Considering virtually all my money is digital at this point, and I rarely have cash on me, I wouldn't oppose this.
What if paper money is going to go all digital? will u support it
Besides like I mentioned in this thread, anyone who doesn't get with the RFID digital currency program gets thrown into FEMA camps or has their chip turned off until they learn to be obedient.
So even if there was civil disobedience, the army, which is called FEMA actually trained their troops to invade american homes and disarm their guns. They are well prepared for this scenario and planned it already and throw them into FEMA camps. No revolution will surive with the patriot act, they already figured everyone out beforehand. Let's say there are enough military and FEMA concentration camps to put like alot of americans there. I mean if you look at history, the u.s put japanese in concentration camps. Did you know there are military in the u.s now training in small camps for civil disobedience? It's happening now, they are prepared for this scenario.
EDIT: Also, the Army, Navy, and Air Force are Department of Defense.
the only ones that will agree to such a system are the ones that don't feel they have financial security and control, much like the double talk of agreeing with the patriot act or else you are a terrorist. Seriously unless they don't teach US history anymore, the right to bare arms is not to defend against the home robber, but against the government and its own army by having the right for a revolution." @StaticFalconar: that's the interesting point i'm trying to make, is it worth trading our human rights, liberties, privacy for more financial security and control? I want other ppl to think about that very point. "
" @HitmanAgent47 said:The Supreme Court ruled that the right to bear arms is a matter of self-defense.the only ones that will agree to such a system are the ones that don't feel they have financial security and control, much like the double talk of agreeing with the patriot act or else you are a terrorist. Seriously unless they don't teach US history anymore, the right to bare arms is not to defend against the home robber, but against the government and its own army by having the right for a revolution. "" @StaticFalconar: that's the interesting point i'm trying to make, is it worth trading our human rights, liberties, privacy for more financial security and control? I want other ppl to think about that very point. "
http://www2.timesdispatch.com/news/2009/jan/09/gamegat09_20090109-084215-ar-104000/
http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/04/19/2176185/military-style-helicopters-over.html
http://www.infowars.com/urban-warfare-drills-linked-to-coming-economic-rage/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3iyApug_g4&feature=channel_video_title
I fail to see how even the Army would have such an easy time against such opposition, especially since both sides would have the same exact equipment.
thi@example1013: maybe during martial law before they propose the RFID solution, they take over. FEMA isn't fighting the army, your fighting the government, it's them vs you. Don't let the names confuse you,
let's say the RFID situation was a national emergency, they declared martial law and require ppl to use the RFID chip. FEMA is now incharge and the united nations. The revolution you talked about are just a bunch of gun owners, they can't win.The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is an agency of the United States Department of Homeland Security, initially created by Presidential Order on 1 April 1979. The primary purpose of FEMA is to coordinate the response to a disaster that has occurred in the United States and that overwhelms the resources of local and state authorities. The governor of the state in which the disaster occurs must declare a state of emergency and formally request from the president that FEMA and the federal government respond to the disaster.
They changed FEMA role in 2003, but I feel you don't understand what i'm trying to say. You just don't get it and I don't know what your point is either. I've actually seen these ppl training in your neigbourhoods in videos for an uprising, but we are getting way too off topics.
FEMA under Department of Homeland Security (2003–present)
President George W. Bush signs the Homeland Security Appropriations Act of 2004Following the September 11, 2001 attacks, Congress passed the Homeland Security Act of 2002, which created the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to better coordinate among the different federal agencies that deal with law enforcement, disaster preparedness and recovery, border protection and civil defense. FEMA was absorbed into DHS in 2003. As a result, FEMA became part of the Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate of Department of Homeland Security, and employs more than 2,600 full time employees.
this was what katrina looked like, see any troops? Why is FEMA all troops? Well they took over at 2003 and they will be there if there is civil unrest. Now let's get back on topic. Did you know canadian troops are hired to be there if there was unrest in the u.s and an uprising? So while you think i'm not american, our troops are going to be there if there was an uprising, they contracted off the work to a bit of our troops too. The difference is the military is more co-ordinated and has better tactics, also artillery. RFID or FEMA camps, that's my point.
