actionTACO

reddit, for enabling and supporting pedophiles (oh, sorry, i meant "ephebophiles")

@benson said:

@Foxtrot0245 said:

Yo, a man lost his life. Who wants to talk some motherfuckin' POLITICS y'all?

Andrew Breitbart would have liked to do that but now that he's dead we have to do it for him, if only to honor his memory.

i honored his memory by falsifying some evidence against an organization that helps poor people.

goodnight bretibart-chan ;____;

loving all the "these people should stop being pussies and grow some thicker skin!" arguments. as if it take a shred of courage to sit around and be someone's punching bag, rather than actually stand up for yourself.

@Mechabolic said:

@NoelVeiga: Civilized? Really? The majority of posts have been "Screw that jerk! How dare he!" and have a general witchhunt vibe to it. Anyone that disagrees with the majority are instantly called nasty things. This is far from civilized.

you're the one that waded into this thread and implied that posters that disagreed with you were angry, simpleminded, hypocrites that simply couldn't see the shades of grey with regards to someone making incredibly sexist remarks. not only that, but you also implied that the victim was "crying sexism" because she got her feelings hurt cause she's just some ~~*GaMeR GuRl*~~ that can't handle the pressure and not because, ya know, maybe she thought the dude was being sexist. then you have the gall to accuse people of trying to make "mountains out of mole hills" and accuse patrick of writing this article simply to stir up controversy and generate some MAD SITE HITTZZ.

you have continuously tried to attach spurious motivations to various groups and people in an sloppy attempt to deligitimize criticisms of someone that you seem to be emotionally attached to, for whatever reason. maybe you should look in the mirror before you accuse people of not being civil. or, at least, stop pretending to be some ultra-rational, independent free thinker that sees "the real picture" and is awashed in a sea of hyper-emotional, close minded, PC-minded people. basically, stop pretending to be stan in an episode of south park.

of course, instead you will probably just continue to argue your point harder. then, after enough people have told you that you're wrong, you'll make a parting shot or complain that people are being too rude, or bitch about "group think" and "political correctness" some more.

@bluefoxxy said:

@punpun said:

@bluefoxxy said:

@punpun: @joshwent: How about the Cards Against Humanity game. Personally, that is one of my favorite videos GB has posted, but anyone could interpret that as bad taste or sexually abusive. Long story short, if you can't show it to you parents, someone will piss and moan.

Read my post again. I'm not attacking GB or the content they produce, but there are plenty of people that would watch content like the cards against humanity video and define it as derogatory or sexually abusive.

There's a difference between playing an offensive card game and sexually harassing someone. You're a fucking idiot.

You are attempting to tie my words to an irrelevant point you are making. I brought it up saying that anyone can interpret their video as harrassing. You are calling a fellow GB member a fucking idiot for implying that anyone can fluff stories and twist scenarios. Most people commenting on here are also saying how "fluffed" this article is... whos the idiot? Please read my post one more time. Realize that I'm not personally saying that the video is, contextually, sexually harassing. But people can interpret it AS sexually harassing. It's all about context and how people receive information.

I'm calling Patrick out on a fluff story. Not how GB is a hypocrite on sexual harassment. I have never seen GB content that has harassed or abused any gender. Even now, you are reading my post and interpreting it as an attack to GB. It's all about perception dude.

but nobody complained about it. the only person creating fluff stories and twisting scenarios here is you. you're attempting to deflect factual criticisms of statements that actual people made in real life with outlandish thought experiments, invented conundrums, and tu quoque arguments because, deep down, you probably know this shit is indefensible.

and i am pretty sure if someone did find it offensive none of the staff would be dumb enough to argue that racist, sexist, homophobic jokes are a central part of giant bomb and the whisky media family.

everyone knows its impossible to trash talk without making racist, sexist, or homophobic remarks. its like if you were trying to surf and someone took away the ocean. literally the same thing.

you can't do a hadouken without quartercircle + rapejoke. commonsense, people. jeeezz

one time this dumb bitch was bitching about the portrayal of women in video games and then i stood up and said "what about zengief?!? he's musclely and only in underwear and i don't see you complaining about him! now go make me a sandwich!"

then everyone started clapping and carried me out of the room on their shoulders and then david gaider ran up to me and gave me a free copy of dragon age II for so gallantly defending video games.

one time i went to a feminist rally and it was just a bonfire fueled entirely by video games and a pinata shaped vaguely like andy warhol.

true story.

ugh, i can't believe you feminist cunts are getting all outraged and trying to stir up controversy over a dress. just wait until i log on to the extranet and make a rage holo about this for //SITE 6.1 MESSAGEBOARD-REDDIT-MENSRIGHTSACTIVISM//

OWNED AGAIN YOU FEMINAZI SHITBAGS!