Red Dead Redemption is the spiritual successor to 2004's Red Dead Revolver, featuring a vibrant, open world set in the decline of the American Wild West. Players take on the role of former outlaw John Marston, who is forced to hunt down his former gang to regain his family.
Ion Storm releasing Deus Ex in 2000 is probably the biggest one off the top of my head (It is on my short list though and the best game from that gen).
None of Rockstar's open world games are that good. They need better writers, a story structure that benefits from the open world, more ambiguous protagonists (because the gameplay is always at odds with how the story tries to paint the protagonist) and more responsive gameplay. I finished RDR once. I got bored trying to replay it, and when I went back to it maybe two years ago, I was disappointed with how blurry the PS3 version is. It's not even HD/720p. The game also has too much desert. I wanted more deeply wooded, hilly areas, like in McCabe & Mrs. Miller. I still liked it more than the mediocre GTA V, though.
Ion Storm releasing Deus Ex in 2000 is probably the biggest one off the top of my head (It is on my short list though and the best game from that gen).
Yeah, was expecting people saying Zelda, Chrono Trigger, Mario or another kiddie game, but Deus Ex is actually a solid argument.
None of Rockstar's open world games are that good. They need better writers, a story structure that benefits from the open world, more ambiguous protagonists (because the gameplay is always at odds with how the story tries to paint the protagonist) and more responsive gameplay. I finished RDR once. I got bored trying to replay it, and when I went back to it maybe two years ago, I was disappointed with how blurry the PS3 version is. It's not even HD/720p. I still liked it more than the mediocre GTA V, though.
Writing in video games doesn't get better than RDR unless you're talking about CRPG's like Planescape.
because it's a super boring game with easily forgettable characters and the setting is visually unappealing and annoying to traverse, nor is it enjoyable to actually play.
It's a fun game but it's not perfect. No PC release despite demand and ability makes it come up short. If amazing games like Valkyria Chronicles can be released years later on PC, RDR has no excuse.
It's a fun game but it's not perfect. No PC release despite demand and ability makes it come up short. If amazing games like Valkyria Chronicles can be released years later on PC, RDR has no excuse.
It's a good thing you could come in here to give your educated programmers' viewpoint.
RDR didn't get a PC port because it was a miracle that the game worked at all and it was barely held together when shipped. As much as people like to think that porting things to PC is just pressing the "port to PC" button, but it would have been a massive undertaking to make a decent port.
@socurtoxanarosa: Red Dead Redemption is in my top 10 all time, but I don't foresee this thread being especially productive until you or someone else tries to make an argument for it being that good.
@socurtoxanarosa: That game has it all to me and I have only appreciated it more over the years as more games slowly took a crack at that formula because Deus Ex still does it better in like every way, with more depth and choice and better design, which is seriously incredible.
Always found this game incredibly overrated. Really didn't offer much challenge and a lot of boring story missions. They nailed the story and gameworld but the combat was so fucking easy it made the game boring.
It's an excellent game but man...the story is completely incoherent in tone and wanders all over the place, there's too much autoaim (especially from horseback), a large portion of the game is just riding around empty spaces (Which I enjoyed, but doesn't have universal appeal) and those skinning animations...I have "What did you EAT?" emblazoned on my brain forever.
Jeff doesn't like the game (new guns > old guns) and I understand why, even though I did really enjoy it. I don't think "best game ever" is a very useful concept, but I think for a game to qualify it has to have near universal appeal, at least at the point when it launched. Something like Super Mario World or Tetris has a better claim. I mean in 1989 video games were much more niche then they are today but everyone's mom was borrowing their Gameboys to play some damned Tetris. Nobody's mom borrowed their Xbox 360 to play Red Dead Redemption unless they were already into games.
Ok, serious answer - because it's got terrible pacing and the Mexico section of the game is just boring. I felt like I was being jerked around the entire time I was there, not making any progress in the story.
Even more serious answer - because subjectivity, yo, and because Chrono Trigger is fucking great and I played that only a few years ago.
Horizon is better than Red Dead and does most of the same things; just a lot better. Western films are irreproachably fantastic so having a video game version that's just kind of okay/pretty good isn't so stellar; but hard sci fi still has lots of opportunity for improvement and Horizon successfully tells an exceptional hard sci-fi story. Every other aspect isn't really debatable at all.
