Jumping on board the "we don't even want to talk about the terrible shit we did in WW2, let alone remind people" bandwagon along with Germany, Japan decided that the Swastikas, along with other various things in the game, would not be appropriate for it's citizens to view. Of course cartoons that border on pedo-porn and movies that are gratuitously violent in nature are perfectly OK as they don't remind Japan how evil their ancestors really were. I am so fucking happy I live where I do :S
http://www.1up.com/news/square-enix-editing-call-duty-black
lol japan
Call of Duty: Black Ops
Game » consists of 19 releases. Released Nov 09, 2010
The seventh installment of the long-running action franchise, Call of Duty: Black Ops puts players into the early era of the Cold War (including the Vietnam War) as a member of the United States black operations unit known as the SOG.
Japan censors Black Ops: Revisionists are douchebags
In Japan and Germanys defence, never forgetting is different to pointless reminders. Also, the Allied nations can laugh at the Nazi - we defeated it. Those who lived under it, or who joined forces with it cannot - they accepted it, whether forcefully or willingly. Just like as an Englishman I feel ashamed whenever I am reminded how my country owned Ireland, and the things it did there. Doesn't mean I'll let that bit of history go forgotten though.
This is partly because they don't want to allow groups sympathetic to these past causes to rally around Swastikas and the like and also because they recognise how offensive these symbols are to the outside world.
You have misinterpreted it entirely, it's nothing to do with hiding the past, the opposite in fact.
They are intentionally removing ANYTHING that reminds people of the horrific shit Japan did. That is just straight up revisionism. Also I never said I supported the use of the bombs, I was just saying that I'm surprised that they still think so highly of themselves; it's pretty laughable.
And if Japan seriously has a significant number of people that would be "sympathetic" to these "past causes" then I think maybe Japan has a much bigger problem on it's hands and should be focusing on removing these elements from society rather than trying to rewrite history in one of the most futile and pathetic attempts I have ever seen.
There was a Turkish made movie a few years back which was censored and banned from the US, because it contained images of Abu Ghraib torture and painted many of the US soldiers in the movie as sadistic. In particular the censors took offence to the fact that a Jewish Doctor had been portrayed as being part of the group of torturers, completely forgetting the fact that Israeli Soldiers have helped out in such prison complexes in Iraq.
Barely a word was said against the censorship.
The point I'm making is that censorship exists everywhere. It's just about what "offends" you. I doubt a Modern Warfare game would even be allowed to exist if it wasn't so glossed over, and highlighted the true atrocities that have taken place. I suppose the same could be said of the Vietnam war, probably why so few games have ever touched upon the subject, the acts of violence were so blatant and ingrained into US society that even whitewashing over them wouldn't be possible.
" @Undeadpool: Yeah, except it wasn't nationals from countries in the middle east that were removing images of 9/11, it was Americans, because they were the victims. Last I checked the Germans the Japanese were the ones dishing it out, they figured they could take over the world and they got their asses handed to them. Now they want to pretend it never happened...over 60 years later. "A lucid point, but is it really that much better? I mean shouldn't we be NOT changing anything to show the terrorists who committed the horrible crime that they DIDN'T achieve their desired effect (IE: Spread terror) and that we're going to go on with business as usual? I don't want this to become a flamewar (strangely the second time today I've had to make that statement, so maybe I'M the problem), but I'm saying that when something horrible happens to a country, they tend to want to forget it no matter who they are.
" @leebmx: Yet cartoons that prominently display small children in an extremely sexual light and extremely violent movies, such as Ichi the Killer, are perfectly ok. Right. They don't have an issue with violence or other suggestive material on it's own - it's only when it's paired up with anything that may remind anyone of WW2 that it becomes a problem for them. That's revisionism. And if Japan seriously has a significant number of people that would be "sympathetic" to these "past causes" then I think maybe Japan has a much bigger problem on it's hands and should be focusing on removing these elements from society rather than trying to rewrite history in one of the most futile and pathetic attempts I have ever seen. "If it really is futile and pathetic, don't be so riled up about it.
They are not baning these symbols because they are violent or suggestive but because they don't want people bringing back the ideas they represent. They are ACTIVELY trying to stop the past happening again, not forget it.
Your interpretation of this issue is completely mistaken - however your point on the violence of their media may be right (I personally don't think so) however they are not connected.
There are plenty of memorials to victims of the holocaust in Germany and the law on Holocuast denial there serves precisely the point that the banning of symbols from that period serves in Japan. They are trying to make sure these views cannot gain promenence again.
And also, Japan has entirely different ideas of what is "sexually provocative", and has some of the stricter censorship laws out there. It's in the fucking past, and no shit they don't want something that makes them out to be assholes being shown. The fucking game isn't even about WWII or any of that, so who fucking cares. Turns out, Japan is one of the most advanced nations in the world, not just technologically, but also socially. They are people, and they are just as "high" as us, so I don't see why you care how highly they think of themselves, because they AREN'T an Axis power. Get your head out of the past, and think about what's going on right now.
I know you won't, but you should really grow up and stop being such a close minded, zenophobic idiot. Japan is good people now, so who gives a fuck what a few generations ago they did some terrible shit?
And watch some American TV. Glee (which I love btw, so this isn't a criticism), is about sexed up teens doing provocative shit. Welcome to the new age of media pal.
@Undeadpool: Which is fine, but I don't think that means that country should be immune from criticism. What I'm saying here is simple: if a reformed criminal (I know, that's kind of a heavy handed and flawed comparison, but bear with me) decides to start removing or rewriting evidence of his horribly criminal past, that means he really has no interest in learning from his mistakes and people are going to criticize him.
" @RsistncE: There are not editing it because they are trying to bury the past but because they recognise how bad their past actions were and don't want the symbols of those past misdeeds to be allowed in prominence in their society. "I thought this was kind of funny. They don't want to bury the past, then some wordplay that basically equates to burying the past.
" @RsistncE: Cartoon violence and laws against people using offensive symbols from the past are not connected this isn't a valid point. They are not baning these symbols because they are violent or suggestive but because they don't want people bringing back the ideas they represent. They are ACTIVELY trying to stop the past happening again, not forget it. Your interpretation of this issue is completely mistaken - however your point on the violence of their media may be right (I personally don't think so) however they are not connected. There are plenty of memorials to victims of the holocaust in Germany and the law on Holocuast denial there serves precisely the point that the banning of symbols from that period serves in Japan. They are trying to make sure these views cannot gain promenence again. "This. There are similar memorials in Japan, dedicated to the victims of the war (and some specifically to the U.S. soldiers).
" @FourWude: I always speak out again censorship, and don't worry, I'm a pretty harsh critic of the US in a lot of different ways. In other words: don't worry, I'm not saying Japan is the only one guilty of this nonsense.
The point I was making wasn't about highlighting any crimes the US may have committed. It's about the simple notion that every nation on this earth has things they consider "shameful", that they don't want highlighting on a regular basis.
In that respect, the Germans and Japanese have acknowledged their past mistakes, but are not willing to constantly focus on it. I'm just trying to get you to step into their shoes and see it from their perspective. Yes it's "censorship", but that's exactly the world we live in. To be blunt, the Germans and Japanese haven't done anything extraordinary here, they've merely followed the norm.
And yes it may be construed as wrong by some people.
They don't allow these symbols because they know how offensive they are to the rest of the world. Imagine if a German developer brought out a game in which you played as Nazis kllling the allies. This is the sort of thing they are trying to avoid. Unfortunately laws are blunt objects and it leads to bans like the one you have brought up.
How about this - Japan and Germany removes the swastiker because it is against the law, or is deemed offensive. They're not rewriting history, they're just trying to be sensitive towards it. Otherwise they'd not have memorial days.
What is rewriting history is when people talk about WWII as a fight between America and Germany/ Japan. It was a world war, people. I'm sure they have specific memorials to the U.S soldiers, but also the U.K soldiers (of whom my grandads brother was one - tortured in fact), and the French, and the Australians and so on and so forth.
Second of all, I'm against all forms of censorship in every country.
Third, this thread is about Japan; we could talk about any country but that would be off topic since this is about Japan censoring a game.
The fact is that some countries are way more zealous when it comes to censorship. It just so happens that Japan is one of them. I'm not xenophobic is any way; I've got friends of many different nationalities but the shit I hear from some Japanese students is pretty mind boggling sometimes.
I'm not saying we should blame them for what their ancestors did, in fact I never said that. What I did say was that they need to stop pretending like it never happened. It did. Japan fucked up. Bad. Learn from it and move on.
As much as I dislike the US, I still have to say that as far as media censorship goes, they're not nearly as bad as most countries.
1. Japan and Germany know they did wrong,
2. As well as banning denying they did wrong, and doing any of these wrongs every again they also ban:
3. The symbols and insignia of these past wrongs.
They are not trying to bury the past but make sure it can never be repeated.
White man also speak with forked tongue in video games concerning genocide of Indians, maybe...
I understand your critism, but it is best to start at home. And yeah Movie westerns are probably more to blame here. I'm not aquainted yet how video game westerns have approached the subject,. I still have to really get into RDR, and undead nightmare which is my real interest right now i doubt goes there at all.
