Something went wrong. Try again later
    Follow

    Gearbox Software LLC

    Company »

    Gearbox is a company best known for their early work on the Half-Life series, WWII video game series Brothers in Arms, Borderlands and Duke Nukem Forever.

    mini gearbox rant

    Avatar image for wiqidbritt
    WiqidBritt

    601

    Forum Posts

    10

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 5

    Edited By WiqidBritt

    So, Gearbox has been rubbing me the wrong way as of late, first there was the whole DNF review fiasco, and while not technically Gearbox's fault, it still left me feeling a bit off about them. And now Randy Pitchford is calling the eurogamer leak about Borderlands 2 "shoddy journalism". I understand that he's annoyed, sure, but you can't say someone's sucking at their job when they report something that's obviously true. The whole thing stinks of just expecting the games press to just play along with your own plans and expectations. An outlet give your last game a harsh review? Threaten to never send them review copies or early builds of any of their games ever again. Someone ferret out what new game you're working on and write a story about it? Claim that it's not true and that the person writing the story is a hack. 
    Stories like this do absolutely no harm to anyone, there were no details about the game in the story, so people still need to either get the Game Informer issue or wait until that info is out elsewhere to find out what's new.  
     
    On a related note, I think it's pretty funny that the first game Gearbox releases after Anthony Burch (from Hey Ash, Whatcha Playin?) is probably the most sexist game ever released. Anthony and his sister Ashly have had numerous discussions about sexism in games on their podcasts. I realize that he almost definitely had nothing to do with the writing or production of that game, but it still struck me as interesting. 
     
    Ars Technica story about the upset Randy Pitchford 
    http://arstechnica.com/gaming/news/2011/08/developer-calls-accurate-borderlands-2-report-shoddy-journalism.ars 
     Anthony Burch's previous claim to fame, most of the videos are pretty funny 
    http://www.heyash.com/

    Avatar image for wiqidbritt
    WiqidBritt

    601

    Forum Posts

    10

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 5

    #1  Edited By WiqidBritt

    So, Gearbox has been rubbing me the wrong way as of late, first there was the whole DNF review fiasco, and while not technically Gearbox's fault, it still left me feeling a bit off about them. And now Randy Pitchford is calling the eurogamer leak about Borderlands 2 "shoddy journalism". I understand that he's annoyed, sure, but you can't say someone's sucking at their job when they report something that's obviously true. The whole thing stinks of just expecting the games press to just play along with your own plans and expectations. An outlet give your last game a harsh review? Threaten to never send them review copies or early builds of any of their games ever again. Someone ferret out what new game you're working on and write a story about it? Claim that it's not true and that the person writing the story is a hack. 
    Stories like this do absolutely no harm to anyone, there were no details about the game in the story, so people still need to either get the Game Informer issue or wait until that info is out elsewhere to find out what's new.  
     
    On a related note, I think it's pretty funny that the first game Gearbox releases after Anthony Burch (from Hey Ash, Whatcha Playin?) is probably the most sexist game ever released. Anthony and his sister Ashly have had numerous discussions about sexism in games on their podcasts. I realize that he almost definitely had nothing to do with the writing or production of that game, but it still struck me as interesting. 
     
    Ars Technica story about the upset Randy Pitchford 
    http://arstechnica.com/gaming/news/2011/08/developer-calls-accurate-borderlands-2-report-shoddy-journalism.ars 
     Anthony Burch's previous claim to fame, most of the videos are pretty funny 
    http://www.heyash.com/

    Avatar image for twisted_scot
    Twisted_Scot

    1213

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 1

    #2  Edited By Twisted_Scot

    " whole DNF review fiasco, and while not technically Gearbox's fault" & "An outlet give your last game a harsh review? Threaten to never send them review copies or early builds of any of their games ever again" by your own admission nothing to do with Gearbox so why are you getting rubbed the wrong way by them over this? As of the "Leak" of Borderlands 2 they were probably just pissed off because they wanted to make a big announcement themselves at one of the up-coming events so in that respect I can fully understand why they'd be pissed.

    Avatar image for jimbo
    Jimbo

    10472

    Forum Posts

    2

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #3  Edited By Jimbo

    Yeah, the press should all just play along with GameStop's subsidised brochure getting every major exclusive and damn well like it.

    Avatar image for crusader8463
    crusader8463

    14850

    Forum Posts

    4290

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 7

    User Lists: 5

    #4  Edited By crusader8463

    After them releasing Borderlands in such a buggy, broken, and unplayable mess of a state I have made a personally vow to never buy another gearbox game at full price again.

    Avatar image for iam3green
    iam3green

    14368

    Forum Posts

    350

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #5  Edited By iam3green

    yep, not really gearbox's fault on duke nukem. i think they finally just said we should release the game the way it is. i played it at my friend's house and it wasn't that great.

    Avatar image for wiqidbritt
    WiqidBritt

    601

    Forum Posts

    10

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 5

    #6  Edited By WiqidBritt
    @Twisted_Scot: the Borderlands 2 announcement wasn't tied to an event, it's tied to the newest issue of Game Informer, who came out and announced it the next day anyway. Being upset about it is one thing, but calling it out as shoddy journalism is in bad taste.
    Avatar image for twisted_scot
    Twisted_Scot

    1213

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 1

    #7  Edited By Twisted_Scot
    @WiqidBritt said:
    @Twisted_Scot: the Borderlands 2 announcement wasn't tied to an event, it's tied to the newest issue of Game Informer, who came out and announced it the next day anyway. Being upset about it is one thing, but calling it out as shoddy journalism is in bad taste.
    Yeah I didn't say it was tied to an event I said perhaps they were going to make their own big announcement at one of the upcoming event and GI just screwed them out of it by printing that issue 1st. Id be pissed if I were Gearbox in this case as well. Since I havent read the full GI article i cant say whether it is or isn't shoddy journalism :)
    Avatar image for mordeaniischaos
    MordeaniisChaos

    5904

    Forum Posts

    -1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 5

    User Lists: 5

    #8  Edited By MordeaniisChaos

    @WiqidBritt: Leaks are bad, and it kinda is shitty that journalists put it out there as much as they do...

    Avatar image for napalm
    napalm

    9227

    Forum Posts

    162

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #9  Edited By napalm
    Cry harder, OP.
    Avatar image for jasonr86
    JasonR86

    10468

    Forum Posts

    449

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 17

    User Lists: 5

    #10  Edited By JasonR86

    The journalism comment was unnecessary.  I think this was the case of a person tweeting before thinking.  He probably was embarrassed and felt bad for Game Informer as they had the exclusive information to the game's existence.  If I were in his place I would feel responsible to that outlet to keep that exclusive information...well, exclusive.  He was probably upset and reacted rather then allowing himself to sit back and think clearly.  I think he was in the wrong but I understand why he was upset.  He just didn't need to let those emotions out to the public.
     
    As for the DNF thing, I really don't see that as their problem.  They just released a product that was damn near finished.  It is under their name because the original developer doesn't exist as it once did and they wanted the rights to the DN name.  
     
    I don't know, I think out of all the developers in the world of gaming Gearbox would be the last one to irritate me.

    Avatar image for mideonnviscera
    MideonNViscera

    2269

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #11  Edited By MideonNViscera

    Borderlands was a buggy piece of shit? 

    Avatar image for vitor
    vitor

    3088

    Forum Posts

    51

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #12  Edited By vitor

    @Twisted_Scot said:

    @WiqidBritt said:
    @Twisted_Scot: the Borderlands 2 announcement wasn't tied to an event, it's tied to the newest issue of Game Informer, who came out and announced it the next day anyway. Being upset about it is one thing, but calling it out as shoddy journalism is in bad taste.
    Yeah I didn't say it was tied to an event I said perhaps they were going to make their own big announcement at one of the upcoming event and GI just screwed them out of it by printing that issue 1st. Id be pissed if I were Gearbox in this case as well. Since I havent read the full GI article i cant say whether it is or isn't shoddy journalism :)

    They weren't annoyed about the GI issue - they had a cover feature and full access. That was the official reveal.

    It was Eurogamer posting a story a few days before 'confirming' the game's development that they called shoddy journalism.

    And yeah, I used to really respect Randy Pitchford and all the interviews I'd seen him in painted him as a pretty cool guy. But, with his twitter comments regarding bad reviews for DNF, and now this lash out at Journalists for trying to, you know, actually do some journalism and not just be an extension of company PR, makes me thing he's loosing the plot somewhat...

    Avatar image for hailinel
    Hailinel

    25785

    Forum Posts

    219681

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 10

    User Lists: 28

    #13  Edited By Hailinel

    @crusader8463 said:

    After them releasing Borderlands in such a buggy, broken, and unplayable mess of a state I have made a personally vow to never buy another gearbox game at full price again.

    Whaaaaaa?

