Something went wrong. Try again later
    Follow

    Brink

    Game » consists of 10 releases. Released May 10, 2011

    A multiplayer-focused, class-based first-person shooter running on id Tech 4, in which oppressive soldiers and anarchistic terrorists battle for the few remaining resources on a failed paradise known as the Ark.

    So, do You think Jeff Should also Review the PC Version?

    • 67 results
    • 1
    • 2
    Avatar image for funexplosions
    FunExplosions

    5534

    Forum Posts

    -1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #1  Edited By FunExplosions
    Avatar image for funexplosions
    FunExplosions

    5534

    Forum Posts

    -1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #2  Edited By FunExplosions

    Also, polls are funky again. Kinda hard to get one going outside of the main forum topics.


    Edit: Clicky here. Seems people are jumping to the conclusion that the PC version is the same as PC versions traditionally are. This is not true.
    Avatar image for n7
    N7

    4159

    Forum Posts

    23

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 4

    User Lists: 2

    #3  Edited By N7

    No. Because when you get down to it: Who really cares anymore? Brink isn't worth it. The entire internet agrees.

    If you like it, good. But move on with your life already.

    Avatar image for twazuk
    Twazuk

    208

    Forum Posts

    2

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #4  Edited By Twazuk

    There's nothing wrong with liking a shit game.

    Get over it.
    Avatar image for portis
    Portis

    1295

    Forum Posts

    7315

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #5  Edited By Portis

    No, just leave it be. He called the game ass, some people disagreed with it (including myself) and now it's done.

    I just don't see what the point would be to review the PC version. It's the same game but with a mouse and keyboard -- he's still not going to like it.
    Avatar image for funexplosions
    FunExplosions

    5534

    Forum Posts

    -1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #6  Edited By FunExplosions

    For the record: I don't have the game. Never will. Not my cup of semen.


    Edit: I mean tea
    Avatar image for subjugation
    Subjugation

    4993

    Forum Posts

    963

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #7  Edited By Subjugation
    @FunExplosions
    What exactly would necessitate another review? The majority of the gameplay design remains unchanged from version to version and I don't think many of his complaints would be addressed. Plus I'm sure the poor man is having PTSD episodes due to that game now. I'm genuinely interested in your perspective though.
    Avatar image for sethphotopoulos
    SethPhotopoulos

    5777

    Forum Posts

    3465

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 8

    #8  Edited By SethPhotopoulos

    Not enough of a difference to matter.

    Avatar image for funexplosions
    FunExplosions

    5534

    Forum Posts

    -1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #9  Edited By FunExplosions
    @weeman105: The buzz is that the PC version is significantly better. Great, in fact. Chickity check it
    Avatar image for marz
    Marz

    6097

    Forum Posts

    755

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 5

    User Lists: 11

    #10  Edited By Marz

    The game isn't drastically different on the PC to warrant a rereview.  

    Avatar image for grindedstone
    GrindedStone

    39

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 4

    User Lists: 0

    #11  Edited By GrindedStone

     

    Yes, review it on the moble phone. 

    Oh, I mean PC.

     

    It's the same GD turd on PC, but we need a second opinion.

    Because a lot of folks are having fun playing it.

    Avatar image for professoress
    ProfessorEss

    7962

    Forum Posts

    160

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 11

    #12  Edited By ProfessorEss

    Whatever.

    Avatar image for daveyo520
    Daveyo520

    7766

    Forum Posts

    624

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 12

    #13  Edited By Daveyo520

    Move on people.

    Avatar image for wickedcobra03
    WickedCobra03

    2375

    Forum Posts

    587

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 8

    #14  Edited By WickedCobra03
    @SethPhotopoulos said:
    " Not enough of a difference to matter. "
    That is how I feel.  I think Jeff is usually pretty good at fairly playing games, and I think he will play the PC version just out of his own curiosity.  But again,  don't think it will change the score much. I have not played the game, but I feel like this game is going to generally the same experience on PC.  Sure, maybe there are going to be a few more players and server browsers are always great; I personally wish they would bring them back to consoles games.  But it sounds like Jeffs biggest problem with this game is the mechanics and more than anything lasting appeal.  I will give this a go maybe when  it becomes cheaper.  I don't mind buying online only games like Battlefield 1942.  I jumped on that game day one in 2002ish, which was before online-only games were an ok thing to do.

    60 bucks is a lot to spend on an amazing game let alone just an "alright" game.  I can see the appeal, I dropped $40 on Battlefield 1942 day one when it came out considering how janky it was.
    Avatar image for bravestar
    Bravestar

    390

    Forum Posts

    1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #16  Edited By Bravestar

    Surely if he reviews it a second time he will see the light! oh wait it's a bad game... nevermind.