My point is that, in an uprising, they'd be facing an actual military force. I'm not talking about individual citizens who happen to own guns or whatever. I'm talking about actual soldiers with actual military guns, tanks, planes, and helicopters. You know the weapons you see in the Modern Warfare games? I'm talking that kind of shit. They have it. And they answer to the Governors of states. There are Air National Guard organizations (which are controlled by the individual states) that have F-22 Raptors. The same kind the Air Force uses. They account for half of the United States Army's entire active combat forces, making the total number of troops almost 400,000. I'm discounting the fact that Congress can call them into Federal service because, were a revolution to occur, I have no doubt that the various state Governors wouldn't allow these troops to leave." @example1013: maybe during martial law before they propose the RFID solution, they take over. FEMA isn't fighting the army, your fighting the government, it's them vs you. Don't let the names confuse you,
let's say the RFID situation was a national emergency, they declared martial law and require ppl to use the RFID chip. FEMA is now incharge and the united nations. The revolution you talked about are just a bunch of gun owners, they can't win.The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is an agency of the United States Department of Homeland Security, initially created by Presidential Order on 1 April 1979. The primary purpose of FEMA is to coordinate the response to a disaster that has occurred in the United States and that overwhelms the resources of local and state authorities. The governor of the state in which the disaster occurs must declare a state of emergency and formally request from the president that FEMA and the federal government respond to the disaster.
They changed FEMA role in 2003, but I feel you don't understand what i'm trying to say. You just don't get it and I don't know what your point is either. I've actually seen these ppl training in your neigbourhoods in videos for an uprising, but we are getting way too off topics.
"FEMA under Department of Homeland Security (2003–present)
President George W. Bush signs the Homeland Security Appropriations Act of 2004Following the September 11, 2001 attacks, Congress passed the Homeland Security Act of 2002, which created the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to better coordinate among the different federal agencies that deal with law enforcement, disaster preparedness and recovery, border protection and civil defense. FEMA was absorbed into DHS in 2003. As a result, FEMA became part of the Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate of Department of Homeland Security, and employs more than 2,600 full time employees.
You don't seem to understand that a revolution in the United States wouldn't just be a bunch of civilians trying to take over Washington, DC. It would include hundreds of thousands of professional soldiers, SUPPORTING THE REVOLT. If you would read my posts, you would understand this. FEMA can try to disarm civilians. They might even be successful. But there's no chance that FEMA can stand up against HALF OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY.
The only way your scenario will work is if there is a massive stand down or they quit, which they will be thrown in FEMA camps.
" @example1013: no soliders swore an oath to protect their country, they will not revolt against their government if they wanted to implant RFID, they will work directly with the government. My point is they are already breifed on all of this, they already practiced most of their drills already as I posted. They aren't going to fight themselves, they are part of the system. "Are you trying to not understand what I'm saying? National Guard members take an oath of loyalty the their individual state, as well. So even though the federal government could try to force the National Guards into federal service, it wouldn't work in a situation similar to what you outlined. Also, the Oath is sworn to the Constitution first and foremost, not to any government entity.
Here is the map of the 10 regions FEMA will be in control of, the president won't be in control anymore. So it can happen with executive orders.
list of things the president can do signing executive orders. Don't think I don't understand all this, I know what i'm talking about, you don't know all this. Maybe I should of kepted this a secret, but I want to talk about if ppl will go along with the RFID digital currency or not. I didn't mention it required martial law, it's just a what if scenario. Believe whatever you want, I have nothing but evidence to my points.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 10990 allows the government to take over all modes of transportation and control of highways and seaports.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 10995 allows the government to seize and control the communication media.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 10997 allows the government to take over all electrical power, gas, petroleum, fuels and minerals.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 10998 allows the government to take over all food resources and farms.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11000 allows the government to mobilize civilians into work brigades under government supervision.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11001 allows the government to take over all health, education and welfare functions.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11002 designates the Postmaster General to operate a national registration of all persons.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11003 allows the government to take over all airports and aircraft, including commercial aircraft.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11004 allows the Housing and Finance Authority to relocate communities, build new housing with public funds, designate areas to be abandoned, and establish new locations for populations.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11005 allows the government to take over railroads, inland waterways and public storage facilities.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11051 specifies the responsibility of the Office of Emergency Planning and gives authorization to put all Executive Orders into effect in times of increased international tensions and economic or financial crisis.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11310 grants authority to the Department of Justice to enforce the plans set out in Executive Orders, to institute industrial support, to establish judicial and legislative liaison, to control all aliens, to operate penal and correctional institutions, and to advise and assist the President.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11049 assigns emergency preparedness function to federal departments and agencies, consolidating 21 operative Executive Orders issued over a fifteen year period.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11921 allows the Federal Emergency Preparedness Agency to develop plans to establish control over the mechanisms of production and distribution, of energy sources, wages, salaries, credit and the flow of money in U.S. financial institution in any undefined national emergency. It also provides that when a state of emergency is declared by the President, Congress cannot review the action for six months. The Federal Emergency Management Agency has broad powers in every aspect of the nation.
