Something went wrong. Try again later
    Follow

    Electronic Arts

    Company »

    EA is one of the largest publisher/developers in the video game industry.

    These Electronic Arts Games No Longer Online on August 11

    • 114 results
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Avatar image for patrickklepek
    patrickklepek

    6835

    Forum Posts

    1300

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    Edited By patrickklepek
    MORE LIKE ARMY OF ZERO. GET IT. Nevermind.
    MORE LIKE ARMY OF ZERO. GET IT. Nevermind.

    If a new piece of hardware breaks compatibility with old software, at least you have the ability to hook up the old hardware. When Electronic Arts closes down the online services for a bunch of games on August 11, there's no going back. SKATE, Army of Two and others are going offline.

    "The decisions to retire older EA games are never easy," reads the company's support site. "The development teams and operational staff pour their hearts into these games almost as much as the customers playing them and it is hard to see one retired. But as games get replaced with newer titles, the number of players still enjoying the older games dwindles below a point--fewer than 1% of all peak online players across all EA titles--where it’s feasible to continue the behind-the-scenes work involved with keeping these games up and running."

    EA is usually pretty clear about when its games are going offline. You can view a whole list of what games have moved into the dark on the same support website. Here's what's gone in just a few weeks:

    In addition to these titles, EA plans to end support for both Madden NFL 10 and NHL 10 as of October 1st. If for some reason you're especially fond of the rosters in either of these two-year-old sports games, you might want to start getting as many games in as you can.

    Avatar image for patrickklepek
    patrickklepek

    6835

    Forum Posts

    1300

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #1  Edited By patrickklepek
    MORE LIKE ARMY OF ZERO. GET IT. Nevermind.
    MORE LIKE ARMY OF ZERO. GET IT. Nevermind.

    If a new piece of hardware breaks compatibility with old software, at least you have the ability to hook up the old hardware. When Electronic Arts closes down the online services for a bunch of games on August 11, there's no going back. SKATE, Army of Two and others are going offline.

    "The decisions to retire older EA games are never easy," reads the company's support site. "The development teams and operational staff pour their hearts into these games almost as much as the customers playing them and it is hard to see one retired. But as games get replaced with newer titles, the number of players still enjoying the older games dwindles below a point--fewer than 1% of all peak online players across all EA titles--where it’s feasible to continue the behind-the-scenes work involved with keeping these games up and running."

    EA is usually pretty clear about when its games are going offline. You can view a whole list of what games have moved into the dark on the same support website. Here's what's gone in just a few weeks:

    In addition to these titles, EA plans to end support for both Madden NFL 10 and NHL 10 as of October 1st. If for some reason you're especially fond of the rosters in either of these two-year-old sports games, you might want to start getting as many games in as you can.

    Avatar image for mikecardii
    mikecardii

    319

    Forum Posts

    18

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 4

    #2  Edited By mikecardii

    Don't play many EA games online.

    Avatar image for example1013
    Example1013

    4854

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #3  Edited By Example1013

    Wow, they were still supporting like 7 year old games. Can't say I'm surprised, given none of those are subscription games, so at this point they're just losing money.

    Avatar image for sparky_buzzsaw
    sparky_buzzsaw

    9902

    Forum Posts

    3772

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 39

    User Lists: 42

    #4  Edited By sparky_buzzsaw

    Nothing there too shocking or controversial, I think. Certainly can't blame them.

    Avatar image for re_player1
    RE_Player1

    8074

    Forum Posts

    1047

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #5  Edited By RE_Player1

    Oh no now what are me and my Army of Two clan going to do on Friday nights? Oh no wait that never existed...

    Avatar image for xpgamer7
    xpgamer7

    2488

    Forum Posts

    148

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 12

    User Lists: 5

    #6  Edited By xpgamer7

    None of these are games that I expect many people to still be playing rather than the sequels. This is bound to happen and it's good of them to continue services for several years after official releases.

