Although I agree with the words, this video made me laugh so hard

Avatar image for commando
Commando

1999

Forum Posts

249

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#1  Edited By Commando

We're having a reenactment of the Boston tea party at our college on tax day to protest Obama's outrageous spending, and this song was in the invitations. Was it supposed to be funny? It's like really old school music. I don't know why but it made me laugh.


  

Avatar image for gunner
Gunner

4424

Forum Posts

248

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 6

#2  Edited By Gunner

pfft, like there is such a thing as freedom or liberty anymore. We gave that up after WW1.

/sarcasm.

Avatar image for singular
singular

2559

Forum Posts

359

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#3  Edited By singular

This video reeks from populism. 

Avatar image for suicrat
Suicrat

3829

Forum Posts

1057

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By Suicrat

Sin, I normally like what you have to say, but that's total bullshit.

Obama swept into power on a wave of Populism, promising national healthcare, the subjugation of economic rights in the name of economic stimulus and the environment.

Having said all that, this song is a little cheesy. Though I'm glad these Tea Parties are happening, with the movement as it currently exists, I think you'll see a lot of the liberty-oriented third parties coming together, hopefully merging to present a united front against both the right and the left wing by the time the next federal election happens (although, with the power of the internet, you might even see these people come together to nominate Liberty-oriented candidates for the legislative elections in 2010.

Or maybe this is all a pipe dream, but a guy can hope. Where are Canadian brains supposed to drain to if America just becomes Canada South (except with a far shittier banking system)?

Avatar image for kashif1
kashif1

1543

Forum Posts

882

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 1

#5  Edited By kashif1

why is it that i feel as if im the only one who studied history properly, the only alternitive to spending to fix the economy is to do nothing and pretend it will fix itself. If Hoover had taken the first choice he could have avoided the depression.  He took the second choice and the rest is history.

Avatar image for suicrat
Suicrat

3829

Forum Posts

1057

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#6  Edited By Suicrat

Kashif, you can't eat , you can't build a house out of paper, you can't go to space with paper.

When a government spends and prints, all it is doing is making the dollars that already exist less valuable, because the same amount of capital is being represented by a higher amount of paper.

Sure, spending on roads and bridges will bring some people from the brink of ruin to some temporary stability, but the problem is that Americans are buying more and more on credit, and saving less and less. And, uh, 'doing nothing' isn't exactly historically accurate. He signed laws not all that different from the actions of the Obama government in the last couple of months, in actual fact.

Avatar image for codemck
CodeMcK

95

Forum Posts

339

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

#7  Edited By CodeMcK
Kashif isn't saying that printing more money would help, and thats not even what the Obama Adminstration is doing. What hes saying is that government spending of funds puts more money out into the market. Every single historian agrees that the government's spending during WWII is what ended the depression.

And to stay on topic, holding Tea parties to protest the President's spending plan makes absolutely no sense. The purpose behind the original tea party was that colonists were not being represented at all in parliment and therefor had no say in the taxes put on the tea. And unless you live in Washington D.C. which there is no congressional representation, you have had an oppurtunity for your view to be represented in congress.
Avatar image for toowalrus
toowalrus

13408

Forum Posts

29

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#8  Edited By toowalrus

You god damn racist!

Avatar image for suicrat
Suicrat

3829

Forum Posts

1057

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By Suicrat
CodeMcK said:
"
Kashif isn't saying that printing more money would help, and thats not even what the Obama Adminstration is doing. What hes saying is that government spending of funds puts more money out into the market. Every single historian agrees that the government's spending during WWII is what ended the depression.

And to stay on topic, holding Tea parties to protest the President's spending plan makes absolutely no sense. The purpose behind the original tea party was that colonists were not being represented at all in parliment and therefor had no say in the taxes put on the tea. And unless you live in Washington D.C. which there is no congressional representation, you have had an oppurtunity for your view to be represented in congress.
"
That's pretty fallacious, McK. How many Libertarian Party Congressmen are there? Zero. How many Constitution Party Congressmen are there? Zero.

The U.S. government for over a century has been dominated by the left and the right. There hasn't been a Constitutional Adherent in any seat of power for a very very long time in the U.S.

