Something went wrong. Try again later

skinnyman

This user has not updated recently.

195 26 75 29
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

skinnyman's forum posts

Avatar image for skinnyman
skinnyman

195

Forum Posts

26

Wiki Points

29

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#1  Edited By skinnyman

Hell yes, Sam Adams is awesome. The fact that it is available everywhere just makes it better.
 
 @Marcsman said:

Sam Adams sucks.
I already know you're wrong, but do you care to elaborate on why?
Avatar image for skinnyman
skinnyman

195

Forum Posts

26

Wiki Points

29

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#2  Edited By skinnyman

As an American and an avid (American) football fan, maybe I can add  some plain reasons as to why I don't enjoy soccer (which is how I will be referring to it for the remainder of this post).
 
1) Scoring: Yep, it's been mentioned. And yes, the single score in a 1-0 game is going to be pretty exciting when it finally happens. But how long do I have to sit through people endlessly kicking the ball back and forth with no hope of scoring in order to see that point? And yes, in basketball there is too much, making individual scores meaningless for the most part. I think there is a happy medium between meaningless scores every ten seconds and only one score through an entire game with nothing but watching guys running around chasing a ball to fill the rest of the time. In football, scoring is rare enough that it is always hugely exciting, but never so rare that the game becomes a drag. Also, in football, every single play, even the simplest running play, is potentially a scoring opportunity. Watch some highlights from guys like Frank Gore, Chris Johnson, and Adrian Peterson, and tell me you can't get excited to watch someone like that.

2) Specialization: Soccer players are great athletes, but they would never last a season in the NFL. Essentially every player, except the goalie, has the exact same skill set - running and kicking the ball. Maybe an oversimplification, but you get the point. In football, every single player has a unique specialty that only a few other people on the team, if any, are capable of performing. Powerful lineman battle in the trenches, speedy receivers and corners are in a constant game of cat and mouse, bruising linebackers make hits, finesse running backs find holes in the defense, and of course the immensely talented quarterbacks run the show. Not to mention punters, kickers, return men, and everyone else who contributes to the game. It's like a well-crafted RPG.

3) Strategy: The biggest reason that I LOVE American football is the amount of strategy that goes into every single game. Maintaining an offense in a four down system is one of the most complicated but beautifully simple things. Call me a dumb American, but I'm just not seeing that in soccer. The ball changes hands constantly, and true "offense" is limited to a few seconds in which you have possession of the ball within twenty yards of the opposing goal. With football, if it's 4th and short you can pound it right at them, or you can fake the handoff and hit someone on a quick crossing route. It's constant risk-reward calculations, and at the end of the game the strategies in football are unlike any other sport. Watching a skilled quarterback run the two minute drill is the most exciting thing I have ever seen in sports, ever.
 
So yes, I consider soccer to be a kid's sport for the most part. Simple to understand the rules, and a good way to get exercise, but definitely not what I would choose to watch as entertainment. I think that if it were broadcast around the world, a LOT more people would come to this conclusion. The problem is that football doesn't get any exposure outside the States. I would be curious to find how often those of you who are in Germany, Spain, South America, the Netherlands, etc. actually get the opportunity to see a game.

Avatar image for skinnyman
skinnyman

195

Forum Posts

26

Wiki Points

29

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#3  Edited By skinnyman

Get your circadian rhythms on track by going to bed at the same time every night. Also, things like tv and computer screens have "phase-delaying effects", so try to limit yourself to reading a book or listening to music an hour or so before you sleep.

Avatar image for skinnyman
skinnyman

195

Forum Posts

26

Wiki Points

29

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#4  Edited By skinnyman
@kurtdyoung said:

How late? The story you linked to "can not be found".

@iam3green said:
the link doesn't work.
Sorry 'bout that. Drudge tends to overload local news site servers. Here's a new link.
Avatar image for skinnyman
skinnyman

195

Forum Posts

26

Wiki Points

29

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#5  Edited By skinnyman
@example1013: Rather than get into a lengthy debate about conservatism or libertarianism vs. liberalism, suffice it to say that I had not heard that particular quote from her. Defending Palin is always a tenuous proposition, because she tends to represent conservative values very poorly and her communication skills are downright terrible. I will just say that as a general rule, the left has a mentality of entitlement, whether it be to poorly understood rights or to goods and services. In this particular case, vis-a-vis being allowed to say whatever you like on an internet forum, I think that we find ourselves agreeing in principle.
Avatar image for skinnyman
skinnyman

195

Forum Posts

26

Wiki Points

29

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#6  Edited By skinnyman
@example1013 said:

@ConstantRa1n said:

@Gunrock: No. It means other sites have taken away our right to speak freely.

I know there's 5 more pages, but guess what: a private company (in this case a game website) aren't obligated to provide you shit, and they certainly don't have to pay for hosting just so you can spout whatever puerile nonsense got you banned in the first place. Go make your own forum if you want to protect your "right", and you can protect it all day there with yourself as company.

Unlike what Sarah Palin and that stupid ignorant Tea Party candidate from Delaware will say, the First Amendment only protects you from the government.

EDIT: And I'm just using your post to say this publicly. Too many people think the internet is obligated to provide you a space to voice your thoughts. It's great when you can find one, but ignorant to think you're owed one.

Exactly right in the first part. You don't have a right to a website's server space, a radio's microphones, or a TV station's airwaves under freedom of speech. If you want to voice your opinion, do it with your own resources, no one else owes you theirs. That jab at Palin is dead wrong though. Liberals are usually the ones that feel entitled to voice their opinions using the resources of others. Look up the debate over the "Fairness Doctrine" as an example.
Avatar image for skinnyman
skinnyman

195

Forum Posts

26

Wiki Points

29

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#7  Edited By skinnyman
@Brendan: I feel like it would be wrong no matter what the circumstances. Breaking down doors should be reserved for violent offenders IMO. And then there's the fact that she wasn't even at the address, and apparently hadn't been for quite a while.
Avatar image for skinnyman
skinnyman

195

Forum Posts

26

Wiki Points

29

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#8  Edited By skinnyman

I stumbled across this story while making my morning rounds through the news sites (it was on Drudge, naturally). Some guy got his door kicked in by the FBI because his wife had unpaid college loans. Now I am all for paying your bills on time, but let's be honest: a LOT of people have college loans that are past due. Those things are hard to pay back.
 
I had to do a double take because I was pretty sure that this was illegal in the U.S., 4th amendment and all that. This kind of thing really pisses me off, because it seems like no one is ever answerable for their actions when something like this happens. Also, how the hell does the DOE have the right to issue warrants? That seems like it should be WAY out of their jurisdiction.

Avatar image for skinnyman
skinnyman

195

Forum Posts

26

Wiki Points

29

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#9  Edited By skinnyman
@drbendo said:
People who refuse to play a game that they would ostensibly enjoy in the absence of an achievement system solely because they cannot get all of the points is ridiculous.
People truly is ridiculous.
 
@drbendo said:
The dumber of them cannot even manage the correct verb (I'm sure you've seen "he is OCD" or "I'm OCD about..." nonsense throughout the forums).
That's almost as bad as someone saying that "people is ridiculous."
Avatar image for skinnyman
skinnyman

195

Forum Posts

26

Wiki Points

29

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#10  Edited By skinnyman
I definitely agree that achievements have changed the way I approach games... negatively, for the most part. Pulling off an S-rank feels amazing (even though I rarely follow through and do it) and anyone who says otherwise is either lying or has never tried it. Was it a good idea for me to spend hours in Halo: Reach jumping off a cliff and landing on some alien's back? No, but it felt damn good to see that achievement pop up and get 1000/1000 as my score. The thing that irritates me about the achievements in most of my games is their arbitrary nature, and the fact that most developers don't know how to craft meaningful ones. Probably the only full length game that I have seen that really gets it right is ACII. I didn't have to play that game any differently than I would have without the achievement system, and I ended up with a perfect score.

Who are these people who call themselves "gamers" who claim they have zero interest in getting high scores? High scores have been part of the experience since the arcade days. Achievements are just this generation's version of a leaderboard. Not interested? Fine, but you are the exception, not the rule.
 
@WickedFather said:
I was playing Bad Company for the first time yesterday, trundling along and enjoying it then along came an achievement box and ruined everything.  You can't turn off notifications for them and keep on others.  Your "Busy" status lets you stop messages but leaves achievement messages on - why the hell isn't there one for the opposite.  Saying they're completely optional is rubbish.
Yep. Sorry, but I need those notifications when my friends message me to come play COD. I take it these people who recommend turning off notifications have no friends?