This^ also a stable frame rate would be nice, not asking for constant 60 but I don't think over 40 is crazy "
Also what he said- When doing jobs the screen would lag and skip. A difficulty setting More RPG elements. The action wheel back. Better jobs to make money. More variety in weapons and perhaps training. Less gay ass ending that doesn't warn you of what the shit's happening. Less glitches that cause you to have to start a new game cause you got stuck in a room because their action triggers fucked up. Not a dusted off turd that was fable 1 and 2 and being sold for 69,99 when it is essentially the same game with minor changes. I swear I want to kill the creator of this turd. "
Diff setting would be sweet.
I'd like to have one residence that evolves over time as you play the game, like a castle maybe, and as you do good or bad things the castle begins to reflect your play style.
" @mfpantst: asking people their average age is retarded. Asking the website to consider revisiting their review score because of scores given to comparable games and the integrity of the website, is not "
That's up to you to decide. WHat you fail to realize that reviews are opinion pieces and you the reader have to decide whether you agree or disagree. You cannot come and say that one review given puts the entire site's integrity. Games are reviewed by different people with different testes. I hardly think you are going to get a re-review of Brads review of Fable 3. I don't think they actually have the time to do that. So you are down to accepting the score Brad gave it and move on. If you feel that this review has put the integrity of this web site at jeopardy then you always have the option of not visiting it. If you like GB that much then you will all you can say is that you disagree and that's that. "
I think if enough people felt a re-review was a good idea, the staff of GB would hear what the community was saying and discuss it, not just ignore it. And as a member of this community I have an option to voice my opinion and see if others agree, contrary to your menu of options.
@mfpantst: asking people their average age is retarded. Asking the website to consider revisiting their review score because of scores given to comparable games and the integrity of the website, is not
I didnt think it was that crazy of a post. And to me honest, after the first group of snide comments, I lost interest in reading any more posts.
Like I said, you dont persuade or inform people by insulting them. I'm a big fan of people telling me things I dont know or dont fully understand but some of the comments weren't helpful, they were just rants.
" I find it funny that this thread is so big yet the OP's only post is creating this topic. Successful troll is successful? "
I've commented a few times. Sorry you didnt see them. "
Ok so I actually went and counted. You had replied to this thread once when @Ace829 posted his comment. That's not even close to the standard colloquial definition of a 'few' times. Counting your reply to his comment and another reply posted at the same time, plus one from just a minute ago you have now replied 4 times. That's a few times. However, you have replied 4 times to a topic 189 replies long that you started. That's pretty sad and I would reiterate Ace's comments. Apparently successful troll IS successful. edit:Also- since you have claimed to have another 'active' profile, so the one post count doesn't really 'count', I looked at your contributions other than this with your new profile. None. That's right, none. So other than trolling this post you've been pretty useless... "
Pretty sure 4 counts as "a few".
And will someone explain to me what "trolling" is so I can respond back to these fools?
It's amazing how many people have responded along these same lines. Sorry, I asked the GB community a question. "
I called it idiotic because everything in your OP is wrong and just down right silly. I'm going to repeat what probably has already been said in this thread:
Just because you disagree with Brad's opinion does not mean he is wrong. His points were well backed up and (generally) valid. He didn't say anything completely dumb like 'graphics are shit' or 'the controls are bad' (although I did think he whined way too much about the menu and map system)
If you've been looking at the forums and review sections in recent months, a lot of the GB community think the 5 star rating system doesn't work. So you're just posting something everyone already knows about
Complaining about how it gets the same score as games like 50 cent Blood on the sand is dumb as well. That review (and most other reviews) have been done by other staff, and its a completely different game. Reviews on this site are pretty much incomparable.
The score of the review doesn't matter that much. The review itself is a lot more important
Oh yeah, and that sly comment that you asked the GB community, not people like me? Ouch, yeah. That really hurt my feelings. If you don't like the reviews here, you're free to go somewhere else. There is nothing stopping you.
"
Here is an idea, just think about for 20 seconds before hitting reply or quote. Next time you read a blog post like this one, write out your objective bullet points like you just have but leave out the derogatory comments, insults and belittling statements. You don't persuade people by insulting them, let alone help them understand.
Log in to comment