And, yes, the U.S. is printing more money. They are buying commercial paper and are involved in quantitative easing. Those are fancy ways of printing money but it's still printing money


Americans (and their governments as well) spend far too much and save far too little. This is the crux of the matter, and you can tapdance around that all you want, but that is the major problem.
Avatar image for deactivated-57b1d7d14d4a5
deactivated-57b1d7d14d4a5

2945

Forum Posts

950

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 3

You wanna take from achievers somehow you think that's fair
and redistribute to those folks who wont get out of their easy chair

Eww, simplistic bullshit.
Avatar image for red
Red

6146

Forum Posts

598

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 11

#11  Edited By Red

Best song ever.


No sarcasm. True, and catchy.
Avatar image for suicrat
Suicrat

3829

Forum Posts

1057

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#12  Edited By Suicrat
Bellum said:
"
You wanna take from achievers somehow you think that's fair
and redistribute to those folks who wont get out of their easy chair
Eww, simplistic bullshit. "
It's a song not an essay, dumbass
Avatar image for themustachehero
TheMustacheHero

6647

Forum Posts

120

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13  Edited By TheMustacheHero

WTF?!

Avatar image for deactivated-57b1d7d14d4a5
deactivated-57b1d7d14d4a5

2945

Forum Posts

950

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 3

Suicrat said:
"Bellum said:
"
You wanna take from achievers somehow you think that's fair
and redistribute to those folks who wont get out of their easy chair
Eww, simplistic bullshit. "
It's a song not an essay, dumbass"

It's also bullshit propaganda.
Avatar image for suicrat
Suicrat

3829

Forum Posts

1057

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#15  Edited By Suicrat

The welfare state is a figment of Libertarians' imagination? Unprecedented bailouts and corporate welfare is 'bullshit'? No, I'm afraid that's actually happening, Bellum.

Avatar image for deactivated-57b1d7d14d4a5
deactivated-57b1d7d14d4a5

2945

Forum Posts

950

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 3

Suicrat said:
"The welfare state is a figment of Libertarians' imagination? Unprecedented bailouts and corporate welfare is 'bullshit'? No, I'm afraid that's actually happening, Bellum."

What's that got to do with anything? How does that apply to the concepts of "freedom" or "liberty"? More importantly, how does that relate to freedom as defined by the US constitution, just to avoid the bullshit? I'm not sure bailing out failing corporations was a good idea, but the message seems to be yet another thinly veiled attempt to vilify vaguely socialist policies, and to equate it to the American conservative perception of what socialism is (communism).

The above quote is important, because it highlights a big flaw in the popular conservative way of thinking, that people who have more money are superior because they are more productive and harder working. Of course, this is only true as long as it isn't obvious that the big corporations are raping you in the ass by taking government money and using it to pay executive bonuses, but I wont fault the people for a natural level of hypocrisy.
Avatar image for suicrat
Suicrat

3829

Forum Posts

1057

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#17  Edited By Suicrat
Bellum said:
What's that got to do with anything? How does that apply to the concepts of "freedom" or "liberty"? More importantly, how does that relate to freedom as defined by the US constitution, just to avoid the bullshit? I'm not sure bailing out failing corporations was a good idea, but the message seems to be yet another thinly veiled attempt to vilify vaguely socialist policies, and to equate it to the American conservative perception of what socialism is (communism). The above quote is important, because it highlights a big flaw in the popular conservative way of thinking, that people who have more money are superior because they are more productive and harder working. Of course, this is only true as long as it isn't obvious that the big corporations are raping you in the ass by taking government money and using it to pay executive bonuses, but I wont fault the people for a natural level of hypocrisy. "
I don't think the people behind the Tea Parties are necessarily conservatives. They aren't necessarily supporting the rich and opposing the poor. Especially when you consider their opposition to the way the government is handling the failing companies in the steel, manufcacturing, auto, and banking sectors, and to the way the government is precipitating inflation that is potentially devestating to the working poor.

Instead of letting these companies go to chapter 11, and opening up their capital to be bought at a discount by potentially more-productive users of it, the government is maintaining the roster of many of these companies (Wagoner's dismissal notwithstanding.)