The japanese do have a history of not totally wanting to accept the whole thing, The rape of Nanking was horrendous, and still only seventy odd years back. Children, or their children remember the stories. It's like us still remembering WW2. I'd say the Germans have more so done their penance..and you cannot hit these countries over the head forever. That can be viewed as cynical and self serving, also.
@leebmx: Flawed analogy: this is more like a author writing about a rapist/murdered, which is pretty damn common. Activision is publishing this game, not the Japanese government and banning those symbols doesn't ban them from the rest of the world, so there's really no logical way to assume that Japan is trying to not be offensive to the rest of the world. They're just trying to keep this shit out of the view of the Japanese people.
@BrickRoad: I think Japan knows there's a limit to which they can ignore WW2. If they just outright ignored it I think they'd piss a lot of the world off. So they made that concession: one day a year is a lot better than allowing it to exist in the media where anyone can access it at anytime, all day even if they like.
" @RsistncE: This is my last stab at it. 1. Japan and Germany know they did wrong,2. As well as banning denying they did wrong, and doing any of these wrongs every again they also ban:3. The symbols and insignia of these past wrongs. They are not trying to bury the past but make sure it can never be repeated. "I completely understand what you're trying to get at here man, but just like ryanwho said, that 3rd point is just a rewording of "buying the past".
@Bocam: Because I cannot in fair conscience say that it isn't wrong. It's wrong and that's why I care.
@bybeach: If you play RDR you'll notice that the entire game is hyper critical of the US and paints a lot of the people, the governments and the law enforcement of the day in a really bad light. I'm not saying they completely glossed over things or didn't talk about some, but the fact is that game wasn't censored, whereas if it were about Japan with a similar history they would have censored the shit out of it. Besides I'm not saying they should have giant screens everyday reminding everyone of what their country did 60-70 years ago, what I'm saying is that by take a fine toothed comb and literally removing any last bit of evidence of the shit they did in their past completely reeks of revisionism.
" @FourWude: I always speak out again censorship, and don't worry, I'm a pretty harsh critic of the US in a lot of different ways. In other words: don't worry, I'm not saying Japan is the only one guilty of this nonsense.Fair enough, and I am against censorship in general, it's just that I'm not a big fan of revisionist history in either direction. I think my point would've been more valid in an argument about Japan removing the destruction of Megaton from Fallout 3.
@Undeadpool: Which is fine, but I don't think that means that country should be immune from criticism. What I'm saying here is simple: if a reformed criminal (I know, that's kind of a heavy handed and flawed comparison, but bear with me) decides to start removing or rewriting evidence of his horribly criminal past, that means he really has no interest in learning from his mistakes and people are going to criticize him. "
But why would a country which bans any political parties which seek to continue past policies, bans even denying these things happened and has memorials all over the place to the people they hurt bother trying to deny the past through banning people seeing the past symbols." @leebmx said:
I completely understand what you're trying to get at here man, but just like ryanwho said, that 3rd point is just a rewording of "buying the past"." @RsistncE: This is my last stab at it. 1. Japan and Germany know they did wrong,2. As well as banning denying they did wrong, and doing any of these wrongs every again they also ban:3. The symbols and insignia of these past wrongs. They are not trying to bury the past but make sure it can never be repeated. "
If you are trying to deny the past through banning swaztikas etc why have memorials all over the shop?
I'm going to leave it there my friend because I fear there is no persuading you but I really think these two countries (esp Germany my knowledge on Japan is less, because as a Jew I guess I have paid more attention to the holocaust) have come to terms with their pasts and are much more concerned with preventing the rise of extremism than pretending it didn't happen.
EDIT: didn't mean the highlights - I don't know what happened.
There are these things called "Books?" I don't know, I think they have words in them or something. Some even contain historical facts. Unless the Japanese educational system is using CoD to teach their children history. Then we have a whole different set of problems with Japan.
Square should've just revised the game to make it post WW2 where Japan defeated the U.S. and then Hitler was killed by Sephiroth.
Noone wants to be associated with past crimes whether it's genocide or stealing a car. There have been countless WW2 games played from the U.S. perspective, yet none of those games let you nuke Japan. Because they don't want to flaunt the fact that they DID nuke Japan. At the time, yeah, people celebrated, but things change. Germany doesn't want to be known for Hitler and his party, Japan doesn't want to be known as the country that helped Hitler, and the U.S. doesn't want to be known for dropping nukes that killed hundreds of thousands of people, where most of them were civilians.
I think the same would happen in the US if the Japanese developed a game that featured American soldiers gunning down innocent civilians in My Lai.
You should do some research before you go on another bigoted rant again.
