This game is still fun after well over a year and WAW is just meh.

Agreed.

And if you happen to be someone who hasn't played either and is looking to, go with 4.

Old news are old.

but oh so true.

I'd have to agree with Jeff in his video review of WaW in that it "feels like a mod for Call of Duty 4."

Absolutely.

I agree totally, while I'm not a big fan of COD4, at least I'm playing something fun. Being spawned within seconds of the enemy is not cool.

I can't agree more, rented the fucking game just to beat the campaign on Veteran. I wouldn't even call it a mod for Call of Duty 4, it's just a half ass attempt to cash in on the Call of Duty franchise by a company with no talent. 

I cant see many people saying otherwise. WaW was quite a disapointment for me after MW.

 I COMPLETELY agree, that worst part is that most of my friends don't.

the only thing i licked about WaW was nazi zombies

I don`t like either but if I had to choose it wouuld be WAW.

I'm not a huge fan of either, but I will agree that COD4 is far, far better than WAW could ever hope to be. Sadly most of my friends are idiots and can't see this.

My close friends know CoD4 is better but everyone else plays WAW!

"ZombieHunter said:

"the only thing i licked about WaW was nazi zombies

so lets hope that in Modern warfare 2 theres a terrorist zombie mode :P 

"

That won't happen, Infinity Ward is a leader not a follower."

I got tired of CoD4 after months upon months of constant playing.  WaW has managed to retain it's freshness so far, but I am getting tired of CoD's in general...

Would anyone ever disagree?  People play WaW because it's new, and a lot of people played COD4 until they were bored of it.

Yeah but WoW has a longer story mode.

"Wolverine said:

"Yeah but WoW has a longer story mode."

So what? it's fucking ass. The only saving grace of that game is Kiefer Sutherland yelling at you again and again and again as the Enemy AI continuously bullshits you while the friendly AI does fuck all."

"This game is still fun after well over a year and WAW is just meh."

I didn't play WaW, but I watched it being played, and I have to say I wasn't impressed at all. I knew that it was going to be a mediocre game when it first announced though. I'm just happy that Treyarch wasn't given the opportunity to mess up the Modern Warfare universe, because honestly, only IW can do it right.

There's a competition? I just thought everyone knew WaW isn't even near the standards of CoD 4/

WAW is a cheap and fast way to make money out of CoD name, IW actually made that great multiplayer that it ripped off and aded a new skin.

WAW is a cheap and fast way to make money out of CoD name, IW actually made that great multiplayer that it ripped off and aded a new skin.

"WAW is a cheap and fast way to make money out of CoD name, IW actually made that great multiplayer that it ripped off and aded a new skin."

playing the single player in waw was thinking to myself, hey this was in cod4. multiplayer was unplayable except for hardcore modes, the only other fun mode was the nazi zombie mode.

I am probably committing the cardinal sin here in admitting that I haven't actually played CoD4, and instead have been playing WaW non-stop for the past month. However, I do realise that CoD4 is probably better and thus will be purchasing it once I'm done with uni stuff in May. But for someone new to the whole series, WaW is fun.

Both are great games, but they also use vastly different tactics.

I liked what they both did. The both did very different things, to be sure, and some of the stuff in CoD W@W blew me away *Spoilers in case you havn't played them* (The flare ambush, the japanese 'surrenders', the grenade traps, the really nice 'All Ghillied Up' clone, 'Vendetta', the overall feeling of desperation that the game had etc.), but CoD 4 did the same stuff, only a bit more- probably because it was out first- things like when the nuke went off, the part at the end when Gaz and Griggs are done in, the AC 130 gunship 'Death From Above' part, and the AMAZING 'All Ghillied Up' sequence of  levels happened */Spoilers*. That aside, I definitley prefer CoD 4 becasue of the guns. After playing Call of Duty 4, I began to feel that World War II era guns just didn't do it for me anymore. And I guess I was right, because I've prestiged five times in CoD 4 and have yet to reach prestige 1, rank 30 in CoD: W@W. Not to say W@W's bad, just not quite as good, in my personal opinion. Also, I prefer CoD 4's story mode overall.

But, Inifinity Ward made CoD2.

But, Inifinity Ward made CoD2.

WAW was by no means bad.  It just wasn't as good as COD4.  I applaud Treyarch for trying their hardest to come out of Infinity Ward's shadow.  It probably wasn't their idea to do WW2 again either.  Thats probably an Activision idea.  I think Treyarch is quite talented.  I see WAW as a good alternate to COD4 when it comes to multiplayer anyways.

"WAW was by no means bad.  It just wasn't as good as COD4.  I applaud Treyarch for trying their hardest to come out of Infinity Ward's shadow.  It probably wasn't their idea to do WW2 again either.  Thats probably an Activision idea.  I think Treyarch is quite talented.  I see WAW as a good alternate to COD4 when it comes to multiplayer anyways."

There is truthiness in what you say sir.

Everyone knows that Treyarch is just a sellout developer that cashes in on everything IW builds up.  All they did with WaW was throw a quick, badly done coat of paint over the game, and send it out for profit.

I never bought WAW, I knew it was not going to bring the satisfaction of COD4. And still I am playing COD4 like a mad man, I think the only game that will dethrone it for me is MW2.

Nothing new here, but, yes, you are right.

"This game is still fun after well over a year and WAW is just meh."

I said that I would never buy another WW2 game and I stuck to it with WAW. I can't wait on the next MW when it comes out.

Agreed