• 66 results
  • 1
  • 2
Avatar image for ntm
#1 Posted by NTM (9729 posts) -


Avatar image for video_game_king
#2 Posted by Video_Game_King (36564 posts) -

Never, since if they did, they'd destroy the goddamn universe.

Avatar image for theveteran13
#3 Edited by TheVeteran13 (1410 posts) -

After I'm long dead.

Avatar image for ntm
#4 Posted by NTM (9729 posts) -

I have no idea as to when it would happen, so it'd be pointless for me to really make a choice, but I'll just do it since that's the only way I can see choices. I'll choose C. Anyways, I've done this in the past, but I'd like to post this link for those that are interested in theories from scientist and what not, of what our future may be.

http://www.futuretimeline.net/23rdcentury/23rdcentury.htm

Avatar image for alexandersheen
#5 Posted by AlexanderSheen (5150 posts) -
Loading Video...
Avatar image for bravetoaster
#6 Posted by BraveToaster (12636 posts) -

Only Karl Pilkington knows the answer.

Avatar image for intro
#7 Posted by Intro (1270 posts) -

@AlexanderSheen said:

Loading Video...

This, light is fast as fuck guys. Although we do have stuff like this.

L.A. to N.Y. in 12 minutes I believe. And that's what the government tells us about. I'm not some conspiracy theorist either. But it's a fact that we don't find out about the futuristic tech until it's been out/used for a while, they won't tell us what they have as soon as it's made. The bombers during Vietnam are an example of that, iirc.

Avatar image for adoggz
#8 Posted by adoggz (2081 posts) -

let me consult my history of the future textbook. lets see....... lotto numbers, no..... sports team victories, no......... ahh here it is faster than light travel. Discovered in 1987 by a Mr. Gerstmann and used to get some mars burgers. Promptly forgotten about forever afterwords.

Avatar image for peasantabuse
#9 Posted by PeasantAbuse (5098 posts) -

@NTM said:

I have no idea as to when it would happen, so it'd be pointless for me to really make a choice, but I'll just do it since that's the only way I can see choices. I'll choose C. Anyways, I've done this in the past, but I'd like to post this link for those that are interested in theories from scientist and what not, of what our future may be.

http://www.futuretimeline.net/23rdcentury/23rdcentury.htm

I love that timeline. Some of the stuff in the next few years is so cool.

Avatar image for slaker117
#10 Posted by Slaker117 (4873 posts) -

Tomorrow, probably.

Avatar image for viking_funeral
#11 Posted by viking_funeral (2559 posts) -

Was the CERN thing officially debunked, or is it still up in the air?

Either way, I don't think it's a matter of going faster than light, but folding space.

Avatar image for bestusernameever
#12 Posted by BestUsernameEver (5026 posts) -

FTL?

Online
Avatar image for ntm
#13 Posted by NTM (9729 posts) -

@BestUsernameEver: Sorry, faster than light.

Avatar image for hoossy
#14 Posted by hoossy (1071 posts) -

The omega relays were destroyed so never...

Avatar image for wickedfather
#15 Posted by WickedFather (1694 posts) -

Principles this century but only applicable to subatomic flim-flam or wave effects.  A real physical application, that's awayaway.

Avatar image for toxin066
#16 Posted by Toxin066 (3468 posts) -

We have to understand how to connect two points in space first (it's been explained to me like connecting two points on a paper by folding the paper in half). I'm gonna guess we do that in the 22nd century. Then we get the know how to manipulate points, then we have to build a machine that can do that. So I'm gonna say 24th century.

Avatar image for ntm
#17 Posted by NTM (9729 posts) -

@BraveToaster: Ha ha, yes, kind of ironic really. I had changed it just after I made this.

@Paul_Is_Drunk: Yeah, maybe.

@PeasantAbuse: Have you seen the site before? Or you just saw it now? Either way, I'm glad you enjoyed it.

@hoossy: Not yet. They'll be destroyed in our future; 173 years, and nine months from now, or maybe they won't.

Avatar image for ntm
#18 Posted by NTM (9729 posts) -

@Toxin066: Yeah, Paul_Is_Drunk mentioned that.

Avatar image for korwin
#19 Posted by korwin (3837 posts) -

FTL, never. Some kind of point to point jump gate wormhole type deal, probably the 24th.

