So I picked up Bulletstorm knowing I could run it but for some reason the game is going past around 30fps even when I turn V-Sync off, I even put my settings to medium but still my framerate was low. Specs - 
 

Intel Core i7 920 2.66Ghz, 8MB Cache, 1066Mhz FSB, Quad Core 

Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5, X58/ICH10R Chipset, 6x DDR3 2000, 2x PCI-E x16, 2x GB LAN, SATAII, RAID 0/1/10, 8 Ch Audio, ATX 

eVGA GeForce GTX260 (675Mhz), 896MB DDR3 (2304Mhz), PCI-E 2.0, Exhaust Cooled, 2x DVI, HDCP, HDTV(Super Clocked Edition) 

Corsair 6GB Kit (3x2GB), PC-12800 (1600MHz) DDR3, Dominator DHX, 7-7-7-20, Triple Channel Kit 

Western Digital 1TB, Caviar Black, SATA-II, 7200RPM, 32MB Cache 

Windows 7 home edition 64bit 
 
 Any suggestions on what to do? 
 
Thanks.

No idea why that would happen, your specs are good enough i think.. 
hope you get it fixed brah !

I don't think there's any problem with your specs. I don't know why this would happen.

You're not alone bro.
I've got a 
AMD Athlon 4 cores @ 3.0Ghz
GTX 460 overclocked 
 
Game is still choppy, :/ I say it's a bad job on their coders for pc.
 
Don't worry, Battlefield 3 is being primarily made for pc so you have that to look forward to :)

" You're not alone bro. I've got a  AMD Athlon 4 cores @ 3.0Ghz GTX 460 overclocked   Game is still choppy, :/ I say it's a bad job on their coders for pc.  Don't worry, Battlefield 3 is being primarily made for pc so you have that to look forward to :) "

Here  http://www.bulletstormforum.com/bulletstorm-pc/567-definitive-fix-graphics-errors.html

I hope I can get a refund on the game.

This is why People Can Fly didn't put out a PC demo. 
 
Because it's a lazy console port that also happens to be badly optimized.  

I never unerstand how people can have issues with PC games on monster rigs. 
 
I only run a Phenom 955, 4GB DDR3 with an HD4870, but I get next to perfect performance on literally every game I've tried, incl. Crysis. 
 
It obviously sounds like a poor-port.

I was sure I read somewhere that Bulletstorm is having issues with PCs of all sorts. Been searching for it, but I havent locked it down yet.  
 
Edit: Just found it. Ars Technica article. 

" This is why People Can Fly didn't put out a PC demo.  Because it's a lazy console port that also happens to be badly optimized.   "

I had the same problems with everything on high, vsync on and AA at x8, but turning off vsync and putting AA down to x2 managed to fix it. Now it runs fairly consistently at 62 fps, though as a result of turning vsync off there's some pretty bad screen tearing. Still, better than having the game run like junk.

"Here  http://www.bulletstormforum.com/bulletstorm-pc/567-definitive-fix-graphics-errors.html "

" @CaptainObvious said:

"Here  http://www.bulletstormforum.com/bulletstorm-pc/567-definitive-fix-graphics-errors.html "

Interesting article. I cannot believe they tried to half-ass lock away mouse smoothing, that is an on/off function I have seen many times.  I'm a little disappointed (again) with the attitude towards pc gaming lately by various groups, such a devs or the sites that review these games. Perhaps frustrated is a better word, because I kind of get this behind the scenes hostility almost, be it because of Pirating, preference of developing for or playing on, or just the fact PC gaming is not a democratic as consoles. There is no leveling device that everyone has the same thing. Plus, and I agree, Pc's can be a hassle in various ways. But again I t get this vibe of antagonism that is soft, it never proclaims itself, it just shuffles away for various reasons Pc development to the other studio, treats it as a console port which is ass-backwards technically, and often fails to provide the same perks such as dlc. I am thinking of such GB favs as Borderlands or Dead Space 2 here. Granted if it is Starcraft 2, ppl. will say their love of the game and such refutes this, but at the end of the day, it's really they do not have any choice in the matter.  I'm not a big proponent of PC gaming, Bulletstorm might have been a better game on the 360. Or PS3. Though when I think of Painkiller and the Pc approach there and such, and not just the weapons, well, yeah People can fly was the developer, and yeah, I hear nice guns again. Okay. But keyboard and mouse were intrinsic to that game.  Oh well. I guess I would tell you my impression is that Bulletstorm is not worth 60.00 on the pc. "

I heard that it was a bad port. Rather strange, since it runs on UE3 :S

"Don't worry, Battlefield 3 is being primarily made for pc so you have that to look forward to :) "

Your computer must have a virus or something. My specs are mostly equal and I don't have those problems at all. The game runs just fine, then again I am only running it at 1080p. What resolution are you trying to run it at?

" Your computer must have a virus or something. My specs are mostly equal and I don't have those problems at all. The game runs just fine, then again I am only running it at 1080p. What resolution are you trying to run it at? "

1080p with everything maxed except for the postprocessing is on medium. I heard that for some reason 16x10 resolutions are borked in bulletstorm. Try running the game at 1600 x 900.

Game runs perfectly on my pc so long as its fullscreen, average 45 fps. 
 
PC Specs: 
Q6600 Quad Core 2.4GHz 
Nvidia 9800GTX+ 
4 Gigs of RAM 
 
Haven't upgraded this pc since 2007-2008ish. Playing with everything on full at 1920x1080, windowed gets me 16 - 20 fps though.

" 1080p with everything maxed except for the postprocessing is on medium. I heard that for some reason 16x10 resolutions are borked in bulletstorm. Try running the game at 1600 x 900. "

I turned post processing on medium and still using the 1680 x 1050 resolution and the game is running at around 40 - 60 fps and is totally playable now. 
 
Hooray! :D Thanks guys.

" This is why People Can Fly didn't put out a PC demo.  Because it's a lazy console port that also happens to be badly optimized.   "