Now before you sycophants inundate me with your hate-bukkake, you should be well advised to remember what Patrick Klepeck wrote: " I do not need my opinions validated, I need my opinions challenged."
Many comments point out how some people get very angry when an upcoming game from a franchise they like or a game they hope to like receives a less than outstanding score/review. I feel this applies to anything people promote (as they are inevitably vaunting themselves making it personal) and this includes Giantbomb staffers as well. So...
I do not think this article is "spectacular", "amazing", "fascinating", a "great read" whose "points were made eloquently" or any of the other undue hyperbole I have read in many of these comments. I think the piece is adequate and the subject matter mildly interesting but it doesn't deserve the overpraise many bestow upon it. I do not think Patrick Klepeck is as good a writer as some claim and his command of English leaves much to be desired.
Yes, I know Giantbomb is supposed to be a personality driven review site that distinguishes itself by being more marginal and effervescent than more conventional sites. And that is exactly why I cringe when Patrick Klepeck describes himself as a journalist. Being a personality on Giantbomb is fine, but it can be difficult to reconcile the work of journalists and articles whose spelling mistakes and awkward grammar seem to suggest they were first drafts, not to mention casually informing us of the authors football team preferences before moving on to the topic at hand which is sometimes expressed with swear words. Now don't get me wrong: I have nothing against swearing and I don't think Giantbomb would be what it is if they censored innocuous profanity like Gamespot (at least, the last time I checked) but strictly in terms of journalistic pretense, it doesn't really fit.
Either one abides by the ideals of a profession and its standards or one does not. I see Patrick Klepeck more as a columnist or what the Internet calls a blogger and that's fine but I just don't think his work is "spectacular", "amazing", "fascinating" etc.
Log in to comment