That said this forum is the land of Red Dead Haters (I like Red Dead a lot myself) and Persona Fanboys, so don't expect much with this kind of thread.
Because "meh". Admittedly, I just don't like Westerns, but I gave it the ol' college try with earnest desire to like it. Even bought the Undead Nightmare DLC hoping the horror theme would help. Nada. Just couldn't get into it.
Shame, because I can tell that it's a great game, and there are bits I really, really like. Just not my jam.
because it's a super boring game with easily forgettable characters and the setting is visually unappealing and annoying to traverse, nor is it enjoyable to actually play.
It's a fun game but it's not perfect. No PC release despite demand and ability makes it come up short. If amazing games like Valkyria Chronicles can be released years later on PC, RDR has no excuse.
Mass Effect 2 is one of the most overrated games of all time, had no business in GOTY discussions. Linear cover shooter with bad writing, beginning of Bioware's decline.
@socurtoxanarosa: Red Dead Redemption is in my top 10 all time, but I don't foresee this thread being especially productive until you or someone else tries to make an argument for it being that good.
@socurtoxanarosa: That game has it all to me and I have only appreciated it more over the years as more games slowly took a crack at that formula because Deus Ex still does it better in like every way, with more depth and choice and better design, which is seriously incredible.
While i still prefer RDR, Deux Ex is absolutely up there too.
Always found this game incredibly overrated. Really didn't offer much challenge and a lot of boring story missions. They nailed the story and gameworld but the combat was so fucking easy it made the game boring.
Also it's not Metal Gear Solid 2.
It's a game focused on story, not challenge, but it's not a cakewalk on the highest difficult. MGS2 has neat moments but a lot of cringeworthy bullshit, don't even like to remember Otacon's love story with his stepmother.
It's an excellent game but man...the story is completely incoherent in tone and wanders all over the place, there's too much autoaim (especially from horseback), a large portion of the game is just riding around empty spaces (Which I enjoyed, but doesn't have universal appeal) and those skinning animations...I have "What did you EAT?" emblazoned on my brain forever.
Jeff doesn't like the game (new guns > old guns) and I understand why, even though I did really enjoy it. I don't think "best game ever" is a very useful concept, but I think for a game to qualify it has to have near universal appeal, at least at the point when it launched. Something like Super Mario World or Tetris has a better claim. I mean in 1989 video games were much more niche then they are today but everyone's mom was borrowing their Gameboys to play some damned Tetris. Nobody's mom borrowed their Xbox 360 to play Red Dead Redemption unless they were already into games.
No, the games with universal appeal are the ones that cater to the lowest common denominator by definition. It's not only with games, this applies for any medium. That said, RDR has a 95/90 on metacritic, you don't get more praise than this in terms of numbers.
Ok, serious answer - because it's got terrible pacing and the Mexico section of the game is just boring. I felt like I was being jerked around the entire time I was there, not making any progress in the story.
Even more serious answer - because subjectivity, yo, and because Chrono Trigger is fucking great and I played that only a few years ago.
Super Metroid is one of the GOAT's too, still the peak of it's genre. Chrono Trigger is just a silly dragon ball rpg.
Horizon is better than Red Dead and does most of the same things; just a lot better. Western films are irreproachably fantastic so having a video game version that's just kind of okay/pretty good isn't so stellar; but hard sci fi still has lots of opportunity for improvement and Horizon successfully tells an exceptional hard sci-fi story. Every other aspect isn't really debatable at all.
That said this forum is the land of Red Dead Haters (I like Red Dead a lot myself) and Persona Fanboys, so don't expect much with this kind of thread. Didn't play Horizon yet but have a hard time thinking the world is as well realized as RDR or the writing and characters are nearly as good based on the videos and comments.
Didn't play Horizon yet but have a hard time thinking the world is as well realized as RDR or the writing and characters are nearly as good based on the videos and comments. It's certainly better from a technical point for obvious reasons.
Because "meh". Admittedly, I just don't like Westerns, but I gave it the ol' college try with earnest desire to like it. Even bought the Undead Nightmare DLC hoping the horror theme would help. Nada. Just couldn't get into it.