But I am trying to keep the scenario of this thread simple, asking other will they support it. Maybe I am trying to make a point the american ppl might do everything the government tells them to if they slowly push the envolope. Like cooking a frog slowly so it doesn't jump out of the pot. The worst the american cna do in this scenario is to protest.
Establishment of the Council of Governors bill
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Executive_Order_13528
Establishment of the Council of Governors
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 1822 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2008 ( Public Law 110-181), and in order to strengthen further the partnership between the Federal Government and State governments to protect our Nation and its people and property, it is hereby ordered as follows:
Section 1. Council of Governors.
(a) There is established a Council of Governors (Council). The Council shall consist of 10 State Governors appointed by the President (Members), of whom no more than five shall be of the same political party. The term of service for each Member appointed to serve on the Council shall be 2 years, but a Member may be reappointed for additional terms. (b) The President shall designate two Members, who shall not be members of the same political party, to serve as Co-Chairs of the Council.
Sec. 2. Functions.
The Council shall meet at the call of the Secretary of Defense or the Co-Chairs of the Council to exchange views, information, or advice with the Secretary of Defense; the Secretary of Homeland Security; the Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism; the Assistant to the President for Intergovernmental Affairs and Public Engagement; the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Homeland Defense and Americas' Security Affairs; the Commander, United States Northern Command; the Chief, National Guard Bureau; the Commandant of the Coast Guard; and other appropriate officials of the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Defense, and appropriate officials of other executive departments or agencies as may be designated by the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of Homeland Security. Such views, information, or advice shall concern:
(a) matters involving the National Guard of the various States; (b) homeland defense; (c) civil support; (d) synchronization and integration of State and Federal military activities in the United States; and (e) other matters of mutual interest pertaining to National Guard, homeland defense, and civil support activities.
You don't get it. The National Guard is governed solely by the Constitution, meaning any laws enacted by Congress to change its function are inapplicable. It would take a Constitutional Amendment to give the President the power to activate the National Guard on his own, and there's no way such an amendment would even make it through the first round of voting." @example1013: disolve congress, that's my point. Then the national guard will be transfered over to FEMA control. Congress already knows about this, some are angry about it btw. If you don't believe me read the bill yourself
Establishment of the Council of Governors bill
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Executive_Order_13528
"Establishment of the Council of Governors
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 1822 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2008 ( Public Law 110-181), and in order to strengthen further the partnership between the Federal Government and State governments to protect our Nation and its people and property, it is hereby ordered as follows:
Section 1. Council of Governors.
(a) There is established a Council of Governors (Council). The Council shall consist of 10 State Governors appointed by the President (Members), of whom no more than five shall be of the same political party. The term of service for each Member appointed to serve on the Council shall be 2 years, but a Member may be reappointed for additional terms. (b) The President shall designate two Members, who shall not be members of the same political party, to serve as Co-Chairs of the Council.
you didn't even read my edit, here it is again. It states the national guard there. Also you ignored my point about appointing 10 states with new governers. You aren't reading my points, then I don't have to reply to yours.
Sec. 2. Functions.
The Council shall meet at the call of the Secretary of Defense or the Co-Chairs of the Council to exchange views, information, or advice with the Secretary of Defense; the Secretary of Homeland Security; the Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism; the Assistant to the President for Intergovernmental Affairs and Public Engagement; the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Homeland Defense and Americas' Security Affairs; the Commander, United States Northern Command; the Chief, National Guard Bureau; the Commandant of the Coast Guard; and other appropriate officials of the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Defense, and appropriate officials of other executive departments or agencies as may be designated by the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of Homeland Security. Such views, information, or advice shall concern:
(a) | matters involving the National Guard of the various States; |
(b) | homeland defense; |
(c) | civil support; |
(d) | synchronization and integration of State and Federal military activities in the United States; and |
(e) | other matters of mutual interest pertaining to National Guard, homeland defense, and civil support activities. |
I don't think he gets it, how easily his government can change. If there was food riots and inflation triping the prices of everything including gas, they can issue martial law, putting all these executive orders in effect before they roll out the RFID digitlal currency chip idea for my thread. It's entirely possible.
But enough about him not reading my post and replying, what do you think about digital currrency? as a solution?
