Something went wrong. Try again later

kingofpeanuts

This user has not updated recently.

568 945 23 18
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

Why do people enjoy abusing their bodies with substances? Prop 19

Hi Everybody

My name is Adam and I am a Psychology major and am continuing my education in psychology. Through my undergrad I primarily study substance abuse and the emotional issues that are related, I have worked in an RTS (Residential treatment center) in Utah for two summers with teenagers who have drug and behavioral disorders. I understand why many of these kids use these substances but do "recreational" users if they know the risks?(For the record this question is hypothetical)  
The Lancet recently a paper about the most harmful drugs to the user and  to others, surprisingly alcohol rank first among twenty other substances. You my ask "What does this have to do with Prop 19?" well I will tell you.  I would like to mention that I am Canadian and Prop 19 does not affect me, I also do enjoy a drink but have never done drugs.  
I do not understand how marijuana is illegal while alcohol and cigarettes are? (Though personally I think that they all shouldn't be necessary but whatever) In the U.S.A there is no universal health care and the money for treatments mostly comes from insurance or from the individual, so the legalization and taxation of marijuana does not mean much because health effects are less then the effects of smoking or alcohol. In countries with universal health care like Canada, France, and Britain the legalization and taxation does not make sense and I will explain this to you.  
In 2009 Canadian health care spending reached 183.1 billion dollars which comes to $5452 a year. This is amusing that is split among the total population, which it is not because of age, so this number increases the amount by quiet a bit (I do not have this number). My point is the cost of taxing the substances does come close to the amount it costs. Here is a quote from a CBC article from 2007 (Not a fan of the CBC, but needed material)  

 They estimate that, in Canada, the societal costs attributable to smoking for 1993 were approximately $11 billion, of which $3 billion was spent on direct health care costs such as hospitalization and physician time. The remaining $8 billion was due to lost productivity. In comparison, it is estimated that in 1993/94, revenue from taxes on cigarettes totalled $2.6 billion.    

How is it that the a government allows for the taxation to not equal the cost? I do not propose a ban on all substances but there should be more of an individual cost rather than a societal one. I think we as humans need to learn to care more about our bodies and effects all substances can do.
This probably does not have much to do with Prop 19 (wanted to draw people in) and I am interested in what your opinion on this situation is. 
Thanks 
Adam  
Edit: Sorry forgot to add this image.
No Caption Provided
88 Comments

89 Comments

Avatar image for kingofpeanuts
kingofpeanuts

568

Forum Posts

945

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Edited By kingofpeanuts

Hi Everybody

My name is Adam and I am a Psychology major and am continuing my education in psychology. Through my undergrad I primarily study substance abuse and the emotional issues that are related, I have worked in an RTS (Residential treatment center) in Utah for two summers with teenagers who have drug and behavioral disorders. I understand why many of these kids use these substances but do "recreational" users if they know the risks?(For the record this question is hypothetical)  
The Lancet recently a paper about the most harmful drugs to the user and  to others, surprisingly alcohol rank first among twenty other substances. You my ask "What does this have to do with Prop 19?" well I will tell you.  I would like to mention that I am Canadian and Prop 19 does not affect me, I also do enjoy a drink but have never done drugs.  
I do not understand how marijuana is illegal while alcohol and cigarettes are? (Though personally I think that they all shouldn't be necessary but whatever) In the U.S.A there is no universal health care and the money for treatments mostly comes from insurance or from the individual, so the legalization and taxation of marijuana does not mean much because health effects are less then the effects of smoking or alcohol. In countries with universal health care like Canada, France, and Britain the legalization and taxation does not make sense and I will explain this to you.  
In 2009 Canadian health care spending reached 183.1 billion dollars which comes to $5452 a year. This is amusing that is split among the total population, which it is not because of age, so this number increases the amount by quiet a bit (I do not have this number). My point is the cost of taxing the substances does come close to the amount it costs. Here is a quote from a CBC article from 2007 (Not a fan of the CBC, but needed material)  

 They estimate that, in Canada, the societal costs attributable to smoking for 1993 were approximately $11 billion, of which $3 billion was spent on direct health care costs such as hospitalization and physician time. The remaining $8 billion was due to lost productivity. In comparison, it is estimated that in 1993/94, revenue from taxes on cigarettes totalled $2.6 billion.    

How is it that the a government allows for the taxation to not equal the cost? I do not propose a ban on all substances but there should be more of an individual cost rather than a societal one. I think we as humans need to learn to care more about our bodies and effects all substances can do.
This probably does not have much to do with Prop 19 (wanted to draw people in) and I am interested in what your opinion on this situation is. 
Thanks 
Adam  
Edit: Sorry forgot to add this image.
No Caption Provided
Avatar image for jakob187
jakob187

22972

Forum Posts

10045

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 9

Edited By jakob187

Your post?  tl;dr.  My answer to your title?  It's their right and choice. 
 
Personally?  Legalize it all, because if we've already legalized the worst of them all (alcohol), then there's no point in the rest being illegal.

Avatar image for gamefreak9
gamefreak9

2877

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By gamefreak9

Great post, very educational. I agree that the society as a whole should not be crippled but the taxation should be extracted from the individual so that it hits his wallet and hopefully will teach something.  
 
Be warned, we are full of ignorant people here, you won't get much praise :P. 
 
Heres my post from the other forum:    @ESREVER said: 

" I would vote no, because...  
@FancySoapsMan said: 

" ...potheads are annoying. "    
And personally I can't stand the smell of it.   Then again, if it was strictly for personal use at the home, I don't really see a problem with it. I don't know... I'm against things that alter one's state of mind, but I know people get pleasure/enjoyment out of it, and I don't feel like I'm in a position to say they can't have that enjoyment. They say there will be a system put in place to prevent driving while under the influence, but I doubt it would be successful.  Ugh, I'm all wishy-washy on this subject. Saying no it shouldn't be allowed makes me feel like a hypocrite because I'm basing that on stereotypical potheads. It's the same way a person not familiar with the content would judge someone who is into videogames/anime.  I think I'll just throw my hands up off this subject, and hope Texas doesn't have to deal with such a prop anytime soon. My writing teacher is right, I'm fucking terrible at making an argument. "
I think buying it should be legal but smoking it illegal, still get the income but you don't get the worthless uneducated community full of potheads come up with all kinds of BS on how to its not that bad for you. Truth is, its not that bad health wise, however, if you smoke and get high, for the rest couple of hours you will be unproductive, and that in all will breed more idiots.  
 
So yeah, like this people would buy it from w/e state, and sell it in other countries, this would breed income to the state with legal buying power.  
   
The point of the Law is to keep society from stumbling into chaos not give you right so you can feel cool or open minded, or progressive, and legalizing something that inherently is done for the mind effect, and is widely know for making people do stupid shit is not a step in the right direction. Alcohol's effects are not as potent and are much rarer, did you know one in 40 adults gets drunk when drinking?  
 
Most people past a certain age don't drink alcohol for the effects, but for the taste, and even so i also think with this progress in society from blue collar to white collar, people will be using their minds more, and so alcohol itself should be regulated if not halted so that society can rise up to meet this new challenge instead of lag behind rotting while spewing the same shit they have always been.  
Avatar image for kaosangel-DELETED
KaosAngel

14251

Forum Posts

6507

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 3

Edited By KaosAngel

Man, I just think weed is for chilling out and relaxing aft- OH MY FUCKING GOD VIEWTIFUL JOE IS POSTING ON GIANT BOMB!  WHAT THE FUCK I THOUGHT HE STOPPED MAKING GAMES!

Avatar image for mooseymcman
MooseyMcMan

12787

Forum Posts

5577

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 13

Edited By MooseyMcMan
@KaosAngel said:
" Man, I just think weed is for chilling out and relaxing aft- OH MY FUCKING GOD VIEWTIFUL JOE IS POSTING ON GIANT BOMB!  WHAT THE FUCK I THOUGHT HE STOPPED MAKING GAMES! "
Though the sarcasm is evident, I think that really is the best example of why not to do drugs.  
 
Kids, don't do drugs. I don't. 
Avatar image for pinworm45
Pinworm45

4069

Forum Posts

350

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Pinworm45

I don't do drugs, never have, probably never will, but anyone who doesn't support Prop 19 is neither rational nor logical in my mind. Also your graph is ludicrous, I seriously hope you don't take that psychology thing very seriously.

Avatar image for suicrat
Suicrat

3829

Forum Posts

1057

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

Edited By Suicrat

How about private health insurance, where irresponsible behaviour leads to increased premiums, and healthy behaviour leads to reduced premiums, but all are free to live as they choose?
 