    Avatar image for birchman
    birchman

    853

    Forum Posts

    7695

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 9

    #7  Edited By birchman

    Nothing shocking, really. Can't remember when I played any of those games online last.

    Avatar image for this_dude
    This_Dude

    311

    Forum Posts

    508

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 3

    #8  Edited By This_Dude

    Once again proving that letting EA run their own servers is a shitty experience.

    Avatar image for paulunga
    paulunga

    3517

    Forum Posts

    176

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 5

    #9  Edited By paulunga

    The Army of Two one is kinda bizarre. It's not that old yet and the only way you should ever play Army of Two is in Co-Op.

    Avatar image for renegadegd
    renegadegd

    86

    Forum Posts

    36

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #10  Edited By renegadegd

    I hope you guys play all these games for TNT on August 11th!

    Avatar image for bumpton
    Bumpton

    507

    Forum Posts

    62

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 4

    #11  Edited By Bumpton
    @This_Dude said:
    Once again proving that letting EA run their own servers is a shitty experience.

    Is it though? Do you play any of these games still? Know anyone that does? I'm not trying to be a jerk, but they aren't stupid. They're probably shutting these specific ones down because hardly anyone will care.
    Avatar image for younglink
    YOUNGLINK

    641

    Forum Posts

    2

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #12  Edited By YOUNGLINK

    Makes sense. If you are still playing any of these games well...tough tits toots!

    Avatar image for deactivated-5a1a3d3c6820c
    deactivated-5a1a3d3c6820c

    3235

    Forum Posts

    37

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    So.. are they going to continue to do this with games that you bought an Online Pass for? What if I want to keep playing the game I paid specifically to play online?

    Avatar image for fox01313
    fox01313

    5256

    Forum Posts

    2246

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 19

    #14  Edited By fox01313

    Remembered going back through some bargain games a few months ago & found that there were still people playing Battlefield2 online with the 360. I was just going to run through the maps to see how they looked or mess around with trying crazy things using the vehicles but was quite shocked to see people still playing it. Remember at the time it came out was quite fun but glad that they went the way they did with the explosive tech in the Bad Company games.

    Avatar image for shazb0t--defunct
    shazb0t--defunct

    77

    Forum Posts

    464

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #15  Edited By shazb0t--defunct

    Well, that's disappointing. Most Wanted is a helluva lot of fun, as are a few of the others on here. 
     
    Alas, the tides of time surge ever on...

    Avatar image for dg991
    DG991

    1435

    Forum Posts

    6

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 4

    #17  Edited By DG991

    I only see one PC game on there and I am wondering why. Cause it is a demo?

    Avatar image for branthog
    Branthog

    5777

    Forum Posts

    1014

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 0

    #18  Edited By Branthog

    That's pretty fucking lame. I still hadn't gotten around to Army of Two (yes, I know it's almost a whopping three years old).

    It would seem to me that it would be reasonable to require that games be supported for the life of the console. Yes, I know some matchmaking service may have to be run by the developer or something, but all the heavy load is put on users since games are usually hosted on the console.

    Avatar image for shivoa
    Shivoa

    1602

    Forum Posts

    334

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 6

    #19  Edited By Shivoa

    The problem with seeing this as normal operations is that it isn't. There is no need to switch off the old 486 down the hall that is just sitting there making sure matchmaking and CD key auth is working for a title. In the modern server environment then virtual-box it onto one of your blade arrays and if the numbers are low then you haven't lost anything because the servers will be doing the other stuff you put on them. It means you have a good reason to say "sorry auth for these 6 year old games die for an evening, we had a tenfold increase in users randomly that day and we didn't expect it so didn't have the excess capacity to support it. Our bad" but to just switch off games is to remove significant value from old games (in cases of co-op led titles it removes the main component). Of course EA does this to keep costs low by pushing new titles in a franchise or to avoid paying for any techs to run basic maintenance (like moving code to VMs or running a few blades more than the currently do to deal with the small trickle traffic) but for some reason that doesn't lead them to offering the titles with lower prices at point of sale.

