Something went wrong. Try again later
    Follow

    PC

    Platform »

    The PC (Personal Computer) is a highly configurable and upgradable gaming platform that, among home systems, sports the widest variety of control methods, largest library of games, and cutting edge graphics and sound capabilities.

    Which is the better spec computer?

    Avatar image for newfound
    newfound

    80

    Forum Posts

    147

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #1  Edited By newfound

    I have been looking at a new computer, but don't really have a huge knowledge of individual parts! 
     
    My friend made one for me on a shopping cart and sent me the list, he also said he could build it for me for free :) 
      
     http://twinrova.co.uk/computer.png
       I've also looked at this dell one,    
     
     http://www1.euro.dell.com/uk/en/home/gaming_great_deals/fs.aspx?refid=gaming_great_deals&s=dhs&cs=ukdhs1   
      
    and it was this one on that page! 

    Dell Studio XPS 8100 
    Exceptional performance thanks to the Intel Core i7 processor and strong nVidia graphics!        
     
     
    Both of them are more or less the same price but which is the better PC? 
     
    THANKS :)
     

    Avatar image for flaminghobo
    flaminghobo

    4788

    Forum Posts

    4325

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 8

    User Lists: 13

    #2  Edited By flaminghobo
    @newfound: Are you looking to build a gaming PC or just PC that will run well in terms of processing power?
    Avatar image for newt
    newt

    97

    Forum Posts

    69

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #3  Edited By newt

    From a rather cursory look the Dell looks better, but it's also around $300 more..  I'm sure you can get better performance if you put that money into the custom rig.  You might also consider shopping around; I'm not sure the best places in the UK for PC parts, but stateside most people use newegg or mwave.

    Avatar image for jrad
    Jrad

    638

    Forum Posts

    15

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 0

    #4  Edited By Jrad

    The second one, by far. I'd stay away from ATI video cards, really. Nvidia has been ahead for a while now. Plus, you know, the second one has 2TB of space.

    Avatar image for george1st
    George1St

    60

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #5  Edited By George1St

    this is a double edged sword, I recently offered to build my sisters new gaming rig with I7 etc but she settled on the studio xps and i gotta admit after setting it up for her and quickly cracking on crysis it's a pretty solid machine, xps service line has always worked fantastic for me if I've ever had problems with a previous machine I owned. Of course it's upgradable too and the link for the dell didn't show all the options you customised before your buy if it's the baseline machine upgrade that 240gs and you should be good to game..

    Avatar image for dcfgs3
    DCFGS3

    1084

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 1

    #6  Edited By DCFGS3
    @Jrad said:
    " The second one, by far. I'd stay away from ATI video cards, really. Nvidia has been ahead for a while now. Plus, you know, the second one has 2TB of space. "
    Not really, in terms of power the most powerful Nvidia card does beat the most powerful ATI card, but there's no actual need for so much power. Nvidia cards also run louder, require more power and are more expensive. ATI's 5000X series is by far the superior line of cards. I would say that the 5870 is overall the best card on the market.
    Avatar image for atrevelan
    ATrevelan

    618

    Forum Posts

    65

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 4

    User Lists: 9

    #7  Edited By ATrevelan
    @newfound: I got that exact Dell model back in November and it's pretty sweet. GTS 240 can run just about everything at its highest settings--some stuff you'll have to turn down a little, and games like Metro 2033 you're better off not trying at all. I've also heard recently that sometimes you don't get the 240, but a more powerful ATI card instead. Either way, you're in good shape.
     
    Massive hard drive, lots of RAM, good graphics card. I'd say go for it.
    Avatar image for newfound
    newfound

    80

    Forum Posts

    147

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #8  Edited By newfound
    @FlamingHobo: Both really, I play games and stuff but I use a lot of applications such as photoshop etc 
     
    @newt: Dell is actually £10 cheaper! :) 
     
    @George1St: Yeah I can upgrade parts, is the i7 better? 
     
    Also was wondering if dell machines could be easily upgraded at a later date?
    Avatar image for slasherman
    SlasherMan

    1723

    Forum Posts

    53

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #9  Edited By SlasherMan
    @newfound: For gaming, the first one. The HD 5850 wipes the floor with the GTS 240, which is essentially a slightly beefed up 9800 GT (aka 8800 GT) with a higher clockspeed.

    For general processing, the second one for the i7 860.
    Avatar image for subject2change
    subject2change

    2971

    Forum Posts

    50

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 5

    #10  Edited By subject2change
    @Jrad said:
    " The second one, by far. I'd stay away from ATI video cards, really. Nvidia has been ahead for a while now. Plus, you know, the second one has 2TB of space. "
    That's not true at all, and this is coming from an NVIDIA fan boy.
     
    Also the Dell is the better machine if priced at only 800euros (??) compared to the other at nearly the same price. However i'd upgrade the graphics card, and i'd do it myself and not go with the 5770 or 260 that dell has for options.
    Avatar image for newt
    newt

    97

    Forum Posts

    69

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #11  Edited By newt
    @newfound: saw the wrong total; as others have said, you'll probably want a better GFX card if you drop on the dell.
    Avatar image for george1st
    George1St

    60

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #12  Edited By George1St
    @newfound:  off the top of my head the I5 are just standard quad core but the I7's are quads with true hyperthreading meaning 8 logical cores  as oppsed to 4 so for encoding editing etc the I7 is the way to go for sure (don't quote me on that though) , also noticed on the one your mate offered to build there was no OS so unless you have one thats an extra 100+ off the bat. In my case with my sister the deciding factor was that she got a discount off the dell. this is a fairly meaty article giving a rundown of the I series cpu's 
    http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-core-i5,2410.html
    Avatar image for slasherman
    SlasherMan

    1723

    Forum Posts

    53

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #13  Edited By SlasherMan
    @George1St said:
    " @newfound:  off the top of my head the I5 are just standard quad core but the I7's are quads with true hyperthreading meaning 8 logical cores  as oppsed to 4 so for encoding editing etc the I7 is the way to go for sure (don't quote me on that though) , also noticed on the one your mate offered to build there was no OS so unless you have one thats an extra 100+ off the bat. In my case with my sister the deciding factor was that she got a discount off the dell. this is a fairly meaty article giving a rundown of the I series cpu's  http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-core-i5,2410.html "
    It's 4 physical cores and 8 logical threads for the i7 (2 per core when HT is turned on), but 4 threads/cores for the i5.
     
