I have an addictive personality, so I won't touch an MMORPG with a 50 foot pool. It's the same reason I stay away from heroine, but at least with heroine, I'd be more likely to ask for help.
Star Trek Online
Game » consists of 6 releases. Released Feb 02, 2010
A sci-fi MMORPG developed by Cryptic Studios and Perpetual Entertainment which allows players to fight amongst the ranks of Starfleet, join the Klingon Empire, or rebuild a Romulan homeworld.
Deal Of A Lifetime?
For that kind of money I'd expect a Star Trek babe (Jeri Ryan please) to come and play with me, after which I might show her the game...
The problem with the game is that most quest is solved either by fighting in space and then fighting on ground or vice versa. And the few "detective" quests are a bit boring. I'll miss playing the beta, but there are other games around with more variety.
My bad joke aside, It does look good and I managed to not let it get the better of me. I instead loaded up my Steam version of Eve Online for the first timeto use my 30 day trial (The next best thing to STO. I'm scared, VERY scared. Because it's good, VERY good.)
More to the point, admittedly I've played the Open Beta quite a bit based on my hyper nerdery and had a really good time.
Hope it turns out well for you dude, as nobody likes a $300 sucker punch in the gut.
Well, this isn't the first game to do this. I remember there have been a couple, the only one I'm sure of is Lord Of The Rings Online. It was also 200+ish for a lifetime subscription. At the Time, I'd been paying Blizzard for two years, and as you said, I had just been playing it due to a guilttrip. LOTR Online seemed like a WoW clone, so I decided to get the lifetime subscription.....then the beta "talked" out of it. Its only really worth it if you even think you'l be playing it up to 20 something months (depending on the other pricepoints), and in my case anyway. I decided that if the so called best game in the genre, WoW, had been boring me after around 8 months (and Lv 40), a game that wasn't even on par with it would probably be even less likely to hold my attention.
Anyways, best of luck. When it comes down to it, Its these kinds of random spending that make life worth living!!!!
Oh god. I COULD'VE GOT A PS3 FOR THAT MONEY.
I think STO will die out like LOTRO, AoC, WHO etc did. There's just no competition against WoW. Certainly there will be a hardcore crowd who'll stick to it until the servers are taken down, but I don't think that's the point of an mmo.
I'm sorry, bad deal :<
The best bet for you would have been the 1 year deal. I mean come on, with all the games coming out this year there is NO WAY you are still going to even think about this game a year from now (or even six months from now). It's your money and you can do what you want with it, but this seems really stupid and the way you seem to be relatively ok with that is kind of disgusting.
An MMO average lifetime is a year, so why pay more upfront?
How many games do you still play for longer than a year that you would willingly pay for if you had to? Any games I go back to after a year it's usually time killing between new releases and I only play them for a day or two.
$300 can get you a lot of used games.
They run servers 7 days a week, 24 hours a day, which is costly in and of itself and runs up an enormous electricity bill. These servers also need upgraded or replaced, which is extremely expensive. They're hosting tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands, or (in the case of WoW) millions of players on an expansive network. Can you imagine the bandwidth bill? They constantly have developers on staff pushing out patches and bugfixes, and once copies of the game stop selling, they need to be paid somehow. Same with customer service, "Game Masters," and all that noise." The problem is that yes, you love the game today. Sure, you'll love the game tomorrow. But -everyone- falls out of love with a video game eventually, and MMOs are no different. People stop liking them eventually. Imagine a kid who was crazy about Gears of War 1. He would play his Gears of War constantly. No one could best him in a shotgun duel. Well, Gears of War 2 comes out two years later. Now he wants to play that instead. There will always be a new awesome game that comes out which will soak up all your time. And this is why no single game is ever worth 300 dollars, IMO. "
It's really not hard to figure out why either a monthly fee or a microtransaction basis are necessary for the operation of an MMO. Profit is also a part of it. They can't just sit on their thumbs not actually benefiting from putting so much work into the constant operation of a game. No MMO has ever become profitable off of software sales alone, not even Blizzard's behemoth.