    Hopefully people will continue to care about games and the history of them and so work out ways of unbreaking any of these games so in the future we can go back and see them as they should be.

    Avatar image for wolf_blitzer85
    wolf_blitzer85

    5460

    Forum Posts

    2

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 6

    #20  Edited By wolf_blitzer85

    But I haven't played those games yet! EA should cater directly to me!

    Avatar image for sn1per
    Sn1PeR

    153

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #21  Edited By Sn1PeR

    They are shutting down '10  sports games in '11 that have only been out for two years.  This is one step closer to them simply only supporting online with the latest year sports game.  Tiger Woods 10 is still a good game -- this pisses me off.

    Avatar image for sooty
    Sooty

    8193

    Forum Posts

    306

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 3

    #22  Edited By Sooty

    Removing Army of Two is pretty dumb. That shouldn't even use EA servers, it's only co-op isn't it?

    Avatar image for buft
    buft

    3409

    Forum Posts

    1787

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 13

    User Lists: 4

    #23  Edited By buft
    @Shivoa said:

    The problem with seeing this as normal operations is that it isn't. There is no need to switch off the old 486 down the hall that is just sitting there making sure matchmaking and CD key auth is working for a title. In the modern server environment then virtual-box it onto one of your blade arrays and if the numbers are low then you haven't lost anything because the servers will be doing the other stuff you put on them. It means you have a good reason to say "sorry auth for these 6 year old games die for an evening, we had a tenfold increase in users randomly that day and we didn't expect it so didn't have the excess capacity to support it. Our bad" but to just switch off games is to remove significant value from old games (in cases of co-op led titles it removes the main component). Of course EA does this to keep costs low by pushing new titles in a franchise or to avoid paying for any techs to run basic maintenance (like moving code to VMs or running a few blades more than the currently do to deal with the small trickle traffic) but for some reason that doesn't lead them to offering the titles with lower prices at point of sale.

    Hopefully people will continue to care about games and the history of them and so work out ways of unbreaking any of these games so in the future we can go back and see them as they should be.

    yeah except the '10 sports games are more like 2 years and only 1 iteration behind, i mean thats fine for me but there are people who dont like to be forced to buy the next iteration for the small changes and wait several years for some major changes, now they are forced to pony up if they want to stay online. 
    Avatar image for ebe
    ebe

    7

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #24  Edited By ebe

    Wouldn't this just be the EA account stuff? Matchmaking should still work over XBL, shouldn't it? 
     
    I seem to recall deleting my Army of Two save in an attempt to restart the campaign and having it download my progress from my EA profile instead.

    Avatar image for laserbolts
    laserbolts

    5506

    Forum Posts

    4

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #25  Edited By laserbolts
    @Khann

    So.. are they going to continue to do this with games that you bought an Online Pass for? What if I want to keep playing the game I paid specifically to play online?

    Which one was that?
    Avatar image for jayjonesjunior
    jayjonesjunior

    1148

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #26  Edited By jayjonesjunior
    @Sn1PeR said:
    They are shutting down '10  sports games in '11 that have only been out for two years.  This is one step closer to them simply only supporting online with the latest year sports game.  Tiger Woods 10 is still a good game -- this pisses me off.
    Plus the 1% thing is bullshit, when you have titles like Madden, FIFA and Battlefield, even brand new games are going to have less than 1% of the user base.
     
    (1% in this case can be many many thousands of players)
    Avatar image for ramone
    Ramone

    3210

    Forum Posts

    364

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 5

    #27  Edited By Ramone

    Another example of EA shitting on the people who can't afford games as soon as they're released. Their games are usually quality but their treatment of consumers is pretty bad

    Avatar image for crusader8463
    crusader8463

    14850

    Forum Posts

    4290

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 7

    User Lists: 5

    #28  Edited By crusader8463

    If only there was a technology available to allow a dedicated group of people to set up some kind of private server like thing to keep playing games they may enjoy long after developers stop caring to support them. Like some sort of always there server. For the dedicated bunch of fans that want to keep playing the game they paid money for.