That'd be nice...

Avatar image for computerplayer1
Computerplayer1

1066

Forum Posts

401

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 2

Edited By Computerplayer1

Well yah, here in Canada we essentially pay for everyone's healthcare through taxes. I'm all for helping out everyone, but not if theyre going to do something stupid like cause someone else harm or themselves harm because they were drunk or on a heroine binge. People who are on record more than once or a couple of times should start getting charged for their hospital bills, it's that simple. 
 
I shouldn't have to pay for someone else's 'rightful choice'. I respect the idea of free choice, and all the power to them, but they should eventually be taken off free healthcare if they choose to do those things.

Avatar image for bobdaman18
Bobdaman18

721

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Bobdaman18

I completely agree that taxes should be used to compensate for negative externalities caused by an individual's actions.  Its not so much that i want the tax to act as a deterant, people should be free to do whatever they want as long as it doesn't affect other people, but they should bear the full cost of such an activity.  I hope pot gets legalized everywhere, its immoral to push your beliefs on someone when it doesn't affect you.
Avatar image for suicrat
Suicrat

3829

Forum Posts

1057

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

Edited By Suicrat
@Computerplayer1: But why should they have to pay for your healthcare? What if some psychological institution does a longitudinal study illustrating the negative psychological effects of long-term exposure to video games, and the economic cost to the health care system? Then you, Mr. High-and-Mihty, are screwed.
Avatar image for mcwingstar
mcwingstar

87

Forum Posts

12

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

Edited By mcwingstar

Super interesting social issue. As a former user of many different substances in my high school days, prop 19 is a thing I used to really get behind. After seeing the number of regularly-smoking freinds lose all motivation, fall into depression (with one eventual suicide), due to the substance im not such a great believer in it being the "safe" drug it's touted to be. 
On the other hand, as some people have noted, people probably should be free to do such things, and cutting down on the crime aspect of drug dealing could have significant advantages. 
 
Also, in answer to your question " Why do people enjoy abusing their bodies with substances?", because it's fun? And (pulling some behavioral economics into this) many people significantly discount costs that are not immediate (eg. health problems), which makes the overall benefit (fun!) seem greater than the future cost. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperbolic_discounting)

Avatar image for re_player1
RE_Player1

8074

Forum Posts

1047

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By RE_Player1
@kingofpeanuts: I'm also a psychology major and a Canadian so this was a very interesting read. I don't know what I can add to this topic but I too agree that the individual creating these problems for themselves should cover the costs and not be a societal cost. Unfortunately you can't really link the use of these substances with the problems the users of these substances face in every case so the cost comes out of universal health care, a negative to the health care in Canada but I much rather pay higher taxes for health care than have no universal health care like America. 
Avatar image for seriouslynow
SeriouslyNow

8504

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By SeriouslyNow
@Computerplayer1:   What if one or more of those people is a playwrite, author, star, musician, business person or sports star who is bringing your country massive income and international recognition? 
Avatar image for jakob187
jakob187

22972

Forum Posts

10045

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 9

Edited By jakob187

I should probably point out that I smoke cigarettes and drink.  That's it.  I smoked pot for about 7 years or so, and while I enjoyed it, I can definitely say I don't miss it and I'm glad I don't toke anymore.  I'm all for education against doing drugs. 
 
However, I'm not going to sit here and play like I'm some high and mighty person to decide what someone does with their bodies.  The only real concern comes with public intoxication, and even then, it's not like keeping it illegal is going to stop that scenario anyways.  Might as well legalize it so we're filling the jail cells with people that are actually committing crimes, not sitting around the house and shooting up, then vegging out. 
 
It's not like legalizing pot means everyone in the nation is going to start toking.  It doesn't mean that legalizing heroin means everyone is going to shoot up.  It DOES mean that the drug cartels get assfucked.  It DOES mean we empty jail cells that hold people who were busted for less than a joint in their possession.  It DOES mean that regulations can be set for the grade and potency of these drugs. 
 
I was against the legalization of any of it for a long time, even to the point of saying that alcohol should be illegal.  However, in the long run, the realization that illegality doesn't change anything has made me realize that it's better to just legalize it, tax it, and create jobs from it. 
 
