DO NOT read if you have not finished game and dont want ending (kinda) spoilt.
So I have finished mass effect 3 and saw notorious ending which isnt that bad except for the fact,that it negates everything you have done in a trilogy? Does it? I highly doubt that it does, since for me mass effect trilogy is all about characters. Would it really be interesting if Garrus,Thane,Jack( my passion) had not been there? Ending did not took the enjoyment I have got out of all side stories, even out of the main story. It was good enough even though we did not get epic fight between reapers and united galaxy as was implied at the begining of the game. So what ? Would 5 minutes of cutscenes have satisfied you? And the catalyst stuff was pretty wicked, if you asked me. Much better than " the last fight" .Unfortunetely after credits ending with father and son was kind of sad since it could have been so much better, for instance: I got good ending and chose to take control of the reapers and consequencies of that was : destroyed mass relays. What if after credits sequence would have been like that: same good old father telling stories to his son, but this time in far distant future like in 3670 years after events of mass effects and remembering Shepard basically as legend who stood and saved the galaxy, as a myth similar to Romulas and Remus ( founders of Rome).
Now if we are complaining about ending in mass effect 3, maybe we should start complaining about all of the bad games that are out there. Why dont we sue Peter Molyneux for not delivering what he has promised and I am sure, if that was the case we would not have seen fable series at all. Why dont we sue ubisoft guys for making far cry 2 so shitty and tedious? Also Mcdonalds for making me fat.
P.S. Vincent, your sunflowers suck , give my money back.
Log in to comment