    Avatar image for wintersnowblind
    WinterSnowblind

    7599

    Forum Posts

    41

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 4

    #17  Edited By WinterSnowblind

    Haven't played the console version but the PC version is pretty bad and I agree with pretty much everything Jeff said in the review for the Xbox version.

    Doesn't seem like any need to review it again and I'd even go as far to say those who are claiming the PC version is "significantly better" are just clutching at straws, desperately trying to defend the game.
    Avatar image for dagas
    dagas

    3686

    Forum Posts

    851

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 8

    #18  Edited By dagas

    You'd have a greater chance making him re-endure Persona 4 than do another review of Brink, I think.

    Avatar image for ahmadmetallic
    AhmadMetallic

    19300

    Forum Posts

    -1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 11

    #19  Edited By AhmadMetallic

    Jeff doesn't know how to use WASD

    Avatar image for fox01313
    fox01313

    5256

    Forum Posts

    2246

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 19

    #20  Edited By fox01313

    Not sure if he should do an official review of it but someone at GB should look in on the PC version & compare notes with the 360 review and either put up a separate review or just talk about the PC version on the bombcast as I'm curious to see how it fares.

    Avatar image for vexxan
    Vexxan

    4642

    Forum Posts

    943

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #21  Edited By Vexxan

    No, he should not.

    Avatar image for nekusakuraba
    NekuSakuraba

    7810

    Forum Posts

    1670

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #22  Edited By NekuSakuraba
    @RiotBananas said:
    " I am already fucking sick of people trying to think of ways to make this game better 'Oh play it with a full group' or 'Play the PC Version' Shut the fuck up, it's just a bad game. "
    @N7 said:
    " No. Because when you get down to it: Who really cares anymore? Brink isn't worth it. The entire internet agrees.If you like it, good. But move on with your life already. "
    You guys are SO wrong.
    Avatar image for oginam
    Oginam

    459

    Forum Posts

    242

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 4

    #23  Edited By Oginam
    @RiotBananas said:
    " I am already fucking sick of people trying to think of ways to make this game better 'Oh play it with a full group' or 'Play the PC Version' Shut the fuck up, it's just a bad game. "

    The same can be said of Team Fortress 2 and Monday Night Combat. Team based and heavy objective based shooters are only "good" for a general audience given certain circumstances.

    The game has a lot of flaws and is most definitely not worth $60. That being said, I actually own the game and have played it - unlike, I would surmise, the majority of people saying its a shit game based on Jeff's or (God forbid) Mcelroy's review without having played it themselves.

    This is a Demon's Souls situation. Initial impression by the GB crew is that it is shit so that gets repeated by everyone on the Whiskey sites (like Will Smith on the Tested podcast and Joey on TNT, neither have played the game but feel just fine bashing it). However (and not to compare Demon's Souls to Brink in terms of quality) it is entirely possible for a review or quick look to distort the basic conceits of a game, how it is played or meant to be, and focus far too heavily on minor negative aspects.

    I don't disagree with the game getting 2 stars as a single player experience/offline bot game - shit, I would probably give it 1 star there. On the PC, with a group of real players (which is the only way I have played by and large) this is a solid albeit flawed team based shooter - worth at least a 3.5 given those specific circumstances (which most reviewers didn't wait for because there has to be a review on day one). So even the 80s on metacritic are BS, this whole thing is just kinda screwed really. "shrugs"
    Avatar image for ryno9881
    ryno9881

    652

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 4

    #24  Edited By ryno9881

    This game is getting more attention then it deserves.

    Avatar image for dingofighter
    Dingofighter

    1888

    Forum Posts

    251

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #25  Edited By Dingofighter

    If he feels it's different enough to warrant it's own review, then yes.

    Otherwise it's not really needed, is it?
    Avatar image for owl_of_minerva
    owl_of_minerva

    1485

    Forum Posts

    3260

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 1

    #26  Edited By owl_of_minerva

    People taking GB's review as gospel is far worse than Brink could ever be. Sounds like a borderline broken console version was released, but is not reflective of the experience on all versions necessarily. I see no point in a PC review though because this isn't a review site and completeness in reviewing is not a priority. If they didn't generate traffic I don't think they'd do them at all.

    It would be nice if people read a little bit more critically before parroting the opinions of others.