Hell, we allow late-term abortions in this country, and that's something more horrific to me than snorting a line.

Avatar image for suicrat
Suicrat

3829

Forum Posts

1057

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

Edited By Suicrat
@Bobdaman18 said:
" I completely agree that taxes should be used to compensate for negative externalities caused by an individual's actions.  Its not so much that i want the tax to act as a deterant, people should be free to do whatever they want as long as it doesn't affect other people, but they should bear the full cost of such an activity.  I hope pot gets legalized everywhere, its immoral to push your beliefs on someone when it doesn't affect you. "
It's absolutely stunning how quickly you contradict yourself in that post.
Avatar image for rsistnce
RsistncE

4498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By RsistncE

Anyone who says "they don't do drugs" is a hypocrite if they drink alochol. 
 
@gamefreak9: That's horseshit. The VAST majority of people drink alcohol because of the effects. I highly doubt many people (if anyone at all) would drink booze if it didn't get you drunk. Case and point: barely anyone drinks non-alcoholic beer.

Avatar image for everyones_a_critic
Everyones_A_Critic

6500

Forum Posts

834

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 1

If you ingest THC by vaporizing Cannabis buds you're not doing any harm to your body. Also, if you've had a drink of alcohol, soda, or coffee, you've done drugs.

Avatar image for staticfalconar
StaticFalconar

4918

Forum Posts

665

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

Edited By StaticFalconar
@kingofpeanuts said:
"

  I would like to mention that I am Canadian and Prop 19 does not affect me, I also do enjoy a drink but have never done drugs.  

Fail, fail, fail.  
 
The first thing you have to get in your head is the definition of a drug. Alcohol is a drug, Aspirin is a drug, even vitamins are a drug (By definition of a pharamcist, so if you don't trust the definition of a dug from the guy that gives it to you, what can you trust). If you study up on some eating disorders, regular ass food triggers the same response that some drugs do to these people.  
 
While you do make a point with the whole heathcare coverage thing, the only reason I am for Prop 19 is purely to get the stigma of what a drug is out of people's mind, and show people just because its legal or illegal doesn't mean its bad or good for you. Since I live in the land of pay for own goddamn health coverage (and the cost for being covered is higher if you an alcoholic/smoker etc) overall it all works out. Anything rebuttal with spewing out numbers that health coverage cost this or the economic lost is that, is purely a fault of the health coverage system itself and not the drugs. I would rather live in a world where I can be free to choose my own life, even at the expense of my own health instead of being an outlaw in the eyes of society. The world is pretty overpopulated, so there is no reason to try to keep those around that doesn't want to be here as long as the rest of the folks. 
Avatar image for deactivated-5c5cdba6e0b96
deactivated-5c5cdba6e0b96

8259

Forum Posts

51

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 3

I have tried Marijuana and can say I didn't enjoy the experience that I got with it but I know people who can just relax and become peaceful. It's up to people what they do with their bodies, you have one life so live it the way you see fit.
 
My only question is, why the hell is alcohol legal but not marijuana?

Avatar image for jeust
Jeust

11739

Forum Posts

15085

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 15

Edited By Jeust
@Suicrat said:
" How about private health insurance, where irresponsible behaviour leads to increased premiums, and healthy behaviour leads to reduced premiums, but all are free to live as they choose?  That'd be nice... "
Yep... That's a very good idea.
Avatar image for mikewrestler5
Mikewrestler5

637

Forum Posts

42

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Mikewrestler5

Here we go...

Avatar image for suicrat
Suicrat

3829

Forum Posts

1057

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

Edited By Suicrat
@gamefreak9 said:
" Great post, very educational. I agree that the society as a whole should not be crippled but the taxation should be extracted from the individual so that it hits his wallet and hopefully will teach something.  
 
Be warned, we are full of ignorant people here, you won't get much praise :P. 
 
