Let me ramble a bit.
He discussed Japanese culture and how wearing masks curbed the spread of the virus there so I do not know whether he is really anti-mask. Although he had a guest on, an epidemiologist, who downplayed the importance of wearing masks so maybe he worked backwards from his conclusion there. It was funny when Bill Burr called him out on it though.
I do not know where he stands politically because he also had Cornel West (a self-admitted radical left) and Bernie Sanders on and he was receptive and agreeable with what they had to say. Tony Hawk was also on his show. My point is sometimes he has some good guests on and he lets them talk at length about anything they want so I guess it's fine. I rarely listen to his show myself but it's always welcome when he has guests who I recognize.
Maybe it just goes with the territory of growing your show by having diverse voices from every walks of life. I recognize that's VERY PROBLEMATIC because some people with harmful ideologies can get mainstream and may radicalize simple-minded folks.
On the other hand, there is also the factor of giving someone enough rope to hang themselves exposing their hideous beliefs to other people making them less appealing. Pushing back will only deter his guests to say what is really on their mind hindering the audience to judge for themselves the true nature or agenda of his guests. It is up to the audience to think critically and to push back if they detect BS. To counter myself, guests with agenda will use insidious language leading to disingenuous discussions about important matters so that's dangerous too. But again, critical thinking hell even basic thinking, is all you need to parse through the likes of Ben Shapiro or Candace Owens.
Anyway, I do not even know why I wrote this. I am aware of the problems with Joe Rogan and I am not defending him in any way. I am just confused when people put him in a box but I guess that's fine too. People can think whatever they want.
Log in to comment