Something went wrong. Try again later

Giant Bomb News

234 Comments

The Story Behind Phone Story, Apple's Latest App Store Ban

Paolo Pedercini's sharp critique of Apple and modern tech consumerism was approved before it was banned.

No Caption Provided

Apple approved Phone Story for sale in its App Store last Friday. The application's developer, Molleindustria, decided to be patient and prepare a formal announcement for the week after. Just before noon, only hours prior to the official news going out, Phone Story was taken down. As of this writing, it's still not available in the App Store.

Phone Story is not a traditional piece of software. It's a game and interactive statement, using the attraction of game mechanics to pull players into a charged narrative that has a very specific message to convey. Phone Story wants to remind users about the impact their love of electronic devices and how an obsession with The New Thing has consequences around the world.

Phone Story is split into four mini-games. First, you're directing soldiers of the Democratic Republic of the Congo to maintain an efficient workforce of children extracting the resources needed for the devices we love. In another, you're directing a grounded safety net around to catch assembly line workers from committing suicide, a commentary on the ongoing tragedies at factories abroad, such as Foxconn. In the third mini-game, you're an "Apple" employee tossing devices at hungry, mindless customers. The final game invokes the dirty process of recycling discarded devices, as different iDevice pieces come down the screen.

A narrator is present throughout the entire experience, putting the mini-games in context.

Paolo Pedercini intended to make a statement, but Apple's content guidelines are not very clear.
Paolo Pedercini intended to make a statement, but Apple's content guidelines are not very clear.

30-year-old Pittsburgh, PA resident Paolo Pedercini is the creator of Phone Story, a designer unafraid to shock you--but doesn't come across as someone merely hoping to shock. He also wants you to listen.

When I first emailed Pedercini, I asked the obvious question: didn't you know this would happen?

"I'm very familiar with the app store policy and the game is designed to be compliant with it," he said. "If the project was just about being censored we could have gone further. [...] If you check the guidelines, Phone Story doesn't really violate any rule except for the generic 'excessively objectionable and crude content' and maybe the 'depiction of abuse of children.' Yes, there's dark humor and violence but it's cartoonish and stylized--way more mellow than a lot of other games on the App Store."

Pedercini wouldn't expand on Phone Story might have changed if he'd purposely gone "further," but to underscore his provocateur nature, Pedercini told me about an application he had been mulling over. It's...explicit.

"A similar project that I was planning to distribute only to jailbroken devices," he said, "involved a dominatrix talking vagina the user was supposed to lick regularly (little known fact: touch screens work with your tongue) like a virtual pet for phone fetishists."

Like I said: provocateur.

Players click/touch the children who decide to take a break from mining more materials.
Players click/touch the children who decide to take a break from mining more materials.

Pedercini received a phone call from an Apple employee named Richard when Phone Story was removed. The employee was open to a discussion, but their conversation didn't last very long. Pedercini was told his application had been removed for violating the following guidelines:

  • 15.2 Apps that depict violence or abuse of children will be rejected
  • 16.1 Apps that present excessively objectionable or crude content will be rejected
  • 21.1 Apps that include the ability to make donations to recognized charitable organizations must be free
  • 21.2 The collection of donations must be done via a web site in Safari or an SMS

Phone Story does not solicit donations through the application--that would be handled when profits came in from sales. Since Phone Story has been removed, it's unclear whether that will happen with its iOS release, as Pedercini isn't clear how many people were able to purchase the application before it was pulled down. 15.2 provides the biggest issue for Pedercini, as his depiction is front and center in Phone Story, and while he may disagree with Apple's interpretation, the App Store is curated.

"We are considering to make an app that uses broad metaphors to address the same issues," he said. "That's what directors used to do during McCarthyism and artists used to under totalitarian regimes. In an Apple-controlled technological world, where computers are replaced by dumb tablets, we'll have to resume strategies from the dark times of our history."

If you have an Android phone, you don't have to wait, as the application is now available there. I played Phone Story on my Mac and not my iPhone, thanks to a version he provided me. It's unclear if what I played will be released.

Suicide nets were installed at Foxconn facilities following a large number of employee suicides.
Suicide nets were installed at Foxconn facilities following a large number of employee suicides.