    Avatar image for sandweed
    sandweed

    161

    Forum Posts

    23

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #29  Edited By sandweed
    @crusader8463: System link probably still works
    Avatar image for avantegardener
    avantegardener

    2491

    Forum Posts

    165

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 11

    #30  Edited By avantegardener

    Woooh, Tiger 10!

    Avatar image for reddin
    reddin

    435

    Forum Posts

    4

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #31  Edited By reddin

    The biggest problem for me is that they want to run their own matchmaking stuff specifically so they can shut it down when they want you to buy the new one.
    If this really was about the costs of hosting they would just use the xbox live matchmaking.

    Avatar image for deactivated-5a1a3d3c6820c
    deactivated-5a1a3d3c6820c

    3235

    Forum Posts

    37

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    @laserbolts said:

    @Khann

    So.. are they going to continue to do this with games that you bought an Online Pass for? What if I want to keep playing the game I paid specifically to play online?

    Which one was that?

    One what?

    Avatar image for greggd
    GreggD

    4596

    Forum Posts

    981

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 4

    #33  Edited By GreggD

    @shazb0t said:

    Well, that's disappointing. Most Wanted is a helluva lot of fun, as are a few of the others on here. Alas, the tides of time surge ever on...

    I tried playing it online a year ago and NOBODY was playing it.

    Avatar image for phrosnite
    phrosnite

    3528

    Forum Posts

    1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 5

    #34  Edited By phrosnite

    Army of Zero... Nice joke :)

    Avatar image for somejerk
    SomeJerk

    4077

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #35  Edited By SomeJerk

    Didn't they just put BF2142 on Steam? :(

    Avatar image for crusader8463
    crusader8463

    14850

    Forum Posts

    4290

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 7

    User Lists: 5

    #36  Edited By crusader8463
    @sandweed: The chances of finding someone locally to like an older game is next to impossible, unless you have a close group of friends that are really into the same games.
    Avatar image for benjaebe
    benjaebe

    2868

    Forum Posts

    7204

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 6

    #37  Edited By benjaebe

    And yet I still don't care. If people aren't playing the games anymore and they're using up resources to just sit there doing nothing, I can understand the policy.

    Avatar image for ch3burashka
    ch3burashka

    6086

    Forum Posts

    100

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #38  Edited By ch3burashka

    This is fucking bullshit. The traffic on these games is so small they can probably host them all on one server - it doesn't cost them much at all to run them. They're still on current-gen systems for god's sake, what if someone picks one of these games up used at GS and is all surprised why they can't play online? Fuck you greedy motherfuckers, EA.

    Avatar image for infininja
    infininja

    872

    Forum Posts

    16

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #39  Edited By infininja

    @sandweed said:

    @crusader8463: System link probably still works

    *whoosh*

    @somejerk said:

    Didn't they just put BF2142 on Steam? :(

    2142 doesn't seem to be on Steam, neither is the demo that they're shutting down.

    Avatar image for cookiemonster
    cookiemonster

    2561

    Forum Posts

    42

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #40  Edited By cookiemonster
    @Ygg said:
    Removing Army of Two is pretty dumb. That shouldn't even use EA servers, it's only co-op isn't it?
    It had online multiplayer as well, but it was pretty dull and broken.  
     
    I don't think anyone is playing the sequel to army of two, let alone the original now.
    Avatar image for dogma
    Dogma

    1018

    Forum Posts

    34

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #41  Edited By Dogma

    I would like to see the numbers of how many people play on these servers every month. I'm quite sure the number is horrificly low. It may sound harsh by EA to shut these off but if we knew the (probably) low activity these games have online we would probably agree with their choice.