Shame, because I can tell that it's a great game, and there are bits I really, really like. Just not my jam.
If Rockstar takes what it has done with Grand Theft Auto 5 and implements that into a new game as to what works, what doesn't, RDR2 will be the greatest game alive. Well, 2nd, behind HuniePop.
It's a fun game but it's not perfect. No PC release despite demand and ability makes it come up short. If amazing games like Valkyria Chronicles can be released years later on PC, RDR has no excuse.
Mass Effect 2 is one of the most overrated games of all time, had no business in GOTY discussions. Linear cover shooter with bad writing, beginning of Bioware's decline.
@socurtoxanarosa: Bleh, zelda does the open world thing better and Mass Effect does the overall story better. RDR had a few great moments, a couple great characters and a great ending. It also dragged in spots and the side content was kind of tedious. It was a great game but not ground breaking or mind blowing. But you know, debating opinions is dumb anyway.
Could I ask...what does your top 10 look like? I'm just trying to get a sense of your taste and maybe your age. I don't even think it'd make my top 10 open world games. I think it's solid but not even close to knocking my socks off.
Idk...I feel like I got past the whole my favorite, the greatest something something. Not that it's something ppl have to grow out of but I get different things from different games.
Super Metroid is one of the GOAT's too, still the peak of it's genre. Chrono Trigger is just a silly dragon ball rpg.
Akira Toriyama did the art for Chrono Trigger, sure. Apart from that, Chrono Trigger doesn't really share anything with Dragon Ball. Yes, I know that Magus is basically Vegeta, but then not really if you've ever thought about either character.
Doesn't hurt that I really like Dragon Ball. Not ironically, I genuinely enjoy that stuff. It's dumb and childish, but whatever. I am of the opinion that if you've lost the ability to enjoy something dumb and childish, then you've lost something of great value.
I should add that I do respect RDR. It did the whole "video game Western" thing better than pretty much anything else has, though that's at least partially because not much else actually has tried to be a video game spaghetti Western. It's got great atmosphere, it's downright gorgeous even when compared to games of today, the voice acting and dialog and characters are generally likable and interesting (except when you're reminded that oh right, I'm playing a Rockstar game). I can definitely see why someone would love this game. I have enjoyed games for many of the same reasons that people enjoy RDR, and ignored similar problems in other games. I love Skyrim, but that game has a mountain of problems.
It's just that RDR never struck a chord with me personally, so its problems really stand out. The horrible pacing in the Mexico section is the game's most glaring issue - the story goes nowhere for an entire third of the game and in a game where the story is the biggest draw, that's not a good thing. And the game drops most of the likable characters in that portion, so you're left with a bunch of assholes jerking Marston around from job to job in search of information that he never gets. Despite its looks and atmosphere, the open world gets pretty boring when you realize that it's actually rather devoid of interesting things to do. The gunplay isn't great, the lock on is too generous because Rockstar can't be arsed to code some decent analog stick aiming so you never get a satisfying headshot or anything like that.
So... yeah. Maybe there's a general consensus that Red Dead Redemption is fucking fantastic, that's fine, that's great, that's way better than people banging on about how amazing Uncharted 2 is. It's also a game that I would have forgotten about long ago if people weren't still bringing it up.
If Rockstar takes what it has done with Grand Theft Auto 5 and implements that into a new game as to what works, what doesn't, RDR2 will be the greatest game alive. Well, 2nd, behind HuniePop.
@socurtoxanarosa: Bleh, zelda does the open world thing better and Mass Effect does the overall story better. RDR had a few great moments, a couple great characters and a great ending. It also dragged in spots and the side content was kind of tedious. It was a great game but not ground breaking or mind blowing. But you know, debating opinions is dumb anyway.
Mass Effect 2 barely had a story, bunch of daddy issues unrelated side quests and one final mission.
Could I ask...what does your top 10 look like? I'm just trying to get a sense of your taste and maybe your age. I don't even think it'd make my top 10 open world games. I think it's solid but not even close to knocking my socks off.
Idk...I feel like I got past the whole my favorite, the greatest something something. Not that it's something ppl have to grow out of but I get different things from different games.
Tier 1 - Red Dead Redemption
Tier 2 - Dark and Demon's Souls, Super Metroid, Bloodborne and The Witcher 3.
