captainfish

Now they just need a way to find their ISPs and figure out a way to cordon them off in their own part of the internet.

I hope Johnny doesn't get fired for his Civ V confession.

Babies all of you. Babies. I beat the entire game, lost my save progress and then beat it again. Kid and all. You are babies.

It is a crew of 6, but since you play one of them you only rescue 5.

It would've been cooler if you did everything in vector so you could full screen it and enjoy high resolution VB. It controls nice though.

Activision might rape you though. Start clenching now to be safe.

I thought we were over this now. Bioshock was never supposed to just be about Rapture. It was about a fantastical shooter set in a strange and wonderful location with no real-life points of reference. It takes a historical period and some of the ideals that might define that period and uses them to flesh out the characters, setting and story.

Bioshock isn't Rapture, it's the feeling you first got when you saw Rapture.

What shouldn't have existed are the Bioshock Rapture sequels. Despite any character work or story, they can't hold any of the freshness that the original had. It is literally going back to a known setting to do a story, something most games do, but Bioshock didn't

With Infinite, they are taking us to a new fantastic place, with it's own people, historical period and even supernatural elements. It even has a much different atmosphere, no longer is it confining and opressive, now it's open and joyous although it's still sinister.

Also it seems the mechanics and the feel of the combat will be similar to that of Bioshock. At least enough that calling it something new would cause people to make the comparisons themselves.

No More Heroes 2 was also really good. Damn this game had a lot of good years.

Yea, I'm sticking to that.

Kinect Solitaire

Dude, maddox would be proud.
Well handled sir.

It's weird how a lot of people in this thread assumed based on the OP saying that she "wants to engage in 'activities'" instantly means that the OP wants a relationship. They assume that he will be getting in a relationship with a cheater and get hurt as a result. I'll give him the benefit of the doubt in knowing that is probably a bad idea. 

When someone in a relationship acts on their desire to have sex with another person, they are betraying the person they are in a relationship with regardless of whether or not the other person reciprocates. When the other person decides to have sex with that lady, they aren't actually betraying anyone. They do not have any responsibility to the lady's partner, or the well being of their relationship. In that case, the cheater is, in my opinion, morally worse than the cheatee. However, I would say if a 3rd party attempts to seduce someone who is in a relationship knowingly, they are purposefully attempting to damage that relationship. In that case the moral positions would switch, or at least even out.

These are all vague ideas, though. The OP feels like the girl would like to sleep with him, and she is already lying about hanging out with him. Continuing to hang out with her, with a strong feeling that it will end in sex could be considered the willful seduction of this lady. However, it seems like her relationship is pretty much over, except she hasn't ended it. Probably because he "loves her" and she just "likes him" and she doesn't want to see him hurt. When they finally break up, it will hurt him a lot. She should probably break up with him, rather then force the relationship to end by cheating. The latter is the easy way out.