Heres my post from the other forum:    @ESREVER said: 

" I would vote no, because...  
@FancySoapsMan said: 

" ...potheads are annoying. "    
And personally I can't stand the smell of it.   Then again, if it was strictly for personal use at the home, I don't really see a problem with it. I don't know... I'm against things that alter one's state of mind, but I know people get pleasure/enjoyment out of it, and I don't feel like I'm in a position to say they can't have that enjoyment. They say there will be a system put in place to prevent driving while under the influence, but I doubt it would be successful.  Ugh, I'm all wishy-washy on this subject. Saying no it shouldn't be allowed makes me feel like a hypocrite because I'm basing that on stereotypical potheads. It's the same way a person not familiar with the content would judge someone who is into videogames/anime.  I think I'll just throw my hands up off this subject, and hope Texas doesn't have to deal with such a prop anytime soon. My writing teacher is right, I'm fucking terrible at making an argument. "
I think buying it should be legal but smoking it illegal, still get the income but you don't get the worthless uneducated community full of potheads come up with all kinds of BS on how to its not that bad for you. Truth is, its not that bad health wise, however, if you smoke and get high, for the rest couple of hours you will be unproductive, and that in all will breed more idiots.   So yeah, like this people would buy it from w/e state, and sell it in other countries, this would breed income to the state with legal buying power.     The point of the Law is to keep society from stumbling into chaos not give you right so you can feel cool or open minded, or progressive, and legalizing something that inherently is done for the mind effect, and is widely know for making people do stupid shit is not a step in the right direction. Alcohol's effects are not as potent and are much rarer, did you know one in 40 adults gets drunk when drinking?   Most people past a certain age don't drink alcohol for the effects, but for the taste, and even so i also think with this progress in society from blue collar to white collar, people will be using their minds more, and so alcohol itself should be regulated if not halted so that society can rise up to meet this new challenge instead of lag behind rotting while spewing the same shit they have always been.   "
Ever hear the phrase "arbeit macht frei"? Laws don't exist for social engineering, they exist to deter the victimization of others via coercion.
Avatar image for jakob187
jakob187

22972

Forum Posts

10045

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 9

Edited By jakob187
@RsistncE: I drink scotch for the taste and flavor of it, not to get drunk.  I typically drink only a glass or two.  If I wanna get drunk, I go with Jack & Coke or beer.
Avatar image for bombhills
bombHills

650

Forum Posts

-1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By bombHills
@kingofpeanuts said:
"

Hi Everybody

  I also do enjoy a drink but have never done drugs.

"
So you DO do drugs... Anytime I hear about a "drug free" environment I think of all the pharmasuticals that are rampant and in your face advertised.
 
Got a headache? Take a pill
Depressed? Take a pill.
Aches and Pains? Take a pill
Allergies? Take a pill
Fat? Take a pill. 
 
It is just plain wrong in so many ways to ban a plant that grows just like any other. Personal freedom is what we should be talking about, no one deserves to go to jail for a dried flower.
Avatar image for mcwingstar
mcwingstar

87

Forum Posts

12

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

Edited By mcwingstar
@Bucketdeth said:
" My only question is, why the hell is alcohol legal but not marijuana? "
Uneducated guess: tried prohibition when it was far too widespread in the US, especially due to it being common in the upper class.
Avatar image for canberra
Canberra

1065

Forum Posts

117

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Canberra

I've read Ke$ha's works profusely and i'll say social traditions?

Avatar image for gamefreak9
gamefreak9

2877

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By gamefreak9
@RsistncE said:
" Anyone who says "they don't do drugs" is a hypocrite if they drink alochol. 
 
@gamefreak9: That's horseshit. The VAST majority of people drink alcohol because of the effects. I highly doubt many people (if anyone at all) would drink booze if it didn't get you drunk. Case and point: barely anyone drinks non-alcoholic beer. "
Theres a reason why beer outsells booze, more taste, less effect. Booze is more popular in colder countries because of its additional heating effects. You will find that lots of people just drink beer with their food to merely enhance the taste, even formal people drink it(whom are all about appearances). Wine, is commercially know for being popular for taste and not effect as well. Non-alcoholic beer does not have the same taste...  
 
I hope you don't mind but how old are you?
Avatar image for rsistnce
RsistncE

4498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By RsistncE
@jakob187: Hence, the "vast majority". If alcoholic effects disappeared from those beverages only a very tiny niche would remain of people who actually drink because they enjoy the taste. 
 
@gamefreak9: 24 and I know that those same people enjoy the slight buzz also. Believe me, alcohol would lose most of it's appeal for th vast majority of people if the effects related to drinking it were to vanish. You're right about the non-alcoholic beer though, that was my bad.
Avatar image for gamefreak9
gamefreak9

2877

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By gamefreak9
@Suicrat said:
" @gamefreak9 said:
" Great post, very educational. I agree that the society as a whole should not be crippled but the taxation should be extracted from the individual so that it hits his wallet and hopefully will teach something.  
 