The App Store is familiar to this kind of controversy. Now former Apple CEO Steve Jobs' personal stance, which defines Apple, has been clear on pornography, but when it comes to satire, politics and social commentary, where the line should be drawn hasn't been clear.

Pulitzer winner cartoonist Mark Fiore had his application pulled for poking fun at political figures. Media outrage prompted Apple to allow it back. Such decisions come on a case-by-case basis, however, and small, independent developers like Pedercini have little way of fighting back.

"I own an iPhone and I've been following all of the issues addressed in the game--things that make me uncomfortable as a consumer and as software developer," he said. "Since the App Store [opened] people kept asking me: 'Why don't you make a game for iPhone?' and I had to talk for a while about what I think is wrong in this Apple-complex. This game is basically the answer to that simple question."

Even though Phone Story is available on Android, don't assume that's explicit approval of Google, either. Pedercini has his own concerns there, but for now, pivoting there is his only option to respond quickly.

"I'd be much happier if the game was actually available to everybody and possibly generating discussions around the issues it addresses instead of creating even more debate around the controversial App Store policies," he said.

More information on Pedercini's concerns about modern consumerism, its effects on the world, proposed solutions to the problem and what you can do to influence the cause one way or the other can be found at Phone Story's website.

Patrick Klepek on Google+

234 Comments

Avatar image for napalm
napalm

9227

Forum Posts

162

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By napalm

INB4 a bunch of self entitled babies shit on Paolo Pedercini because they claim he's "only doing it for art, and it's not art" because the fail to understand the fundamental message.

Oh, wait...

Avatar image for brocknrolla
BrockNRolla

1741

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By BrockNRolla

@Paul_Tillich: Yes, I've always been a believer in philosophy, but always with a practical edge. High ideals are key to working toward what is best for society, but they must be grounded in the real world. There is plenty of law that is the antithesis of that, but largely I think the law is a positive tool for our society. We should all hope our lawmakers are guided by higher philosophies of truth and justice for the future, though I can't say I'm confident of that across the board.

Also, neuroscience and economics? Sounds fascinating.

Avatar image for paul_tillich
Paul_Tillich

358

Forum Posts

40

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Paul_Tillich

@Jumanji: You have no imagination.

Avatar image for autobzooty
autobzooty

108

Forum Posts

2333

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 8

Edited By autobzooty

@Paul_Tillich said:

@autobzooty said:

Comparing Apple managing the content they distribute with living under a totalitarian government is pretty ridiculous. If you don't like it, don't distribute on their platform. Just because you want to develop for a platform that has a large audience doesn't mean Apple rules the world and needs to be rebelled against.

Would it be nice if Apple didn't censor the App Store? Yeah. Should you be angry or surprised when that doesn't happen? Dude...

We live in a digital age. Philosophers and theologians have been moving to social media to make their points about ethics etc. because books no longer reach an audience. Placing good business before a message about how people matter is pretty much a definition of a totalitarian government.

Apple isn't stopping him from saying what he wants to say. They're controlling the content that they distribute. Apple doesn't have a responsibility to give him a podium to stand on, and he doesn't have a right to use their distribution service for anything he wants. Apple gets to make those terms and exercise their own discretion.

If Apple was actively trying to stop his message from appearing in places outside of their own jurisdiction, you might have something a little closer to a totalitarian government. But even then, Apple isn't the government. The kind of self-victimizing and hyperbole he's exercising isn't exactly helping him out here.

Avatar image for deactivated-57d3a53d23027
deactivated-57d3a53d23027

1460

Forum Posts

121

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 5

It seems incredibly insensitive to the people who committed suicide and their families. Regardless of whether or not he is trying to spread a message. Added on-top of that it won't change anything, regardless of how many people listen or find out that it was banned from the appstore. It's significantly more insensitive than a game like Medal of Honor, because it deals with a very specific incident.

Avatar image for paul_tillich
Paul_Tillich

358

Forum Posts

40

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Paul_Tillich

@autobzooty said:

@Paul_Tillich said:

@autobzooty said:

Comparing Apple managing the content they distribute with living under a totalitarian government is pretty ridiculous. If you don't like it, don't distribute on their platform. Just because you want to develop for a platform that has a large audience doesn't mean Apple rules the world and needs to be rebelled against.