    Avatar image for crusader8463
    crusader8463

    14850

    Forum Posts

    4290

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 7

    User Lists: 5

    #14  Edited By crusader8463
    @Hailinel said:

    @crusader8463 said:

    After them releasing Borderlands in such a buggy, broken, and unplayable mess of a state I have made a personally vow to never buy another gearbox game at full price again.

    Whaaaaaa?

     What don't you understand? It took them about a year to patch the online to a playable state, and by then the community was non existent, and the UI was still a pain in the ass to use.
    Avatar image for shanedev
    ShaneDev

    1703

    Forum Posts

    7

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #15  Edited By ShaneDev

    Randy has a habit of speaking his mind. CVG used to make news stories out of pretty much everything he said however this was just pathetic . If that is really his views on some actual journalism by a publication then his reputation severely degrades in my eyes. It seems like that persistent idea with publishers and developers that publications should just be another tool in marketing the game. The Ars article gives a good example of this. Why even write something like that at all, it was a mere 24 hours before the thing was revealed and it wasn't even Gearbox who was going to reveal it, It was Game Informer. 

    Avatar image for wiqidbritt
    WiqidBritt

    601

    Forum Posts

    10

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 5

    #16  Edited By WiqidBritt
    @Twisted_Scot: seriously? first off, it's eurogamer that he's upset at, and secondly if you think Game Informer is the kind of publication that would risk compromising their relations with developers you are out of your damn mind. Being tied to Gamestop means they pretty much have to fall in line, but at the same time they get a lot of exclusives that way. 
     
    @Napalm: very mature. 
     
    in addendum, here's an article where Randy Pitchford basically says that Duke Nukem Forever is the best game he's played since Half-Life 2, and that any "lowball" reviews would be held accountable by the readers 
    http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2011-06-02-duke-nukem-forever-scores-dont-matter
    Avatar image for twisted_scot
    Twisted_Scot

    1213

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 1

    #17  Edited By Twisted_Scot
    @WiqidBritt said:
    @Twisted_Scot: seriously? first off, it's eurogamer that he's upset at, and secondly if you think Game Informer is the kind of publication that would risk compromising their relations with developers you are out of your damn mind. Being tied to Gamestop means they pretty much have to fall in line, but at the same time they get a lot of exclusives that way. 
     
    @WiqidBritt said:
    @Twisted_Scot: the Borderlands 2 announcement wasn't tied to an event, it's tied to the newest issue of Game Informer, who came out and announced it the next day anyway. Being upset about it is one thing, but calling it out as shoddy journalism is in bad taste.


    Wait wait wait....Your getting pissed at me for saying Game informer instead of Eurogamer? Perhaps you should check your replies as I hadn't mentioned GI until you did. You seem to get pissed very easily, perhaps a time-out is in order.
    Avatar image for wiqidbritt
    WiqidBritt

    601

    Forum Posts

    10

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 5

    #18  Edited By WiqidBritt
    @Twisted_Scot said:
    @WiqidBritt said:
    @Twisted_Scot: seriously? first off, it's eurogamer that he's upset at, and secondly if you think Game Informer is the kind of publication that would risk compromising their relations with developers you are out of your damn mind. Being tied to Gamestop means they pretty much have to fall in line, but at the same time they get a lot of exclusives that way. 
     
    @WiqidBritt said:
    @Twisted_Scot: the Borderlands 2 announcement wasn't tied to an event, it's tied to the newest issue of Game Informer, who came out and announced it the next day anyway. Being upset about it is one thing, but calling it out as shoddy journalism is in bad taste.


    Wait wait wait....Your getting pissed at me for saying Game informer instead of Eurogamer? Perhaps you should check your replies as I hadn't mentioned GI until you did. You seem to get pissed very easily, perhaps a time-out is in order.
    Forgive me for letting other people's stupidity upset me, I don't know what I was thinking. You said Gearbox was upset at Game Informer, which they are not, they gave Game Informer the exclusive announcement and the first details of the game, Gearbox has no reason to be upset with GI.
     
    @MordeaniisChaos
    : how exactly do leaks really hurt anyone? Sure, publishers and developers have PR plans for slowly drip feeding details and announcements to the public, but I don't see how knowing about a game a day or even a few weeks early is really all that damaging except for the publication that was supposed to have the exclusive reveal. 
    Avatar image for iamjohn
    iamjohn

    6297

    Forum Posts

    13905

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 5

    #19  Edited By iamjohn

    Wait, what? The HAWP guy is now working for Gearbox?