    Avatar image for ariesdog
    AriesDog

    41

    Forum Posts

    25

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #42  Edited By AriesDog

    The main reason I don't buy EA games is that instead of letting Xbox Live run their games' servers, like everybody else, they insist on running their own. Then a few years later, they shut 'em down.  
     
    They got that concession back in the original Xbox era when they were so big they could make or break a system by becoming a third-party developer. That's no longer the case. I would love if Xbox revisited this special status and revoked it.
    Avatar image for zaglis
    zaglis

    912

    Forum Posts

    2

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #43  Edited By zaglis

    Hah. Ironic, I recently played some Half-Life DM with 31 other strangers. Its fucking bananas and Crossfire is still fun as ever. Camp in bunker, plant trip min-...uhh. Got too carried away there.

    Avatar image for cirdain
    Cirdain

    3796

    Forum Posts

    1645

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: -1

    User Lists: 6

    #44  Edited By Cirdain

    Please tell me there will be an extra long TNT.

    Avatar image for jocund
    Jocund

    127

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #45  Edited By Jocund
    @Khann said:

    @laserbolts said:

    @Khann

    So.. are they going to continue to do this with games that you bought an Online Pass for? What if I want to keep playing the game I paid specifically to play online?

    Which one was that?

    One what?

    I think he's asking which EA game did you buy specifically for the online.  
     
    Anyway, this practice is still kinda shitty, but I think it's reasonable for these games to get the axe- they are pretty old. 
    Avatar image for maluvin
    Maluvin

    750

    Forum Posts

    5

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #46  Edited By Maluvin
    @crusader8463 said:
    If only there was a technology available to allow a dedicated group of people to set up some kind of private server like thing to keep playing games they may enjoy long after developers stop caring to support them. Like some sort of always there server. For the dedicated bunch of fans that want to keep playing the game they paid money for.
    I find your ideas intriguing and wish to subscribe to your newsletter.  
     
    Seriously, it's amazing people wonder why dedicated servers are such a big deal to some of us.
    Avatar image for sammydesinasnl
    SammydesinasNL

    849

    Forum Posts

    168

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #47  Edited By SammydesinasNL

    Last chance to become a battlefield veteran with modern combat folks!

    Avatar image for onan
    onan

    1356

    Forum Posts

    8845

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 10

    #48  Edited By onan
    @Bumpton said:
    @This_Dude said:
    Once again proving that letting EA run their own servers is a shitty experience.
    Is it though? Do you play any of these games still? Know anyone that does? I'm not trying to be a jerk, but they aren't stupid. They're probably shutting these specific ones down because hardly anyone will care.  
    Compared to... well, every single other 360 game that ISN'T published by EA, yes. Microsoft only just pulled the plug on support for Xbox 1 games. Just recently! They handle the online support for all games published by default, and EA fought tooth and nail in order to get MS to let them control their own servers and services instead of letting MS do the heavy lifting (a non-issue on Sony platforms since Sony only hosts servers for first-party titles). Microsoft let them do it because getting Madden online was important to making the 360 a competitive brand.

    You're right, they aren't stupid. Just a little evil. MS should implement a new rule at least: If you insist on hosting your own servers, you're not allowed to make online multiplayer achievements. 
    Avatar image for lunar_aura
    Lunar_Aura

    2824

    Forum Posts

    17

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 4

    #49  Edited By Lunar_Aura

    So basically EA is warning us from their actions that any game we buy from them has an online shelf life of 2 to 3 years. Got it. I'll remember that the next time I see current and future EA online enabled titles.

    EA probably lost more money losing consumer faith from this stunt as opposed to doing nothing at all.

    Corporations are so fucking myopic these days. Even their greed gets in the way of their bottom line of making money. Good job, asshats.

    Avatar image for sin13
    sin13

    275

    Forum Posts

    214

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 11

    #50  Edited By sin13

    What actual server maintence is there for this stuff? Aren't all these games peer to peer and doesn't Microsoft handle the match making side of things on their servers?

    This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:

    Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

    Comment and Save

    Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.