Tier 3 - Metal Gear Solid, The Last of Us, Portal 2 and Fallout New Vegas.
Super Metroid is one of the GOAT's too, still the peak of it's genre. Chrono Trigger is just a silly dragon ball rpg.
Akira Toriyama did the art for Chrono Trigger, sure. Apart from that, Chrono Trigger doesn't really share anything with Dragon Ball. Yes, I know that Magus is basically Vegeta, but then not really if you've ever thought about either character.
Doesn't hurt that I really like Dragon Ball. Not ironically, I genuinely enjoy that stuff. It's dumb and childish, but whatever. I am of the opinion that if you've lost the ability to enjoy something dumb and childish, then you've lost something of great value.
I should add that I do respect RDR. It did the whole "video game Western" thing better than pretty much anything else has, though that's at least partially because not much else actually has tried to be a video game spaghetti Western. It's got great atmosphere, it's downright gorgeous even when compared to games of today, the voice acting and dialog and characters are generally likable and interesting (except when you're reminded that oh right, I'm playing a Rockstar game). I can definitely see why someone would love this game. I have enjoyed games for many of the same reasons that people enjoy RDR, and ignored similar problems in other games. I love Skyrim, but that game has a mountain of problems.
It's just that RDR never struck a chord with me personally, so its problems really stand out to me. The horrible pacing in the Mexico section is the game's biggest, most glaring problem - the story goes nowhere for an entire third of the game and in a game where the story is the biggest draw, that's not a good thing. And the game drops most of the likable characters in that area of the game, so you're left with a bunch of assholes jerking Marston around from job to job in search of information that he never gets. Despite its looks and atmosphere, the open world gets pretty boring when you realize that it's actually rather devoid of interesting things to do. The gunplay isn't great, the lock on is too generous because Rockstar can't be arsed to code some decent analog stick aiming so you never get a satisfying headshot or anything like that.
So... yeah. Maybe there's a general consensus that Red Dead Redemption is fucking fantastic, that's fine, that's great, that's way better than people banging on about how amazing Uncharted 2 is. It's also a game that I would have forgotten about long ago if people weren't still bringing it up.
Akira Toriyama did only the art, but he could have written the game as well because it's just your regular shounen with all it's tropes in form of a highly polished jrpg. I liked Dragon Ball as a child too, i even watch some of it's highlights on youtube sometimes, but i know that i like it because of nostalgia, as you said, it's dumb and childish, so, i try to separate this kind of thing when i need to be critical.
And it's fine RDR not clicking with you, certain works require an specific "background" to be fully appreciated, regardless of their quality. Hate Uncharted btw.
My biggest problem with Red Dead, is why is the main character doing all of these stupid things for stupid people, that have nothing to do with what he is trying to accomplish, and actively goes against his supposed new moral code.
In that regard, he completely fails as being a compelling protagonist. It's not that he's flawed, which would have been interesting, it's that he doesn't make any sort of sense out side of, how do we make this game really long?
Rant over. If you love it, cool. A lot of people do! And I'd rather someone love a game than not. For me Mass Effect 2 is where it's at. Flaws and all. I mean it probably has more flaws than Red Dead, but it also has some of the best moments, most interesting characters, and the most incredible sense of place, that no other game has given me in the same way.
If you took Red Dead Redemption out of history altogether, you'd lose nothing. If you did the same to Burnout Paradise, you'd lose an entire framework.
Honestly, if there wasn't a sequel on its way (releasing between this year and never) I would still be diving back into that game for another run. But who really cares? My opinion nor anyone else's in this thread shouldn't have an affect on your enjoyment of it.
I mean you have your opinion, and I have mine. Liked RDR at the time, but outside of the shoot out for John, everything else is forgettable... to me. I understand you think it's perfect, but I spent more time with Mass Effect 2, and prefer it over RDR. I also felt at the time, and even more so now, that playing the game wasn't that great.
To each their own though, man. Also what's the point of saying anything is the greatest anything? Red Dead was hugely successful. Doesn't that validate your opinion enough to just let it ride off into the sunset?
This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:
Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along
with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely
increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.
Comment and Save
Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other
Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll
send you an email once approved.
Log in to comment