    Avatar image for wiqidbritt
    WiqidBritt

    601

    Forum Posts

    10

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 5

    #20  Edited By WiqidBritt
    @iAmJohn: yeah, they even did a few HAWP episodes in the Gearbox offices. Dude's writing Borderlands 2 actually, and he wrote (and voiced the director for) that claptrap proposal video 
      
    Avatar image for twisted_scot
    Twisted_Scot

    1213

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 1

    #21  Edited By Twisted_Scot
    @WiqidBritt said:
    @Twisted_Scot said:
    @WiqidBritt said:
    @Twisted_Scot: seriously? first off, it's eurogamer that he's upset at, and secondly if you think Game Informer is the kind of publication that would risk compromising their relations with developers you are out of your damn mind. Being tied to Gamestop means they pretty much have to fall in line, but at the same time they get a lot of exclusives that way. 
     
    @WiqidBritt said:
    @Twisted_Scot: the Borderlands 2 announcement wasn't tied to an event, it's tied to the newest issue of Game Informer, who came out and announced it the next day anyway. Being upset about it is one thing, but calling it out as shoddy journalism is in bad taste.


    Wait wait wait....Your getting pissed at me for saying Game informer instead of Eurogamer? Perhaps you should check your replies as I hadn't mentioned GI until you did. You seem to get pissed very easily, perhaps a time-out is in order.
    Forgive me for letting other people's stupidity upset me, I don't know what I was thinking. You said Gearbox was upset at Game Informer, which they are not, they gave Game Informer the exclusive announcement and the first details of the game, Gearbox has no reason to be upset with GI.
     
    @MordeaniisChaos
    : how exactly do leaks really hurt anyone? Sure, publishers and developers have PR plans for slowly drip feeding details and announcements to the public, but I don't see how knowing about a game a day or even a few weeks early is really all that damaging except for the publication that was supposed to have the exclusive reveal. 
    Like I pointed out YOU mentioned Game Informer, before that I had not even mentioned either of the publications. I have to apologize however as It was my own fault for thinking that this was a post that contained something to be discussed when its pretty much just another person making a post, half-arsed reading what people reply and the then screaming when they offer another possibility to your own. You said in your inital post that the whole Duke Nukem thing wasnt directly linked to Gearbox so its a mute point, you said you didn't get what Gearbox's problem with the "leak" of BL2 and I merely suggested that they may have wanted to be the first to announce it at an upcoming event. As for the piece you linked about Randy saying Duke Nukem is a great game and it doesn't matter as much what the reviews say when it comes to Duke Nukem he is right. Duke sold fairly well considering how bland and crappy the game was and was received and since the article takes place before the game was release would you expect him to say anything else? Shit if people were to honest about a crappy product before it comes out every trailer for his movies would just feature a 30 second clip of M Night Shyamalan saying "once again I'm sorry" followed by the release date. 
    I'll leave you to your ranting.
    Avatar image for wiqidbritt
    WiqidBritt

    601

    Forum Posts

    10

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 5

    #22  Edited By WiqidBritt
    @Twisted_Scot: how do you not get the concept that Game Informer was supposed to be the one to announce Borderlands 2? A Game Informer announcement isn't something they just decide to do on a whim, these things are planned months in advance, Game Informer was always supposed to be where the game was announced which is why I mentioned them in the first place. 
     
    also, if the text on your computer screen is screaming at you, you may have mental issues that need to be worked out. I am not screaming at all, I'm not even talking aloud as I type things... I don't even move my lips when I read.
    Avatar image for tehmaxxorz
    TEHMAXXORZ

    1190

    Forum Posts

    4491

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 2

    #23  Edited By TEHMAXXORZ
    @crusader8463 said:
    @Hailinel said:

    @crusader8463 said:

    After them releasing Borderlands in such a buggy, broken, and unplayable mess of a state I have made a personally vow to never buy another gearbox game at full price again.

    Whaaaaaa?

     What don't you understand? It took them about a year to patch the online to a playable state, and by then the community was non existent, and the UI was still a pain in the ass to use.
    I played online quite a lot soon after it was released and I had zero bugs, only slight lag because of low pings due to the client and the multiplayer wasn't broken since I always found a game in seconds.
    Avatar image for crusader8463
    crusader8463

    14850

    Forum Posts

    4290

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 7

    User Lists: 5

    #24  Edited By crusader8463
    @TEHMAXXORZ said:
    @crusader8463 said:
    @Hailinel said:

    @crusader8463 said:

    After them releasing Borderlands in such a buggy, broken, and unplayable mess of a state I have made a personally vow to never buy another gearbox game at full price again.

