Something went wrong. Try again later

Giant Bomb Review

75 Comments

Command & Conquer 4: Tiberian Twilight Review

2
  • PC

Command & Conquer 4 attempts to be a smaller game than its predecessors, but rather than going back to basics, this new approach makes for a dull experience.


You're usually faced with a decision between a lot of low-end units or a few high-end ones. 
You're usually faced with a decision between a lot of low-end units or a few high-end ones. 
For all the changes that Command & Conquer 4: Tiberian Twilight makes to the once-unbeatable C&C formula, it's surprising that the largest issue is that the game feels monotonous and tiresome right out of the box. By stripping away some of the more complex elements of resource-gathering and other staples of the real-time strategy genre, C&C4 makes individual units feel almost entirely meaningless, leaving you little reason to actually strategize your way through its campaign, since you can just pump out more units as your existing ones get taken down without penalty. When placed together with a lackluster campaign and a persistent online progression system that means you won't be able to see the game's best units until you've invested way more time into the game than it deserves, Tiberian Twilight feels like it was designed to kill interest in the Command & Conquer franchise.

The disappointing part about all this is that the changes made to the franchise sound like a good idea. Rather than turtling up and building an elaborate base, or immediately feeling the brunt of an early game rush, C&C4 works on a much smaller scale. In most games, you'll be limited to somewhere between 10 and 30-ish units at any given time. The major limiting factor is a command points cap, and most units take three or six points to spawn. Units build out of your crawler, a class-based structure that you can pick up and walk around the map at will, allowing you to set up camp anywhere you like, for as long as you like. And if your crawler gets blown away in a fight, the game doesn't end. Instead, you can spawn a new crawler and keep going. There's a cap on respawns in campaign games to give you an eventual way to fail.

The game's three classes play a bit differently and offer different units. The offense class gets the heavy ground-based vehicles and plays fairly straightforwardly. Defense gets infantry units and defensive structures, like bunkers and turrets. This means the defensive crawler has a build radius and also has a power limit, which is sort of like the command point limit for units, but instead prevents you from just creating a zillion turrets all over the map. Support gets the air-based units and an energy meter that allows you to cast support powers, like airstrikes or a healing radius. The energy refills on its own and lets you sort of hang back and still make an impact on the battle.

 The maps are small, which keeps things moving at a decent pace. 
 The maps are small, which keeps things moving at a decent pace. 
The campaign is meant to tie up the current story arc, which has Kane and the Brotherhood of Nod sort of making peace with GDI in a last-ditch attempt to save the planet, which is being overrun and contaminated by tiberium, the same crystal-based form of energy that kicked off this entire war to begin with. Though attempts were made to make the franchise's signature video sequences a bit better and more serious, the story falls flat from start to finish. Previously, the sequences were bad in a campy and fun way, often with a little stunt casting to sweeten the pot. Now, they're just bad. Joe Kucan continues to be the high point as the charismatic villain, Kane, but even his role feels pointless in the grand scheme of things. Overall, it's full of characters you won't care about double-crossing each other in ways that barely matter.

Of course, it's not hard to see that the game's multiplayer is probably where the developers hope you spend most of your time. The game has a persistent progression system that works across all modes, and as you level up, you'll unlock additional units and upgrades that make you more effective in battle. This is unfortunate, in a way, because low-level players aren't going to have access to the more useful tactics until they earn enough experience points to even the playing field. Normally, the response would be to say "well, just play against people of your level." But the game doesn't seem to be great at automatically matching players up that way. The XP system also comes at the cost of requiring an Internet connection at all times. I'd guess that this is to preserve the sanctity of the unlocks by storing your status server-side, but it also means that even if you want to skirmish or play the campaign, you'll need to be connected. And if you happen to get disconnected, your progress goes right out the window. The only other "benefit" of being connected all the time is that a chat room sits at the bottom of every menu screen, which is handy if you want to see people attempting to chat in Russian or love reading complaints about the game you're currently playing.