And the existence of the Welfare State is dependent upon taxation, taxation is a fundamental violation of a person's liberty because it appropriates a portion of a person's wealth generating abilities to be given to less productive people. In other words, it is a declaration of sovereignty over the individual.

And the people behind the tea parties are opposed to the use of this wealth for anyone other than the creators of it. Whether or not it's given to people for bonuses they didn't deserve or used to invest in companies that should be allowed to fail isn't the issue for them, it's the fact that their wealth is being taken from them in the first place.
Avatar image for deactivated-57b1d7d14d4a5
deactivated-57b1d7d14d4a5

2945

Forum Posts

950

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 3

Are you suggesting that we should adapt pure capitalism? Even if such a thing is possible, its likely far more dangerous for the average person than a democratic government with a clear foundation (the constitution). Or are you suggesting that a government can exist without funding? Also, it's a little off to suggest that people who's wages are payed by the government aren't productive. We owe our modern society to a large number of these people. Also, without governments there is even less incentive to invest in basic research, which gets more expensive every year it seems. We rely on government for a great deal. Without taxation, governments cannot function.

Avatar image for commando
Commando

1999

Forum Posts

249

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#19  Edited By Commando
Suicrat said:
"Bellum said:
What's that got to do with anything? How does that apply to the concepts of "freedom" or "liberty"? More importantly, how does that relate to freedom as defined by the US constitution, just to avoid the bullshit? I'm not sure bailing out failing corporations was a good idea, but the message seems to be yet another thinly veiled attempt to vilify vaguely socialist policies, and to equate it to the American conservative perception of what socialism is (communism). The above quote is important, because it highlights a big flaw in the popular conservative way of thinking, that people who have more money are superior because they are more productive and harder working. Of course, this is only true as long as it isn't obvious that the big corporations are raping you in the ass by taking government money and using it to pay executive bonuses, but I wont fault the people for a natural level of hypocrisy. "
I don't think the people behind the Tea Parties are necessarily conservatives. They aren't necessarily supporting the rich and opposing the poor. Especially when you consider their opposition to the way the government is handling the failing companies in the steel, manufcacturing, auto, and banking sectors, and to the way the government is precipitating inflation that is potentially devestating to the working poor.Instead of letting these companies go to chapter 11, and opening up their capital to be bought at a discount by potentially more-productive users of it, the government is maintaining the roster of many of these companies (Wagoner's dismissal notwithstanding.)And the existence of the Welfare State is dependent upon taxation, taxation is a fundamental violation of a person's liberty because it appropriates a portion of a person's wealth generating abilities to be given to less productive people. In other words, it is a declaration of sovereignty over the individual.And the people behind the tea parties are opposed to the use of this wealth for anyone other than the creators of it. Whether or not it's given to people for bonuses they didn't deserve or used to invest in companies that should be allowed to fail isn't the issue for them, it's the fact that their wealth is being taken from them in the first place."
It's actually the Auburn University College Republicans, but the democrats and libertarians are encouraged to come too, and some of them are.
Avatar image for snipzor
Snipzor

3471

Forum Posts

57

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 1

#20  Edited By Snipzor

Anyone realize that this tea party is bound to get violent? This kind of stuff never works well. Get a bunch of angry, young, impatient, and especially impulsive people together and mob rule will take over. As it always does.

Avatar image for jayge_
Jayge_

10269

Forum Posts

2045

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 3

#21  Edited By Jayge_
Snipzor said:
"Anyone realize that this tea party is bound to get violent? This kind of stuff never works well. Get a bunch of angry, young, impatient, and especially impulsive people together and mob rule will take over. As it always does."
I can't wait for it, actually.
Avatar image for omegapirate
OmegaPirate

5643

Forum Posts

6172

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#22  Edited By OmegaPirate
Jayge said:
"Snipzor said:
"Anyone realize that this tea party is bound to get violent? This kind of stuff never works well. Get a bunch of angry, young, impatient, and especially impulsive people together and mob rule will take over. As it always does."
I can't wait for it, actually.
"
*gets camera ready*