    Whaaaaaa?

     What don't you understand? It took them about a year to patch the online to a playable state, and by then the community was non existent, and the UI was still a pain in the ass to use.
    I played online quite a lot soon after it was released and I had zero bugs, only slight lag because of low pings due to the client and the multiplayer wasn't broken since I always found a game in seconds.
    Good for you. Me and 5 other people I know of personally couldn't even get past the log in screen, let alone playing with one another. On the rarest of rare of occasions one or two of us got on, but then none of us could connect to one another because we kept getting some Game Spy connection error. We each contacted support separately and all they did was shrug and link to a blog that some user made to supposedly fix the developers crappy game him self to allow people to play online, and even after doing that the game still didn't work. 
     
    When we gave up on ever being able to play the online co-op focused game online in a co-operative fashion with one another we tried the terrible single player, and boy was it was terrible. Guns would disappear from our inventory at random, organizing the inventory was a constant pain in the ass, enemies/mission objectives would constantly get stuck in walls or just not spawn forcing us to redo missions over and over again, and to top all that off it just wasn't fun to play.
    Avatar image for mfpantst
    mfpantst

    2660

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 4

    User Lists: 0

    #25  Edited By mfpantst
    @WiqidBritt: So I had thought pitchford was saying that they had shared info with press under a word of mouth agreement that press would break the news on a certain day, and eurogamer did it early or something.  I don't see that being such a bad thing to be pissed about.  HOWEVER, as much as I really enjoy the games gearbox tends to make, I can't help but feel like something is wrong, like pitchford and co aren't infact trying to make better games but just think they have the 'special sauce' or something.  Idk, it just feels like there's this awful hubris going on over there which is saying something considering everything I've seen gearbox talk about up until right around when they announced they were finishing up DNF seemed like they had their heads on straight and their minds tuned into what gamers like me wanted.  Now it feels like they think they can tell me what I want and they assume I'll buy it.
    Avatar image for youngfrey
    YoungFrey

    1363

    Forum Posts

    10811

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 4

    #26  Edited By YoungFrey

    I'm going to go against the grain and say DNF is 100% Gearbox's fault.  They didn't make that crap game, but they bought it and got it published.  They hyped it up, claimed it was still relevant. If you buy a piece a garbage and sell it to somebody else, you still sold them garbage.  It's not even like they were tricked into buying DNF. 
    Avatar image for wiqidbritt
    WiqidBritt

    601

    Forum Posts

    10

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 5

    #27  Edited By WiqidBritt
    @YoungFrey: when I first heard that they bought and were going to finish and put out DNF, I figured that their plans were to get the broken game out quickly and then start on a 'good' Duke Nukem game of their own, but now I'm not really sure if such a thing is really possible any more. 
     
    @mfpantst: I'm not saying he shouldn't be upset, I would just hope for a bit more professionalism. And yeah, I still don't know how to feel about Brothers in Arms: Furious Four... to go from a franchise that prides itself on realism so much that it's actually telling the story of real soldiers and the battles and skirmishes they took part in to a wacky over the top take on Inglorious Basterds? It seems a little tasteless.
    Avatar image for spaceinsomniac
    SpaceInsomniac

    6353

    Forum Posts

    42

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #28  Edited By SpaceInsomniac

    I guess "Deep Throat" was also shoddy journalism, right?  *sigh*
     
    Yes, after releasing DNF and now this, Gearbox and Randy Pitchford aren't doing themselves any favors lately.  Well, other than making Borderlands 2.

    Avatar image for mfpantst
    mfpantst

    2660

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 4

    User Lists: 0

    #29  Edited By mfpantst
    @WiqidBritt: Agreed on the professionalism part.  I tried reading through his tweets and was thoroughly confused at first.  I'm cautiously optimistic about the Brothers in Arms game.  Even if it is removed from what the franchise is about, I'll be ok if its a good game.  The hubris about DNF and other kinda scares me though.  I mean, tasteless I could be ok with, but only in the confines of a good game.  And to others who would (correctly) say DNF is not really gearbox's game, while that is true (and i've argued that point), there's a sense that gearbox is proud of the game, like it is actually good.  I'd be on firmer ground with gearbox if they put DNF out with an air of finishing the game being a charitable work/labor of love (while recognizing the game as deeply flawed), as opposed to their presentation of the game as this great thing.

    This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:

    Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

    Comment and Save

    Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.