Silly silly Jeff, when will you ever learn. I don't even know if you could play more than a year of it with GB and such.
" Haha wow, I'm not sure I could ever buy a lifetime subscription fee. Even if it removes the "guilt" of a monthly fee, I'd rather be charged once a month and be able to get out of it, rather then realize I spent $250 on a lifetime subscription for a game I don't want to play. "This.
Jeff you're an impulsive buyer.
But yeah, back when I played WoW, I always felt like I had to play it because of the monthly fee I was paying. If I played any other game besides WoW, I felt guilty and felt like I was wasting money. So one-time fee for an MMO is nice.
But Jeff.....c'mon now. You're a game reviewer. How many games do you actually stick to playing?
I would pay $150 for a lifetime subscription with game included.
$15 dollars is way too much to pay to play a game for a month after you already dropped 50 bucks on it and thats the only way to play the game. Really, it should only be $5, but I guess as long as they can get away with charging $15, they will.
Jeff, you fucked up. Because Star Wars the old Republic will be out next year and you wont be playing this game anymore.
Do it, Jeff. You can play as a borg. And once that money's out of the way you are playing an mmo everyone else has to pay for for FREE.
and even if you don't make it that long, at least you can rest assured that if they release expansions and updates that make the game interesting enough to revisit, you're not paying to get back to that world.
DO IT
You know what he's like. It's one of the reasons we love him and the rest of giantbombso much. He's a bit... you know... silly... is our Jeff. lol.
@BrickRoad: Aaah... Shatners dramatic silences... What would comedy... do without them? lol.
Lesson to be learned here kids. Sure the single life may be lonely. But look at what you're able to do with some extra cash.
I too often struggle with the idea of paying a lump sum for an MMO to take that pressure off. Feeling guilty when you aren't playing a game should not be the case and I think you justify yourself well in this case. The worst thing that can happen is that the game tanks before a year and I feel that not having that pressure of playing it totally worth the price. I wish that more MMO companies would adopt this strategy simply because it allows you to dabble more and not have that feeling like you always need to be in the game doing something.
Good luck taking over the federation, and space.
I paid $336.00 for my two years of World of Warcraft, so that's a good price if you are into the game. If I had paid $300.00 for WoW back in the day, I might still be playing it. When Star Wars: The Old Republic drops I am seriously considering going "lifetime" if it is offered.
Why not ask all those people who bought Hellgate : London (Bill Roper even works for these guys!) lifetime subscriptions how it worked out for them? LIfetime subscriptions aren't something you offer if you expect to make an MMO that keeps people playing. Champions Online got boring after 2 weeks. Cryptic hasn't been making good games lately. $300 just seems like a poor deal, the only people it would make sense for is hardcore Star Trek fans. Even then you could go buy the complete series of both the original Star Trek and The Next Generation on DVD for about that much. The only game in the MMO genre a lifetime subscription would make sense for is WoW and they never offered one. Most other MMOs are desolate within a year.
GAH this is the exact thinking I have had going on in my head for days and if it wasn't for the stupidly awesome QL I would've never considered this. I know WoW fans that play for years and rack up huge bills over time, and personally I am very against paying monthly so this concept of a one time payment is appealing. But with little time to make a decision and no in depth reviews of the game out there, its a hard choice to make.
Best of luck to you and the game Jeff. Who knows, maybe in a few days time I'll be joining the insanity as well...
" I paid $336.00 for my two years of World of Warcraft, so that's a good price if you are into the game. If I had paid $300.00 for WoW back in the day, I might still be playing it. When Star Wars: The Old Republic drops I am seriously considering going "lifetime" if it is offered. "Oh, dude, if that's even offered with Old Republic, you wouldn't be able to stop me from getting a life time subscription.
Please Log In to post.
This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:
Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.Comment and Save
Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.
Log in to comment