 Kane deserves a better send-off.
 Kane deserves a better send-off.
Once you actually get into an online game, you'll find that the action is very different from the C&C games of the past. Instead of simply exterminating the opposing side, you'll need to hold down control points on the map. Holding points and destroying enemy units both contribute to your team's score, and the first team to 2,500 points wins the match. You can still respawn your crawler as many times as you need, but since the enemy is earning points each time your crawler is destroyed, you've got a bit more of an incentive to stay safe. The matches are very fast, and swarms of lower-end units seem to do better than teched-up mammoth units, which adds to the speed. It's very different than the typical C&C multiplayer, and it really feels like someone just went and applied a first-person shooter game type to an RTS. It's a cool idea that you might get into if you're already accustomed to playing RTS games competitively. I thought that maybe the simplified nature of the game would mean that dopes like me who are only good at getting stomped out in a mutliplayer RTS game would get a fresh lease on life. This does not appear to be the case, and even though the teams can get up to five per side, the battles are still small enough that everyone needs to be on their game in order to succeed.

Though it has two campaigns and a healthy array of maps for skirmish and multiplayer, Command & Conquer 4 feels like it's missing about half-a-game's worth of content. There are some neat ideas in play, but the action itself isn't strong enough to make it all work, and the cutscenes aren't good enough to make you forget that the game isn't all that hot. At this point, C&C fans would be better served by sticking with Red Alert 3.
Jeff Gerstmann on Google+

75 Comments

Avatar image for the8bitnacho
the8bitNacho

2304

Forum Posts

6388

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 2

Edited By the8bitNacho

Disappointing.  Glad I didn't buy this when I was at the store yesterday.

Avatar image for mildmolasses
MildMolasses

3200

Forum Posts

386

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 16

Edited By MildMolasses
@Pie said:
"Is C&C dying out as a series now then?  "

Not surprising since they seemed to be rushing them out over the past couple of years
Avatar image for mattbodega
mattbodega

2281

Forum Posts

34417

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 4

Edited By mattbodega

Remember that story from a little while back, that EA was going to can the C&C Team as soon as they finished with 4? It'll be interesting to see if that comes to pass.  It means the developers can blame a total lack of motivation and zero publisher support to give C&C this reboot.  
Regardless of whose fault it is, this game seems like a real bummer. Activision has definitely earned it's reputation of wearing you out with year after year of franchise iteration, but make no mistake: EA ruined C&C the same way. All the good will built up after the release of C&C 3 has disappeared. 

Avatar image for hero_swe
hero_swe

1378

Forum Posts

44

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By hero_swe
@OroJackson said:
"Ouch, 2 stars stings  Man, whatever happened to the CnC I used to love "


EA killed westwood, that's what happened
Avatar image for raiz265
raiz265

2264

Forum Posts

6

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By raiz265
@EgoCheck616 said:

" This is what happens when you lay off a team before they're finished a product. Imagine what Modern Warfare 2 would have been like if this mess happened before the game launched. "

look at how it turned out on PC even before "this mess happened" 
 
... could not resist :E
Avatar image for buckybit
buckybit

950

Forum Posts

619

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By buckybit

I call this a good review, because a good review is good written, not about a 'good' score. 
 
 I am still interested to see it for myself (if they release a Single-Player Demo) - otherwise will probably wait for a lower price point. The Quick Look was rather appealing - I don't mind less complex "strategy" in some RTS games, if it's fast paced. It's way more interesting looking than SupCom2 for me.

Avatar image for jimbo
Jimbo

10472

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Edited By Jimbo

I can't even see where they were coming from with this.  It's like they asked somebody to design it who has never even played an RTS before, let alone a C&C game.  
 
This is... it's just... somebody get me EA on the phone.

Avatar image for shifty_mcfly
Shifty_Mcfly

211

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Shifty_Mcfly

What a shitty send-off for Joe Kucan. Long live Kane!

