bonesaw's forum posts
Jakob187: yea its a shame this series went to such a waste... could have been so much better. I think I have heard of Feast... don't really know much about it but the title alone sounds intriguing. thanks for the heads up!
Horror movies of the 21st century have been known for there terrible writing and dialogue and predictable story-lines. movies such as Prom Night and Black X-mas are just a couple of the many dreadful horror/suspense movies that have plagued the movie industry for sometime. That was the norm for some time until one unexpected cult film came seemingly out of nowhere. Sure its sequels aren't nearly as good as the one that started the franchise, but it is still one of the only recent horror movies that is even remotely memorable. Unlike most horror films of late, this movie requires your immediate attention in order to understand figure out how and why the mysterious psychopath know as Jigsaw (Tobin Bell) is committing these murders and how is latest victims, Adam (Leigh Whannel) and Dr. Lawrence Gordon (Cary Elwes) are connected to all of the recent murders that have taken place. From the beginning, you are immediately thrown right into the thick of the story with Adam and Dr. Gordon first finding out that they have been taken captive and chained in some room which can only be described as desolate and an almost unnervingly perfect locale to entrap these men. From there its just a matter of these two characters trying to figure out why they have been placed here and what they have in common would place both of them in this situation. At first you get the feeling that the plot is going the usual route of most horror movies (victims find out where they are, proceeding to panic and trying to break the bonds which they already know are impossible to break but still doing in anyway because they fail at first to ask themselves the obvious question: "why are we here?"). Thankfully however, this doesn't last long with the characters eventually coming to grips of what their in for and ultimately trying to find a way out of this small, enclosed tomb. Of course, the whole movie doesn't take place in this one little room, rather it is simply there to state that "this is the present, this what is happening now", with other sequences that take place outside of the room being past events to help flesh out each of the characters backgrounds and purpose while moving the plot along in a gripping and suspenseful fashion.
At a glance, Dexter seems like nothing more than another rip off of the critically acclaimed, long running tv series CSI. Its got everything from the precise, in depth investigations of a mutilated body to controversial dramatic sequences between the main characters. However, all similarities stop there, as Dexter proves itself worthy of being not only a great stand alone crime/drama series, but also one of the well crafted and invigorating shows of all time.
Jakob187: you bring up some really good points and ideas which really helped me to understand why you enjoyed it so much. however, this was not the first time i saw this movie (in fact i saw it in theaters when it came out), so to sit down and watch it a third time won't do much at this point. Even so, your critcisms and opinions are most appreciated regardless, as they not only help me be more aware as a reviewer but also let me see a different perspective from my own, which helps in that it lets me see a different side of this film that i would normally wouldn't have seen before. In fact, i honestly think you should write your own review of the film because 1. you know go a great deal about this director and the way in which he presents his films and 2. you have alot of solid points that I think most people (including myself) would really help us understand why this film had is so important to you.
Jakob187: for me, i just thought that a little more time could have been spent on delving into the personal aspect of Joey. Sure we know he was part of a crime syndicate, but we don't we really know what he did or why he left them in the first place. As a result its hard to be fully engaged in this film without a little back story on this character to make overall experience feel truly meaningful. Also I get the plot was supposed to be disjointed, but even so, I felt that it never really went anywhere and was over before it could really become truly compelling like it should have been. Nevertheless, a pretty decent movie by all means. thanks for the comment!
Like most movie's based on graphic novels, or novels in general, A History of Violence is another one of those movies that is all flash and little substance. While there are some exceptions to this rule (Sin City, 1408), this movie seems to lie in limbo between a crappy overdone and poorly re-written script based loosely on the plot, to a monumental masterpiece that captures feel of the books that came before them while still keeping you on the edge of your seat from beginning to end. Thats why its frustrating to find myself loving the movie for certain elements (great action sequences and casting) and absolutely despising it for others (poor character development, generalized story that fails to impress). But through it all, I found myself liking it more than hating because although most of the characters are irrelevant to overall importance of the story (either because they get killed or they only appear briefly to give the plot that extra push it needs to proceed), its the way in which Tom Stall (Viggo Mortensen), AKA Joey, communicates with them and or puts them out of their misery that makes this film enjoyable to watch. Sure the acting is great, with most of the characters behaving as you'd expect with little substance or emotion that as result makes you feel disconnected from the characters who's job it is to make you feel a sense of desperation and sorrow when one conflict after another plagues Tom and his family till the very end. However, even with this major problem, its made up for pretty efficiently by the simple fact that Tom can kick some serious ass. Unlike most action heros, Tom doesn't go guns blazing for people, he instead waits like a stealthy assassin until the moment makes itself available in which Tom can unleash some serious gut-wrenching attacks, which unfortunately happen so fast that you don't even have time to blink before realized that something crazy just went down. And ultimately, thats what saves this movie from being another book to movie translation, in that these sequences are thought out and spaced accordingly throughout the film. Although, it would have been nice if there had been a few more of these insane fights as there are only a couple throughout the films 90 minute showing, which ends almost to quickly and on a mysterious if somewhat confusing ending.
Ever since 24 first debut back in 2001, it was one of the shows that seemingly revolutionized the way a tv series captured an audience. Between its careful association with the specific hours throughout the day which equal to one full day in real time, to the innovative use of split screens to tell multiple stories at once, 24 was destined to be one of the best action packed and suspenseful series of all time. I must admit that my expectations were low because when I watched trailers or a few minutes of an episode, all I saw is a run of the mill action series with predictable plot twists and characters. However, it was only when i finally started watching the series from beginning to end that I saw how magnificently each character developed and how each story line seamlessly transitions into another to make a at first confusing series of events into one intricately devised action blockbuster that keeps you on the edge of your seat throughout.
hello my few fellow readers,
Log in to comment