Would it be nice if Apple didn't censor the App Store? Yeah. Should you be angry or surprised when that doesn't happen? Dude...

We live in a digital age. Philosophers and theologians have been moving to social media to make their points about ethics etc. because books no longer reach an audience. Placing good business before a message about how people matter is pretty much a definition of a totalitarian government.

Apple isn't stopping him from saying what he wants to say. They're controlling the content that they distribute. Apple doesn't have a responsibility to give him a podium to stand on, and he doesn't have a right to use their distribution service for anything he wants. Apple gets to make those terms and exercise their own discretion.

If Apple was actively trying to stop his message from appearing in places outside of their own jurisdiction, you might have something a little closer to a totalitarian government. But even then, Apple isn't the government. The kind of self-victimizing and hyperbole he's exercising isn't exactly helping him out here.

You are right. Apple has no responsibility. That is also my problem. Companies that act in their best interest without concern for future consequences is a reason to be concerned; lost in recent comments about legal rights is the fact that this game meant to make a point about what is best for our species. Apple has the right to stop the message, and I have the right to refuse that a true message be stopped.

Avatar image for obinice
obinice

312

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By obinice

Quick Look.

Avatar image for claritysam
ClaritySam

645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By ClaritySam

I'm sure people will probably think I'm kissing arse, but I can honestly say I would have lost interest in GB by now if it weren't for Patrick. Good stuff yet again.

Avatar image for archteckguru8
ArchTeckGuru8

247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By ArchTeckGuru8

Man... why not make this game as a criticism?

Avatar image for ryanwho
ryanwho

12011

Forum Posts

-1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By ryanwho

Congrats to whiteboyfro for managing censorship that gives his on the nose statement a million percent more attention than it would have gotten just being allowed to exist.

Can't ask for better press.

Avatar image for applet0n
applet0n

702

Forum Posts

82

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By applet0n

@afrofools: I think you're right. I don't understand why no-one else has pointed this out.

Avatar image for phished0ne
Phished0ne

2969

Forum Posts

1841

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

Edited By Phished0ne

@Jumanji said:

@the_OFFICIAL_jAPanese_teaBAG said:

This game almost reminds me of that stupid game where you walk for 10 minutes and you have the choice to shoot a guy

Exactly. Another shit nongame that has the audacity to actually charge people money.

Im pretty sure Passage was/is free, at least on the PC/Mac it was.

edit: wrong game. sorry for my intrustion.

Avatar image for phoenix87
Phoenix87

755

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By Phoenix87

Now I want to play this game.

Avatar image for mikemcn
mikemcn

8642

Forum Posts

4863

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 8

Edited By mikemcn

That is the most unsurprising piece of news i've heard in awhile.

Avatar image for makoto_mizuhara_sakamoto
Makoto_Mizuhara_Sakamoto

598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Tommy Wiseau's latest work... "PHONE STORY"!!!

(Never coming to a theater near you due to depictions of child slavery/endangerment, suicide, and Apple's logo without Apple's permission)

Avatar image for originalgman
originalgman

306

Forum Posts

557

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By originalgman

Man, I really just don't know how to feel anymore. I already know about the horrible labor practices that go into making everything from electronics to clothes to food around the world. I know that my game consoles contain minerals that were mined in countries like the Congo and helped fund murdering guerrillas. That all sucks.

But then today, I went to an exhibit in NYC called Dialog in the Dark where you're lead through a fake city soundstage in total darkness by a real blind person equipped with nothing but a cane. You get on the subway, walk across traffic in Times Square and go shopping. He tells me how Apple has made his life so much easier with the barcode scanners in their devices that tell him everything he needs to know (cost, calories, brand) about everything in the store. Devices that only do that one function used to cost way more than a phone that also has voice GPS navigation that lets him map out his route through the city.

I hear stuff like that, and I realize how truly useful these devices can be to some people, even if all we see for the most part are people updating Twitter about what they're eating for lunch and playing time-wasting games. I guess this game isn't going to make anyone throw away their iPhone; even the guy who made it uses one. I'm a non-Apple user, so maybe I'll pick this up if only for the donation to charity it makes to stop these bad labor practices.

Avatar image for walkerd
WalkerD

507

Forum Posts

1762

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By WalkerD

This story just reminds me of how fun it would be to work at Foxconn. No need to take the elevator or the stairs, I'm taking the suicide net.

Avatar image for jaks
jaks

257

Forum Posts

18

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By jaks

"I own an iPhone"

Whoopsy-doodles. End article here. Enormous hypocrite detected.

Avatar image for stalkingturnip
StalkingTurnip

157

Forum Posts

113

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 1

Edited By StalkingTurnip

The App Store is not a right. They invented it. Even if it is a right, ou already waived it by creating an account. And if you need an iOS game to tel you where your iOS device came from you are an idiot. You should have known about this before.

Avatar image for nushi
Nushi

40

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Edited By Nushi

This is subject matter that might win awards in print media, I really appreciate tackling an issue that has some significance to it, there's none of the normal top 10 hottest babes sleaze that is associated with much of the gaming press, Bravo Mr Klepek and Giantbomb. Bravo

Avatar image for red
Red

6146

Forum Posts

598

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 11

Edited By Red

Sounds like a stupid, pretentious app about stuff we've heard a billion times before, and it sends a far greater message about apple through its rejection than its publication.

Avatar image for selbie
selbie

2602

Forum Posts

6468

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By selbie

When you throw shit in the fan, expect to get some collateral spray. He should have known the content he produced would be banned. All he had to do was disguise the bad stuff enough so that it wasn't blatantly obvious.

All companies have a responsibility to be ethical. Apple doesn't want to be seen as condoning any form or violence towards children and they have every right to enforce that on THEIR hardware. If you use their platform, you are agreeing to their policies. If someone sued Apple for allowing this content, they would have no defence in court IMO.

Yeah this shit is real, and real people are being harmed in other countries, but it's not the companies that are the problem, it's the corrupt governments that turn a blind eye. It's great to focus people's attention towards this stuff, but eventually if there is no action against the governments (a la Libya, Egypt etc.), the problem simply comes back.

Avatar image for weetle_canary
weetle_canary

6

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By weetle_canary

I think to blame the world's woes on Apple or any one company is unfair, I have had so many electronic devices that I have sent to the local recycling company, they do pay me loosely based on weight of stuff like old newspaper, old broken keyboards, mice, broken ceiling fans, broken scanners, a broken Pentium PC (this made me about US$2.3), fried motherboards, fried power supply, used batteries, you get the picture? We all have stuff, a lot of stuff.

However I still kept my first ever mobile phone, a very old Nokia, because it still works, but i'd be embarrassed to be seen with it, its not broken, but it is junk. Yeah I still use my second ever mobile phone, also a Nokia, its slow as ass, I hate it, but its all I need really, sigh #@$@&* phones.

There is no perfect world. The short solutions on Pedercini's website are nothing but naive suggestions, who will enforce them, which body? Who will pay for it ultimately? I think some of them have been suggested already elsewhere, the reason nobody does it is because everyone is a greedy corrupt ass or because these solutions don't work? At least our Xbox, PS3 and LCD TVs last 10 years am I right? But all those plastic the games come packaged with, blockbuster after blockbuster hits, oh my god, lets play them all with this baggage of planet killing guilt!

Best solution, don't buy shit you don't need. Maybe live in a cave, sell your car, better still lets all just fucking commit suicide so we consume nothing more. I'd like to sustain and improve our home planet, but come on, a game that criticizes its own distribution channel is really ironic in a jackassery sort of way. We know the planet is going to hell in a hand basket alright?!

Avatar image for big_jon
big_jon

6533

Forum Posts

2539

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 18

Edited By big_jon

I think it was I cool idea to be honest.

Avatar image for bricewgilbert
bricewgilbert

270

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 25

Edited By bricewgilbert

Missing the point if you think making it in flash and putting it up on the PC is good. The point of the content was to criticize (and possibly enlighten) the very people who are using the device. Another point is the market he feels that is being created by closed environments like apple. What if everyone had decided to do that? What if PC's or the web took that approach? We're lucky we have the web as such an open medium, but apple is the biggest company in the world and they have a lot of sway.

Besides even if apple was tiny and had no impact on the world why censor a political/educational game?

Avatar image for rain_1
Rain_1

180

Forum Posts

67

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Rain_1

I bought the app for android. It kinda works - the response on the touch controls is not perfect, but it works.

It's a nice show and tell. Apple shouldn't have removed it, because it's all true.

Avatar image for vinsanityv22
vinsanityv22

1066

Forum Posts

6

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By vinsanityv22

Ugh....I don't care what the f*** Apple is doing. I'm here to read about video games and watch videos about video games. I'm not interested in time wasting, cheaply made garbage. If I was, I'd be wasting my life in Farmville right now

Avatar image for musubi
musubi

17524

Forum Posts

5650

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 17

Edited By musubi

This is dumb. Sorry but guilting people into feeling bad over this stuff Is wrong it its own right. If we are going to start bitching about how smart phones are made lets just bust this wide open and admit that most consumer goods that aren't made domestically are probably made in sweatshop like conditions. I mean I feel bad for the people who end up in these factories making these things but I'm also not going to feel guilty for being a consumer.

Avatar image for jmrwacko
jmrwacko

2537

Forum Posts

50

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By jmrwacko

@Demoskinos said:

This is dumb. Sorry but guilting people into feeling bad over this stuff Is wrong it its own right. If we are going to start bitching about how smart phones are made lets just bust this wide open and admit that most consumer goods that aren't made domestically are probably made in sweatshop like conditions. I mean I feel bad for the people who end up in these factories making these things but I'm also not going to feel guilty for being a consumer.

You have a responsibility as a consumer to not consume things that were made under immoral conditions. It's like how you'd have a responsibility not to accept hush money after witnessing a murder.

Avatar image for jmrwacko
jmrwacko

2537

Forum Posts

50

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By jmrwacko

@Paul_Tillich said:

I was once proud to be part of the Giantbomb community...but at least people have shown their true colors now so I can be less engaged. I thought this place was above knee jerk-off comments one would find on IGN and Gamespot...

Nope, Giantbomb got popular after Gamespot and gamespy went to shit, so you get those users here too. At least they're articulate.

Avatar image for mcshank
McShank

1700

Forum Posts

920

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By McShank

@rebgav said:

"A similar project that I was planning to distribute only to jailbroken devices," he said, "involved a dominatrix talking vagina the user was supposed to lick regularly (little known fact: touch screens work with your tongue) like a virtual pet for phone fetishists."

That is the new best thing on Giant Bomb.

Id buy it.

Avatar image for ley_lines
Ley_Lines

313

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Ley_Lines

I dislike this game not from the message, content or graphics. The only games that should be on the app store that end in "story" are Kairosoft games. Kairosoft would have made a kick ass iphone story game, it would about brand marketing, proper management and score multipliers.

Avatar image for godzilla_sushi
godzilla_sushi

1353

Forum Posts

402

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 19

Edited By godzilla_sushi

My feeling on the issue will be lost in the ether, and rightly so! I would never be able to make my point elegant like all of you.

But....I'll join the masses and say that this fell in a gray area where a person with common sense would say "Yeah, maybe it breaks some rules, but the overall message is positive. Pass." There aren't a lot of places for wiggle room when Apple says explicitly "This is the game we intend for you not to make. This is the kind of game we aren't willing to move the line on." In some ways, the smart phone has been an amazing way for people to communicate and share new ideas. But the truth is that there are a few companies that hold all the rules close, and they will not open it up for anyone, ever. The idea is wonderful, but the outlet might not be the best place.

Expecting someone to read through pages and pages of the rules that are now implemented from everyone is a consumer choice but totally unreasonable. Hopefully there will be places that the message can be heard. News stories like this shine a spotlight on a problem that consumers might be innocently ignorant to. I know when I was 6, or 12, or 18, I was unaware of individuals my age working under poor conditions to birth the devices I use to this day. The e-waste is excessive and depressing for many Eastern countries. Getting the message and awareness out there will always work when sites like Giantbomb are willing to inform their readers of it.

Avatar image for mudman
MudMan

1423

Forum Posts

300

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 11

Edited By MudMan

@BrockNRolla said:

@NoelVeiga said:

And that's why I present this as a moral issue, not a legal issue. If they had banned an aggregator of child porn... well, that software would probably be illegal anyway, but still, we wouldn't be discussing this. Because on the moral sphere, that ban is appropriate. Banning this software because it's bad PR for them in a platform that is a medium for creative expression for artists, though is bullshit. As in "it's a morally indefensible position by a corporate agent over an act of expression by an individual that they just happen to be able to legally curtail".

Also, and this may be getting a bit too technical for the venue, I suggest not mistaking the right for the articulation of it. Granted, there is an inherent value that is protected with property rights, which is ultimately what Apple is exercising here in regards to their app store, but when you see the app store as a public communications medium that is a majority controller of what ammounts to a duopoly over a mass communications medium, there are more relevant rights than property at stake, and free speech is one of them. There's a reason why many countries limit the amount of newspapers or TV networks a single corporation can own, and this kind of crap is it. Apple may not be in that much of a position of power yet, but them pulling this sort of thing suggests that if they were to be, they'd need to be limited in their ability to curate, as you put it, the content in their store.

BUT, that is why the law is important here. The App Store is not a public communications medium, it is a commercial property. While you may feel that there are more relevant rights than property here, the US court system does not agree. Property rights are some of the most enshrined and protected rights in this country, and the courts have repeatedly upheld a store's right to refuse to carry products. The only cases in which property rights have even been disputed in terms of freedom of expression have been when property owners have opened themselves up to free public use, such as denying someone the right to protest in the walkways of a privately owned mall. Given that Apple is the gatekeeper, the accepter, the reviewer, and seller of all products within the store, they haven't opened themselves to the public at all.

If that sounds dangerous, then that's a relavant opinion. But the law of the US doesn't currently say that freedom of expression can be allowed to override other basic rights like another's right to property.

See, that's where we don't agree. The app store is absolutely a public communications medium. It just happens to have been created by a private company.That's also true of the printing press, the television or the telephone, though, and nobody disputes their public communications status. Imagine if a phone company tried to prevent you from speaking about certain things over the phone because they "own the line". It IS true, but we have accepted that the medium is public, it's just the management of it that is private.

On the Internet, that realization is still not there, and it's even less so on the notion that these days digital stores are actually public communication channels. The app store isn't just a storefront, it's the platform through which artists reach out to people, the same way that CNN is a platform for jounalists and HBO a platform for artists. While I'm willing to accept that we must give those corporations a lot of leeway to decide what they want to air or not, there are limitations in place for them, and if a single corporation controlled a large portion of the available communications channels for news or for video-based fiction it would be both a competitive concern and a concern for free speech.

Apple might not be there to an extent where law needs to get in place to regulate their ability to manage their own storefront, but it's certainly close enough that I have a moral problem with them shooting down specific products based on PR concerns. I'm saying that this issue is certainly not within the confines of legal action, but it absolutely warrants people having a moral concern with it. And that's also their right. We may not be able to request Apple to not do this out of a legal issue with free speech, but it is certainly reasonable to consider it an immoral, shitty thing to do and call them out on it, even if they are legally entitled to do it.

Avatar image for mudman
MudMan

1423

Forum Posts

300

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 11

Edited By MudMan

@Deathpooky said:

@NoelVeiga: I don't really know what to say. If you think the only way you can make an impact is voting, then I disagree with you, especially if you think something like humanely raised meat is only a scam by corporations to get people to pay more. Change can happen from above, but it also can happen from below, and I'd argue a change from below is more effective and more comprehensive.

There might still be morally problematic products out there even if you refuse to buy them, but if you get enough people to buy morally clean products then there's that much less bad stuff out there. One person buying locally raised and non-factory meat or cage-free eggs has at least the impact of that one person buying it, even if there are 100 people buying McDonald's next door. The more people that buy the better product, the more companies will do it. Eventually if that's a market leading position, then everyone will do it, and we largely eliminate the problem. As I said, it's happened before without government intervention in numerous areas. If enough consumers request something, it gets fixed.

And I don't even get your Infiniti reference. Nobody is saying that you need to entirely devote your life to charity, donate every bit of money you make to saving lives, or refuse to buy anything that has any moral issues. But that's not a reason to never donate to charity or never consider what's behind the things you buy. Charity or thoughtful consumer purchases aren't all or nothing propositions.

" If you get enough people to buy morally clean products then there's that much less bad stuff out there" is exactly my point. The way to do that? Politics and legislation.

