What if paper money is going to go all digital? will u support it
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/fema_executive_orders.htm
I have read EO 12919 at least twice now. They say in the article you posted the following:
" These E.O.'s signed by Kennedy would give authority to the Federal Emergency Management Agency to control: communications, energy, food, fuel, farms, transportation, highways, railroads, inland waterways and seaports, health, education and welfare, drafts citizens into work forces under government supervision; relocation of populations, designates areas to be abandoned as 'unsafe'; relocates communities, and controls all public storage facilities. "
They further do say (correctly) that clinton's 12919 supercedes those EO's. First, they are plain wrong. Section 201 article a establishes 6 different emergency management functions to 6 different heads of government organizations other than FEMA. So they are simply misstating the orders. Further, I think you are misreading them. Even the article you linked makes it clear that since the president cannot declare a "National Emergency" and enact these orders, there must be legislation to do so. No legislation has been passed, which means this still cannot happen.
So I see what you're saying, that FEMA could be used to quell civil unrest, but I'm sorry, I'm a realist. If you tell me that this is all documented by an executive order, and it's there, I'll believe ya. But I've sat down now and read through them and there's no way in which civil unrest could fall under the scope of the items mentioned. It's simply not there. And sure I'll believe in secrets and all that, but the articles you are linking me to all list out available executive orders and all of the articles incorrectly sum up the executive orders they list.
Just try putting a damn micro chip in a strippers panties. That just isn't the American way.
On second thought, someone needs to make the Eazy Pass panties. Swipe your card for a lap dance... Brilliant!
National Emergency Centers Establishment Act (Introduced in House)
HR 645 IH
111th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 645 To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to establish national emergency centers on military installations.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
January 22, 2009 Mr. HASTINGS of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
A BILL To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to establish national emergency centers on military installations.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `National Emergency Centers Establishment Act’.
SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF NATIONAL EMERGENCY CENTERS.
(a) In General- In accordance with the requirements of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall establish not fewer than 6 national emergency centers on military installations.
(b) Purpose of National Emergency Centers- The purpose of a national emergency center shall be to use existing infrastructure–
(1) to provide temporary housing, medical, and humanitarian assistance to individuals and families dislocated due to an emergency or major disaster;
(2) to provide centralized locations for the purposes of training and ensuring the coordination of Federal, State, and local first responders;
(3) to provide centralized locations to improve the coordination of preparedness, response, and recovery efforts of government, private, and not-for-profit entities and faith-based organizations; and
(4) to meet other appropriate needs, as determined by the Secretary of Homeland Security.
They never really talked about what is the appropriate needs, determined by secretary of homeland security. It's vague, but it's right there in the bill, he doesn't even need congress. In my scenario, the RFID riots, but in reality, I say it's a false flag biological attack the u.s will unlease on it's citizens or something like that from my sources. But that's for a different discussion altogether.
closing of state borders
drafting of citizens into labor forces for government work
establishment of actual centers described above
And if the definition of national emergency was somehow expanded to mean civil/economic unrest (which in nowhere is this done) I'd think you have a point. The EO for the first 2 of the three above do not state any of those items. It's actually pretty egregious to me that people are telling you EO 11000 is authorizing the drafting of citizens into labor posts, as it pretty clearly is talking about existing govt employees and recruiting efforts (recruiting is different than drafting).
That's why I tend to look at some of this as a little far fetched. The documents you are sourcing are real, but this main document evidencing the creation of 'internment' camps was first introduced 6 years ago, and no lawmakers have seen fit to pass the thing. Which tells you, the bill is bad. and which tells you it hasn't happened yet, and most likely won't. In 6 years, we've had 3 different congresses, and all of them have killed this bill.
29:00
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYnUJejz_xQ
Besides who cares, these built FEMA camps are part of my fictional scenario, they serve their purpose. But they still exist and even if it's not put into law yet, there are 800 of them in the u.s right now so I think it would fit very well with my thread. I used the term civil unrest, but martial law should be the better term. I"m sure they can pass it though the house of congress later on if they needed to by creating a false flag attack and tells congress to act. But the FEMA camps are already built.
Remember, this thread is fictional, a what if scenario. I see no need to discuss it futher if it's fictional
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment