In ontario.
In public. Down the street or any where. Besides stores or so on that have sign saying you need a shirt. The law was made to make sure law was equel to men and women.
Before law was only men could walk down street and so no with no top but now women can just as men are aloud.
I just learned today that is legal for a women to go topless
Depends on the area.
You can walk around nude in some areas of Vermont. A few years back I used to see people walking around naked a bunch in Burlington. Then again, it's only really viable for a couple of months out of the year since it's Vermont and it gets cold here really quickly.
" Depends on the area. You can walk around nude in some areas of Vermont. A few years back I used to see people walking around naked a bunch in Burlington. Then again, it's only really viable for a couple of months out of the year since it's Vermont and it gets cold here really quickly. "I dont think a city can make it illgeal its a right all women have now.
" In ontario. In public. Down the street or any where. Besides stores or so on that have sign saying you need a shirt. The law was made to make sure law was equel to men and women. Before law was only men could walk down street and so no with no top but now women can just as men are aloud. "Same law applies in NY city. Women are allowed topless.
" I'm just waiting for the day where it become mandatory. "I've seen enough amateur porn to know why that's a bad idea.
" @benjaebe said:Of course they can make it illegal. Don't be silly." Depends on the area. You can walk around nude in some areas of Vermont. A few years back I used to see people walking around naked a bunch in Burlington. Then again, it's only really viable for a couple of months out of the year since it's Vermont and it gets cold here really quickly. "I dont think a city can make it illgeal its a right all women have now. "
" The only women willing to do this are women you do not want to do this. Also, I want someone to justify to me why children watching softcore porn is bad, but this is not. I don't care one way or another but I hate how people flip around on shit like this. "One is depicting sexual situations and objectification.
One is just some chick's tits out.
Huge difference.
What? Watching softcore porn and going topless/nude are completely different things. Watching softcore porn is masturbatory, but going topless/nude is hardly sexual at all, merely a comfort thing." The only women willing to do this are women you do not want to do this. Also, I want someone to justify to me why children watching softcore porn is bad, but this is not. I don't care one way or another but I hate how people flip around on shit like this. "
" The only women willing to do this are women you do not want to do this. Also, I want someone to justify to me why children watching softcore porn is bad, but this is not. I don't care one way or another but I hate how people flip around on shit like this. "It's what happens when people from older generations with different beliefs from the youth of today are in charge of writing laws, and then that stuff becomes what's generally accepted by people.
" @Pinworm45: Pornography is often women who need money being paid to sexually debase themselves whereas this is allowing women to have the same rights as men with a choice of whether or not they want to use it. Difference seems pretty obvious to me. "If they need money so bad they have no choice but to "debase" themselves, then surely the fact that the job is available is a good thing for them -- after all, if it wasn't, they would be forced to face something even worse. And if they don't need it that bad, they are just as free to choose not to do it as they are to decide whether or not they want to walk around topless.
I wasn't talking about the actual differences, those are obvious. One's in front of a camera, one is n... well actually both probably would be, what with cell phones." @Pinworm45: Pornography is often women who need money being paid to sexually debase themselves whereas this is allowing women to have the same rights as men with a choice of whether or not they want to use it. Difference seems pretty obvious to me. "
I was asking about the difference to a child, since people constantly freak out about children seeing pornography, or nipple slips like at the super bowl. I seriously doubt a child cares about career choices women make anway, and I seriously doubt if they did that they would be harmed from such thoughts. Maybe bored.
@ThatFrood said:
The above applies to this as well. I don't understand why super bowl nipple slips are damaging to children but this is not." @Pinworm45 said:
What? Watching softcore porn and going topless/nude are completely different things. Watching softcore porn is masturbatory, but going topless/nude is hardly sexual at all, merely a comfort thing. "" The only women willing to do this are women you do not want to do this. Also, I want someone to justify to me why children watching softcore porn is bad, but this is not. I don't care one way or another but I hate how people flip around on shit like this. "
I also don't understand what the big deal is about porn specifically, but then I was raised on watching Red Shoe Diaries on Showtime every friday night since the age of ~9.
" The only women willing to do this are women you do not want to do this. Also, I want someone to justify to me why children watching softcore porn is bad, but this is not. I don't care one way or another but I hate how people flip around on shit like this. "By children you mean 12 or under. At which point they shouldn't have any sexual thoughts or desires until they are a teenager, 13.
" @Pinworm45 said:Why? or what? What happens on the day someone turns 13 that magically changes everything? Are me and every guy I know freaks because we admit being interested in such things before 13? are we damaged goods because we saw all the tits and sex in Starship Troopers?" The only women willing to do this are women you do not want to do this. Also, I want someone to justify to me why children watching softcore porn is bad, but this is not. I don't care one way or another but I hate how people flip around on shit like this. "By children you mean 12 or under. At which point they shouldn't have any sexual thoughts or desires until they are a teenager, 13. "
There are a lot of rights that people don't know they have. Like in many cities in the US, it's perfectly legal to open-carry a firearm. You just need a permit for concealed-carry. But people, including the police, often don't know this.
However, to say that "a city can't make it illegal, it's a right all women have" is simply not true. In many places in the US, it's considered indecent exposure. Slowly places have been making it legal.
But as others have already said, for the most part, I'm not sure that's something you'd REALLY want to see. I mean, c'mon - do you want to see Oprah topless? I sure don't.
" @Pinworm45 said:Are you serious? I knew I liked boobies and wanted to have sex long before I had hair down there." The only women willing to do this are women you do not want to do this. Also, I want someone to justify to me why children watching softcore porn is bad, but this is not. I don't care one way or another but I hate how people flip around on shit like this. "By children you mean 12 or under. At which point they shouldn't have any sexual thoughts or desires until they are a teenager, 13. "
" @Pinworm45: Scientifically speaking, children 12 and under are considered asexual. But puberty starts at different times for different people. Not to mention if someone said they wanted to have sex with a 12 or under, they would be considered a pedophile. Whereas if they said they wanted to have sex with a 13-19 year old, they wouldn't. "There is so much completely and utterly incorrect about what you just wrote that I don't know where to start and as such will simply sum it up with this sentence, followed by a stern and firm:
No.
I never got the no shirt, no shoes, no service thing. What if I have no pants? Is wearing a shirt with shoes without pants now sanitary?
" @Pinworm45 said:Where we choose to object her by staring at her fun bags" The only women willing to do this are women you do not want to do this. Also, I want someone to justify to me why children watching softcore porn is bad, but this is not. I don't care one way or another but I hate how people flip around on shit like this. "One is depicting sexual situations and objectification. One is just some chick's tits out. Huge difference. "
Good on them. I remember watching an episode of Cops a while back and some "dude" was walking around without a shirt and got pulled over and chewed out by the cops. The funny thing was they blurred his chest because he was taking female hormones which caused his tits to start swelling. I was pretty young at the time and remember thinking what kind of ridiculous, hypocritical double standard all the topless in public laws are.
" This kind of thread is the reason why nerds don't get respect. You should all be ashamed. Also, I live in Ontario, and this obviously isn't something that actually happens. "Yeah, we should be more like Jocks who give women the utmost of respect and don't objectify them and aren't ragingly horny at all.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment