" @Ineedaname said:

" @oldschool said:

For the record, I don't care about sport games, but I am curious as to why anyone would not have a Wii for sport games now.

These were your words aswell, and it's personal preference surely, I have pro on Wii and don't play it much, but I did have it on PS3 which I played a lot more.                                                                                                                          I've not played tiger woods so can't comment. But did the tennis games turn out any good?Other than that 2 games hardly makes it the definitive console.And so you know my comments weren't calling you a fanboy or anything like that I was merely commenting towards the statement. "

That first sentence is 100% correct and I would even attempt to argue against it.

There is nothing wrong with my sentence you quoted as well.  It merely poses a question to which only an individual can answer - for themselves.  As for the definitive console, that is about sport games now and into the forseeable future.  Call it predictive in nature.  It is also about the fact that if you love sport games, then why would you not have a console that does certain sports better and more fun than the others?  

I still believe that a real gamer has as many consoles as their wallet can afford.  You buy the games that you enjoy and denying the greatness of all the consoles is taking some irrational dislike to stupid levels.  I have a 360 for the games the Wii cannot deliver.  I have a Wii for the games the 360 cannot deliver.  I will have a PS3 when the price is better, for the exclusives that no-one else can deliver.

"

I usually dont like simulation sports games, but i have fun with madden on the wii, guess because it feels easier

Wii version for the clear win on Tiger 10, there's enough praise out there to suggest it's considerably better than the other versions in every way except for visuals that mean little.

 As far as Virtua Tennis though, no way, the next gen versions are far better, but only because the effort that went into Virtua Tennis Wii was shockingly bad. SEGA gave it to Sumo Digital who did a terrible job of implimenting decent motion controls. It was almost like they were adding them at the last moment in order to meet expectations. Vitua Tennis Wii looks terrible.

Tiger Wii 10 is considerably better, but Virtua Tennis is far from being as good as other versions. However, Grand Slam Tennis may well be the best Tennis game released this year.

On the other dull matter of the this thread, I find it comedic that some take offense by the nature this thread, especially given thewording used by Oldschool. I have seen countless threads on this forum clearly conceived with the only of aim of trolling the Wii and it's games, and the language used within them is far more direct in conveying a certain opinion. As soon as someone posts a positive story, the trolls all rush in and attempt to dismiss the merits of the game even when good hard evidence of it being notably better ...

GameSpy

Tiger Woods 10 on the Wii is the definitive golf game. Beyond the high level of immersion from the Motion Plus controls, and the many months worth of entertaining game modes, this version welcomes the widest ever audience to a "sim" sports game. EA is leveraging the Wii perfectly.