Be warned, we are full of ignorant people here, you won't get much praise :P. 
 
Heres my post from the other forum:    @ESREVER said: 

" I would vote no, because...  
@FancySoapsMan said: 

" ...potheads are annoying. "    
And personally I can't stand the smell of it.   Then again, if it was strictly for personal use at the home, I don't really see a problem with it. I don't know... I'm against things that alter one's state of mind, but I know people get pleasure/enjoyment out of it, and I don't feel like I'm in a position to say they can't have that enjoyment. They say there will be a system put in place to prevent driving while under the influence, but I doubt it would be successful.  Ugh, I'm all wishy-washy on this subject. Saying no it shouldn't be allowed makes me feel like a hypocrite because I'm basing that on stereotypical potheads. It's the same way a person not familiar with the content would judge someone who is into videogames/anime.  I think I'll just throw my hands up off this subject, and hope Texas doesn't have to deal with such a prop anytime soon. My writing teacher is right, I'm fucking terrible at making an argument. "
I think buying it should be legal but smoking it illegal, still get the income but you don't get the worthless uneducated community full of potheads come up with all kinds of BS on how to its not that bad for you. Truth is, its not that bad health wise, however, if you smoke and get high, for the rest couple of hours you will be unproductive, and that in all will breed more idiots.   So yeah, like this people would buy it from w/e state, and sell it in other countries, this would breed income to the state with legal buying power.     The point of the Law is to keep society from stumbling into chaos not give you right so you can feel cool or open minded, or progressive, and legalizing something that inherently is done for the mind effect, and is widely know for making people do stupid shit is not a step in the right direction. Alcohol's effects are not as potent and are much rarer, did you know one in 40 adults gets drunk when drinking?   Most people past a certain age don't drink alcohol for the effects, but for the taste, and even so i also think with this progress in society from blue collar to white collar, people will be using their minds more, and so alcohol itself should be regulated if not halted so that society can rise up to meet this new challenge instead of lag behind rotting while spewing the same shit they have always been.   "
Ever hear the phrase "arbeit macht frei"? Laws don't exist for social engineering, they exist to deter the victimization of others via coercion. "
Granted me using them as additional income isn't the correct usage either, but i'm sure you can understand my pattern of thought:P, i like to call it opportunistic(business) :p. 
Avatar image for claude
Claude

16672

Forum Posts

1047

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 18

Edited By Claude

 I drown in threads like this.
 I drown in threads like this.
Avatar image for gamefreak9
gamefreak9

2877

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By gamefreak9
@RsistncE said:
" @jakob187: Hence, the "vast majority". If alcoholic effects disappeared from those beverages only a very tiny niche would remain of people who actually drink because they enjoy the taste. 
 
@gamefreak9: 24 and I know that those same people enjoy the slight buzz also. Believe me, alcohol would lose most of it's appeal for th vast majority of people if the effects related to drinking it were to vanish. You're right about the non-alcoholic beer though, that was my bad. "
I mean, i'm sure that the effects is part of the majority of the initial attraction but i am talking about adults here, and after perhaps tasting it for a number of years they develop an appreciation for the taste. When i was a teen i enjoyed drinking for the effect, now however, i hate the effect, i have greatly reduced how much i drink but not halted, many members of my family are the same way. Noteworthy though is also culture, i think the British need some kind of... i don't even know...
Avatar image for iam3green
iam3green

14368

Forum Posts

350

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By iam3green

drugs are mmkay. i don't know why people do drugs. i barely even drink, my last drink was last weekend, it was one drink. i don't like the feeling of any kind of drug.

Avatar image for ch3burashka
ch3burashka

6086

Forum Posts

100

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Edited By ch3burashka

Why do people think it's cool to tell other people how to live their lives? 

Avatar image for praab_nz
Praab_NZ

281

Forum Posts

160

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Praab_NZ
@CH3BURASHKA said:
"Why do people think it's cool to tell other people how to live their lives? 