Just the economics of the situation mean that the premium-cost product is rarely going to make it not profitable to sell the cheaper, more profitable product that also requires these moral compromises. Economics are about buying cheap and selling expensive. Moral concerns suck and decreasing demand to the point where selling expensive is no longer possible. That's not a pattern of economy, that's embracing a wasteful option for the sake of human morality.

Making a compromise that is more expensive for the higher good is the realm of politics, not of economics.

Morally, and that's where Louie CK's my life is evil bit comes in, making marketplace choices because of moral reasons is always just a patch. If you avoid killing people with your car but still kill people with your phone or your TV or your sneakers, then you're not preventing morally compromised products, you're just creating a market for the Prius. If you want to stop the moral problem overall, you need to regulate it.

I'm not saying that buying products that don't engage in shady practices is a *bad* thing, but I'd like people to realize that it does more to make the customer feel good than it does to stop the problem. That requires larger sacrifices and paying much more attention to boring stuff like politics and economy, You don't get to save the world and go shopping at the same time. It takes more than that.

Avatar image for musubi
musubi

17524

Forum Posts

5650

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 17

Edited By musubi

@jmrwacko: And as I said thats half the goddamn products we use on an average day.

Avatar image for christianiscooldood
christianiscooldood

10

Forum Posts

10

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

It makes sense why Apple would ban this. But think about it: if it wasn't banned, then the only people who would know about it are people who already own iPhones and browse the app store. It wouldn't have stopped anyone from buying an iPhone because the customer base was exclusively people who owns iPhones. Now, he is going to potentially bring it to a different market, and it is getting infinitely more press than it would have.

Avatar image for seriouslynow
SeriouslyNow

8504

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By SeriouslyNow

@SSully said:

DOWN WITH THE SYSTEM!

But in all seriousness it makes sense why this was taken down. It doesnt matter how stylized the graphics are, it depicts people killing themselves, illegal child labor and the most obvious thing it does is openly insult the company who owns the device he is trying to put the game on.

With all that said do I support apples decision? No, I am all for open systems, but if I ran apples app store I personally wouldn't let this shit on there.

Also I would like to try this, but this guy has another thing coming if he thinks I am going to pay a dollar to experience this "game"

Oh yeah of course that makes sense. Just like Director of the iTunes being able to promote and sell his own, guideline breaking, fart app. The guidelines got changed when he caught selling just the kind of apps that he blocked other people from selling. I can't see why you wouldn't want to pay for this but you'd probably pay to watch something like Tropic Thunder. Both are parodies which aim to inform and offend using humour. You seem confused, you're all for Open Systems but you're happy that Apple is able to suppress the truth of their nefarious business practices and the income of creative people just so they can look good and yet continue to do nefarious shit.

Avatar image for hagridore
hagridore

529

Forum Posts

481

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 21

Edited By hagridore

@Vonocourt: Wow, I had no idea. Sounds like a nightmare.

Avatar image for rheinmetall
Rheinmetall

179

Forum Posts

504

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 6

Edited By Rheinmetall

I'm against banning, and against big companies, but I think this game developer has gone too far with Phone Story. Probably the whole reaction, including mine, is hypocritical, but it's not right to play with other people's tragedies.

Avatar image for rageexpressive
RageExpressive

57

Forum Posts

321

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By RageExpressive

I don't know why the community is so dismissive of this game because of the message it tries to convey. The message is not a nice thing, but its certainly true, and as usual, the world decides to turn a blind eye to the bad things and act like its all nice and rosy in the garden.

A lot of you say that its not the companies, but the countries...If the companies would stop funding the corrupt governments by paying a slight extra, there would be no problem.

Avatar image for angryredplumber
AngryRedPlumber

273

Forum Posts

1280

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 8

Edited By AngryRedPlumber

@jmrwacko said:

@Demoskinos said:

This is dumb. Sorry but guilting people into feeling bad over this stuff Is wrong it its own right. If we are going to start bitching about how smart phones are made lets just bust this wide open and admit that most consumer goods that aren't made domestically are probably made in sweatshop like conditions. I mean I feel bad for the people who end up in these factories making these things but I'm also not going to feel guilty for being a consumer.