    Difference between i5 and i7 is minimal in gaming, but more pronounced in other processor-hungry applications.
    Avatar image for wrect
    Wrect

    327

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #14  Edited By Wrect

    The first one is slightly better.
    Avatar image for carpetplant
    contagious

    93

    Forum Posts

    25

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #15  Edited By contagious

    The one your friend cooked up is overall better, and the difference of an i5 to an i7 is minimal at best.

    Avatar image for jrad
    Jrad

    638

    Forum Posts

    15

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 0

    #16  Edited By Jrad
    @DCFGS3:  I've been stuck with a 4870 for a while, so maybe the 5xxx series has improved dramatically? ATI support for DXVA is utter crap, and generally if you run into any strange graphics issues playing games it's because of shoddy ATI drivers. Their openGL support is better, but the list of issues ATI cards have with DirectX games (especially some older ones) is insurmountable.
    Avatar image for george1st
    George1St

    60

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #17  Edited By George1St
    @SlasherMan: 
    I thought it was something like that it's been awhile since I read up on them as I have no job right now and i wanna upgrade my current q6600 system to an I7 860 it makes me sad everytime I look at them, only game i've seen that recommends an I7 is empire total war and it's the sole reason I want one too as after 150+ turns on a standard quad the a.i turns can take 2-5mins to complete.......not really fun spending that much time doing jack but your right. also cant the I series cores communicate with each other at a cpu to cpu level so they can spread the loads out between themselves? very handy if you run multiple monitors with multiple apps.
    Avatar image for newfound
    newfound

    80

    Forum Posts

    147

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #18  Edited By newfound

    Cheers guys for all the input for me I think I am going to go for the dell with an upgraded Graphics card!  
     
    And like george said I'd have to be getting myself an OS system etc  
     
    Also I may get a new monitor and I think if I go with the dell they can throw it in as part of a deal! 
     
    Cheers for the help guys!

    Avatar image for animasta
    Animasta

    14948

    Forum Posts

    3563

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 4

    User Lists: 5

    #19  Edited By Animasta
    @Jrad said:
    " @DCFGS3:  I've been stuck with a 4870 for a while, so maybe the 5xxx series has improved dramatically? ATI support for DXVA is utter crap, and generally if you run into any strange graphics issues playing games it's because of shoddy ATI drivers. Their openGL support is better, but the list of issues ATI cards have with DirectX games (especially some older ones) is insurmountable. "
    I've had a 5770 for a while and it's been great
    Avatar image for hitmanagent47
    HitmanAgent47

    8553

    Forum Posts

    25

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #20  Edited By HitmanAgent47

    Or you can get your friends build and get a i7 instead of an i5. You can at least overclock it, not sure if you can with a dell. Dells are usually overly expensive, however at least their monitors are usually quite good.

    Avatar image for ben_h
    Ben_H

    4834

    Forum Posts

    1628

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 5

    #21  Edited By Ben_H
    @Jrad said:
    " @DCFGS3:  I've been stuck with a 4870 for a while, so maybe the 5xxx series has improved dramatically? ATI support for DXVA is utter crap, and generally if you run into any strange graphics issues playing games it's because of shoddy ATI drivers. Their openGL support is better, but the list of issues ATI cards have with DirectX games (especially some older ones) is insurmountable. "
    Maybe your graphical issues are from something else?  I've yet to have issues with any of my ATI products, whether it be my two 5770s or my old X1950 Pro.  None of them have ever given me a problem nor have the drivers.  I would hesitate to recommend the new Nvidia cards right now because though they are more powerful, they turn your PC into a space heater and eat power like nobody's business.  Maybe I could recommend the 465, but definitely not the 480 or 470.
    Avatar image for slasherman
    SlasherMan

    1723

    Forum Posts

    53

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #22  Edited By SlasherMan
    @Ben_H said:
    "Maybe I could recommend the 460, but definitely not the 480 or 470. "
    Fixed. ;)
    Avatar image for jrad
    Jrad

    638

    Forum Posts

    15

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 0

    #23  Edited By Jrad
    @Ben_H: Admittedly, it isn't really AMDs fault that several games have issues with their card -- most of the time, it's the developers who did a lazy job. Usually quick console ports are the ones affected, so it's not particularly rampant.
     
    One point I refuse to concede, however, is ATI's horrible, horrible DXVA support. Playing 1080P+ video on a PC with a mid-tier processor is nearly impossible on an ATI card. On Nvidia's end, however, their drivers will automate the entire process and reduce CPU drain immensely, offloading most of the processing to the GPU. ATI forces you to jump through hoops and in the end, it may not even work properly, while Nvidia's technology (while actually slightly inferior when it comes to processing) is compatible with pretty much every video ever encoded. This means that, for whatever reason, my 8800GTS is leagues above my significantly newer ATI card when it comes to watching HD video.

    This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:

    Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

    Comment and Save

    Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.