You don't get it. Putting martial law in effect means the President doesn't get the National Guard, meaning he's only got half his troops. Government change is actually extremely slow except in times of the utmost crisis. Germany was in a time of utmost crisis at that point. Barring a war, we can never reach such a point. And in a war, the situation would change completely, and this would be even less likely to happen." I don't think he gets it, how easily his government can change. If there was food riots and inflation triping the prices of everything including gas, they can issue martial law, putting all these executive orders in effect before they roll out the RFID digitlal currency chip idea for my thread. It's entirely possible. "
Here is a real RFID in the hand and according to wiki.
Just after the operation to insert the RFID tag was completed. The yellow is from the iodine disinfection before inserting the chip.
Some ppl claims that it's in some passports, but I have to research that. I also heard a rumor wallmart might use that for their products, some ppl said they found RFID chips in their clothes, but I have to confirm that first. Maybe a tatoo code will be easier, or maybe they might include this chip in a medical card. But the point i'm trying to make is what if the government wants more control and this was the safest way to safeguard from fraud paired with rectinal scanners. FDA already approved this in 2004.
NO. It's not just the concept of a wholly digital currency but the idea of a totally manipulated and controlled money that scares me. Which is why I am against fiat, paper money anyway. Money must be independent, it must be NOT be manipulated for the benefit of political objectives. It is there for everyone to use, we all have a stake in our money. It must not be printed or debased by the few, which is why I believe in a money which is backed by Gold and Silver and free from artificial manipulation. Without a free and independent money, a nation can NEVER be free. You only have to look at the history of the USD over this past century and the freedoms and liberties within the US. The more manipulated and debased the dollar has become the worse the society finds itself in. This is no coincidence. Money is the ultimate medium of exchange, it governs much of our daily lives.
Back on point though, a wholly digital currency would allow for easier manipulation by the govt (which isn't saying much since it's all too easy nowadays). It places more control into central government and allows for a more "controlled" society. Effectively it takes power away from the people. And that's before we get to social liberty problems such as tracking etc.
" So long as the chip is organic and free range I'm in. Serious answer, who the fuck would agree to have a RFID chip implanted in their bodies, only in some totalitarian 1984 alternate universe. Also wouldn't that shit get infected? "
You assume people care enough. Alas, they don't. Most are apathetic on such issues, many are just plain idiots and some positively welcome a more "controlled" society where the govt is supreme overseer, it means they don't need to think for themselves.
But in reality, for an RFID chip scheme to succeed it will only do so if the people want it. And the people are only going to want it if other alternatives have been tried and failed, therefore leaving them no choice. Put it like this, a starving man is a desperate man prepared to do things he otherwise never would.
No, and if it came down to it I would put a gun in my mouth before anyone puts me in a camp.
Also, completely off topic, but it's "people" not ppl.
Well we didn't do anything about the TSA, yeah I think americans are conditioned now for that kind of absolute control. We gave up our freedom in the name of security so easily, what else will they give up in the name of security, or financial security. I really think the american ppl might go for it.
As benjamin franklin said,
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.
I will not support digital money.
Did Nanomachines teach us ANYTHING? If it exists within the digital realm with no physical object to which it can be controlled by you, someone else can and will control it. "Oh, the economy is in a mess so you have a spending capacity of under $500 a month now." ID Tagged money, ID Tagged citizens. Sooner or later our money will be monitored and regulated, which will lead to us being monitored and regulated. They will have full economic control. Full citizen control. Full control over the banks, the large corporations, the government, the press. Full control over war itself.
The human race has been about demonstrating our dominance, our power. Marking our territory and scaring off all the big dogs so we can keep it to ourselves. And it wasn't until we figured out, millions of millions of years ago, that we could use what we have to take things from others that we became a race hellbent on killing, destroying, and taking everything for ourselves. "We the people" is nothing but bullshit. It's just a cover that the government uses to mask their true intentions of taking what they want from who they want and killing who they want for their own personal gain. It's all greed, all money. Nothing else matters to them but money and war. And in a state where we are monitored and our money is regulated by them, what freedoms do we share than that of a common insect? At that point in time, our existence, our identity has no meaning and we are just a bunch of tools used to generate money for the well oiled war machine to keep on keeping on and killing and taking and using fear to strike into the hearts of our enemies as a reminder that if you attempt to bite the hand that feeds you, it will unleash a vengeance that you would never have imagined.
So you tell me. Do you support digital money?
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment