RK92

If you're familiar with the way the original game worked, you played through once as Leon and once as Claire and things would change depending on who you played first, this same thing is in the remake but the IGN reviewer played Leon A and then Claire A rather than doing the actual other half of the game. He should've played Claire B instead of Claire A after playing Leon A. So he just played the first half of the game twice with different characters.

IGN changed their review because they missed half the game.

Yeah, I disagree that if you liked Fallout 4 you'll like Fallout 76. They're entirely different games. I play Fallout for the character interactions and storylines involving people that I can interact with. 76 has none of that.

Or maybe people just like different things than you? Why is that such a difficult concept?

I think it's funny that they photoshopped his hair to be longer.

I like how there was a huge backlash about how the game has been downgraded since the E3 demo based off one image that was shit quality, then Digital Foundry comes in and finds that the game has actually been upgraded since the E3 demo. Internet gonna internet I guess.

For all the talk of how much toxicity there is in that comment section it's really not toxic at all. I can't really see anything there rather than people just making reasonable arguments

@notnert427: crazy to me that you're legitimately ok with a legal precedent being set that it's not okay to copy game mechanics. PUBG itself copied other games. Who fucking cares if Fortnite was failing before adding a battle royale mode? PUBG doesn't have a monopoly on battle royale, and it would be ridiculous if they legally did.

@shiftygism: WWE 2k18 has crawling pins.

@bill_mcneal: the powers make sense though. In season 1 it was said that all of the hosts are connected to eachother as a way to make sure narratives don't stray too far off their paths. So if she has special access to hosts she should be able to control them without saying anything.