You have a responsibility as a consumer to not consume things that were made under immoral conditions. It's like how you'd have a responsibility not to accept hush money after witnessing a murder.

I agree, @jmrwacko. We can't just turn a blind eye to the effects of our actions because they are so prevalent. That "feeling bad" you spoke of, @Demoskinos, is your conscious telling you something is wrong. Do not ignore it because our culture approves of it.

Also, I think censorship is never acceptable, unless it is stopping the spread of hatred or bigotry. However, I feel like this App should have been free of charge, or its proceeds should all go to a charity promoting the issues that its creator has taken issue with. But perhaps I misunderstood and that actually is the case.

Thank you, Patrick. You continue to put Giant Bomb well above the rest!

Avatar image for krelle
Krelle

180

Forum Posts

130

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Edited By Krelle

@vinsanityv22 said:

Ugh....I don't care what the f*** Apple is doing. I'm here to read about video games and watch videos about video games. I'm not interested in time wasting, cheaply made garbage. If I was, I'd be wasting my life in Farmville right now

Well, you are a minority. One could say Giant Bomb is not for you.

Avatar image for avantegardener
avantegardener

2491

Forum Posts

165

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 11

Edited By avantegardener

Smashing article Kleppers (that's my new pet name for you) nailing it as usual.

Avatar image for zabant
Zabant

1544

Forum Posts

82

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Zabant

@Warchief said:

add this to the list of reasons apple no longer used the tag line "Think Different" .

This just in, the new slongan is "Apple: You'll buy it anyway."

Avatar image for discoman
Discoman

203

Forum Posts

1086

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Discoman

None of this comes as a surprise. All Apple ever had was a good ad campaign. I remember people soiling themselves back in 2006, waiting for Apple to talk about a video IPod. If they looked on the market they'd see that it's been done, but no that doesn't matter because APPLE hasn't graced us with it yet. Horse shit. People are such drones when it comes to apple products. Frankly, I've never seen such a product go through so many iterations in such a short amount of time, each with such minuscule differences.

As for all this people exploitation: welcome to capitalism; it is about the quick and easy buck. You don't like it? Tough, cause there's no way around it. Why is the US of A involved in the Mideast to everyone's disdain? Oil, it makes the world go round. This is no different.

Avatar image for napalm
napalm

9227

Forum Posts

162

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By napalm

@Discoman said:

None of this comes as a surprise. All Apple ever had was a good ad campaign. I remember people soiling themselves back in 2006, waiting for Apple to talk about a video IPod. If they looked on the market they'd see that it's been done, but no that doesn't matter because APPLE hasn't graced us with it yet. Horse shit. People are such drones when it comes to apple products. Frankly, I've never seen such a product go through so many iterations in such a short amount of time, each with such minuscule differences.

As for all this people exploitation: welcome to capitalism; it is about the quick and easy buck. You don't like it? Tough, cause there's no way around it. Why is the US of A involved in the Mideast to everyone's disdain? Oil, it makes the world go round. This is no different.

This isn't a place for your soapbox.

Avatar image for boodoug187
BooDoug187

494

Forum Posts

5378

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By BooDoug187

Found it funny that he makes it sound like only Apple products are guilty of these things but in reality all modern electronics have the same dark back story, only reason Apple was exposed was because A) its the hot new item and B) There are many Apple haters who will go out of the way to say that they are the main evil in the world.

If you do a game like this, show everything, show that PS3, 360, Wii, Android phone, flat panel tvs, dvds, blu-rays, even the computer he used to make this game all come from the Congo mines, the Chinese labor city factories, and in the end all of them get discarded to nasty places where people make hardly pennies to "recycle" the parts.

If you are going to make a protest, you go all out, you show everything or you just look like another "oh boo I hate [X] company cause they do bad things... dont look in my room for every other high end electronic product that goes through the same shit for their items!"

Avatar image for mikkaq
MikkaQ

10296

Forum Posts

52

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By MikkaQ

Dumb tablets? Luddites!

Avatar image for musubi
musubi

17524

Forum Posts

5650

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 17

Edited By musubi

@AngryRedPlumber: See that's the thing I don't and refuse to feel bad over this. And if you do like I said by all means start chucking all your electronics out the window including whatever phone/computer you used to post on here.