    Avatar image for chontamenti
    Chontamenti

    157

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #27  Edited By Chontamenti
    @RYNO9881 said:
    " This game is getting more attention then it deserves. "
    I have to agree.
    ------
    I voted for NO.
    Avatar image for scarace360
    scarace360

    4813

    Forum Posts

    41

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #28  Edited By scarace360
    @Ahmad_Metallic said:
    " Jeff doesn't know how to use WASD "
    O SNAP!  You tell me
    Avatar image for phantomzxro
    phantomzxro

    1613

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #29  Edited By phantomzxro

    I say no i don't see the point in it. Say what you will about jeff views on the game, but i don't see them changing much for the PC.
    Avatar image for deactivated-57beb9d651361
    deactivated-57beb9d651361

    4541

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 4

    @N7 said:
    " No. Because when you get down to it: Who really cares anymore? Brink isn't worth it. The entire internet agrees.If you like it, good. But move on with your life already. "
    I wouldn't say that, it's actually had pretty decent reviews across the board.

    ...but, no. He should not review the PC version. He doesn't care for the game; let's move on.
    Avatar image for phrosnite
    phrosnite

    3528

    Forum Posts

    1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 5

    #32  Edited By phrosnite

    No.

    Avatar image for somejerk
    SomeJerk

    4077

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #33  Edited By SomeJerk

    There's a day and night difference console Brink to PC Brink.

    It should maybe not be reviewed, but it should be given a quick look.

    And Bethesda should send a free copy out.. to all the reviewers who gave the 360 Brink that got such bad scores, something else to look at.

    Avatar image for yanngc33
    Yanngc33

    4551

    Forum Posts

    87219

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 14

    User Lists: 5

    #34  Edited By Yanngc33

    The shooting is imprecise on consoles but the concept and gameplay are just lame and don't deserve a second look. Plus he's probably busy playing LA Noire

    Avatar image for jams
    Jams

    3043

    Forum Posts

    131

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 5

    #35  Edited By Jams
    @RiotBananas said:
    " @Oginam Sorry, you lost me when you called this a Demons Souls situation.That game was genuinely good.Brink is just another FPS with some light objective modes that won't last more than a month.I cannot believe people are coming out of the woodwork to defend such a mediocre title. "
    How do you know it's good? How much time have you spent with the game?  If the answer is, "I haven't actually played Brink but I" let me stop you right there. The only opinion you should have on the game is, "It doesn't look like it's for me so I didn't buy it.". If the answer is, "I've spent a couple of hours and I didn't like it" then you have a right to state your opinions.

    In all honesty I believe 9 out of 10 people that bash Brink haven't even played the game but go posting in the forums saying how the game is a joke "let's move on" using points they pulled from poor reviews.  It's going to be hard going forward believing any user reviews. It's so easy just to jump on the bandwagon, state some cons of the game you read and bash the game even though you never played it.

    Having said all that I believe a PC quick look could be warranted but from some one who actually likes to play PC FPS. Which I'm not sure any GB staff do. They seem to be more into "Let's run through this game, review it and go on to the next one".
    Avatar image for emkeighcameron
    emkeighcameron

    1895

    Forum Posts

    30

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #36  Edited By emkeighcameron

    I own it on the PC and I feel like I got ripped off. There's nowhere near 60 bucks of content and the game plays like crap. So, no, Jeff doesn't need to do a PC review.

    Avatar image for darkerkamikaze
    Darkerkamikaze

    54

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #37  Edited By Darkerkamikaze

    They should go back and redo every review they've ever done! Honestly I'm enjoying Brink, Jeff didn't, who cares just play the game.

    Avatar image for hzaife
    Hzaife

    166

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #38  Edited By Hzaife

    Brink is bad, lets not subject Jeff to anymore of this

    Avatar image for rolyatkcinmai
    Rolyatkcinmai

    2763

    Forum Posts

    16308

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 5

    #39  Edited By Rolyatkcinmai

    My opinion of the game is that it is decent. His opinion is that it is crap. Do I care? Not really.

    Avatar image for deactivated-5ba16609964d9
    deactivated-5ba16609964d9

    3361

    Forum Posts

    28

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 20

    Brinkgate 2011 is at almost an 8.8 level of annoyance. 
    Seriously other then a mouse and keyboard and possible better graphic, how huge of a difference is there in the PC version then the console one?  If you like Brink  then what the fuck difference does it matter if Jeff Gertsman hates it ?  Will the PC version change Jeff's opinion is such a dramatic matter that he will spend over 20 minutes on Bombcast apologizing for his mistake and offering Epic Mickeys to those he wronged with his 2 Star review of Brink? 

    Jeff hated Spider-Man: Shattered Dimensions yet I disagreed but rather then bitch about it I thought maybe it isn't his cup of tea and went about my day.

    Avatar image for guts450
    guts450

    19

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #41  Edited By guts450

    I got the pc version, its alright, but I wouldn't ask for another review. Personally I like the game but I'm not gonna throw a shit fit cause GB didn't.  And honestly I can't see there being much of a difference between the versions, if you like it you like it, if you don't then then you don't.

    Avatar image for brendan
    Brendan

    9414

    Forum Posts

    533

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 7

    #42  Edited By Brendan

    I'd rather he spend time reviewing L.A. Noire.  

    Avatar image for wacomole
    Wacomole

    1194

    Forum Posts

    681

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #43  Edited By Wacomole

    If only there was a gaming site on the internet that had a massive user-editable wiki section that would allow users to highlight the differences between the 360, PS3 and PC versions and maybe even write their own reviews.

    Oh well we can dream.

    Avatar image for deadlywolverine
    DeadlyWolverine

    33

    Forum Posts

    25

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #44  Edited By DeadlyWolverine

    From the overview of Brink, we should just move on and seek to review new games.
    Just because it is Bethesda doesn't mean the game is fantastic, sometimes a reputation like that can harm expectations as well.
    I was let down expecting more from this game, such a sad string of events.

    Avatar image for jimbo
    Jimbo

    10472

    Forum Posts

    2

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #45  Edited By Jimbo

    I think they (Splash Damage / Bethesda) should have just handled the review process for their blatantly multiplayer-focused game in a less n00b way.

    Avatar image for benjaebe
    benjaebe

    2868

    Forum Posts

    7204

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 6

    #46  Edited By benjaebe

    The PC version has it's own host of issues. Some ATI cards can't even run the game properly, there's some serious lag issues and some levels cut out sound completely. I don't think reviewing Brink on PC would make Jeff like the game anymore. After playing it for a bit on PC the shooting still feels kind of weak and unsatisfying. Yeah, the issues might not be as egregious but at the end of the day a lot of people still don't like how Brink plays, regardless of platform. Move on and stop complaining.

    Avatar image for mystyr_e
    Mystyr_E

    1475

    Forum Posts

    24

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 93

    User Lists: 4

    #47  Edited By Mystyr_E

    Somebody might mention it on the podcast like "I played Brink on the PC, it was...." but a re-review? No way

    Avatar image for jeffsekai
    Jeffsekai

    7162

    Forum Posts

    1060

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 5

    #48  Edited By Jeffsekai

    NOPE

    Avatar image for oginam
    Oginam

    459

    Forum Posts

    242

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 4

    #49  Edited By Oginam
    @RiotBananas: I wasn't comparing the quality of the two games, just that the Quick Look (and in Brink's case, the reviews as well) aren't the best reflection of the game's strengths. In Brink's case, Jeff's dislike of the worst parts of the game is understandable but there is a fairly lacking commentary from him or other reviewers on the game's few good points - due in large part to the lack of a community for playing multiplayer during the review cycle/time frame. I guess that is me defending the game...but I see it more as me not agreeing with the way people are calling it shit without having played it.

    I guess I'm saying the "Brink is shit" talk is somewhat equivalent (or at least reminiscent for me) to the "Demon's Souls is too hard and thus shit" talk in terms of how quickly a game can acquire a reputation based on a few opinions that are then repeated by people who have not and will never play the game regardless.
    Avatar image for jp_russell
    JP_Russell

    1195

    Forum Posts

    1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #50  Edited By JP_Russell

    No, most of the things Jeff takes issue with wouldn't really be lessened in the PC version. 

     

    I have thought from the start of playing this game that it must be abnormally difficult to play with a gamepad compared to other shooters because of how inaccurate the guns are, especially when moving, and yet how much you have to be constantly on the move.  I also think the whole SMART movement wouldn't work as easily on a gamepad as it's more dependent on your turning ability than your lateral movement (i.e., you can't sprint diagonally, so you have to depend on your ability to aim wherever you want to [or don't want to] perform a maneuver, while also being able to quickly aim and shoot at an enemy immediately before or after).  I think all shooters play leaps and bounds better with a mouse and keyboard regardless, but moreso than normal in Brink's case.

     

    However, most of the things that put Jeff off of the game still exist on the PC, and I don't see his verdict being much different.  He might find the gameplay a little smoother on the PC, but the framework that he criticized so much will have the same perceived flaws.

     

    Furthermore, Jeff is a dedicated console gamer, so even if he were to play with a mouse and keyboard, he's wired to have a propensity at this point to move, behave, and think the way he would with the limitations of a gamepad (until he played enough to rewire his brain for the different control input, which he would never do), so I doubt it would give him a huge boost.

    This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:

    Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

    Comment and Save

    Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.