Where do you sit on the Kinsey scale?

I'm a 0 but as far as I can tell this scale needs just 5 categories: hetero, more hetero than homo, equal, more homo than hetero and homo. I think this scale is a little flawed.

4 I guess?

You forgot X!

Is a 0 where you would get grossed out if you touched a dudes hand accidentally, or where you just would never bang one..? These are the hard hitting questions.

@gunslingerNZ
I'm a 0 but as far as I can tell this scale needs just 5 categories: hetero, more hetero than homo, equal, more homo than hetero and homo. I think this scale is a little flawed.     

   

Is it gay to have a dick in your mouth, as I may have to change my answer...

" Is it gay to have a dick in your mouth, as I may have to change my answer... "

I've never, ever been physically attracted to another man. So 0. 

Unless Kinsley counts dudes that look like chicks. In that case, 1. (This one time I saw a picture of a hot Japanese chick, and it turned out to be a dude. The idea of her... him having a penis completely killed any attraction, though.)

I like how everybody thinks they're at a 0, although the OP clearly states that almost everybody Kinsey profiled got at least a 1. Everybody's letting their homophobia get ahead of their reading ability. 

I voted 2, I can appreciate a good looking bloke, I won't go there But I can admit that good looking people are good looking regardless of gender.

" I like how everybody thinks they're at a 0, although the OP clearly states that almost everybody Kinsey profiled got at least a 1. Everybody's letting their homophobia get ahead of their reading ability.  "

Well,

This really needs to be a survey then, I am not a homophobe, and by saying 0 isin't that what you are saying?

My mates take the piss by acting gay but they are straight, so I still think I am 2, I don't know,

I don't have feelings of lust towards another man, but I do spend more time with my mates hanging out than with any of my Ex's,

This poll is flawed then.

I voted for 2. I wouldn't have sex with a man or get involved with one romantically, but that isn't to say I haven't been attracted to a few. 

1. 
 
6 for Freddie Mercury.

" 6 for Freddie Mercury. "

" @Cube said:

" 6 for Freddie Mercury. "

Lol yes. "

" I like how everybody thinks they're at a 0, although the OP clearly states that almost everybody Kinsey profiled got at least a 1. Everybody's letting their homophobia get ahead of their reading ability.  "

I picked 2 on the poll but I dunno... 3 maybe?

" I like how everybody thinks they're at a 0, although the OP clearly states that almost everybody Kinsey profiled got at least a 1. Everybody's letting their homophobia get ahead of their reading ability.  "

" @Termite said:

" I like how everybody thinks they're at a 0, although the OP clearly states that almost everybody Kinsey profiled got at least a 1. Everybody's letting their homophobia get ahead of their reading ability.  "

or  you know  some people just arem't attracted tp males. "

" @mutha3 said:

" @Termite said:

" I like how everybody thinks they're at a 0, although the OP clearly states that almost everybody Kinsey profiled got at least a 1. Everybody's letting their homophobia get ahead of their reading ability.  "

or  you know  some people just arem't attracted tp males. "

Probability is against you on this one. :p "

" @Jeust said:

" @mutha3 said:

" @Termite said:

" I like how everybody thinks they're at a 0, although the OP clearly states that almost everybody Kinsey profiled got at least a 1. Everybody's letting their homophobia get ahead of their reading ability.  "

or  you know  some people just arem't attracted tp males. "

Probability is against you on this one. :p "

Can't really make that claim without knowing how many people kinsley did his test, no?  Besides, I'm pretty sure I never felt sexual attraction to a male!    i think...internet traps don't count GODDAMIT "

Yea...everyone's at least a little gay.  I mean I can tell if a guy is attractive or not, that's as far to the right as I go, so I guess a 1 or 2?

" @mutha3 said:

" @Jeust said:

" @mutha3 said:

" @Termite said:

" I like how everybody thinks they're at a 0, although the OP clearly states that almost everybody Kinsey profiled got at least a 1. Everybody's letting their homophobia get ahead of their reading ability.  "

or  you know  some people just arem't attracted tp males. "

Probability is against you on this one. :p "

Can't really make that claim without knowing how many people kinsley did his test, no?  Besides, I'm pretty sure I never felt sexual attraction to a male!    i think...internet traps don't count GODDAMIT "

Now don't they? hmmmmm "

" @Termite said:

" I like how everybody thinks they're at a 0, although the OP clearly states that almost everybody Kinsey profiled got at least a 1. Everybody's letting their homophobia get ahead of their reading ability.  "

On the contrary; their reading ability is exactly what they're making use of. Beyond "0 = Exclusively heterosexual" and "6 = Exclusively homosexual" no explanation for the scale is offered. What does it matter if almost everyone Kinsley profiled got at least a 1? Am I supposed to ignore the only information I've got -- that 0 means exclusively heterosexual, and that I've never been physically attracted to a man (with the exception of one that looked like a woman, and that I was only attracted to until I found out the truth) -- and instead base my choice on statistics? "

I picked zero, but I meant 1-2. CHANGE MY VOTE NOW!!

I'd say 2.

"And no, I'm not saying you should base your choice on statistics"

"it's better to gravitate towards the norm than the extremes."

How does one know where one stands?
I know I'm not a 0 or a 6, what determines if I'm a 2 or a 3???
Is there supposed to be a test to go along with this scale?

Well i do like watching the movie 300 alot so................I'm a 4.

I'm saying that the results so far are completely at odds with what we should expect, and that it's likely because people are afraid to admit that they're anything other than some manly lumberjack. "

"

Well i do like watching the movie 300 alot so................I'm a 4.

"

3-4 out of these, but X if it were an option.

1. I can reconise a good looking guy, but have no homoerotic thoughts whatsoever, but everyone can do that. I don't believe there's guys out there that literaly can't tell the difference between a good looking guy or not. I can see that but that's doesn't mean I want to get anywhere near him or think about blowing him off, that thought makes me sick. Anyone who puts 0 is insecure in my book and is frightend that people in the playground will point at them and call them gay if they mention they can tell if a man is good looking.

1-2