Avatar image for peasantabuse
#20 Posted by PeasantAbuse (5098 posts) -

@NTM: I have glanced at it before, but this is the fist time I've really read anything on it.

Avatar image for liquidprince
#21 Posted by LiquidPrince (16846 posts) -

After they figure out how to move at Light speed...

Avatar image for the_official_japanese_teabag
#22 Posted by the_OFFICIAL_jAPanese_teaBAG (4312 posts) -

Isnt it impossible to move faster than the speed of light?

Avatar image for napalm
#23 Posted by Napalm (9230 posts) -

@PeasantAbuse said:

@NTM said:

I have no idea as to when it would happen, so it'd be pointless for me to really make a choice, but I'll just do it since that's the only way I can see choices. I'll choose C. Anyways, I've done this in the past, but I'd like to post this link for those that are interested in theories from scientist and what not, of what our future may be.

http://www.futuretimeline.net/23rdcentury/23rdcentury.htm

I love that timeline. Some of the stuff in the next few years is so cool.

Until you read on until the very end of the timeline and goddamn... extremely lonely.

Avatar image for theveej
#24 Posted by theveej (932 posts) -

For me D,E,F,G are are possible. I chose D because we might stumble on to something but other than that its either never or in a really really long time from now.

Avatar image for kindgineer
#25 Posted by kindgineer (3084 posts) -

I think it would be naive to click "Never." Mainly because we have only been playing with this type of technology for a very small amount of time, how would we know?

I think we will be having a forum post (if there are forums) years from now about "Do you think we'll have [speed of even faster than FTL!]?"

Avatar image for autobarn
#26 Posted by AutoBarn (107 posts) -

Couple of weeks. Pretty sure we'll have cracked it by then.

Avatar image for ethanielrain
#27 Edited by EthanielRain (1299 posts) -

I think we'll destroy ourselves - and probably Earth itself, too - before we reach that level of intelligence.

Avatar image for thatfrood
#28 Posted by ThatFrood (3471 posts) -

Tomorrow.

Avatar image for visariloyalist
#29 Posted by VisariLoyalist (3129 posts) -

@ThatFrood said:

Tomorrow.

if it happens tomorrow does that make you space jesus or something?

Avatar image for rohok
#30 Posted by Rohok (579 posts) -

Anyone who believes we won't find a way to travel beyond our solar system is a quitter. Quitting is for pussies.

Avatar image for xeiphyer
#31 Posted by Xeiphyer (5831 posts) -

Considering the speed at which new information is created and discovered, if it is possible, it couldn't be more than a few hundred years from discovery. Now, when can we actually build a large working prototype? I imagine that's quite a bit farther away. 
 
Though who knows what we will have in the future. All it takes is one person to make one breakthrough and our whole future could be radically different.

Avatar image for daveyo520
#32 Posted by Daveyo520 (7747 posts) -

Sorry, it is kind of impossible.

Avatar image for mrfizzy
#33 Posted by mrfizzy (1660 posts) -

This sort of depends on the context. We can already get individual particles to go faster than the speed of light. As for getting a human to go that speed? Never, even if they did manage to do it the person would never survive. Also the cost of doing it would probable rule it out.

Avatar image for xakura
#34 Posted by Xakura (127 posts) -

The singularity. Then all bets are off.

Avatar image for korolev
#35 Posted by Korolev (1800 posts) -

@Paul_Is_Drunk said:

Was the CERN thing officially debunked, or is it still up in the air?

Either way, I don't think it's a matter of going faster than light, but folding space.

Unfortunately (or fortunately, depends on how you look at it) it was debunked. Most scientists working at CERN had serious reservations about announcing "FTL particles". Turns out it was a faulty cable that was throwing off their measurements. The guy who "announced" the discovery looks like a fool because he said that he "accounted" for every possibility, but no, he didn't account for a loose/faulty cable. He voluntarily left his job out of shame.

Avatar image for perryvandell
#36 Posted by PerryVandell (2219 posts) -

Probably never, as it would require us to decrease our mass to zero. The "probably" is there since we once thought the Earth was flat and the center of the universe not that long ago. Either way, it'll be interesting to watch how technology evolves over the coming years.

Avatar image for bigchickendinner
#37 Posted by BigChickenDinner (787 posts) -

It's happened already.

