" Before you read any of this, Zelda means the world to me. I think Zelda needs a makeover, I know the concept still works, they have me camping outside the store each new installment but lately the Zelda series have not been making the impacts they should have. At least I think it could really benefit as a series from a fresh new look. It worked for Metroid with Prime and they have some killer franchises that are just rotting on the shelves (ok, they're coming back a lil now with DK and Kirby!). Retro has amazed me with the Prime series, I'm sure that they are one of the few studios that could make it work. They probably know what an honor it is to work on such a envied franchise. "Seems logical, especially since there has been a precedent of this within the Zelda games themselves. Retro hasn't made one, but anyone who has played either of the oracle games for the GBC or Minish Cap for the GBA knows that Capcom did a magnificent job. I see no reason why Retro couldn't do the same for a next gen title. However, I'm curious if the Zelda franchise really needs such a reboot. Skyward Sword is just around the corner, and doesn't look bad at all.
But will Skyward Sword will be successful in 2012? I think it looks good, but I already know I enjoy Zelda games. Nintendo on the other hand might be having trouble attracting new fans to an aging series. I guess the first question we need to ask is not who needs to make this game, but WHAT will they need to do to it? Perhaps unpopular options need to be explored, such as voice over dialogue, more realistic graphics, violence, etc. Any of these drastic moves run the risk of being unpopular amongst die hard fans, yet are typical things that seem to help sell video games in the current age.
If Nintendo decides to take such a drastic route, only then will they decide what company is best to handle it.
Log in to comment