Something went wrong. Try again later

Onomatopoeia

This user has not updated recently.

103 0 9 1
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

Onomatopoeia's forum posts

Avatar image for onomatopoeia
Onomatopoeia

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By Onomatopoeia

@taku128: (both DMC4 and the new DMC are still much worse than Bayonetta/Arkham City).

This is the most misinformed and stupid sentence I've ever read on this site. Congratulations.

Fucking Arkham City better than DMC4, what planet do you hail from?

But Bayonetta is great but the QTEs let it down.

Avatar image for onomatopoeia
Onomatopoeia

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Sorry new dante won't happen ever, money talks and capcom got the message loud and clear that new dante is not what makes money.

They could have put Dante in a game made by Ninja Theory but it still would have turned out shit. Devil May Cry is about gameplay and cheesy humour. It's not about story or abortions from assault rifles.

Avatar image for onomatopoeia
Onomatopoeia

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By Onomatopoeia

@ezekiel said:
@oldirtybearon said:

@bigboss1911 said:

Classic Dante should be winning this no problem, the fuck is wrong with you people?

DmC was the better game?

DmC is dull. The story takes itself too seriously and there are too many cutscenes. There are only like six enemy types, most of them with bloated health. DMC3 had cooler bosses and more of them. DmC's bosses are almost all ugly. The color pallet or world design of DMC3 wasn't as monotonous, and the combat allowed for more variety. DmC doesn't need two evade buttons. And DMC3 didn't have fucking boring levels like where you follow Kat as she's being pursued.

Sure thing brah. You're totally right. Those are absolutely the reasons why DmC Dante is winning this poll.

The only reason "New Dante" is winning because of people who think storytelling is important in the game that was responsible for creating a subgenre.

Avatar image for onomatopoeia
Onomatopoeia

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By Onomatopoeia

It's absolutely fucking HORRENDOUS. And that's the only way I can describe this game.

Avatar image for onomatopoeia
Onomatopoeia

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@jesushammer said:

@rvone: Bioshock Infinite was the definition of a mess. Mess doesn't necessarily mean totally bad, but the development was a mess and what we got was a a shooter with an artstyle. I felt the atmosphere of Columbia wore off as soon as I was shooting random soldiers. For the record I think out of the "Bioshock" series System Shock 2 is probably the best gameplay and story-wise. It had the most interesting mechanics, dying actually mattered, the most interesting story, and the best atmosphere. I wouldn't say Bioshock Infinite isn't a solid game because it is. There is nothing inherently wrong with it, but it just feels like the same shooters we get constantly with some Bioshock powers thrown in(which were all way too similar because most had a stun of some type or were useless) and a really terrific art style. It has it's good point sure, it isn't a bad game and I never said it was. It was just all over the place and didn't feel like it knew what it wanted to be, except for another Bioshock game of some sort. Also whether you liked the story or not has nothing to do with it being nonsensical because that game's story made zero sense. You can pull out the argument that any story with this kind of time travel/parallel universes has that, but I've seen Moffat episodes of Doctor Who that made more sense than Infinite.

That is not in any way the definition of a "mess". Not to mention the fact that in the same paragraph, you said it was a "solid game". Which kind of contradicts the whole mess thing. And it's also your opinion that the story made no sense. I thought it made as much sense as it needed to.

Infinite had so much potential and it ended up as a boring shooter in a setting that somehow had less freedom than Rapture. I liked the music though.

Avatar image for onomatopoeia
Onomatopoeia

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I thought the reboot was horrible. It was physically painful to play.

Avatar image for onomatopoeia
Onomatopoeia

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@excast said:

@somejerk said:

And so, an overbudgeted AAA game not selling well enough kills another studio.

The Bioshock series has made a ton of money over the years.

Bioshock: Infinite went through chaos in development, Ken commissioned the entire game to be made again.

Avatar image for onomatopoeia
Onomatopoeia

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

It's WoW with a clunky first person mode.

Discussion end

But WoW is successful.

It's The Old Republic with a clunky first person mode.

Avatar image for onomatopoeia
Onomatopoeia

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@e30bmw said:

@onomatopoeia said:

Titanfall.

  • 729p (why this doesn't run at a constant 60fps at 1080p is down to the developers or the Xbox One crappy hardware)
  • 6 players
  • no destructible environments
  • no single player
  • no shooting through walls
  • $60

Who in their debatable sane mind would buy this?

I'm glad you figured out the formula for the perfect game, 1080p, more than 6 players, destructible environments, single player and shooting through walls. Basically Battlefield 4...

I'm not claiming "the formula for the perfect game" shit like 1080p and 60fps should be an industry standard. No shooting through surfaces and the lack of destructible environments is just a recipe for camping. The game has giant mechs, smashing through buildings should have been one of the first design choices for this game along with shooting through surfaces. 6v6 is bad anyway for a game like this. Asking $60 for a game that is just a shallow multiplayer shooter is wrong.

And Battlefield 4 is shit.

Avatar image for onomatopoeia
Onomatopoeia

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10  Edited By Onomatopoeia

@pie said:

i heard the game sucks, can anyone confirm?

Everything I have heard from people playing the beta is how terrible it is.