    Avatar image for drpockets000
    DrPockets000

    2878

    Forum Posts

    660

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #84  Edited By DrPockets000

    I'm guessing either 4 or 5.  Obsidian looks like they're going completely crazy with this one, and they're building on an engine that, while it is a couple of years old, has had many, many issues ironed out. 
     
    Plus, it has many of the folks from the original working on it, so they are going to get the story and atmosphere as perfect as it can be.

    Avatar image for re_player1
    RE_Player1

    8074

    Forum Posts

    1047

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #85  Edited By RE_Player1

    2 stars

    Avatar image for carlthenimrod
    carlthenimrod

    1638

    Forum Posts

    22

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 5

    User Lists: 2

    #86  Edited By carlthenimrod

    C+, two thumbs up, and a gold star.

    Avatar image for dystopiax
    DystopiaX

    5776

    Forum Posts

    416

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 0

    #88  Edited By DystopiaX

    depends. 4, or 5 if they ignore the fact that a lot of the basic graphics are the same and, from what i've seen, it's basically more of the same with a few gameplay revisions. Hopefully the shooting has improved a lot, I think ADS will make it a lot better.

    Avatar image for comradekhan
    ComradeKhan

    698

    Forum Posts

    348

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #89  Edited By ComradeKhan

    Final Review:  THSUPADOPE!

    Avatar image for kowalskimandown
    KowalskiManDown

    4170

    Forum Posts

    3525

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 19

    #90  Edited By KowalskiManDown

    I hope for a 5 obviously. But I can see it being a 3. When do the reviews for this go up?

    Avatar image for beachthunder
    BeachThunder

    15269

    Forum Posts

    319005

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 30

    #91  Edited By BeachThunder

    Gamerankings scores after a week:
     
    PS3: 80.23
    PC: 79.82
    360: 79.47

    Avatar image for hailinel
    Hailinel

    25785

    Forum Posts

    219681

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 10

    User Lists: 28

    #92  Edited By Hailinel
    @OtakuGamer said:

    " @Hailinel said:

    " @OtakuGamer said:

    " @Blair said:

    " @OtakuGamer said:

    " 4 stars I really hope they change the rating system somepoint. "

    That would be incredibly stupid. "
    Why? You tell me a reason why having a 10 point system would be incredibly stupid.    "
    What purpose would a ten-point rating serve?  The ten point rating systems commonly employed by other review sources are badly skewed to the point where anything below a 7.0 is considered utter trash.  And don't even get me started on the fanboy arguments over goddamn decimal points. "
    So 3 stars is equivalent to a 6.0 score? Anyway, the only reason why I think it would be better is because it can be compared with other sites easily since most of them use a ten point rating.  I don't get it, but if most of you like the 5 star rating system then fair enough, don't mind me. "
    No, it is not equivalent to a 6.0.  Three stars doesn't equate to anything on a ten-point scale.  Read the site FAQ.  Three stars is defined as:
     
    "The halfway point. An inherent appreciation of this game's specific gameplay style, characters, subject matter, and so on may play as big a role in your enjoyment as the actual quality of the game."
    Avatar image for mattbosten
    mattbosten

    516

    Forum Posts

    184

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #93  Edited By mattbosten

    4 stars, same as Jeff gave 3. Expecting the review to be along the lines of it adding enough to keep it fresh but if you didn't like Fallout 3 you're not going to like NV.

    Avatar image for bolthor
    Bolthor

    88

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #94  Edited By Bolthor

    If Jeff is doing the review then 4 at best. Personally I loved Fallout 3 and I can't wait for New Vegas.

    Avatar image for samcotts
    samcotts

    2434

    Forum Posts

    253

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #95  Edited By samcotts

    Wow, a lot negative predictions. 
     
    I will be shocked if it doesn't get at least 4 stars from Giant Bomb (hopefully Jeff doesn't review it, Brad, Vinny and Ryan seemed to appreciate Fallout 3 more, I don't think Jeff "gets" it), and at least 90/100 on gamerankings/metacritic/etc.

    Avatar image for mikkaq
    MikkaQ

    10296

    Forum Posts

    52

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #96  Edited By MikkaQ
    @OtakuGamer said: 

    So 3 stars is equivalent to a 6.0 score? Anyway, the only reason why I think it would be better is because it can be compared with other sites easily since most of them use a ten point rating.  I don't get it, but if most of you like the 5 star rating system then fair enough, don't mind me. "

    Well it's kinda silly to compare one site's review score to another. That's the problem, people are comparing scores when they should just read the reviews and compare the points being made. Score numbers are so arbitrary, and different for each site that comparison is pointless.  
     
    If I had to wager a guess, 4 stars? It's a highly-anticipated sequel to a game that's only had it's reputation improved over the last two years by great post release support. Obsidian CAN make good games when prompted to, Alpha Protocol seemed like an issue of time and budget. I quite liked the weekend I spent with it. Look at KOTOR 2, that game was pretty awesome for an outsourced sequel. I have a feeling people who liked the first game will like this in equal measure, which is why I can't see the score changing that much.  
     
    Not a huge Fallout fan though, so whatever. 
    Avatar image for one_2nd
    one_2nd

    2388

    Forum Posts

    246

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 4

    #98  Edited By one_2nd

    4/5

    Avatar image for blueman
    Blueman

    746

    Forum Posts

    5

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #99  Edited By Blueman

    I'm expecting a Metacritic average of less than 85%. I reckon the game will be criticized for being too similar to Fallout 3, even though that's what most people want.

    Avatar image for mikkaq
    MikkaQ

    10296

    Forum Posts

    52

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #100  Edited By MikkaQ
    @Blueman said:
    " I'm expecting a Metacritic average of less than 85%. I reckon the game will be criticized for being too similar to Fallout 3, even though that's what most people want. "
    If reviewers did their job like you're predicting, Madden would have the lowest score in metacritic history. 

    This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:

    Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

    Comment and Save

    Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.