Because time isn't real........

No Caption Provided
Avatar image for karlpilkington
#38 Posted by KarlPilkington (2810 posts) -

@BraveToaster said:

Only Karl Pilkington knows the answer.

They never will.

Avatar image for thedudeofgaming
#39 Posted by TheDudeOfGaming (6117 posts) -

Just a completely random guess based on....well nothing really, but I'm kind of leaning towards the never thing.

Avatar image for mcghee
#40 Posted by McGhee (6128 posts) -

Perhaps near light speed, but with current physics going faster is impossible.

I've also heard that it is already theoretically possible (the math has been done) to create a worm hole to be traveled through. But the energy that would be required to send anything of significant size is so ridiculously high, like all the energy of a galaxy, that it is impossible.

What it all comes down to is a new fundamental understanding of physics, something radical. Because from what we understand about how things work now it will never happen.

But I am basically talking out of my ass, so who knows?

Avatar image for pezen
#41 Posted by Pezen (2141 posts) -

I am sure at some point space travel has a means to it that we're yet not entirely aware of. Some solutions only come after you've researched other solutions. Today we're looking at point-to-point holes and faster than light, but that doesn't mean there can't be other forms we're not entirely sure of yet. We're a bit too undeveloped to grasp concepts of such magnitude and too proud to think of ourselves as primates of technology. But I am certain we'll eventually be exploring the galaxy like it was business as usual. But definitely not anytime soon.

Avatar image for philantrophy
#42 Posted by Philantrophy (356 posts) -

We will be able to reach FTL because of some ruins on Mars. Isn't there a theory about using wormholes to "teleport" through the galaxy?

Avatar image for williamrlbaker
#43 Posted by WilliamRLBaker (4941 posts) -

never since the speed of light cannot be broken what can be done is it can be cheated technically worm holes and other traveling methods aren't going faster then the speed of light but simply cheating there way through.

Avatar image for forkboy
#44 Posted by forkboy (1577 posts) -

@the_OFFICIAL_jAPanese_teaBAG said:

Isnt it impossible to move faster than the speed of light?

According to the current laws of science, yeah. But who knows what developments we'll have in 100 years time. I mean in 1895 if you asked a physicist they'd think that the idea of splitting the atom was absurd because atoms are indivisible, the clue is in the name after all. And yet less than 50 years later it had been done. Ditto with something like the age of the universe being 13.7 billion years, or the idea of light being carried by particles called photons or so many other elements of our understanding of physics. So yeah, it seems hugely unlikely, but there is a slim chance that we're missing some sort of fundamental thing in some area of physics that could enable FTL travel.

@Rohok said:

Anyone who believes we won't find a way to travel beyond our solar system is a quitter. Quitting is for pussies.

Well in fairness, travelling outside the Solar System is not the same as FTL travel. We could create stasis chambers which allow for travel over huge distance while slowing aging down to almost nothing or some other thing. You get the idea.

Avatar image for shagge
#45 Posted by ShaggE (8350 posts) -

All we need to do is build a craft out of light, then cover it in grease.

Not hard, scientists.

Avatar image for jack268
#46 Posted by Jack268 (3370 posts) -

Infinite time ago

Avatar image for penguindust
#47 Edited by PenguinDust (12988 posts) -

Not going to happen. It's physically impossible. That isn't to say that some other form of interplanetary travel might be developed or discovered such as folded space and jumpgates, but just pushin' the pedal to the metal and gunning it faster than the speed of light in a spaceship won't happen.

Avatar image for angeln7
#48 Posted by AngelN7 (3001 posts) -

B , but also who cares I'll be dead by then so I won't be traveling in cool space ships and meet cool aliens like in videogames ... this world sucks!

Avatar image for alexw00d
#49 Posted by AlexW00d (7473 posts) -

We'll never be able to travel faster than light, even a simple grasp of special relativity would show you so. Whether or not we will be able to manipulate the other supposed 7 spacial dimensions is another question entirely, and that is how we 'will' be able to cross large distances in a short amount of time, if we ever can.

Avatar image for godmil
#50 Edited by Godmil (199 posts) -

Faster than light travel? No.

Sorry, it's a just a big no. Any other guess is more optimistic than thinking we'll find a magical race of pixies who live in coffee cups and convert caffeine into anti-cancer diamonds.