                   

                "

Because if other people living their lives affects someone elses life negatively then you've got a problem.
Avatar image for kingofpeanuts
kingofpeanuts

568

Forum Posts

945

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Edited By kingofpeanuts
@CH3BURASHKA: I tried to avoid anything on how people should live. People are free to do what they want.
Avatar image for aronman
Aronman789

2738

Forum Posts

16

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Edited By Aronman789

People do drugs because they think it is fun, same thing as having sex, playing sports, playing video games, socializing, there is nothing more to it.

Avatar image for praab_nz
Praab_NZ

281

Forum Posts

160

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Praab_NZ
@Aronman789:
Okay, theres alot more to it actually, theres alot of rebellion, self punishment, and escapism as well connected with doing drugs of all kind including (maybe especially) alcohol.
Avatar image for jumanji
Jumanji

463

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Jumanji

Hey Adam,
 
Judging by your profile pic, it seems that you enjoy abusing your body with porn. Why?

Avatar image for bobdaman18
Bobdaman18

721

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Bobdaman18
@Suicrat:
How did i contradict myself? 
Avatar image for seriouslynow
SeriouslyNow

8504

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By SeriouslyNow
@Praab_NZ said:
" @CH3BURASHKA said:
"Why do people think it's cool to tell other people how to live their lives? 

                   

                "
Because if other people living their lives affects someone elses life negatively then you've got a problem. "
So people should stop driving cars, or buying products, because you know, burning fuel produces carcinogens.
Avatar image for aronman
Aronman789

2738

Forum Posts

16

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Edited By Aronman789
@Praab_NZ said:
" @Aronman789: Okay, theres alot more to it actually, theres alot of rebellion, self punishment, and escapism as well connected with doing drugs of all kind including (maybe especially) alcohol. "  
I never understood the idea of self-punishment, seems rather stupid to me.
Avatar image for claude
Claude

16672

Forum Posts

1047

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 18

Edited By Claude

 Civ V... so sad.
 Civ V... so sad.
Avatar image for kingofpeanuts
kingofpeanuts

568

Forum Posts

945

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Edited By kingofpeanuts
@Jumanji: No, I just though that it was a hilarious picture I found that I got of Kotaku.
Avatar image for kingofpeanuts
kingofpeanuts

568

Forum Posts

945

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Edited By kingofpeanuts
@Claude: Nice
Avatar image for jumanji
Jumanji

463

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Jumanji

Well, here's the message I got: you're trying to signal to other forum goers that your "online" life is based on two vices, videogaming and porn consumption. I must be wrong though. So anyway, how much porn -do- you watch a day?

Avatar image for praab_nz
Praab_NZ

281

Forum Posts

160

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Praab_NZ
@SeriouslyNow:
Hey look, it's condescending SeriouslyNow to make a redundant comment. Cars and drugs are not comparable. E.g smoking pot in the presence of someone affects them, driving a car in the presence of someone does not affect them unless you are running them over.
Avatar image for jumanji
Jumanji

463

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Jumanji

Anyways, Adam, you seem really worried about the actuarial impact of adverse lifestyle decisions.
 
Would
it
surprise
you
to
learn
that....
 Fat smokers are actually - really- cheap for the Canadian social safety net (I'm analyzing holistically here, so I'm considering net consumption of services and gratuities including pension benefits, strain on infrastructure, etc)?
Do you know why?
It's because they die during their productive years! Unlike those celibate, teetotalling, delightfully spry 85-year-olds, the fatty/smokers checked out of life before they really began collecting benefits!
That's right, shitbag! If you kick it before you turn 65, society owes your estate a big smoochy kiss kiss! So maybe the solution isn't no drugs... the solution is way more drugs!!!
 
edit: kids, I'm kidding here. Drugs are bad, they destroy your ability to set and achieve your goals. Some of them can damage your liver, others your heart, and all of them your brain. However, that doesn't mean that you should abstain from drugs out of a pseudo-Carousel logic. Abstain because you gather strong evidence to support that choice: understand the physiological risks of drug use; pay close attention to peers who heavily use drugs over a span of years and see where their lives end up; etc. "drugs r bad, mmmkay? drug users r weak and immoral and I am a geek ubermenschen who has transcended my meatbag, mmmkay?" is a weak argument that will collapse the first second the pill drops.

Avatar image for sagesebas
sagesebas

2465

Forum Posts

579

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 5

Edited By sagesebas
@jakob187: Alcohol is hardly worse than Heroin, cocaine, Meth, or PCP