" @RsistncE: Your complaints are idiotic and ignorant. They're censoring the game for violence so the game can be sold prominently in stores. Lots of games get this treatment in Japan, including Japanese developed games. Japanese ratings have gotten harsher in recent years so games with lots of violence that would only have a M in the US have the Japanese equivalent of an AO rating. You should do some research before you go on another bigoted rant again. "Incredible. Some people here say it has nothing to do with the violence, you say it has everything to do with the violence. Yet I have a hard time figuring out how a Swastika is violent. Either way you've just called many people in this thread (along with myself) idiots. Good job on not discussing the topic in the civil manner as everyone else here is doing. Well done. Personal insults are awesome.
@Egg0: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_history_textbook_controversies
My country and it's government was personally responsible for the deaths and/or abuse of aboriginal children because they were forced into residential school by said government. The government apologized publicly, paid out millions (which I disagree with, but that's a topic for another day) and now it's taught widely in school curriculum. There's been books, movies etc. None of it has been ever censored.
The fact of the matter is that some countries are going to be more prone to censoring than others. To suggest that all countries are equally likely to censor material is absurd; I have a sneaking suspicion that you wouldn't say that the US would censor material on the same level of the UAE. This difference in levels of censorship has to do with a lot of things, such as culture (for example, east asian countries generally have a high power distance compared to countries in the west.). I really have a hard time seeing how people could say Japan is no worse than most other countries with it comes to censorship.
The ignorance and uninformedness in this thread is mindblowing.
There is no country in the world where Nazi Germany is thematized, discussed, taken apart and scrutinized as much as in Germany, especially in German media.
Laws exist that this particular topic will never be trivialized.
That is why certain themes in a video game would result in a higher rating.
That is why some publishers(!) decide to censor their games. To get a lower rating. To sell more copies.
Get your facts straight.
" The ignorance and uninformedness in this thread is mindblowing. There is no country in the world where Nazi Germany is thematized, discussed, taken apart and scrutinized as much as in Germany, especially in German media. Laws exist that this particular topic will never be trivialized. That is why certain themes in a video game would result in a higher rating. That is why some publishers(!) decide to censor their games. To get a lower rating. To sell more copies. Get your facts straight. "And boom goes the dynamite.
Uhhhh...." The ignorance and uninformedness in this thread is mindblowing. There is no country in the world where Nazi Germany is thematized, discussed, taken apart and scrutinized as much as in Germany, especially in German media. Laws exist that this particular topic will never be trivialized. That is why certain themes in a video game would result in a higher rating. That is why some publishers(!) decide to censor their games. To get a lower rating. To sell more copies. Get your facts straight. "
Activisions hand is kinda forced when Germany or Japan would outright ban the game if it wasn't heavily cut and censored. Which is why this is all so mind blowing. I don't doubt that the citizens of Germany (and to some extent Japan) acknowledge their past and are openly critical of it, but why is the government so keen on requiring cuts that go down to such stupid details as cutting "Sympathy for the Devil" from the soundtrack of the game? The censorship of violence and sex is intrinsically immature and childish, moreso than the content itself. When they need to start wiping out even the tiniest hints of their past in media (which is voluntarily purchased by the way, no one is shoving it down your throat after all) it smacks of denial on the part of the government.
@BrickRoad: The problem isn't just the Swastikas though....they also cut out most of the gore and violence and Germany additionally required that "Sympathy for the Devil" be cut also. Really? If it was just about the symbols they would have cut the Swastikas and stopped there, but they didn't; they wanted to make sure any violence in the same product that had Swastikas would be removed, because heaven forbid the inference is made that Swastikas and violence are somehow related.
" The original meaning of that symbol was not of Nazi-ism. You'll see it everywhere in parts of the world, before WWII happened. I'm sure the Pokemon Company wasn't referencing 1930's Germany. "No, of course they weren't. The symbol has a long history both in the east and the west. Doesn't change the fact that they didn't think the world would care. And Pokemon have their own company now?
yea man, foreigners suck! I am all upset about how I was going to get the japanese version, but it is censored, so it concerns me personally! I also don't understand their culture at all, which means it is stupid, and I can feel justified in talking smack about it on the internet! That'll show em." Jumping on board the "we don't even want to talk about the terrible shit we did in WW2, let alone remind people" bandwagon along with Germany, Japan decided that the Swastikas, along with other various things in the game, would not be appropriate for it's citizens to view. Of course cartoons that border on pedo-porn and movies that are gratuitously violent in nature are perfectly OK as they don't remind Japan how evil their ancestors really were. I am so fucking happy I live where I do :S
http://www.1up.com/news/square-enix-editing-call-duty-black lol japan "
Please Log In to post.
This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:
Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.Comment and Save
Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.
Log in to comment