" @CSXLoser: Couldn't 2,4, and 9 work or am I just not understanding this problem? "
no. the trick/clue in the riddle is that the guy went outside to investigate the street address, and when he did so he still had another question. that means he was debating between two equal answers. 14, the street address. its not a straight math riddle but one with logic as well. "
No, I've read through your "answer". This is a stupid riddle that leaves room for mutiple interpretations. Both 3 and 2 work as an to answer to the singuler modified noun "Son" in my "youngest son likes bannanas". Here, I will prove it in symbolic logic if only to make myself feel better about taking that class,
@Ragdrazi: I was trying to say something to that effect. It's actually quite odd if you think about it - we're a democracy yet we're not given enough information to properly vote. How are we supposed to know what issue to support and which to not if the only information we get is from politicians who (One) have an agenda and (Two) probably are not told the whole picture as well.
Also, if Assange was able to get this information so easily doesn't it stand to reason that most nations have probably uncovered this for themself? Perhaps the Taliban itself?
I'm trying to imagine a wonderful world where all this information calms down political partisanship, at least on a national scale. Think about it - we now have pretty complete picture of the world. Perhaps we should stop with the fucking arguments and talk about what this information MEANS. Not what it is, for it is definetly not insignifigant.
You can be a partner with youtube? Really? And you can make money from being a partner with YouTube by taking licensed characters and recreating it? I'm sure once you do that it breaks what's considered fair use (But I might be wrong).
Log in to comment