Avatar image for egocheck616
EgoCheck616

820

Forum Posts

37

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By EgoCheck616

This is what happens when you lay off a team before they're finished a product. Imagine what Modern Warfare 2 would have been like if this mess happened before the game launched.

Avatar image for jeffsekai
Jeffsekai

7162

Forum Posts

1060

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By Jeffsekai

ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww

Avatar image for deactivated-590b7522e5236
deactivated-590b7522e5236

1918

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

just remake red alert 2 instead of R-word.org'ing C&C!

Avatar image for deactivated-6418ef3727cdd
deactivated-6418ef3727cdd

2721

Forum Posts

697

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

This confirms all my expectations for this game.

Avatar image for tortoise
Tortoise

291

Forum Posts

364

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By Tortoise

In multiplayer "...low-level players aren't going to have access to the more useful tactics until they earn enough experience points to even the playing field."
 
Bullshit game design in my opinion. The field should always be balanced with newcomers in mind. I feel the same with MW2 and other FPS games where you unlock important things as you go on: you start out immediately against people not only more experienced in the game and on the maps, but with more choice of weaponry and sometimes just plain better weapons. This is even worse in an RTS game where I can only imagine if you don't have any paper you'll get smashed by rocks or if you lack scissors you'll get wrapped in paper and have no effective way to respond.

Avatar image for binman88
Binman88

3700

Forum Posts

49

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

Edited By Binman88

Someone said it in the forums I think, can't remember who, but I agree: Remake Red Alert 1 with these graphics and I would be super interested. I'm not even that interested in RTS games anymore (probably because of how they've turned out) but I would probably buy it.

Avatar image for captain_insano
Captain_Insano

3658

Forum Posts

841

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 15

Edited By Captain_Insano

does anyone else think that Jeff's disapproving pose (the cartoon one) looks exactly like Kane on the cover art for the game

Avatar image for pie
Pie

7370

Forum Posts

515

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

Edited By Pie
@ThatFrood said:
" @Pie said:
" Is C&C dying out as a series now then?  "
It... kind of has been for awhile now. "
The fact that this is the next numbered C&C made it seem more significant to me. I dont know 
Avatar image for trejik
Trejik

117

Forum Posts

751

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By Trejik

Well, this sucks.
 
Too bad I don't care. Guess why?  Star. Craft. Tuu.
 
Oh yeah. I went there.

Avatar image for raiz265
raiz265

2264

Forum Posts

6

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By raiz265

played 2 rounds in the multiplayer BETA and it was just horrible...

Avatar image for daryl
Daryl

1776

Forum Posts

178

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Daryl

Great now back to some real games. 

Avatar image for thatfrood
thatfrood

3472

Forum Posts

179

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 15

Edited By thatfrood
@Pie said:
" Is C&C dying out as a series now then?  "
It... kind of has been for awhile now.
Avatar image for ghostiet
Ghostiet

5832

Forum Posts

160

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 3

Edited By Ghostiet

Maybe they'll retcon this shit after 10 years, like they did with Heroes of Might and Magic IV. People - not even fans, just casual men - still refuse to acknowledge that piece of shit as a HoMM game, or its existence at all. It's like with Leisure Suit Larry: weird, there's V after III!

Avatar image for travist
TravisT

199

Forum Posts

329

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By TravisT

Ouch. A shame the series couldn't end on a high note.

Avatar image for mikkaq
MikkaQ

10296

Forum Posts

52

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By MikkaQ

Yeah that's too bad. Poor poor Kane. What a great character he was.

Avatar image for pie
Pie

7370

Forum Posts

515

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

Edited By Pie

Is C&C dying out as a series now then? 

Avatar image for orojackson
OroJackson

694

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 14

Edited By OroJackson

Ouch, 2 stars stings
 
Man, whatever happened to the CnC I used to love