Well, my aunt showed me Altered Beast on the Genesis at a really young age. Why not for my kids?
When you have a child, what'll be the first game you show them?
If thought hard about this and im starting my kid off with the Nes. Giving him some Super Mario Brothers, Metroid, Punch Out, Ninja Turtles, Final Fantasy, Mario Brothers 3 and maybe some more.
God of War 3 Kratos vs Aphrodite.
Nah, maybe Jak and Daxter. Problem is the sequels take a really dark turn as much as I love them. If I can get working copies maybe the original Spyro or Crash games.
" Demon's Souls "Funny thing is that I have played that game so much my 5 year old knows it. She actually remembers certain levels (not the prison one thank the gods). But she knows the enemy placement in world 1-1.
To get back on topic. The first real game my daughter got into was, and still is, Peggle.
" GTA 4. So if my child turns out to be a fuck up, I can always blame Rockstar for corrupting his childhood. "GTA 4? That's so 2009. Bulletstorm is where the moral cesspool is right now.
I'm an uncle, when my nephew turns four I'm gonna show him some Mario, then some Mega Man. I've got plans for this kid. He'll be one of us. His mother won't like it, but I'll make it happen. Father is on board, he bought some shitty Wii driving game for five bucks and lets him steer (he just turned two).
"Ocarina of Time."I think this would be a bad plan; OoT is really rather complicated for a video game in comparison to games like Super Mario Brothers, Pac-Man, or Space Invaders. I'm not saying those would be my picks (Pac-Man and Space Invaders would be bad choices, for sure) but they're definitely much simpler than that game, even from a control and puzzle standpoint. And the reasoning that is required to understand that gravity will break the web may work once you're at least seven or eight years old, but you need some video game logic to let that happen any sooner. (My reasoning has NOTHING to do with the fact that I think OoT is also not a very good game anymore, but rather the complexity being a bit high for people new to game controllers.)
I lean towards Super Mario Brothers because it's the first game I played; it's also very simple, operating on two buttons, a d-pad, and a simple goal; get as far right as possible. Exploring how other things work would be left to them, and while a two or three year old isn't going to necessarily understand the ecology of Mario, given enough time they'll probably understand the goal of getting as far right as possible. I like the idea of Pokémon because it starts their gaming experiences with deeper stories, but at the same time I do want them to find joy in games that don't have explicit stories. Of course, those earliest of games were mostly about oppression, and that's not the thing that makes games good anymore.
I think I'd probably pick Super Mario Brothers. I'd love to play some River City Ransom and see if that'd be a fun game for a young kid, but I've never really had experience with it.
I'm less worried about the games they play when they're three or four, though, and more worried about when they're six, 'cause I don't love just keeping them in the SNES economy, but newer games seem to aim at ten and up (many of the best being 16 and up.)
Minecraft.
Damn child labour laws making it illegal for kids to be shoveling coal and working the mines. I'll make damn sure they get that turn of the century experience all kids had during the industrial revolution.
Like father like son; I'd have to subject them to DOOM, Quake, or Duke Nukem 3D. Then pawn them off onto Sam and Max: Hit the Road, Grim Fandango, and Full Throttle. Finally, introduce them to the world of online FPS like Counter-Strike, and then through self discovery, they'll no doubt end up playing games like Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, then developing an interest in RTS too, so he'll go out and buy StarCraft.
Of course, things have changed, but that's the general plan. ;)
I see your point. But from my experience, young kids can learn and pick things up in games really, really quickly. It's kind of insane. I agree that seven or eight is probably a good age to start that game, which is when I first played it.
" Final Fantasy XIII "Yes, my child. Games were this bad at one point." ""But then this game came around and FIXED EVERYTHING!" RIGHT!?
Duke Nukem Forever
Actually I'm going to be one of those parents who says "Go play outside, goddamnit." Even though my parents did the same to me and I never listened.
I would not show them any games, if they developed a natural interest in video games then they can choose to play whatever they want.
I'll try to get him/her to play Super Mario Bros, if only for a little bit. It's the first video game I ever played in my life and it'd be kind of cool to turn it into a tradition. But I'd mainly want it to be Super Mario Bros. so that he/she has some understanding while he/she's growing up of what technology used to be like and how awesome video games have grown to be. I mean, I was born in the mid-90s and I still thought it was really cool just to be playing a video game, let alone a "primitive" one.
Unfortunately, I have a feeling that when my kid is the age I was when I first played a video game, he/she won't be as easily enthralled by technology as I was/still am. In that case, I'll just show my child whatever is kid-friendly and fun; probably something by Nintendo.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment