Disagree with a lot of this because the game really did have some unique features, but at least you gave your reasons. The games aren't entirely amazing, but some people just dismiss these games based on the history around them. You didn't talk about the really innovative multiplayer modes. The trailers for the game are great and give a good sense of the atmosphere. TrailerTrailer
For some alternative and more favorable retrospectives on Kane and Lynch 2:
https://www.inverse.com/article/16496-enough-with-hitman-already-it-s-time-for-kane-lynch-3
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/why-i-love-kane-and-lynch-2-dog-days
http://xanderkishblog.blogspot.co.uk/2013/08/kane-and-lynch-2-anti-shooter-before.html
http://www.pcgamer.com/revisiting-the-bleak-bloody-world-of-kane-lynch-2/
And the first game:
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2013-07-21-kane-and-lynch-dead-men-retrospective
There characters and atmosphere were some of the most interesting and unique of this genre. The two voice actors were great, and so was the interaction between the characters. Unlike some other companies games, it doesn't play too heavily into obvious movie references but only just uses just enough influence. There were some slightly funny moments in the game as well.
The gameplay was basic 3rd person action, nothing really bad but not amazing or anything, however the atmosphere voice acting really added to the game. The multiplayer did have great modes.
For many fans of Max Payne 1 and 2, the 3rd game was too big of a departure in style, tone, and writing. That makes sense because it had a different developer on it. Max Payne 3 just felt like it was trying to make some blatent, and wasn't as coherent with it's narrative.
The developers from this company really do have an interesting way of story telling and building game worlds and narratives. A third game that finishes out the story of Kane and Lynch with the same voice actors would be interesting.
Log in to comment